Catholic Hocus Pocus

You havent been born again. Youll understand.

This is gonna end up like Machine Gun Kelly vs Eminem

>Machine Gun Kelly vs Eminem
Things that only morons get their head occupied with.
>ROPE

All christianity is hocus pocus.

A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Oh, boy. The pastor who loves niggers. Fucking cuckstianity.

>every christian who lived after the apostles from roughly 100A.D. to the 1800's got it completely wrong
>nobody worshiped God right until the Baptists came along

hmmmm

Attached: 1466231203959.jpg (374x347, 39K)

Granted, technically this gets too comical. But if the purpose is to expose their false doctrine, this sermon makes valid points scripturally one way or the other.

I personally don't believe that Catholics are heretics from day one, this religion evolves over time (rather radically) despite their claim of 'Apostolic'. But to get to the intricacies of it is rather exhaustive and frankly will eventually lead to the same conclusion as demonstrated in this sermon.

No, no, Christianity there are certain times where Gospel works DESPITE of the Catholic church.

And as to present day, the label Baptist will at least get you in the ballpark of Biblical Teaching

* in Christianity

What denom are you?

>Gospel works DESPITE of the Catholic church.

And the Eastern Orthodox Church? And the Coptic Church? And the Syriac Church? And the Armenian Apostolic Church?

All these Churches have been separated by time and distance, some of them having very little contact with the See of Rome from the beginning. And yet they all believe the "pagan" things like the Real Presence, Marian devotion, the Intercession of Saints, and Sacraments. And for all of their history. No one disputed these things until the Reformation. They were all universally agreed upon. Don't you find that strange?

Matthew 16 (KJV)

18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

reminder to beta orbiters and boomers this button at the top of the thread on the left hides said thread

always type "sage" into the options field whenever replying to shill/slide/containment threads so it does not bump them

Attached: minus-expand.png (280x280, 878)

Baptist.

Alright, alright, if you asking for precision, sure Gospel will still work despite all man-made institutions. It always has, is and will be. When we face God Himself, He will ask what you personally believe. Don't be like Adam.

>No one disputed these things until the Reformation

Not really, If you read Paul letters these kinds of heresies are there from the very beginning. The Word of God is the Reformation, by that I mean is whether you believe what is said there or someone else's false preaching.

>Not really, If you read Paul letters these kinds of heresies are there from the very beginning.

Attached: srsly3.png (401x440, 343K)

I like Steven Anderson in general, but his polemics against sacramental theology are just ignorant and counter to the history of the early church. Jesus never said "study the bible". Jesus said "pray and fast". The Apostles were bewildered when Jesus instructed them to eat his body and drink his blood because they did indeed have to get past their hang up that it sounded like cannibalism.

Attached: 1503317909815.png (2192x3912, 192K)

2 Corinthians 11:13

>For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

?

Based Niggerlover

Attached: 1527181328587.jpg (1200x1370, 857K)

But the Catholic Church is no man-made institution. It was instantiated by Christ himself.
It is Christ's body.

You need both scripture and tradition, because scripture IS part of tradition. Without the Church, then what is the gospel? Some brief, partial accounts of Christ's life, and a handful of pastoral letters written by fallible men. But these men were with the Church. And the Holy Spirit is with the Church.

That;s how these mortal, fallible men were able to write something infallible and inspired.

One thing many people missed out is that the whole Bible is also what Jesus' said

Acts 17:11
>These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

>race mix promoter
into the trash it goes

Yes, of course that there were heresies. But the Eucharistic Sacrifice in the celebration of the Holy Mysteries of Lord's Body and Blood is like a given from the very beginning.

Read st. Justin's Dialogue with Trypho chapters 41. and 116.-117.

>Without the Church, then what is the gospel? Some brief, partial accounts of Christ's life, and a handful of pastoral letters written by fallible men.

2 Peter 1:21
>For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

Even the supposed 'the first pope' won't agree with you

Heck, God even uses a talking donkey on one Instance. Don't put Church above God, you got it backward

You get my point tho, Reformation as in battling heresies is nothing new. There are great schisms across the history, this Reformation is only the latest, and maybe you can say that this is the biggest and most impactful, but again, nothing new.

The Church is God. It is the continuing presence of Christ on earth.

If it isn't, then what was the point of the Incarnation? Why did the Word become flesh?
If Jesus was here to simply teach, then why couldn't God just do that through the Holy Spirit like he had done through the centuries?

God became man because it was predestined that God have a physical, tangible presence on earth. He became Christ, died, was buried, resurrected and ascended into heaven, and left behind the Church as a continuing presence.

There is a place for the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

He's going to hell (for many reasons)

go back to r eddit fucking retard

He's an anti-Christian satanic preacher of the devil. He says there is no redemption for those who are gay. God tells us that even the worst of sinners can be saved.

>kike necklace
>cyrillic shirt
Hmmm

So this is a thing.
Looks very obviously shooped, but I quite can't convince people of it.
What says you, Jow Forums?

Attached: 1536052023161.webm (1062x614, 247K)

Your understanding of the Bible is a mess, I don't even know where to begin with.

Get a new church for your own good. Or read your bible yourself.

John 17: 16-21

>16 They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.

>17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.

>18 As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world.

>19 And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.

20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;

>21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.

Catholic church needs to be burned to the ground

I understand the Bible.
Why should I accept your own personal interpretation of the Bible over the Church Fathers, the Doctors of the Church, or the other countless intellectuals who studied the Bible?

Are you going to be like Pastor Anderson and say that I should listen to you because you are "saved" without further elaborating?

Protestantism is all based on feelings. "I feel saved, so you should listen to me".

I'd rather use my reason and study Scripture scientifically and objectively, without being swayed by fine talkers like Anderson.

This guy looks like he supports blacks dating his daughter.

What interpretation? Scriptures I provide is as clear as day!

>Are you going to be like Pastor Anderson

I don't have this mentality that I hinged my understanding of the Bible on other men. God expects us our own personal faith. There are things that I disagree with him, but If it's aligned perfectly with the REST of the Bible, sure I'll buy it.

>Bible over the Church Fathers, the Doctors of the Church, or the other countless intellectuals who studied the Bible?

Whos being swayed by fine talkers here? Ever heard of the religion of the Pharisees?

You expect me to have my own personal understanding on the Bible, but what about problematic passages like Matt 16:18 that cause confusion and many people have differing interpretations.

Not everyone can be right. Someone has to be misreading or misinterpreting.

You need someone interpreting the Bible objectively.

Anderson wears a tie. A tie is a noose. Being hung from a tree is a curse. One can be hung from a tree by a noose. One might say that a tie is not a hangman's noose however a cross is not a tree but is fashioned from one. In a similar manner a tie is a rope fashioned into a noose around one's neck.

>Deuteronomy 21
>22 And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree:
>23 His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) that thy land be not defiled, which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.

A tie then is a symbol. It is a symbol for committing a sin worthy of death and a willingness to die because of it. This is a trap because Jesus offers you redemption from sin and eternal life. These are things of the spirit but if you want the things of the flesh, to prosper in this world you are forced to place a noose around your neck. The tie therefore becomes an occult symbol of servitude to this world.

Attached: 1529050687916.jpg (1469x1102, 320K)

the Catholic Church abandoned the Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church at Vatican II. it's been a downward spiral of heresy and pedophilia ever since.

>You need someone interpreting the Bible objectively.

You are precisely right on this one.

Thus,
1 Corinthians 2: 13
>13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

Compare scriptures with scriptures. let the Bible speaks for itself.

This is also why I like to hear Pastor Anderson's preaching, he aware himself to do this in his preaching and has been great most of the time.

STOP REPLYING TO THE ANDERSON FETISHIST FAGGOT, HE POSTS HUNDREDS OF THREADS HOPING HE'LL NOTICE HIM AND BUTT FUCK HIM:
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/Anderson/troll_country/tm/type/op/

Attached: 1512403759006.jpg (186x238, 12K)

STOP REPLYING TO THE ANDERSON FETISHIST FAGGOT, HE POSTS HUNDREDS OF THREADS HOPING HE'LL NOTICE HIM AND BUTT FUCK HIM
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/Anderson/troll_country/tm/type/op/

Attached: 1511960277686.png (853x861, 622K)

logically serve anything else than the nationality or man could
work for anything else than man. Of course, as I have said before,
it is easier to see in state authority the mere formal mechanism of an
organization than the sovereign embodiment of a nationality's in-
stinct of self-preservation on earth. For in the one case the state,
as well as state authority, is for these weak minds a purpose in it-
self, while in the other, it is only a mighty weapon in the service
of the great, eternal life struggle for existence, a weapon to which
everyone must submit because it is not formal and mechanical,
but the expression of a common will for preserving life.

Hence, in the struggle for our new conception, which is entirely
in keeping with the primal meaning of things, we shall find few
fellow warriors in a society which not only is physically senile but,
sad to say, usually, mentally as well. Only exceptions, old men
with young hearts and fresh minds, will come to us from those
classes, never those who see the ultimate meaning of their life
task in the preservation of an existing condition.

We are confronted by the endless army, not so much of the
deliberately bad as of the mentally lazy and indifferent, including
those with a stake in the preservation of the present condition.
But precisely in this apparent hopelessness of our gigantic strug-
gle lies the greatness of our task and also the possibility of our
success. The battle-cry which either scares away the small spirits
at the very start, or soon makes them despair, will be the signal
for the assemblage of real fighting natures. And this we must see
clearly: If in a people a certain amount of the highest energy and
active force seems concentrated upon one goal and hence is definitively
removed from the inertia- of the broad masses, this small percentage
has risen to be master over the entire number. World history is made
by minorities when this minority of number

In general, Nature herself usually makes certain corrective deci-
sions with regard to the racial purity of earthly creatures. She
has little love for bastards. Especially the first products of such
cross-breeding, say in the third, fourth, and fifth generation, suffer
bitterly. Not only is the value of the originally highest element of
the cross-breeding taken from them, but with their lack of blood
unity they lack also unity of will-power and determination to live.
In all critical moments in which the racially unified being makes
correct, that is, unified decisions, the racially divided one will be-
come uncertain; that is, he will arrive at half measures. Taken
together, this means not only a certain inferiority of the racially
divided being compared with the racially unified one, but in prac-
tice also the possibility of a more rapid decline. In innumerable
cases where race holds up, the bastard breaks down. In this, we must
see the correction of Nature. But often she goes even further.
She limits the possibility of propagation. Thereby she prevents
the fertility of continued crossings altogether and thus causes
them to die out.

If, for example, an individual specimen of a certain race were to
enter into a union with a racially lower specimen, the result would
at first be a lowering of the standard in itself; but, in addition,
there would be a weakening of the offspring as compared to the
environment that had remained racially unmixed. If an influx
of further blood from the highest race were prevented entirely,
the bastards, if they continued mutually to cross, would either
die out because their power of resistance had been wisely dimin-
ished by Nature, or in the course of many millenniums a new mix-
ture would form in which the original individual elements would
be completely blended by the thousandfold crossing and therefore
no longer recognizable. Thus a new nationality

of this new people, formed in the course of thousands of years,
would, in consequence of the general lowering of the racial level
and the resultant diminution of spiritual elasticity and creative
ability, not suffice victoriously to withstand the struggle with an
equally unified, but spiritually and culturally superior race.

Hence we can establish the following valid statement:

Every racial crossing leads inevitably sooner or later to the decline
of the hybrid product as long as the higher element of this crossing
is itself still existent in any kind of racial unity. The danger for
the hybrid product is eliminated only at the moment when the
last higher racial element is bastardized.

This is a basis for a natural, even though slow, process of re-
generation, which gradually eliminates racial poisonings as long
as a basic stock of racially pure elements is still present and a fur-
ther bastardization does not take place.

Such a process can begin of its own accord in creatures with a
strong racial instinct, who have only been thrown off the track of
normal, racially pure reproduction by special circumstances or
some special compulsion. As soon as this condition of compulsion
is ended, the part which has still remained pure will at once strive
again for mating among equals, thus calling a halt to further mix-
ture. The results of bastardization spontaneously recede to the
background, unless their number has increased so infinitely that
serious resistance on the part of those who have remained ra-
cially pure is out of the question.

Man, once he has lost his instinct and fails to recognize the
obligation imposed upon him by Nature, is on the whole not justi-
fied in hoping for such a correction on the part of Nature as long
as he has not replaced his lost instinct by perceptive knowledge;
this knowledge must then perform the required work of compen-
sation. Yet the danger is very great that the

herd could be formed in this way; a herd beast can be brewed from all
sorts of ingredients, but a man who will be a culture-bearer, or even
better, a culture-founder and culture-creator, never arises from such a
mixture. The mission of humanity could then be looked upon as
finished.

Anyone who does not want the earth to move toward this con-
dition must convert himself to the conception that it is the func-
tion above all of the Germanic states first and foremost to call a
fundamental halt to any further bastardization.

The generation of our present notorious weaklings will ob-
viously cry out against this, and moan and complain about as-
saults on the holiest human rights. No, there is only one holiest
human right, and this right is at the same time the holiest obligation,
to wit: to see to it that the blood is preserved pure and, by preserving
the best humanity, to create the possibility of a nobler development of
these beings.

A folkish state must therefore begin by raising marriage from the
level of a continuous defilement of the race, and give it the consecra-
tion of an institution which is called upon to produce images of the
Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape.

The protest against this on so-called humane grounds is particu-
larly ill-suited to an era which on the one hand gives every de-
praved degenerate the possibility of propagating, but which bur-
dens the products themselves, as well as their contemporaries,
with untold suffering, while on the other hand every drug store
and our very street peddlers offer the means for the prevention
of births for sale even to the healthiest parents. In this present-
day state of law and order in the eyes of its representatives, this
brave, bourgeois-national society, the prevention of the procre-
ative faculty in sufferers from syphilis,

viding a basis for the sustenance and preservation of those be-
ings who, as healthy bearers of our nationality, should one day
serve the same function with regard to the coming generation.

How boundlessly unideal and ignoble is this whole system!
People no longer bother to breed the best for posterity, but let
things slide along as best they can. If our churches also sin
against the image of the Lord, whose importance they still so
highly emphasize, it is entirely because of the line of their present
activity which speaks always of the spirit and lets its bearer, the
man, degenerate into a depraved proletarian. Afterwards, of
course, they make foolish faces and are full of amazement at the
small effect of the Christian faith in their own country, at the
terrible 'godlessness,' at this physically botched and hence
spiritually degenerate rabble, and try with the Church's Blessing,
to make up for it by success with the Hottentots and Zulu Kaffirs.
While our European peoples, thank the Lord, fall into a condition
of physical and moral leprosy, the pious missionary wanders off
to Central Africa and sets up Negro missions until there, too, our
'higher culture' turns healthy, though primitive and inferior,
human beings into a rotten brood of bastards.

It would be more in keeping with the intention of the noblest
man in this world if our two Christian churches, instead of an-
noying Negroes with missions which they neither desire nor un-
derstand, would kindly, but in all seriousness, teach our European
humanity that where parents are not healthy it is a deed pleasing
to God to take pity on a poor Utile healthy orphan child and give
him father and mother, than themselves to give birth to a sick
child who will only bring unhappiness and suffering on himself
and the rest of the world.

The folkish state must make up for what everyone else today
has neglected in this field. // must set race in the center of all life.

considered reprehensible: to withhold healthy children from the
nation. Here the state must act as the guardian of a millennial future
in the face of which the wishes and the selfishness of the individual
must appear as nothing and submit. It must put the most modem
medical means in the service of this knowledge. It must declare unfit
for propagation all who are in any way visibly sick or who have in-
herited a disease and can therefore pass it on, and put this into actual
practice. Conversely, it must take care that the fertility of the healthy
woman is not limited by the financial irresponsibility of a state rigime
which turns the blessing of children into a curse for the parents. It
must put an end to that lazy, nay criminal, indifference with which
the social premises for a fecund family are treated today, and must
instead feel itself to be the highest guardian of this most precious
blessing of a people. Its concern belongs more to the child than to the
adult.

Those who are physically and mentally unhealthy and unworthy
must not perpetuate their suffering in the body of their children. In
this thefolkish state must perform the most gigantic educational task.
And some day this will seem to be a greater deed than the most victori-
ous wars of our present bourgeois era. By education it must teach the
individual that it is no disgrace, but only a misfortune deserving of
pity, to be sick and weakly, but that it is a crime and hence at the same
time a disgrace to dishonor one's misfortune by one's own egotism in
burdening innocent creatures with it; that by comparison it bespeaks
a nobility of highest idealism and the most admirable. humanity if
the innocently sick, renouncing a child of his own, bestows his love
and tenderness upon a poor, unknown young scion of his own na-
tionality, who with his health promises to become some day a powerful
member of a powerful community. And in this educational work the

which today seems scarcely conceivable. If the fertility of the
healthiest bearers of the nationality is thus consciously and
systematically promoted, the result will be a race which at least
will have eliminated the germs of our present physical and hence
spiritual decay.

For once a people and a state have started on this path, at-
tention will automatically be directed on increasing the racially
most valuable nucleus of the people and its fertility, in order
ultimately to let the entire nationality partake of the blessing of
a highly bred racial stock.

The way to do this is above all for the state not to leave the
settlement of newly acquired territories to chance, but to subject
it to special norms. Specially constituted racial commissions
must issue settlement certificates to individuals. For this, how-
ever, definite racial purity must be established. It will thus
gradually become possible to found border colonies whose in-
habitants are exclusively bearers of the highest racial purity and
hence of the highest racial efficiency. This will make them a
precious national treasure to the entire nation; their growth must
fill every single national comrade with pride and confidence, for
in them lies the germ for a final, great future development of our
own people, nay — of humanity.

In the folkish state, finally, the folkish philosophy of life must
succeed in bringing about that nobler age in which men no longer are
concerned with breeding dogs, horses, and cats, but in elevating man
himself, an age in which the one knowingly and silently renounces,
the other joyfully sacrifices and gives.

That this is possible may not be denied in a world where hun-
dreds and hundreds of thousands of people voluntarily submit to
celibacy, obligated and bound by nothing except the injunction
of the Church.

Should the same renunciation not be possible if this injunction
is replaced by the admonition finally to put an

Divine Wisdom from King Terry:

My other thought was about the neck tie. One boss at Ticketmaster used to
joke he saw no point starting the day tieing a noose around his neck. Was
there some shrewd psychology involved in the invention of the tie? What
subconscious message is passed when a professional presents himself to a
nonprofessional? If a tie resembles a noose... is it a promise on the part
of the professional that he is willing to pledge his life by his work? Or,
would a nonprofessional be motivated to fight or submit if he sized-up a
professional bodily for vulnerabilities to expliot in a physical conflict?

Should an engineer make a similar pledge--put a big button on his shoulder
wired to his heart saying press to deliver a lethal shock to my heart. (If
you can!)

Knights used to wear shields. A tie represents an anti-shield. The notion of
letting your guard down is a Christian notion... should I think of ways to
spread symbolic psychological notions of letting guards down all over in
society?

Attached: 1533764469481.jpg (418x438, 24K)

will never understand this. They will laugh at it or shrug their
crooked shoulders and moan forth their eternal excuse: 'That
would be very nice in itself, but it can't be done!' True, it can no
longer be done with you, your world isn't fit for it! You know
but one concern: your personal life, and one God: your money!
But we are not addressing ourselves to you, we are appealing to
the great army of those who are so poor that their personal life
cannot mean the highest happiness in the world; to those who do
not see the ruling principle of their existence in gold, but in other
gods. Above all we appeal to the mighty army of our German
youth. They are growing up at a great turning point and the
evils brought about by the inertia and indifference of their fa-
thers will force them into struggle. Some day the German youth
will either be the builder of a new folkish state, or they will be the
last witness of total collapse, the end of the bourgeois world.

For if a generation suffers from faults which it recognizes, even
admits, but nevertheless, as occurs today in our bourgeois world,
contents itself with the cheap excuse that there is nothing to be
done about it — such a society is doomed. The characteristic
thing about our bourgeois world is precisely that it can no longer
deny the ailments as such. It must admit that much is rotten
and bad, but it no longer finds the determination to rebel against
the evil, to muster the force of a people of sixty or seventy mil-
lions with embittered energy, and oppose it to the danger. On
the contrary: if this is done elsewhere, silly comments are made
about it, and they attempt from a distance at least to prove the
theoretical impossibility of the method and declare success to be
inconceivable. And no reason is too absurd to serve as a prop for
their own dwarfishness and mental attitude. If, for example, a
whole continent finally declares war on alcoholic poisoning, in

with success, then, as said before, the success at least must be
doubted and deprecated; and here they do not even shun to raise
bourgeois-moral arguments against a struggle which strives to
abolish the greatest immorality.

No, we must none of us make any mistake about all of this:
our present bourgeoisie has become worthless for every exalted
task of mankind, simply because it is without quality and no
good; and what makes it no good is not so much in my opinion
any deliberate malice as an incredible indolence and everything
that springs from it. And therefore those political clubs which
carry on under the collective concept of 'bourgeois parties' have
long ceased to be anything else but associations representing the
interests of certain professional groups and classes, and their
highest task has ceased to be anything but the best possible selfish
defense of their interests. It is obvious that such a political
'bourgeois' guild is good for anything sooner than struggle; espe-
cially if the opposing side does not consist of cautious pepper
sacks [small tradesmen], but of proletarian masses, incited to ex-
tremes and determined to do their worst.
If as the first task of the state in the service and for the welfare
of its nationality we recognize the preservation, care, and de-
velopment of the best racial elements, it is natural that this care
must not only extend to the birth of every little national and
racial comrade, but that it must educate the young offspring to
become a valuable link in the chain of future reproduction.

And as in general the precondition for spiritual achievement
lies in the racial quality of the human material at hand, education
in particular must first of all consider and promote physical
health; for taken in the mass, a healthy, forceful spirit will be

as everywhere — only confirm the rule. But if the mass of a
people consists of physical degenerates, from this swamp a really
great spirit will very seldom arise. In any case his activity will
not meet with great success. The degenerate rabble will either
not understand him at all, or it will be so weakened in will that it
can no longer follow the lofty flight of such an eagle.

Realizing this, the folkish state must not adjust its entire educa-
tional work primarily to the inoculation of mere knowledge, but to
the breeding of absolutely healthy bodies. The training of mental
abilities is only secondary. And here again, first place must be
taken by the development of character, especially the promotion of
will-power and determination, combined with the training of joy in
responsibility, and only in last place comes scientific schooling.

Here the folkish state must proceed from the assumption that
a man of little scientific education but physically healthy, with a good,
firm character, imbued with the joy of determination and will-power,
is more valuable for the national community than a clever weakling.
A people of scholars, if they are physically degenerate, weak-
willed and cowardly pacifists, will not storm the heavens, indeed
they will not even be able to safeguard their existence on this
earth. In the hard struggle of destiny the man who knows least
seldom succumbs, but always he who from his knowledge draws
the weakest consequences and is most lamentable in transforming
them into action. Here too, finally, a certain harmony must be
present. A decayed body is not made tJie least more aesthetic by a
brilliant mind, indeed the highest intellectual training could not
be justified if its bearers were at the same time physically de-
generate and crippled, weak-willed, wavering and cowardly in-
dividuals. What makes the Greek ideal of beauty a model is the
wonderful combination of the most magnificent

of the individual, and not even a matter which primarily regards:
the parents and only.. secondly or thirdly interests the community;
it is a requirement for the self-preservation of the nationality,
represented and protected by the state. Just as. the state, as far
as purely scientific education is concerned, even today interferes
with the individual's right of self-determination and upholds.the
right of the totality toward him by subjecting the child to com-
pulsory education without asking whether the parents want it or
not — in far greater measure the folkish state must some day
enforce its authority against the individual's ignorance or lack of
understanding in questions regarding the preservation of the
nationality. It must so organize its educational wo»k that the
young bodies are treated expediently in their earliest childhood
and obtain the necessary steeling for later, life. It must abosre-all
prevent the rearing of a. generation of hothouse plants.

This work of care and education must • begin with the young
mother. Just as it became possible in the course of careful work
over a period of decades to achieve antiseptic cleanliness in child-
birth and reduce puerperal fever to a few cases, it must and will
be possible, by a thorough training of nurses and mothers them-
selves, to achieve a treatment of the child in his first years that
will serve as an excellent basis for future development.

The school as such in a folkish state must create infinitely more
free time for physical training.. It is not permissible to burden
young brains with a ballast only a fraction of which they retain,
as experience shows, not to mention the fact that as a rule.it is
unnecessary trifles that stick instead of essentials, since the young
child cannot undertake a sensible sifting of the material that -has
been tunneled into him. If today,, even in the curriculum of the-
secondary schools, gymnastics gets barely two

which in the eyes of many 'folkish' minded people is considered
vulgar and undignified: boxing. It is incredible what false opin-
ions are widespread in ' educated ' circles. It is regarded as natural
and honorable that a young man should learn to fence and pro-
ceed to fight duels right and left, but if he boxes, it is supposed to
be vulgar! Why? There is no sport that so much as this one pro-
motes the spirit of attack, demands lightning decisions, and
trains the body in steel dexterity. It is no more vulgar for two
young men to fight out a difference of opinion with their fists than
with a piece of whetted iron. It is not less noble if a man who has
been attacked defends himself against his assailant with his fists,
instead of running away and yelling for a policeman. But above
all, the young, healthy body must also learn to suffer blows. Of
course this may seem wild to the eyes of our present spiritual
fighters. But it is not the function of the folkish state to breed a
colony of peaceful aesthetes and physical degenerates. Not in
the respectable shopkeeper or virtuous old maid does it see its
ideal of humanity, but in the defiant embodiment of manly
strength and in women who are able to bring men into the
world.

And so sport does not exist only to make the individual strong,
agile and bold; it should also toughen him and teach him to bear
hardships.

If our entire intellectual upper crust had not been brought up
so exclusively on upper-class etiquette; if instead they had learned
boxing thoroughly, a German revolution of pimps, deserters, and
such-like rabble would never have been possible; for what gave
this revolution success was not the bold, courageous energy of the
revolutionaries, but the cowardly, wretched indecision of those
who led the state and were responsible for it. The fact is that our
whole intellectual leadership had received only 'intellectual'
education and hence could not help but be

I think this thread should be on page one.
I don't appreciate the spammer attempting to obscure Terry's divine intellect.

Attached: 1514629383751.jpg (4264x3148, 1.3M)

Getting your religious instruction from a guy who's dressed like a vacuum cleaner salesman In what looks like hotel conference room... Pathetic

Hahahahaha so much for the supposed the collective alpha males, more like autistic males

>archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/Anderson/troll_country/tm/type/op/

That ain't me.

Attached: 200_s.gif (267x200, 29K)

>When you study the bible, you don't find cars, or TVs, or mobile phones, or medicine and all these crazy things that modern amn does, all the idolatry and anything else. It's a bunch of hocus pocus, and it's as foolish and nonsensical as a magic show. Now let's see what the bible actually says...

Good discussion but let's remember that at the end of the day we pray and worship the same God.

Who is right?
>Two millennia lasting tradition of theology and liturgy
>A 21st century hillbilly from America (aka 99% of Evangelicals)
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Difficult choice.

Attached: holy fathers of kiev.jpg (907x1057, 519K)

The one that isn't full satanic Jew pedos

>The one that isn't full satanic Jew pedos
Whoa, edgyyy!

Checked

>If it isn't, then what was the point of the Incarnation? Why did the Word become flesh?
So his blood can be spilled as payment for the sins of the whole world. Because without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins.