Who would you give it to Jow Forums?

BASADO

read you midget brained pleebs

this is totally politics

Assuming B is telling the truth; B is the only correct choice.

I don't even get how you could possibly answer anything else than B to this question unless B is working for A or something.
If the person who does the labour doesn't benefit from it what's the fucking incentive to work anyway?

Why the fuck do I have the flute in the first place? Child B made the fucking thing, it's theirs to do with as they please.

What kind of Big Government brainwashing is this?

>Yes yes child, you made the flute, but now it is the property of the GOVERNMENT and we get to decide who deserves it.

Violent force is the REAL question being asked my man

B should get it. Child C gets skinned and made into a drum so that A has an instrument to play with.

finally!

they are asking you a question and it FRAMES your position into collectivism
its exactly what they want you to think.
They don't want you to ask the hard question....

I can't give the flute to B, as the flute already belongs to B.

yes B
should get to do what he/she wants with it.
But who the fuck are YOU to decide that is
the real question.

THE COMMUNISTS MUST BE PURGED

BY BLADE AND BULLET

That's not the intention behind this picture. It's easy to tell that you're an ancap just by looking at your autism

Unless B is being paid to make the flute with the notion it will be given to someone else, give it to B. If it was necessary to, give it to A to accomplish something. There is no reason to give it to child C.

does it matter at all user?

Nigger detected. Thread autohidden.

Traditionally, A gets the flute unless C's latent powers are simply unrecognized.
(((B))) is the false flag anti-trad liberalism answer for women and faggots.

NOP
thats where you are wrong kiddo
I'm a natsoc

Absolutely KEKED
gg muhmed

No. He's right. You can logically answer, keep the flute as it is my responsibility to allocate from each according to their abilities to each according to their need.

It's subversive commie propaganda.

why do I have it and how did i get it?

The Rimworld response would be:

Have child a make art to sell.
Have child b make hats.
Harvest the organs of child c and then butcher it so that child b can make hats.

Attached: survival of the fittest.png (720x720, 741K)

>giving away things for free
do fuck off. I'd probably keep the flute anyway. fuck the kids. but here's a logical assessment of the situation:
if child B made the flute and now I have it, that suggests I've already bought the flute from her, mainly because I wouldn't steal a fucking flute. so child B can probably buy some ice cream or whatever. child B will then learn the concept of being rewarded for a good job.
if child A wants to play the flute, I'd tell her to do some chore for me and then I would give it to her, to make her understand the concept of working to get something you want, just as child B did by making the flute. so child A learns the lesson of working hard for a good reward.
if child C wants the flute I'd tell him what he's doing is immoral and he should stop playing the victim card because he'll be universally seen as a dirty beggar that doesn't want to work. I'd tell him he can also do some chore in exchange for the flute, but if he does do that he's a complete dumbass because he has no use for the damn thing. child C learns to assess what a good reward really is, and to only do work that is beneficial in some way.
all three children can therefore learn their mlp style lesson and leave me the fuck alone.
>inb4 you missed the point
I don't give a shit about your false analogies. shove the flute up your ass.

>B literally made the flute and provided materials for it therefore B doesn't deserve it
Are you that fucking autistic

I wouldn't give it to anyone. It's B's flute to give to whom she wants or to keep.

Flute goes to A
she can show her gratitude to B by fucking her with the flute

Under no circumstance whatsoever should it be given to C, the nigger

Child C is the poorest. Therefore child A must have some quantity of money greater than child C

This image is a stupid trap, every answer gets twisted into "SEE YOU ACTUALLY SUPPORT SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM"

B paid the material costs to create the flute - that is, B fronted the capital. Even if B had only provided the materials and someone else had provided the labor, for free or in exchange for goods-in-kind, the flute belongs to B until B transfers rights to it.

Lurk for at least two years before posting

We will draw the two white children with squinty eyes and big smiles, and the brown child will have big round eyes and actual lips on its mouth. Totally accidental.

In my state, everyone who wants a flute gets one.

Attached: BIGKEK.jpg (473x473, 37K)

It is not stated that that amount is what the flute is worth, nor is it stated how much greater the amount is.

Child A and C have equal rights to the flute. B can make a new one.

kek
nice ID

It's my flute. I am bigger, stronger and more intelligent. Using my superior qualities I forcefully conscript them each into assembling more flutes and if their labor is of quality they might see enough to cover cost of their energy of input.

That state is a mental one and it's called insanity

Child C has no rights to anything.
MUH GIBS are not a valid reason to take something from someone who spend time and resources building it.

Answer A if you are a normal logical thinking human being and answer B if you are a communist

>fuck
>kill
>adopt, hormone therapy, plastic surgery, marry, fuck, kill

"There is no floote." - The Matricks

B is the polar opposite of communism, what in the name of fuck are you even saying?

>Taking the flute away from Child B when she made it and provided the materials for it

I don't understand what kind of monster would do this

Why can't Child B rent the flute out to Child A in exchange for playing it for her.
Depending on negotiation, Child B can ask for specific songs, or that she be invited to any flute playing sessions,, even training on how to play herself, if he's not too busy making another.

That way, both children can receive what they want most.

Child C can go make his own goddamn instruments and sell those or get fucked.

>What happens with C if you give it to A or B?

C's life is exactly the same as if B had never made the flute. C existing does not entitle him to B's work. Just because B made something, so it now exists, does not mean C has a right to it. B bought the materials to make the flute. B took the time to learn how to make flutes. B took the effort to actually make it.

If you give the flute to anyone except B, then B will say "Well shit, if I make something it'll just get taken away from me, so I'm not going to bother." and then B doesn't make any more flutes.

If A BUYS the flute from B in a fair and consensual transaction, then B has money to buy more flute materials and make more flutes. C can enjoy listening to A play the flute, while B produces more flutes to sell. The increased supply decreases he cost, making flutes more affordable for people like C.

Basically, if you give the flute to anyone except B, you're a communist faggot.

Also, Child C is a nigger.

i work every day making stuff and get to ke

Its B's property.

I don't understand why I have possession of the flute in the first place. Did I steal it from child B?

Attached: Nozick-1.jpg (376x437, 69K)

>le ebin utilitarianism
you give the flute to child A who can actually use it, maybe force A to teach B and C

The text specifically states that B bought the materials to make the flute herself, and produced it of her own will, aka she's not being employed to make it by someone else.

but your work provides the materials and paid you for the task of making it

>Also, Child C is a nigger
That's the only thing that matters

based and redpilled

Exactly giving it to A or C is theft

B because they she made it.

Don't forget the cannibalism. Or, if your colonists are like 'oooh noooo, not human meaaat.' then you feed it to the animals instead.

They call it being a psychopath, I call it being efficient. Those bandits who attacked me were going to die anyway. It would be wasteful not to make use of them.

Looks like I got a new flute, fuckers.
Might makes right.

Attached: hitler.png (823x449, 338K)

Kill the American goy and couple goyim from Jow Forums for good measure, ban the Chinese girl, give it to the English bird.

B, having spent money on the materials, effort to learn to make flutes, and time to craft it, seeing as all her hard work has resulted in the thing she made being taken from her by force, has decided not to bother making things any more, as they will just get taken away. You are correct, Child A and C do have 'equal' rights to the flute, in that they both have exactly 0 right to it. You are also correct that child B can make a new flute, if they so choose.

Child A must negotiate the price with Child B or gtfo. Child gypC should worry about basic needs or DIE.

How does giving it to B make your statement true?

Obviously B, the rightful owner of the flute.

Who would you give it to Jow Forums?

Attached: 3children.jpg (961x682, 197K)

I think you flipped A and B, mate.

Still B, they can be reasonable at times

It's a trick question.
Give it to the nigger and he will get swindled by the Jew, resulting in the Jew having the shekel.
Give it to the Muslim and he will use the shekel to buy the nigger from the Jew, and once again the Jew ends up with the shekel.
The only solution is to give the shekel to the Jew, wait for the Muslim to kill the Jew, and then take the shekel from the nigger.

child B
giving it to A destroys the world
giving it to C gives A chance to trick a dumb nigger
giving it to B means he'll blow himself up along with the shekel

Break it into 3 pieces. Now they all have a flute that can play like 2 notes and they have to work together to play anything other than the ooga booga rap beats from child C's country.

The fact that child B made the flute and you're deciding who to give it to means we've already stepped into the realm of communism. You took what they made and you're deciding who to give it to, rather than letting them decide who to give it to. This is no different than if you wrote a song and I walked in and said "that's some great artistry, beautiful lyrics, and a great rhythm... but I'm going to decide who profits by performing this and I won't compensate you for your creativity". In a society like that creativity and production in general is stifled, because there's no incentive to create or produce.

Since we've already decided this is a communist society, we must do what will produce maximum economic value. This means giving the flute to child A, who will then use it to produce music (which would otherwise not happen). However as mentioned above, this will remove the incentive to create or produce, and will lead to long-term economic ruin.

The only solution then is to enslave the population and FORCE them to work and produce.

>tl;dr: Put handcuffs on all three children an force them to make more flutes

Attached: gimmedatfofree.jpg (957x1429, 278K)

Kill everyone and tell nobody about the flute.

alexandria ocasio cortez ugly commie bitch would give it to C.

the only correct answer is A

A can play the flute. the flute has a purpose.
B can´t play the flute. the flute has no purpose.
C can´t play the flute. the flute has no purpose.

If i give the flute to B or C, they can do nothing with it, the flute will be stored somewhere and be without value for anyone.
If i give it to A, A can make beautiful music everyone can enjoy and it is more fun for all 3 of them then it would be if a non-fluteplayer just owns it.

If A gets the flute, everyone is a winner.

Confiscate the flute along with child B, take both to a secret government facility where the flute can be deconstructed to learn it's secrets, and the child interrogated and autopsied for the same.
Kill Child A as a collateral witness to the flute.
Feed Child C disinformation so that he creates false flute conspiracy videos online which undermine the publics confidence that the flute ever existed.

Tell them that flutes are for faggots and that they should fight over the piano instead

that was the answer to my post

You French are smart, no wonder Napoleon cucked most of Europe and made other leaders shit themselves at his very presence. i would have never thought of that.

I would patent the flute and lease it to Child B with a 20% royalties clause for all renters. Child B rents it out to Child A, who performs in a concert.

For Child C I would apply for federal funding to construct 1,000,000 new flutes over the course of 10 years, and promise a flute-giving process that encouraged minorities to rent my flutes.

I will construct cancer flutes in China for 1/10 of the cost I told the government, have them shipped over here and distributed while I pocket the difference.

>Establish domestic commerce
>Get rich
>Poison minorities with cancer flutes

What more could you want?

Child A works at Starbucks.

The flute refers to farmlands. They are owned by Boers and A N' C are trying to steal them.

crinfe and fitting ID

Child B made the flute so in order to give it to anybody you would have to take Child B's property. these people have no clue what private property rights are

it isn't yours to be giving it

that´s because the new picture used for that old problem is a way too short text, so you kind of end up assuming you took the flute away from B and now decide who to give it.
I had that one like 10 years ago in philosophy classes.
It´s more like the children beating each other and you are the teacher and stop the fight and try to solve the argument. There were originally way more reasons in the long discription scenario to not hand it out to B, like the material it was made from was actually from some shitty stick C gave her.

B decides

>Its B's property.

Not within the question's universe. It's my property to 'distribute' and all 3 children are whining to me for gibs.

Child A wants me to gib education
Child B wants me to gib labor rights
Child C wants me to gib equality

Such good little commie slaves, if I can forever promise but never deliver I can rule than a good long while.

B made the flute with materials she provided. The flute is already hers, giving it to someone else is theft. The optimal solution is for B to sell her flute to A.

Cool, now that we agree, give me your money. I can use it better for both of us. You have no proof of this beyond written word, but you already accepted similar parameters in the original question.

At least B put women in their place

Attached: 4ed9c2b51323eff1b5c7de6cb19e1566.jpg (1000x1500, 437K)

sure, i do that daily by paying taxes
if you can increase my wellbeing better by using my money than i could by using myself, not giving it to you would be dumb

Love it.

Glad we agree, but I’m also going to have to ask you to stop posting and get back to work. You are now making both our lives worse by wasting time. Thanks for understanding!

>my wellbeing
Why your wellbeing? A isn't improving B's situation by playing the flute.

A definitely. If B didn't get payed for the flute it is either because she gave it away or she is a retard. C is a nigger.

Have child B sell flute to child C so he can rent it to child A at a lower cost than buying. Boom, everybody happy