>Tasks Create memes Spread memes on social media Harass Journalists on Twitter Join up with Friends and form communities Get fit Get a job Don't be a pathetic mockery
how many of you here are actual NatSocs and not just either monarchist/conservative LARPers lusting after kaiser willy (who was a faggot), or AfD optics cucks who cry about those NS hooligans who did that chant in Chemnitz?
all the germans ive seen online do this. germany has the greatest fascist tradition in europe, and the nominally pro-white ones online seem to discard that for kaiserreich/trad faggotry or MUH OPTICS
Shouldn't you be at a free concert in support of refugees that just happens to be sponsored by major global corporations? Now why would those evil mega corporations support you and those open borders you like so much? What? It isn't just Coca Cola giving you free bus rides and soda pops to enjoy while you rebel, it's also Unilever? Wow! Transnational corporations are so good for us!
Libertarianism could have worked if we weren't flooded with low-IQ, gibs-loving, liberty-impaired shitskins flooding in for the last half century. Feelsbadman.
I've watched JF and alt hype, specifically their debates with kraut and the geneticist CV. I have some questions since I keep seeing you pop up.
1. Through quantitative genetics IQ has high estimated heritability. Same with big 5 trait openness. Some weird studies using molecular genetics come up with a much lower amount of genes linked to these things. Is this evidence that twin studies are deeply flawed?
2. With race realism, how do you decide on what set of discrete categories to organize a cline? CV's argument is that, sorting for 10 categories in genetic clustering you get groupings that put parts of Europe with non-white groups. So how do we decide on a number?
3. How do we decide how to biologically group people? If football players have higher rates of lactose intolerance, is that an argument for biologically grouping them? My answer is we group based on kinship, and Fst distance being an inverse kinship coefficient means we can guess that great genetic distances hurt social cohesion.
4. What's the future of race, IQ, etc. in science as molecular genetics develops? Whether it's an NYT op-ed or a study on race on medicine, the use of race seems to be increasing and recent findings on g score, the negative Flynn effect, and stagnated test score gaps means the IQ debate is not at all settled against hereditarians.
Are we seeing a reversal of trends from the 60s-90s in psychology, anthropology, and biology on race and intelligence?
1. I think the weird results here stem from the complexity of the involved genetic interactions. Overall, intelligence is a too complex trait and I'd say the trick is not to look at genes individually but as groups/combinations. If I look at papers on the effects of mutations in a single allele I have often seen wildly divergent phenotypes, especially when it comes to behaviour. But then, if you factor in the interactions with other genes these suddenly make sense again.
2. Yeah, that is really about how you analyze those clusters. I never liked this statistics stuff frankly, prefer to think in migrations of distinct groups, how they mixed and what selective pressures might have shaped them on their divergent evolutionary paths.
3. Yes, I'd prefer that approach too. Phenotypes are often misleading, some are rather 'neutral' stuff from founder effects and many more are rather a result of what pathogens your ancestors were confronted with (immune system is still one of the biggest players in our recent evolution).
4. The future? I'd predict that as soon as population-wide genetic screening becomes a thing (most likely for medical reasons at first) we'll be dealing with a dataset that will show VERY clear patterns. It will even go beyond classical 'race' as it will show the differences even within populations and I'd say these will be mostly determined by from which ancestral group you derive most of your genes. I have certain theories regarding a split between those with and without Neanderthal admixture which only grew stronger during the Neolithic with the split between those that developed the first agriculture and those that transitioned from hunter-gatherer more or less directly to a semi-nomadic pastoralist lifestyle.
I love it when lefties claim that the world politics has been moving ever more to the right since the 80s, yet we've been going so far left that even Marx and Engels would tell us to take it easy
Haha, we had this discussion here more than once. In theory this would be possible but targeting will never be that clear so you would have to accept quite a bit of collateral considering Europe's genetic history.
Aaron Clark
East Germans never internalized democratic political norms. For them democracy is a competition between two totalitarian models... and it's beautiful.
Connor Morgan
i don't understand why CSU/CDU don't get rid of Merkel. no Merkel, no AfD
Leo Butler
The whole establishment invested itself into a bullshit utopian ideology so the whole establishment will defend it to the last.
Easton Brown
Not arrogant just better Nazis... forgot the last word Hans.
Jeremiah Lee
It's very possible if you could have the virus affect melanin-rich people.
Nathaniel Diaz
ist der Typ von der AfD besoffen im ZDF?
Mason Martinez
Kind of. In a perfect world I would be a liberal (a REAL liberal not what the left has perverted it into) ... but I do not live in an ideal world. I see a very narrow path towards a bright future for our species, our manifest destiny. But we are not the generation destined to see this bright future. We are here to sweat and bleed for this vision to come true. This is our duty. Our Daseinsberechtigung. And for this aim we have to do all that is necessary ... however horrible it may appear to us. The alternative can only be extinction.
