Trees could be used to reverse climate change

Trees are the best carbon sequestring method we know. If we only planted 10bn trees a year, in 30yrs we had enough new trees (if we kept the new forrests around and take out the wood) to reverse CO2 levels.

But SJW organizations like Greenpeace actively campaign against reforrestations and turning Africa’s Sahara into a large forrest... because “muh, where would the sand snakes go? Also, muhhhh albedo!

Attached: DDEF5E8F-160E-49E7-8883-50EEB532451A.jpg (1754x1524, 2.63M)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/housing-network/2014/may/21/six-reasons-to-build-on-green-belt
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/18/housing-crisis-solution-build-on-green-belt
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/22/green-belt-housing-crisis-planning-policy
theguardian.com/housing-network/2016/mar/24/boris-johnson-build-green-belt-london-housing
theguardian.com/society/davehillblog/2012/may/18/should-we-build-on-london-green-belt
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

If we legalised weed this would also contribute to this as well. I think it should be a international law to build more parks within cities I’m talking nature reserves which are beautiful and abundant in life we must encourage society to learn to grow plants and trees etc in order to live at harmony with nature so generations in front of us can live. We need to go back to our roots and respect nature.

Honestly your kind of right.
A large number of plants in an area not only clean the air but attract moisture as they bring it up from the ground.

The Sahara, with its aquifer of water only 10m down in some areas, would be easily de-desertified with dedicated effort.

But then again the niggers would ruin it all anyway, I say we work on the desert in Nevada first.

How would legalising weed help?

Like the way he just kind of slipped that in there?

Niggers in Africa are cutting down forests at a massive rate, soon we'll all run out of air to breath.

"Kind of right"? What are you, a libtard? OP's entirely right and surprisingly not a faggot.

Nature already plants it's own trees at a greater rate. Grass lands absorb more CO2 than forests. As CO2 increases plants naturally absorb more of it especially in the tropics. Moreover CO2 has very little effect on atmospheric temperature. There is no point or reason to plant 10 billion trees a year, even if it were possible.

paper industry is sequestering practically this much CO2 every year

OP is wrong.

STOP! being green and fixing things isnt Left compatible. Housing for the workers is what we need!

(Guardian strikes again)

theguardian.com/housing-network/2014/may/21/six-reasons-to-build-on-green-belt

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/18/housing-crisis-solution-build-on-green-belt

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/22/green-belt-housing-crisis-planning-policy

theguardian.com/housing-network/2016/mar/24/boris-johnson-build-green-belt-london-housing

theguardian.com/society/davehillblog/2012/may/18/should-we-build-on-london-green-belt

TAXES! TAXES REGULATION AND SHAME IS THE WAY TO GO!

Can't fix the bogey man or else there's no more bogey man!

There're not, but even if they were, what does it matter?

* they're

Says the guy who thinks CO2 has a statistically negligible effect on atmospheric temperature.

It does. Water vapor has a far greater effect.

cow braps are the real enemy

Sure, but that would actually solve the problem.
The goal was never to solve the problem, it was to tax your breathing air by taxing CO2.

> GUID filename
> 1 post by this ID

theyll get redpilled in the end,their data base has a worm at its heart

Hardly, 200 years ago there were many more bovines around than now, living wild. North America was covered in Buffalo, many more then, than now.

Ah, but 200 years ago there were fewer humans, which is the true objective. Checkmate non-satanists.

>Greenpeace actively campaign against reforrestations
please have a real citation for this so I can make somebody have a meltdown

this is why the island of plastic floating in the Pacific would be a great place to print a new chain of islands then plant whatever. Using the sun to desalinate the water and dredge up the seabed for fertilizer and WHAM carbon issue is solved along with making use of garbage at the same time

>proposing creative solutions
oy vey

I think your brain just fell out. That is a ridiculous idea, totally pointless, and totally unfeasible anyhow.

>turning Africa’s Sahara into a large forest
Well, first you need to get rid of the local 'fauna'

Attached: jejeje.jpg (600x400, 83K)

The leftists don't give a fuck about the climate, it is just another scam to rob working people for the benefit of worthless scumbags.

Makes a person wonder why they (((who ever))) is spraying the skies and blocking out the sun, and poisoning our soil. also Co2 reduction.
Seems they decided to do the one thing that would destroy us all instead of let nature take it's course.

Can I borrow your shoe horn?

Hmmmm .........cryptic.......