The real text of who is really european

Western hunter gatherer were the native population that lived in europe since the begining ten of thousands years ago
Not the farmer and not the aryans this is the real identity of europe free hunter gatherer

Attached: 1536090677815.png (800x581, 61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tFAa7oxWpcNN-OdMMjBdb4NeWKG7EkpKMzZJVW2_MME/edit#gid=1145986956
eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/07/sneak-peek-basal-eurasian-k7.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

This how a pure native european woman look like
This is your eva

Attached: 2226c42e2f1a4f783bd155b1ff9f4e12.jpg (3000x3000, 1.01M)

That's a Neolithic farmer DNA woman

Neolithic farmer-med
Hunter gatherer-Finnic/Baltic blond aryans
Aryan- red hair/blond hair slavo-celtics

No, is magdalenian mesholitic woman , our eva

Attached: 1526565431982.jpg (600x800, 47K)

Attached: 1526565508614.jpg (600x689, 52K)

so saami are the whitest?

Attached: maxresdefault (9).jpg (1920x1080, 250K)

Most Europeans are a mix between all three.

Baltic people samis have a little mongoloid admixture

Attached: 99167045-Estonian-tripletsmain-SPORT_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqZgEkZX3M936N5BQK4Va8RTgjU7QtstFrD21mzXAYo54.j (480x300, 24K)

>Our
If you're French yes, then your DNA is majority Neolithic farmer DNA. But if you're Scandinavian, Dutch or Northern German your DNA is mostly from Yamnaya. Corded ware did not have a lot of Western Hunter gatherer DNA.

Attached: Haak_et_al_Fig_3.png (1084x1132, 151K)

Attached: studio-shot-of-young-estonian-woman-looking-at-camera-DFEN2A.jpg (866x1390, 114K)

Finland and the Baltic used to be Nordic before the N1c Saami invaders came.

Attached: early_middle_neolithic_map.png (720x800, 72K)

Where do you draw the line guys?

Attached: 1482284184056.png (995x1484, 76K)

You know that first farmer is mix of native european and anatolian farmer?
Did you know that yamna has around 20% whg admixture?
It seem you dont , thats why all europeans has so much hunter gatherer admixture
Shut up already

Well modern Brits are Africans so based on your DNA you would be classified as Black not long ago in America.

Attached: Autosomal.png (896x1168, 72K)

Attached: 1535827869455.png (641x550, 312K)

Nice autism

WHITE

>Statistical noise
Fucking hell

That is a Ukrainian.

Kraut, your ancestors were blacks, it is makes you angry?

Attached: 1535925624324.jpg (533x800, 144K)

Cheddar man was a Western Hunter Gatherer, one of the three groups that make up Europeans today. He is genetically related to Europeans, and has no relation to SSA at all.

that Eurogenes test is old and surpassed by his own more recent test, Basal-rick K7
yes Baltics in general have the most WHG but that old test doesn't take into account the WHG already present in anatolia_neolithic and LBK farmers, thus is a poor measure

by f statistics, Basques have nearly as much WHG affinity as Baltics and more than most Scandinavians

Attached: Villabruna_vs_Villabruna_cluster.png (1206x641, 49K)

>kraut
Lmao
Keep your delusional garbage to yourself memeflagging faggot.

>Baltics are real europe
oh yes yes yes yes

Thanks user , is there a pic with% of whg in different populations?

Is not your country gave to the world the greatest artist (Hitler)?

Attached: 1449175874071.jpg (1280x1707, 2.41M)

unfortunately those at Eupedia have not made it into a map yet, but here is the datasheet
I'd make it myself if I knew what kind of software they use
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tFAa7oxWpcNN-OdMMjBdb4NeWKG7EkpKMzZJVW2_MME/edit#gid=1145986956

WHG = Villabruna cluster

And this is why this genetics autism is fucking worthless. These midget gimp blob people is who you people think are the real white people. They look like a tribe of down syndromes.

Thanks

Steppic ancestry:

Responsible for modern day Indo-European language families/derivatives today. Pastoral in natural; brought with them was patrilineal traditions, mastery of dairy farming/lactose persistence mutation, mutations for blue eyes, red hair, blonde hair, etc. Came from the Steppes during the Bronze Age from the East that changed the landscape of Europe in its own right. Brought its own phenotypical strains that are peculiar to populations with high Steppic ancestry such as Nordids and Eastern Mediterraneanids (Pontids, etc.). Best modern day proxies for this ancestries being Eastern Europeans, etc.

Neolithic ancestry:

Responsible for bringing their mastery of agriculture, societal intricacies/developments, sedimentary lifestyles, etc. Known mutations they brought was light skin, dark hair/eyes, etc. For European derived Neolithic ancestry peculiar to Europeans specifically; came from Anatolia that dispersed along land and Maritime routes through Southwestern and Southeastern Europe that spread throughout Europe during the Early and Middle Neolithic. Phenotypical strains peculiar to high Neolithic ancestry being possibly Mediterraneanids (Atlanto-Mediterreans/"Atlanto-Meds"), Alpines, Dinarics, etc. Best proxy being Sardinians , etc.

Hunter Gatherer ancestry:

Akin to being named "Old European/Europe", for good reason, preceding the Neolithic and Bronze Age time periods. As their name suggests, mainly maintaining a hunter-gatherer/scavenging lifestyles and tribalism. Diet consisting of an omnivorous diet between berries/plants and meats. Indigenous to the European continent, eventually adopted agriculture from Neolithic peoples from the early Neolithic onwards. Mutations peculiar to them being, blue eyes, dark hair, swarthy light brownish skin tone (WHG), light skin, eyes and blonde hair (SHG and EHG), etc.) Modern populations with the most preserved HG ancestry being Baltic populations such as Lithuanians, etc.

Attached: 1507589475763.jpg (783x590, 82K)

At the Jews. Below them are all European peoples (with the possible exception of Chuvash, don't know about them) and thus white

no..

Attached: Mothers of Europe.png (801x884, 1.08M)

>Separating Lebanese Christians and Muslims and giving the Muslims more Sub-Saharan....

Yikes

Do you have an actual argument?

in most studies/tests I've seen, christians and muslims in the near east are a lil bit different, which isn't really surprising if they segregated

What does religion have to do with genetics?

How can they be separated by religion and not tribes? What nonsense

what's weird about it? people from different religions often segregate and don't mix, and because of the deep history of early christians in the near east and the rise of islam, again, this is not surprising

It's very weird actually, and they're the only ones separated that way. Anyone can convert to be a Christian.

sure, but normally it doesn't happen, religion is usually passed down within religious groups and conversion, especially in the near east between different abrahamitic religions, is probably a taboo within your group

Yamnaya don't have whg admixture, they are a mix of ehg and chg.

>sedimentary lifestyles
I think you meant sedentary. Otherwise good rundown user. Some sources further break down HGs into Atlantic, Scandinavian, Eastern, and Caucasus. Finally there are the Ancient North Eurasians, who contributed to the Steppe Yamnaya people. The Siberian Mal'ta boy (24kya) is the only known example of the basal YDNA haplogroup R, from before it split into R1b (found throughout western Europe), and R1a (typically baltic, ukraine, russia). The Ancient North Eurasians also contributed genetics to the people who crossed the bering land bridge and became indigenous north americans

Attached: 1475128620161.jpg (500x200, 65K)

Ehg is mixture of ane and whg

Lebanese Christians and Muslims descend from very different tribes. It's not a simple matter of religion, it's also genetics.
If you think Muslims and Christians in Lebanon were mass interbreeding through the ages, then you are a complete moron.

The one thing we do know, from YDNA analysis anyway, (which is admittedly only a small bit compared to autosomal) is that some CHG were haplogroup J, while some WHG were haplogroup I. These share a common ancestor (haplogroup IJ) from which they split over 30,000 years ago. The interesting thing is that IJ is still around: in Iran.

You could make the same "argument" against literally any other peoples. It's pretty obviously someone just added it to mess with them instead of staying neutral.

Of course it's taboo to marry someone from a different religion, but people can obviously just convert at random so it should not really be a category in genetics but the area where these people lived.

Where did you get that spreadsheet anyway?

eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/07/sneak-peek-basal-eurasian-k7.html