Is this actually plausible?

Is this actually plausible?

Attached: 6zCzL4GYVU4wzM-RO5EvaOQqUVEubgCFbpncDVROkak.jpg (640x748, 80K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=UoDd8Fm-FiI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_Crater
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Doesn't the US still own the Panama Canal though?

no

No, Panama has control over it but the us military patrols and safeguards it. If Panama becomes compromised the treaty allows for the us to take the Canal Zone back.

Obviously not. But annexing mesoamerica all the way to the panama canal would be cheaper than the wall, lulz. You can even deport the spics afterwards, just for shits and giggles.

Attached: 1475795684710.gif (300x249, 124K)

nah, after the 80's it was a waste of time

Mountains.

Hopefully we build one on our border too to keep those morons out

Ahh, the leaf... The Planet's copycat.

Good. That means no more terrorists can come into our country through Cuckanda

its called rio bravo but you fucker started building dams

and it made it easier to cross :^)

Not even close to possible.

What if we used nukes?

a canal of that size isn't physically possible

Thats what they said about the Panama canal :^)

Your mother's anus says otherwise.

No, the faggot mr peanut gave it away, never mind how many of our people died to build it.

What fucking crack are you smoking thinking that? The wall is a one time fixed cost of $25B at the worst with minimal repairs/maintenance. Your idea requires massive infrastructure and welfare spending on what's essentially a 3rd world country on top of needing massive police and military action to rid the country of drugs and gangs. Not to mention you would still have a major southern border problem.

as plausible as this useless wall

just institute a shoot on sight order at the borderwalls america has now
>why build an expensive wall when you can build a wall of guns

panama canal (and your "trump canal") will become increasingly unimportant as the ice of the arctic melts which opens up a way shorter trade route from asia to europe.
guess what country is ready for conquering the arctic? russia

I love this
Jow Forums should just do it
And so we will

Very clever I like it let's do that.

Attached: 0036036855551266_b.jpg (683x987, 83K)

As long as we flood out California while we're at it.

>useless
they put up walls in yuma az and illegals went down by 98%

>useless
Ask the Israelis how useless a wall is

Idiot, once the Arctic melts we will come together to face off against Satan & the tunnel Nazis.

Is there an option to join the tunnel nazis?

Satan loves Donald Trump and tunnel Nazis.

why? it would take too much effort to dig? we have robots now.

RIP el paso

Build the Canal !!!!

>2023: The United States completes the Trump Freedom Canal
>2024: Mexico wins all Olympic swimming events

That's even dumber and less practical than a wall.

Maybe, but it'd be hell of a project given the mountains and hills. San Diego (South Western chunk) is hillier than a dog's knotted cock.

That and we'd have to recreate border crossings and eminent domain a bunch of houses, and possibly annex part of Mexico.

>hillier than a dog's knotted cock.
i dont... understand why you picked that analogy.

You'd need quite a lot
youtube.com/watch?v=UoDd8Fm-FiI

Take over until the Panama canal, its narrow enough that the border control would be much easier. Then build a wall around commiefornia and deport all the spics there, you get rid of drug cartels and the marxist cancer at once. You'd make a better use of your military than bombing goat fuckers for (((them))).

A US counterpart
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_Crater

i mean we'd get rid of a large chunk of our agriculture and biggest trade ports. and then have no one to be modern day slaves picking peppers for 20 pesos an hour. food would skyrocket

Actually i just realized why OP is complete bullshit; a ton of our food trade is from mexico, especially fruits. middle america is a bunch of corn and cows. so we'd get rid of illegal beaners but then food cost to ferry it over and unload again would be insane

It sounds like something a drill sergeant would say

just build a few bridges at the border for trucks. Guarding those would be ezpz.

Tunnel Snakes Vs Tunnel Nazis: CONFIRMED

I'm really not convinced with the liberals idea to maintain a modern version of slavery, just get rid of them and automate everything already.

They were going to blow it up

No.

Attached: download.jpg (474x266, 26K)

It does not

Panama canal cost the Americans 430,000,000$ in 1914. That's 10,600,532,000$ in today's money. The canal stretches over a distance of 51 miles.

The US-Mexico canal would stretch over 1500 miles and would probably cost just a little over 312,000,000,000,000$. And last time I checked the US only has 20,412,000,000,000$, and the budget allocations are much lower than that.
Anyway even if you'd have the money, leftists wouldn't let the president do shit.

>tfw can't afford to build a space ring and establish a permanent settlement for the white people to live peacefully on
Capitalism sucks man, all the money goes exactly where it shouldn't.

Attached: daZfhmTCBd-2.png (300x250, 13K)

Annex mootxico, enslave spics, leftists and homos to dig it by hand. In a hundred years they will think aliens build it like the pyramids.

Of course not. Any ship would take the path of least resistance. Why go through a canal hundreds of miles long when you could just go through Panama?

>what is a tunnel

Looks like an easy route to Canada.

Aren't Saudi Arabia actually doing this to Qatar?

If the U.S. Civil war ended differently, and pushed further south, there could have been potential.

Attached: tehuantepec.jpg (550x393, 41K)

It's a longer trip to go down to Panama, go through the canal, then come back up.

The environmental consequences would probably be huge

And as another user said, going through panama would be significantly easier even if coming from Europe.

the mexican problem is generational, even if we build a wall jews will wait another 50 years and we will go thru all this bullshit again.

We need the canal, it will increase the cost of entry to the US. The dems wont be able to destroy a canal via funding neglect.

we have two choices
1 we either colonize south america and force them into good government

or

2. we totally separate ourselves from Latin america.

Either way this problem will be there long after we are gone for our children to deal with.

The rio grande takes up half the border and it doesn't stop anyone. What makes you think creating a canal would?
Also, you'd have to avoid intersecting it with the rio grand.

we need a sea of texas, total separation from mexico

Texas is only half the border

>hey Mexico, would you be interested in a canal that brings prosperity to your border towns?

>chip in 30% and we'll make a deal

Attached: 1535238819661.gif (499x499, 3.02M)

user you can't compare 1914 technology to 2018, I would be impressed if the president were to spitball the idea and ask for quotes. You never know, it may only be half a trillion by now. (probably using lots of explosives for earth moving still)

>no dick
What's the point?

It would be easier to just colonize Mars you retard

Even if you put locks on the Rio Grande, to the west of it is all desert and mountains.

What good is a wall anyway? New Zealand has an amazing wall but their commie government actually PAYS to import gibsmonkeys, PAYS to build them public housing despite the Chinese blowing a housing bubble so the natives can't afford a house, and then the government PAYS the gibsmonkeys to breed.

In the long run, escape to space is the only option. I'd like to see the pedo kikes try this rapefugee shit in the fucking asteroid belt.

Underrated

>Remove taco up to southern border in pic.
>Use money for original wall to make canal and now smaller wall.

Attached: United_States_Polk_2.jpg (964x740, 56K)