Daily reminder that what you dismissively reject as "communism" only failed because it was hijacked and controlled by...

Just get rid of the teachers teaching it. bring in teachers reminding us that communism is bad.
Book burnings are never a good idea

Are you claiming that might equals right?

Because if so I should skull fuck you and take your wallet.

> I'd be a moral god

Yup.
Do you like my sundried tomatoes, I like your potatoes. Want to trade?
Yeah? Cool. You know the effort I put in, I know yours. Lets trade.
New friend made.

Stalin a capitalist??
Lol ok

A warning is a good start.
Let me give you an example (I am a physicist).
Imagine there is a Milky Way wide coalition of planets. The only rule is:
a) NO A.I
because A.I will be the same wherever you are.
So we get planet cracked for breaking a rule we didn't know.
because A.I is outlawed via the cosmos.
This is communism.
It IS the A.I and it is also the punishment, for an unknown crime.

/thread

That's not how might=right works. If you do that then a stronger entity - the government - will punish you.
International and domestic law has always been dictated by the superior sovereign. The UN and NATO are run only by the strongest countries. The WTO is a USA/China love fest.
Might is right isn't a moral question, it's a question of reality. If your system is as fragile as a honey bee, it doesn't deserve its existence.

I have to agree with this. Even if you destroy all of the books about it, that wont fix the problem. Someone else would eventually come along running a similar scam. People forget that communism is appealing because it offers the promise of "fixing" the fact that life isn't fair, for the "low" cost of the capitulation of individual liberties to an entity meant to govern the collective.

Fine give them a warning.
Just book burning is too lefty for my liking

All I suggest is do as we do.
Keep an SD card of the communist party members and addresses in a lead box with a pi 3b.
As soon as they try it.
We tiger kidnap all of their family members. We have to be swift.
Then we torture.
There ends that coup de tas.
When they return to free their family, they die.
We keep our promise and release the families.
But let them know, their family member is the reason why they are missing a hand.

We need to go to the level of them, and further.
To the power of three.

You mean sink to their level? Hmm...

Gommunism, socialism that is, was tried only for brief period of time such as in USSR with 5 year plan which doubled the GDP.
Just like NatSoc.

Then a crafty capitalistic swine came and has been CIAniggering everywhere they go.
You can see on U.S. CIA reports how many times they attempted to kill Castro, how many countries they used trade embargo for sole reason of being socialist ( socialist democrat=/= democratic socialist).
Also none of countries were Communist by definition as that requires banning of ALL CURRENCY.
They were SOCIALIST. A state which is in transition to gommunism.
CIAniggers will deny this.

Daily Reminder: There is no such thing as "Capitalism". There is only the principle of Private Property and the ability to engage in voluntary exchange in a Free Market. The entire concept of "Capitalism" is Marxist propaganda specifically designed to end the right of private ownership and crush the right of voluntary exchange to usher in their incoherent utopian vision of forced equality under the thumb of a totalitarian state. Don't fall for this False Meme. Know what it is, who created it, and what it is meant to accomplish.

Attached: 1521108174785-pol.png (480x406, 118K)

Daily reminder that all the problems of Capitalism are bc leftards try to hijack the system.

can't hijack something you invented, retard

Attached: 1445879553712-3.jpg (2225x961, 850K)

Not sink.
Raise the stakes.
Literally.
Let it be known, this is what happens to authoritarian fucks.
Have no pity for them, they have none for you.
Your human aspect will be our downfall.
Do not see them as human.

Attached: Ganowicz.jpg (500x481, 49K)

You like licking the boot of monopolistic thugs don't you?

sent from your mac, I'm sure

I want sword combat with your kind.
Street level.
I know your lot appreciate bombs, and indistinct murder.
I guess the people with STEM backgrounds will have to one up.

/post

You like licking the boots of jewish "revolutionaries" don't you?. By the way, Trotsky was a Jew, so was Lenin's mother, and so was Jacob Schiff, the wall street jew who financied them.
/thread

I am talking about burning books. I have more respect for books then I do them.
For all I care you can line up the Commies against a wall because I know a Communist country will kill my family.
But erasing history is not what I want.

Daily reminder that OP doesnt contribute to his threads and is only good at bait and shill posting

Attached: Screenshot_8.png (330x69, 3K)

Yeah, but it is always fun to bash Commies.

Sent from RedOS you fucking faggot.
That argument is more than shit.
Capitalism is forced upon your ass thus you can't opt out even if you ran to fucking jungle.

How am I supposed to use tech when all of it was made by capitalistic swine and all commies who tried to make their own got shoahed because of competition?
Im supposed to never drink or eat or sleep or use anything since using capitalistic product==complying with it?

My family did "The Long Walk".
From Siberia.
I do not agree with it either, I am an academic.
But nothing bar Islam is rabid in a man than Communism.
I think I can morally take the hit of a book burn to erase the ideology, and then sleep safe knowing I may have bought us 30 years.
The wall should have never come down.

You are fucked

No, I don't.
Even if leftist circles theres a hate for Trotsky.
Trot patrol is a thing.
Trotsky wanted to cause world revolution killijg everyone who didnt agree with him.

Stalin stopped him from collective suicide.
Stalin also purged all the jews and bankers just like Hitler did.
But guess thats jewish as well? Gets those noggin joggin

>it will work next time!
>millions die
>not true communism!
repeat ad infinitum

Kill yourself?
For the purity of your ideology?

Finding two communists that agree on what communism and socialism is, is like finding two identical snowflakes or two piles of sand with the exact same number of grains. You all have 1,000 different ideas on what Marx said. You're even worse than Christians.

I think such bad ideas must never be forgotten, lest they be rediscovered by future generations who think they have found something new that has never been attempted and has not already failed repeatedly.

Attached: meme9834231570.jpg (550x420, 57K)

Then why do you not subvert Israel from within?
Instead, you attack us...who you are supposed to "liberate".
What ego does it take to be you?
You want to help the proletariat?
Suicide bomb Israel.

Lenin was a mischling and Stalin married a kike.

But they ARE and STILL do it.
We need to try something new.
It's fucking time man.
We need to Crusade against this, or we will not exist.

Lefties got balls to go out and fight. They fuck it up and Im not always proudest of antifags, but they do something.
They go out and protest when Shlomo ties the noose and gives shitty work environment.
Right wing cucks like you would just say " heh get better educayshun buddy".
I bet you'd cry on Jow Forums about fucking joo managers and CEOs if you ended in sweatshop.
Surely your right wing snob buddies would agree with you.
And do nothing.
Impotent cucks.
Leftists fought for your parents right to have 8hour workweek.
Else you'd be working 12 hours a day, 6 days a week

Communism is Judaism.

So why aren't you following your leader, Cucktler?

And how could I fucking forget Marx and Engels

The only thing they do agree on is their hatred of the spook they call "Capitalism". Theirs is a religion of resentment towards anyone who has "more" than they do, despite most of them being very well off and comfortable.

Attached: 1520504959610-pol.jpg (640x791, 30K)

Damn that
>not real communism
Maybe one day, huh?

Put a clear warning at the front of the book.
This is a work of fiction and can not actually work, these books have not been destroyed to show you that Communism is a failed system.

I am sorry to hear about your family though

You imbecile just go to leddits r communism or socialism or lsc.

THEY HATE ISRAEL TO THE CORE.
EVERY 5TH POST IS ABOUT ISRAELS MISTREATMENT OF MIDDLE EAST.

FUCKING HELL.

HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO WRITE

LIBERALS=/= LEFTIES

LIBERALS= HILLARY AND COMPANY OF USA AND THEIR PUPPETS OF ISRAEL.

YOU FUCKING KEKS REEEEE

Where are you living at? Are you preparing for the invasion on the 14th?

you don't have to be a corporate shill, thats a choice

No.
The Labour Party sold my "Gifted Status" as an intelligent child/engineer.
After Rover was sold, I had no choice but service.
I ended up jumping out of Hercules with my Remington 700 and Guilie suit in Iraq.
There's your Labour. There's your Kalergi.
It took me 20 years to get back to my level.
I despise everything about you.
Have you been to Cheoung Ek?

Also don't forget, that Stalin did not trust the Jews and killed and imprisoned most in the party. Not a naive man, even if you dislike him.

>So... RWDS when?
Because all that matters is that someone do SOMETHING violent and that will make everything better!

Attached: 1530398617159-pol.jpg (960x960, 83K)

This is coming in parts because it's too large.

I see you have a brain, cool.

The problem here is that exploitation is inherent to hierarchy and by relying a stronger entity to protect you, which you have no practical influence over, you open yourself up to domination.

I'm skeptical of the idea that power corrupts absolutely on the individual level, otherwise people like Cyrus the Great wouldn't have existed, but on a systematic level absolute power is a terrible idea.

Now, the next thought would be, "but don't modern liberal democracies have checks and balances to prevent abuse? Moreover, aren't they set up in way that makes them somewhat accountable to their constituents?"

Yes, liberal democracies--talking classical liberalism here--do have checks and balances. But, if we break that statement down a bit it translates into, "I rely on the state to protect me from the state." When put that way it sounds naive, no matter how compartmentalized the state is, no matter how many oversight committees are internally established within the state, the state is still the ultimate decider. In order to prevent systematic abuses, the state must be accountable to an external force, which leads into the next question.

Accountability under democracy ideally is setup so that the people who make up the democracy are the ones who wield influence over it. And to be fair, this works really well, democratically run corporations like Mondragon are an example of that. The problem is that we usually call "liberal democracy" isn't really democratic in nature.

Cheap meme.
Hitler was part of the Kalergi Plan.
He was one of them.
If he were around for The EU, after Kalergi, he would have won the second Charlemagne Prize.

> Part 2

Liberal democracies could become true democracies by instituting a slew of techniques, bottom up organizations, horizontal organizations, recall elections, referendums that can be called by popular vote not parliamentary approval, banning lobbyists, instituting mandatory sousveillance, forcing all public officials to be wholly transparent in all financial dealings, making all governance transparent--no secret meetings--and most of all banning lobbying. But they don't, why?

They don't because the external force regulating the state in the modern liberal democracy is not the democratic citizen and his diverse interests. (Diverse as in 100 million different people are going to have a large set of different and sometimes conflicting interests, not diverse as in cultural diversity, don't get triggard and sperg out because I said the word.)

Instead, the state is regulated by the interest of capital, or in other words the interests of money seeking to make more money, profit. All business are enslaved to this interest, they must be lest they fail and go under. The problem is that profit doesn't give a shit about morals, culture, art, science or anything else that actually matters in life. And since the state is subservient to profit that means you are subservient to profit since the state can and will dominate you.

So maybe we rephrase what I said earlier. Instead of, "Because if so I should skull fuck you and take your wallet."

let's change that to, because if so the state should skull fuck you and take your wallet.

And yes, when I talk about the state in the abstract I am referring to authoritarian states. When I say democracy I mean the interests of the people working for the people.

Your neglecting to mention that Stalin murdered her too.

> suicide bomb israel

Heres a Japanese communist that kidnapped French diplomats, bombed Israeli airports and fought 30 years in Middle East against Israel.

This must be a jewish puppet. Surely gubberments will show this on media.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusako_Shigenobu

Fucking faggots.

Sure, tell them to Venezuela, and how they hijacked the companies to make them of the state.

They sure got hijacked there!! KEK

sage

George Orwell warned us.
Aldous Huxley gave us the polar.
We ended with both.
And the Reserve just so happens to be our only fall back.
Do not doubt for a second the vile nature of Communism.
Pure Communism was Year Zero in Cambodia. The bones are still there.

Came here to post this

Attached: Lots of thinking.jpg (1280x960, 384K)

Always somebody else's fault, isn't it?
Nothing at all to do with the inherit controlling nature of communism, or how rife it is for corruption and exploitation

> labour party
> not liberal tools of the aristocrats

Everytime.
You equate neoliberal globalist tools to lefties.
It's like equating natsocs to neonazi skinheads.

What do you think about Yuri Bezmenov?

>Also none of countries were Communist by definition as that requires banning of ALL CURRENCY
Like in Cambodia? That went well.

Have you been to Cambodia?
What do you think about Yuri bezmenov?

>I am an academic
Larping too hard there

Those same capitalists sent Lenin on a train to Russia, those same capitalists sent Trotsky from New York with a lot of gold, Perhaps Communism was controlled opposition from the start? Note that all Communist govts switched to state capitalism not long after their introduction while only retaining the Marxist ideology for cultural/social control.

So if I deny does that mean I can glow....

Amen.
Glad to see some kin here.
Fucking retards. Middle class coastal fucks.

Communism and capitalism both rely on class antagonisms to survive

Test me.

Tbh Im not sure if he is paid by cianiggers or true.

You call them joos, we tankies call them capitalists. Its evident theres propaganda and bread and circuses all around to distract the masses for easier exploitqtion.

Note that I am not anti ethnicity/anti patriotic. I think preserving culture is important even in context of a communist worker. Turning everything to mish mash is absurdity.

> tfw both pol and leftypol call me a shill
> leddit hates me for using slurs

Not your parents paid for academia.
I am from hard STEM.

If the state skullfucks you and takes your wallet, there is nothing you can do about it. I'm not saying it's morally right, but there's nothing you can do about it. Now on your next step I'm sure you'll say that since it has nothing to do with morality then my initial argument of communism not working because it's fragile is void. That is not the case. An individual is not morally bound to protect himself from the superior entity. The system that he lives under is. If that system is so weak that it constantly leads to the death of its citizens, it is morally and actually justifiable that that system does not exist. And once again, all this is rhetorical since capitalism was never the be all downfall of Communism.

Every time.

Attached: sharememe6236432986.jpg (480x360, 52K)

>transfer all property rights and material wealth to the politburo
>abolish currency along with property rights for proletarians so they cannot challenge the political upper class
This is all communism is it just redefines and further centralizes class contradiction and the control of one class over another

Daily reminder

youtube.com/watch?v=6B5jMXZ4PvY&t=541s

Attached: 908879fyLiAM.jpg (934x601, 82K)

Maybe you are not a communist and have not seen the world? Even after the horror stories of my Polish grandparents that raised me, I believed it was a true path.
Then I travelled the world.
When you trip on femur's in a random field, thats communism.
Year Zero was the purist form ever applied.
Visit Cambodia. For us, and life.
You already share half our values.

No go see it for yourself, not travelling with backpackers. Stay with locals.
Hear the story.

Fuck off, poorfag.

You want equality?
Put a gun in everyones hand.

Sure you are. I am from arid Mars myself

Communism: Loyal party Beaurocrats become the Aristocracy, a ruling elite of concentrated wealth and power who micromanage the lives of the lower class, keeping them impoverished and starving to prevent another revolution.

Attached: IMG_20170419_112449.jpg (1080x1920, 349K)

Wrong, thats Stalinism, aka Tankies.

I said test me.
Your semi verbose notion of a desert does not create an addition to my lexicon.

What Communist leader got it right?

The first, best and only real solution.

Attached: 1522799322191-pol.jpg (543x630, 114K)

/nailed it

It's extreme capitalism. Crony capitalism.

Attached: 1513549367466.jpg (428x604, 29K)

You might have to adopt me to plink blue helmets if they come. Because I will watch your six brother.

communism isnt relevant, it failed more than the USA invasion of iraq. it is simply too easily corrupted. stalin is the example of why. he wasnt meant to be in power but since he held to right position and knew the right dudes he came to power (if trotsky isnt much better, that insane nationalist). i inwoke the words of vladimir putin to describe communism "its a dangerous fairytale".

Im not sure what I am.
I was natsoc and got no answers, only called subhuman for being slav.
My country wqs communistic and I compared some basics and while there was no luxury from communist corrupt cucks, basics were there.
U had a job, u had education, u could study anythimg u wanted how long u wanted, u had decent healthcare and wages adjusted to inflation were 2.5 higher than now.
They also took my families land, houses etc. Nobody got killed.
And desu id trade that for a functional civilized state with low crime and normal people not enamored with bling and wealth status.

Still experimenting with ideologies. I just hate when pol doesnt even use brain cells to examine what the opinion is thinking.

Jow Forumscommunism has more in common with Jow Forums than The_Donald does.
And they are scattered into million pieces so they will fail.

Replace "rifle" with "butter knife" and this post will become visible in your country Nigel. God save the queen!

Attached: george.jpg (800x419, 52K)

Communists agree with everyone being armed so they can overturn the oppressive overlords.
Even Marx said that for Gods sake.