By an American Jew in 1928:
> Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot digest, which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlasting ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit to either reject or accept in full.
> In full, of course, you never have accepted our Christian teachings. In your hearts you still are pagans.
Is he right or just a crazy megalomaniac Jew?
Other urls found in this thread:
self bump. are you faggots reading this?
pretty sure christianity was invented by the romans to pacify the jews (joe atwills theory on the flavians), but maybe the jews turned it around on the pagans at some point.
Pacify the Jews? Nigger the Jews used the romans to kill Christ. Fuck are you talking about faggot?
Yes, the Romans wrote in the NT that the Jews killed Christ so people would hate them.
Short version is Jews were resisting Rome and prophesied there would be a militaristic messiah that would save them. Vespasian captured Josephus (elite Jewish general) and brought him into his court, because he flattered him by saying Vespasian was the true messiah for the Jews. Together, the Flavian court, with the Herods, Alexanders, Josephus and the Hebraic literature they had seized, they wrote the New Testament, in the same typological form as the Old Testament, inventing the Jesus character as a pacifist figure for the Jews to worship. Think, “turn the other cheek”, “if a soldier asks you to carry his pack for a mile, carry it for two”, etc. The sacrament was dark satire of the Jews resorting to eating their own children during the siege warfare from the Romans. Tons of other symbolism and dark satire is identified by Joe Atwill in his book. New Testament was propaganda directed at the Jews to make them submit to and secretly worship Caesar as god.
Fishers of men were Romans spearing Jews who were swimming to shore from their capsized ship.
In Gadara, the pigs who ran into the oceans were the Jews who had been surrounded by Roman soldiers and forced off a cliff.
When the “rocks cry out” it was rocks shrieking through the air from Roman catapults.
Lots of other dark humor like this all throughout the New Testament. It maps seemingly spiritual symbolism to literal historical account in Wars of the Jews (also written by Josephus).
Worst is probably the sacrament of drinking blood and eating flash referring to real cannabilism that occurred from supply lines being shut off during seiges.
The master stroke is probably the resurrection scene. When pieced together chronologically in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and read in a literal sense, it plainly reveals a dark humor that the resurrection was a misinterpretation by a hysterical “Mary” (e.g. what Romans called Jewish sluts) and the gardener she speaks with represents Caesar, the true God who “pruned” the line of Lazarus from the tree of life.
Other than Zionism and AIPAC there is no Jewish agenda. It doesn't benefit the Jews to turn everyone into trans communist SJWs or flood the country with Muslims.
I like where this is going
He's not saying Christianity is bad he's saying most Christians don't have the conceptual understanding to follow it accurately.
It's like if you gave someone a book of magic but didn't give them proper knowledge of how to use it.
Resent: thats an interesting word choice.
>our christian teachings. Our.
Thats an interesting word choice almost as if it were written by a racist to be inflamatory. Most likely a forgery to portray jews poorly. I doubt its authenticity
STRIKER CURRENTLY GASSING A KIKE LIVE
youtube.com
The essay author admits ALL of that.
He goes further and says that Jews are even DEEPER in our minds than that... that their control of the Western psyche goes all the way back to the formation of Christianity.
He's absolutely right.
I'm not sure where you're getting that. Follow it accurately how? When it was interspersed with our Pagan beliefs (early Catholic church) things were better. He writes...
> Look back a little and see what has happened. Nineteen hundred years ago you were an innocent, care-free pagan race. You worshipped countless Gods and Goddesses, the spirits of the air, of the running streams and of the woodland. You took unblushing pride in the glory of your naked bodies. You carved images of your gods and of the tantalizing human figure. You delighted in the combats of the field, the arena and the battle-ground. War and slavery were fixed institutions in your systems. Disporting yourselves on the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life and laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy. Yours was a noble, sensual culture, unirked by the prickings of the social conscience or by any sentimental questionings about human equality. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.
> But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.
> Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. Our tribal laws have furnished the basic groundwork of all your august constitutions and legal systems. Our legends and our folk-tales are the sacred lore which you croon to your infants. Our poets have filled your hymnals and your prayer-books. Our national history has become an indispensable part of the learning of your pastors and priests and scholars. Our Kings, our statesmen, our prophets, our warriors are your heroes. Our ancient little country is your Holy Land. Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people thought and taught has become inextricable woven into your very speech and tradition, until no one among you can be called educated who is not familiar with our racial heritage.
> Jewish artisans and Jewish fishermen are your teachers and your saints, with countless statues carved in their image and innumerable cathedrals raised to their memories. A Jewish maiden is your ideal of motherhood and womanhood. A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. We have pulled down your idols, cast aside your racial inheritance, and substituted for them our God and our traditions. No conquest in history can even remotely compare with this clean sweep of our conquest over you.
American Jew reporting in, he sounds right so far
Irrefutable. I'm surprised Atwill doesn't get more attention
Core of what I'm getting at in terms of actionable items. Wasn't Hitler right to revive our Aryan / Pagan roots through symbolism?
What has a more profound and inspiring effect on the White man's psyche -- the cross or the swastika?
What religious foundation can we trust for our survival and rebuild our culture?
I'd argue that we really crave a return to Natural Law, which is much closer to Paganism than Christianity.
Preservation of a nation can be justified under Natural Law. It cannot be justified under Christianity.
hes right to the most practical extent, but in effect he is wrong.
When it comes to pagan ways. the Western world is rife with it, and it infects christianity at every level I've ever seen. The immortal soul, the splitting of god and the saints into distinct entities that are digestible, placing significantly more emphasis on hellfire and punishment.
that said, there isn't a religion that exists on this planet that is followed to the letter by anyone so far as I can tell. It's all tribalism. there is no jewish faith that the jews fully accept either.
The simple reality is that christianity goes against human white instinct based solely on the prevalence of aspect and revisions on the principles of its foundation (Judaism).
Some will say this is a good thing and evidence that white Christianity is good while evil Judaism is bad, but they're the same god either way. think about the hatred of circumcison on this board. where did that tradition come from? who demanded that agreement? who began the mutilation of small child's penises? If you are a christian there is only one answer. I don't mean to spit on Christianity. I hope that it will continue along side paganism. But because of the salvation story, there is very much conflict in regards to what should be changed or considered undivinely inspired. You cant seem to get any christians to refine their faith because to them, they would be commiting sin. If that's the case, If god demanding small children get their weewees cut up to appease him is not a crime he has to answer for, well. You are welcome to believe that way. But It's not some kind of jewish trick that other white people would not accept this bullshit lying down.
Yes it's definitely written to be inflammatory. It was used by Nazis as evidence of Jewish domination, but is it made up? My take is he's an overzealous Jew who is basically saying whites don't have the spiritual guts to FULLY call out Jewish influence, because we'd have to strip away the institutions that give us so much comfort (e.g. just believe in this one weird trick God did coming back from the dead and you'll have everlasting life).
Wikipedia says he's a Jew who was a biographer of the Rothschild family.
The magazine, The Century, was originally an American nationalist magazine started in the late 1800s not long after the Civil War. Around the time this article was published, it was taken over by Isaac Rice, a Jew... then shortly after the magazine was shut down.
So what it seems like is that this magazine was originally a strong voice for American nationalism. The Jews noticed this, and hatch some plot to take over the magazine. They publish this article as a huge FUCK YOU to American nationalism, then they shut it down.
Yes... I agree with a lot of what you're saying.
But what the fuck do we DO with Christianity?
There are some good morals taught... the golden rule, sacrifice -- but these morals are only good when applied in the context of a nation, NOT universally. You can't apply the golden rule to an 75 IQ nigger who rapes babies, nor a 150 IQ Jew who rapes babies.
I do think a chink in the armor is circumcision. If we can legislate to ban this, then the Jews will become less "clannish" and therefore weakened. It will also expose Christians to the JQ, and force them to introspect why the fuck they were mutilating their children.
>150 iq
>modern jews
kek
Ultimately though I disagree with what you're saying. Circumcision is a chink in the armor? not at all. it is a strength because christians DONT WANT TO BE TOLD THEY ARE WRONG ABOUT ANYTHING!
much of humanity is like this but understand if a christian fails to believe that would mean they are destined for eternal torment in most of their minds. Almost none of them will ever look at their god and say. "well? what's your explination for doing something so fucking evil?" Indeed what is the point of christianity if their god is not perfect? Its something I'll have to talk about to my religious friend when we're on more stable footing, but it's certainly something that I think will have very little headway
thankfully, what these kikes are doing with circumcision is beyond what happens because of christfag neglect. Its practically pornographic and cannibalistic. Theres plenty of room to redpill normies. just be 14, go to any school. and spread leaflets of images of kikes sucking on the cock of small children everywhere.
Jesus, Peter, and Paul all opposed circumcision in the New Testament.
Galations 5:2
> Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.
The New Testament explicitly says don't circumcise multiple times. Christians don't have to admit God was wrong to believe that. They just have to realize they've been tricked by Jews into following the old covenant instead of the new covenant.
>circumcision bad
>circumcision was good though yes?
>w-welll
what do you mean tricked into following the old covenant. it was gods covenant was it not? it was his holy word was it not? was everyone who followed such a covenant not morally justified in obeying gods word to mutilate small children?