Why is this allowed? nobody needs a $1.5 MILLION DOLLAR CAR THAT IS A FUCKING USELESS TOY

Attached: AR-101029850.jpg&MaxW=622&cci_ts=20101029083901.jpg (600x291, 43K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=txSboSNQINs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I dont need you either but you're still making gay threads.

you dont need anything nice, only utilitarian. i imagine you dont live that way, you fucking retard nigger.

>why is this allowed?
Why shouldn't it be allowed?

>nobody needs a $1.5 MILLION DOLLAR CAR
Says who?

>inb4 you never post again because you're a hit and run shill.

Do any of you ever think of what goes into making those cars or items ? People assemble and make those parts, the materials needed to make said parts, the mining and forging of said materials, all offer large amounts of jobs.

>trying to place objective value on art

they only made 430 and they sold at a loss. it would actually help the economy to ax bugatti

>falling for an advertisement campaign and thinking a fucking CAR is ART

if there a giant bridge over the pacific ocean, a veyron/chiron could get you from sydney to L.A in 12 hours.
they are built for maximum reliability at speed.

something that literally does not matter, because speed limits and traffic exists.

such a strange vehicle.

i feel like it was invented as a form of transport for the reptilian globalists after they cut down world population to 500 million, and use whites as slave labor to build autobahn type highways all over the planet.

>they only made 430 and they sold at a loss. it would actually help the economy to ax bugatti
So the state should go in and close down any company and any individual project that "doesn't make a profit" now?

I mean if it "helps the economy" it's worth it, right?

>the car isn't art because I say so!
>People shouldn't be allowed to buy luxury items when there are cheaper alternatives available.
This is how you sound right now.

True, but tons of other car companies are out there making expensive cars. Let alone all the other luxury items that people buy still supply lots of good jobs.

>max reliability at speed
fuck no. the tires burn out in 15 minutes at full throttle. but dont worry the gas tank empties in 12
unironically yes. a million dollar farm tractor will perform tasks worth many times that amount. a bugatti only takes. you cant plow thousands of acres of crops with one

those companies employ very few people. and most of those people are in the 1%

>taking a dump on a piece of canvas counts as art but engineering a car isn't

listen to yourself

>why is this allowed
In some countries, it’s not allowed.

thats science and math not art.

if they're selling at a loss is essentially economic charity
you're right, tons of labor from all kinds of industries goes into each one

>unironically yes.
So you want the State (which is currently usurped by the Jews) to have even more power over the economy and ban any project or company that doesn't arbitrarily make enough of a profit for your liking?

>a million dollar farm tractor will perform tasks worth many times that amount.
But who are you to say what a person spends their money on? They've made the money. It's their right to save or blow it as they see fit.

>a bugatti only takes. you cant plow thousands of acres of crops with one
So there should be only one model of car that people are allowed to buy?

You need nothing but food, water, and clothing.

Art is in the eye of the beholder

>parking a 1.5 million car in a less than 2.5M house.
The absolute state of nu-money.

its not your money
go fuck off

no it doesnt. they only employ a few hundred people

>if they're selling at a loss is essentially economic charity
And what if the second year of that company's existence they pulled a profit?

What if they pulled a profit every single year, had one bad year and then made a profit again the following year?

In both those instances you would've ended an otherwise successful company.

>You need nothing but food, water, and clothing.
Congratulations. you're now a communist.

>fuck no. the tires burn out in 15 minutes at full throttle. but dont worry the gas tank empties in 12
he's asking if its good for the economy and you're describing things wealthy people choose to spend their money on, thereby stimulating the economy
just stop

Attached: TSTBaQ7.jpg (1462x2046, 98K)

yes. hitler would agree. honestly you guys know jack shit about actual natsoc economic policy and i dont know why you lolbertarians keep sucking his cock

>thats science and math not art.
the way the car looks is art.

This is why communists are so happy to enslave millions of people. They think that uninvented items already exist in some conceptual realm, and its up to them to force people to build them.

>I WANT A FASTER CAR
uhh....okay.... so what do you want me to do about it
>I DONT CARE JUST GO DO MATHS UNTIL YOU GET ONE

Why are there so many shitty threads?
Are the Jews working overtime?

an caps will defend this

>yes. hitler would agree.
No he wouldn't. You know nothing of national socialism nor Hitler.

>honestly you guys know jack shit about actual natsoc economic policy and i dont know why you lolbertarians keep sucking his cock
you're a fucking retard and you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. I bet you even believe the holocaust happened.

>Why are there so many shitty threads?
mods don't police the board for quality anymore.

1.hitler hated capitalism and had very left wing ideas about money
2. the holocaust has been greatly exaggerated, not 100% fake. about ~200k died but they died from disease and starvation like average germans during the wars end

That car has a camel toe in front.

>allowed

The commie has spoken.

>hurr durr the free market will fix it
obviously there is a demand for a supercar that is cheap enough to buy. so why hasnt the all powerful free market delivered? oh right, its because the rich want to keep everything for themselves. lamborghini wont make an affordable model to maintain "exclusivity"

>1.hitler hated capitalism and had very left wing ideas about money

Just one of the many ways in which Hitler was a fucking retard.

Most of the features in your car, assuming you have one, that you take for granted originated in high-end cars and gradually became more and more common in mid and low-range cars, if not outright standard.

kike

>1.hitler hated capitalism
National Socialism did not punish success. One could be rich and successful under National Socialism, just not at the expense of the people. As such luxuries could be bought by the people.

>and had very left wing ideas about money
National Socialism is neither Left nor Right.

>2. the holocaust has been greatly exaggerated, not 100% fake. about ~200k died but they died from disease and starvation like average germans during the wars end
The Holocaust literally did not happen the least. No Jews died due to a program of extermination.


>Just one of the many ways in which Hitler was a fucking retard.
Under Capitalism, the people and the state exist to serve the Economy. It's a soulless, materialist ideology.

Under National Socialism, the the state and the economy exist to serve the People, who are homogeneous. It is not a soulless, materialist ideology.

>oh right, its because the rich want to keep everything for themselves

Really is that why you can go to the store and plunk down $100 to buy a phone that can literally do anything?
You have in your pocket a device more powerful than the biggest supercomputer 30 years ago.

Jeeze the Veyron has aged badly. Looks like shit, though it wasn't great to begin with

OY VEY

Even a fucking Smart Car would have been a super car a few decades ago.

>Under Capitalism, the people and the state exist to serve the Economy. It's a soulless, materialist ideology.

Wrong

>Under National Socialism, the the state and the economy exist to serve the People

Wrong again

bull shit. a 50 year old rolls royce is still better than an average modern car

That's 1.5 million out of the pockets of rich assholes and into the pockets of the engineers, welder and machinists that put that car together you fucking moron.

>Imagine being so butthurt that people have things nicer than you that you want to ban them.

>Wrong
Absolutely not. Capitalism is all about "he who dies with the most things win". You exist to have a job and make money and spend money on things.

>Wrong again
Why would I listen to a non-National Socialist's views on National Socialism?

>rich want to keep everything for themselves
How old are you?

Do you think power windows were in anything BUT expensive fucking cars when they were first introduced?

I'm old enough to remember when most cars still had fucking hand crank windows.

>Why would I listen to a non-National Socialist's views on National Socialism
You should look at historical evidence of how unsuccessful it is

>BUT WE WOULDA HAD A PARADISE IF THOSE DAMN JOOOOOOZ DIDNT INTERFERE

ok bud

thats because microchips are easier to mass produce than millions of hand wired transistors and core memory weaved by hand. also its a false equivalence. ferraris have been around for a hundred years. ferraris are still expensive

nope. in the 1920s a duesenberg could do 180 mph

>also its a false equivalence. ferraris have been around for a hundred years. ferraris are still expensive

No. You proved my point.
Ferraris are expensive because they're art.

>You should look at historical evidence of how unsuccessful it is
You mean I should look at the Jewish narrative of history.

>ok bud
And we should listen to what the Jews say about National Socialism why exactly?

>because the holocaust!
okay, goy.

except they barely see any of it and since theyre europoors theyre likely struggling to get by

>You mean I should look at the Jewish narrative of history.

>stop listening to what the winners say about history.
>start listening to the losers, and copying what they did again.

sounds like a winning strategy

I’m old enough to remember 3 on the tree.

The tech in a Smart would have blown peoples MINDS in the 1920's.

Nobody asked for a useless faggot but here you are.

>>stop listening to what the winners say about history.
Just because the Allies beat the NSDAP doesn't mean they were right.

>>start listening to the losers
Just because the NSDAP were defeated by the Allies doesn't mean they were wrong.

If anything, history proves that the Allies destroyed the NSDAP because the NSDAP was right and the Allies were wrong.

In fact, it does have a purpose, to attract pussy.

how is a fucking car art!? its just a car that goes really fast how is that art!? thats scientific research! you think a ferrari looks the way it does because some hipster cunt thought it was pretty? that body styling isnt art but the most effective way of reducing drag they can come up with.

Cars like these are pieces of art and an attempt to push the envelope of engineering. Buy a 3k Civic and stfu there are plenty of poorfag marketed automobiles.

You want to talk about a racket, why does a half decent bicycle cost over $2000? That market leans much more toward the rich than automobiles

Assholes talk about the 1%. This is such a Jewish psyop, like “Bush did 9/11”. Maybe the top 10% of the 1% are buying this. But the bottom half of the 1% are not. The lower half of the 1% should be included in the 99% for all intents and purposes.

bikes are getting so pricey because carbon fiber frames cant be mass produced

So why do you think everyone should be forced to buy only one model of automobile?

And which automobile should the people only be allowed to buy?

experienced engineers make six figure salaries, machinist and welders usually make upwards of 60k to 70k per year. I didn't menton the line workers and unskilled assemblers because they tend to get jack shit, but the skilled tradesmen and the engineers who designed the car get a decent cut.

>bikes are getting so pricey because carbon fiber frames cant be mass produced
So why don't you open a bike company that produces or imports those $25 bikes that all the chinese have?

>how is a fucking car art!?
Because art is the product of a human creativity.
An artist needed to design it.

Attached: ferrari-250-gt-blueprint-antique-jon-neidert.jpg (900x615, 168K)

Ferarris look the way they do because there are laws on car features.

If you want to see what engineers actually produce when they're going solely for performance metrics, look at Le Mans winners.

im not saying that at all. im saying that a $2 million dollar car thats incapable of any practical task is way too fucking excessive.
the technogy to mass produce caebon fibers doesnt exist so it wouldnt make much difference. africa maybe but even i wouldnt trust niggers to make frames

Commie faggot detected

You can buy an adult sized bike at Walmart for 85 USD right now.

There's a guy who made a fucking cardboard bike.

youtube.com/watch?v=txSboSNQINs

>posts an engineering schematic thus proving my point
exactly. its a balance between (((safety laws))) and performance

not a carbon fiber one and certainly not a good quality one

>im not saying that at all. im saying that a $2 million dollar car thats incapable of any practical task is way too fucking excessive.

You're not even being intellectually honest with yourself. At least not honest enough to make a decent argument.

You don't REALLY think that a 2 million dollar car shouldn't EXIST.
You just think that no human being should HAVE 2 million dollars to spend on a car.
And the reason you think that is because you're a Communist.

Quit pussyfooting around and have the balls to say what you think.

boy are you a dumbfuck, the designers who design the car body don't give a fuck about drag, they are just playing with clay. the real engineers have to bring the artist's interpretation to life. maybe the atist who creates the design is an engineer also, but more than likely they go to an art school rather than an engineering school.

There are more roles than just some random single engineer designing the whole entire car all by himself, there is more to it than that. and yeas artists are involved because aesthetics are more important the functionality.

In Engineering, there's this saying:
>You can have something quickly, cheaply or of high quality. Pick two.

>im saying that a $2 million dollar car thats incapable of any practical task
Like driving and giving the owner/driver a pleasurable experience that they feel is worth the price they paid?

Who are you to say what is or isn't practical?

>is way too fucking excessive.
According to whom?

>the technogy to mass produce caebon fibers doesnt exist so it wouldnt make much difference.
Those $25 bikes in China aren't made of carbon fiber. I don't even think they're made of stainless steel. Probably aluminum or iron.

>africa maybe but even i wouldnt trust niggers to make frames
So why don't you create a business that makes the bikes along the basis of: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"?

those are the rich 1% who are the enemies of the people

Specifically, they go into Industrial Design.

Basically, the Designer makes something, hands it to the Engineer who unfucks it, who then hands it to the Drafter who further unfucks it and then that goes into production.

>those are the rich 1% who are the enemies of the people
you can't help but sound like a communist, you know this right?

hitler also hated them

Do you really think that helps your argument?

>hitler also hated them
Hitler hated the people who were exploiting Germany to make money. Hitler didn't hate rich people or successful people.

Also...
>Hitler hated the rich therefore you should join with us communists because we hate rich people too!
No.

because i cant make carbon fiber bikes that cheap until it can be mass produced like steel and when it can be, then the problem of bikes costing too much wont exist.

>Not supporting the 1% means you’re commie...
Fuck this board has become so underage it’s getting unbearable

Attached: E7110213-781E-4A2D-B24B-27FBDA02AAB8.jpg (500x522, 112K)

>because i cant make carbon fiber bikes that cheap
Why can't you make aluminum or iron bikes like the ones made in China? Do you think 750 million chinese ride around on carbon fiber bikes?

You're a commie because you support class warfare instead of racial survival.
You'd willingly side with niggers, faggots and kikes if it meant you got more money out of it.

Go away and enjoy your 3 homes and stolen money Bernie!

Attached: image.jpg (640x407, 89K)

engineers, machinists and welders are in the 1%? you think the engineer making 120k per year is a one percenter? the machinist who programs the machines in the plant making 70k per year is a one percenter?

what shit pay are you making? I work as a line worker I make 40k per year I know how to program CNC's a little, but no where near the actual certified machinists and I could never imagine myself welding as good as the welder in the plant.

what kind of pay are you making, are you a poorfag working for 7.50 per hour at mcdonalds?

Why should I not be allowed to buy an expensive toy?

>needs

You don’t need to be on Jow Forums, so ban yourself.

>at mcdonalds?
Not for long, if that's the case, lol.

Attached: McDonalds Automation.png (600x388, 391K)

wait why did Hitler hate machinists? who would make his tanks if he gassed the machinists and welders?

>Why should I not be allowed to buy an expensive toy?
Because the communists don't want you to! they think they know how to spend your money better than you do! Therefore, they should be allowed to have all your money since you're so irresponsible.

If this guy isn't trolling, and he literally think's somebody making 100k is in the 1%....

Yeah I bet you $100 that he's workin at Dunkin Donuts or something. He has to pedal his ass all the way to work on a bike, so all he can think about is how bad he wants carbon steel and how butthurt he is that nice cars exist.