Well

He does. He does have a fucking point.

Yeah, it is a problem. It's a problem that the corporation she works for pays her such a shit wage that she has to use food stamps, essentially making the taxpayers subsidize the company.

All 8 of those people are Democrats and supported by Democrats.

Sour Grapes

Attached: 1301930654480.jpg (784x680, 75K)

Jow Forums is so edgy yet half you faggots here were raised by a struggling single mother

keep shilling for your kike overlords though - old money

if one hunter had 500 buffalo and everyone else fought over squirrels and rabbits, what would happen to that one dude?

Why can't poorfags understand that equity in a company does not equal liquid cash? If Amazon went tits up tomorrow, Bezos would lose 98% of his fortune

>The billions of poor shitskins scattered all over the world is somehow a responsibility of the richest people in white countries

spbp
slide threads.. slide threads everywhere

what if they took those 8 guys and there money and just burned it all in a fire...
wouldn't that help to fight inflation?

>he thinks the dollars value has anything to do with the amount of paper in the world

Ahajahahhajahhahahaahah*breaths in* AHAHAHAHAHAHHHAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHHAHAHAHAHA nah that's not how it works man sorry

Governments set the minimum wage. But if you want the min wage to be set at a level where mom doesn't need food stamps to buy groceries, then the members of the government should get paid minimum wage, no more.

>The only way a fair and equal society can be ensured is to pay everyone the same no matter their job
Great idea, chap! By the way, my job will be professional napper.
You'll voluntarily take care of hard/dirty jobs like working at oil rigs, timber industry, mortician or being a prison guard, right?

Retard plebs think stocks are the same as cash in the bank.
Bezos is worth a lot, but it's all locked up in stock he can never sell, or he instantly loses control of his company.

Yeah the mom is taking taxpayers money, not the 8 wealthies

I am willing to bet the average neet in america has more wealth than 2 billion people simply because a lot of people on this earth don't have a cent to their name.

i didn't know. that's why I was asking. I figured an expert like you would be here

What if...
What if both are a problem.

Neither are the problem, the mechanisms of credit generation are the problem.

He actually does have a point.
Kill the banker.

My job is take care of old junk in a junk heap. I don't really guard it or maintain it but its their and you guys will have to pay me equal pay for it.

Such a shame that someone with ID: KKK will "1 post by this ID" this thread.
Sage

I somehow feel like this is a false dichotomy.

Did the mom even tried to get a job or does she just goes around looting when one of the brothers gets shot by the cops for definitely not pulling a gun?

And WHO exactly sets these wages and makes sure no one is skimming? How do you know they're not getting more money? Who watches the watchmen?

Of that 4 billion, at least 3.5 billion have a NEGATIVE net worth. So if you're debt-free and you find a dime under your sofa cushions, you are wealthier than half the world. Congratulations, welcome to the ranks of the evil rich.

scarcity creates wealth, if Billionaires payed their employees more you'd see prices drop. IF we stopped food stamp programs entirely you'd see prices drop.

the bigger issue is monoplies, we need to stop monoplies and we need to stop the government from printing money willy nilly. we need to go back to the gold standard.

Your stereotyping is disgusting.

Are you going to reply to everyone who asked a legit question in this thread, such as
or are you just gonna make cuck replies to cherrypicked posts?

Whats the point? Jews are evil? Everyone already knows that. That there are 4 billion people in this world that are too stupid to even feed themselves while ubermensch are uber successful? WHAT IS THE POINT?

so go protest at their houses, faggot
if you can get past their walls and armed guards

And yet that 2% is probably more than the combined wealth of 98% of the people on this board, fuck, on Jow Forums, will ever collectively have ever been worth over their entire lives.

Point about what? Should we take their money and give it to her? Should we punish them for being rich, because fuck me how dare they? MAKE A FUCKING POINT YOU ASSHOLE.

>only one thing/group is the problem

Yes. He does have a point, the mom buying groceries with food stamps is the problem.

He was trying to be sarcastic but he actually just described the truth perfectly.

Attached: C6wsgKcV4AE3HpD.jpg (596x424, 37K)

If you blame the rich for the state of the poor, you take away the value of the poor by preventing them from working. Single moms with food stamps lose their food stamps if they make even a little bit more money, which is why they don't marry or get better jobs.

Did he just find Amazon in his cereals one day?
He built an empire and I think for that he deserves it. You eat tendies and shit your pants, so you are worth nothing.

Which is not their fault you faggot, but the glorification of single-motherhood and the sexual emancipation of women. Pol is aware of this and opposes it, so I dont understand your argument

Eh, least you are honest in your opinions. I'll give you that. My main consolation is you are the sort of person who thinks like that, which is surely suffering enough.

first world is richer than 98% of the rest of the world. these people are retarded

Most of these 4 billion people have zero net worth. I'm probably worth at least a billion or two of these people.

Or get rid of foodstamps, so corporations have to pay their employees living wages.
Also stop having kids out of wedlock, that also helps with finances, furthermore you're not a nigga. Now that I think about it, maybe you are.

False dichotomy
They are both problems

So, jealousy is this issue?

Entitlements are literally the reason we are in debt

We're all taxed by inflation. Maybe we should try changing the kike monetary system instead of pinning all of the blame on CEO's.

Attached: 6aac921068543e698e34f1082a771f32c59f7668517643da762d1be233b450fd.png (254x254, 140K)

Yes he does.

Attached: 251cbbfafe695ce914826a47a7686ab1e843c7b676deb517bf0afa593546cc64.jpg (640x799, 57K)

Stop this anti-Semitism.

The billionaires don't encourage people to treat jobless poverty as an acceptable life style choice

What point?
Is there a finite amount of wealth?
Once the rich fucks get x amount does no one else get any ever again?
How fucking stupid do you have to be to think literal NUMBERS are finite?

The mom on food stamps IS the problem.

Attached: coalburner-pig-spawn-with-nappy-hair.jpg (534x712, 58K)

If that's the measure, a whole lot of first-world people have negative net worth, like double-digit percentages.
t. used to be a financial analyst as a short gig.

You're right. That bitch is a burden.

Treating money as something that should be infinite and not limited is how inflation happens and kills countries

>Having money makes you a problem
>Siphoning money makes you the victim
Kys OP

he's right the mom buying food with food stamps is the problem. if your situation is not economically viable then you shouldn't procreate. but if forget that everyone thinks theyre entitled to have children even if they drain society to do so

These fucking 4 people employ over 30milion people all around the world you commie cuxk

There are more successful and less succesfull people in this world. What is your point?

hmm

>the mere existence of rich people are enough justification for many poor who choose to never do an honest day’s work, it totally makes sense, checkmate, bigots!

Attached: 3ACBD11D-24FB-4AA7-BA07-1DD24CF78F1E.jpg (600x400, 40K)

I don't have an issue with people being more successful. The hoarding money is the problem. They should have to buy gold or somthing at a certain point to keep money in circulation

> race to the bottom
Why would I spend years at uni, learn my trade, take any risk, accept any overtime, care about the result, or try any harder than anyone else, if there's no reward for doing so?

Nothing if he had an army protecting him

>pssst it is infinite, because we dont have to use cash anymore.
Its all fiat now. If it werent there would be LESS inflation and LESS of a gap between rich and poor.
Why tf do you think the kikes push for usuary and fiat so hard?
Its not even about the money, its about the power. Without fiat the 1% would still be generally on the same level as everyone else, same risks. But since made up money exists they can literally have so much "money" they can buy power in many forms. Under a resourced based economy, this would not be possible.
Its not about the money, its about the power.

But they are not hoarding actual money. Net worth is usually mostly real estate, vehicle, stocks, company shares etc.

Burgers will defend this.

We don't live in ghettos ya dingus

Though if you said most of us grew up with divorce then that's more accurate

You a democrat?

socialnewsdaily.com/74225/vote-for-scott-wallace-because-its-awesome-when-politicians-start-talking-about-population-control/

foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/20/top-dem-candidate-gave-millions-to-groups-advocating-for-taxing-families-to-hilt-for-irresponsible-breeding.html

lifesitenews.com/news/democrat-candidate-contributed-millions-to-population-groups-against-irresp

np4sd.org/about/herman-daly/

>X is bad, so dont worry about Y

Attached: 1531950662236.jpg (470x439, 23K)

That's not an issue. Having excessive liquid assets is.

Huh well would you look at that...

Attached: 45ae304a47ad93ea66e253f72fa0350c22ae9d6eb359f0e45483533b13be9e6c.png (1168x4386, 1.25M)

The nigger with nine kids by seven baby daddies is the problem, not “the mom.” No one is against the social safety nets the country has implemented. People are against freeloading pieces of shit who hate the very people and system that allow them to survive.

so you redistribute the wealth. do you have any idea what that would do to the economy? it was completely flip it. hyper inflation would likely follow and after the dust settled you'd be right back where you started.

^
This

>leftists still don't understand how net worth works

yes, and those 8 guys are probably globalist shills funding all sorts of libtard initiatives. Wanna bet?

as always:

problem assessment right
solutions none
solutions terrible

just whining about the obvious

I dont like rich fucks either, they could do more for the less fortunate if they wanted, basically makes them all selfish dicks in my book, but how is a rich fuck having a shit ton of money utterly stop someone else from becoming prosperous?
How is it a "problem" that they have a lot?

Everyone knows that only normie cucks marry thesedays.
You should have children.
But only a dumbfuck normie thinks a wedding will buy him exclusive rights to some thot's well-weathered pussy.

a mother with her child.

>this triggers pol

Do you have children user?

>Excessive liquid assets
What measure do you have that would classify it as excessive? What constitutes hoarding fiat money when it has no real value than what some kike banker says it has? What grounds could you actually pass to control what people do with their money? You're a commie fuck with feelings-based ideals, forced equality drops efficiency, always will. Being a jealous whiny shit that is god awful with money isn't going to support any particular case. Unless you can quantify what you're asking for, you're doing nothing more than presenting normi(e)tive statements

> nobody has ever done something for any reason other than monetary gain
> no great scientists or philosophers were from wealthy families, allowing them to work on improving our society without having to worry about money
Sure is enlightened in here

There is no tax worse than profiteering.
And in that regard corporate America has an open season license on all you gullible goyim.
Profit is unearned money, by definition.
And whose money exactly?
Your money goy! Lol
CEOs and directors would like to thank you for ur fundraising.
And special mention must go to your actual tax dollars which subsidize corporate America also.
Capitalism is parasitic by design.
Burgers will defend this.

Scientists gained self-gratification through discoveries in which humanity was an otherwise unintended-beneficiary. They are by no means philanthropic/humanitarian in their practices, it's just a side-effect

>Profit is unearned money, by definition
Where you retarded emu? By definition, it's an advantage or financial gain, the literal difference between earned and spent. You're confusing political ideology with economical, here's your (you)

Eat shit you commie faggot. Enjoy your dirt sandwich for dinner tonight.

I wholeheartedly agree that they weren't philanthropists and their achievements were fuelled by self-gratification.

My point is that there are clearly reasons outside of money that someone would go to uni, learn a trade etc etc

>Someone did something for personal satisfaction in the past
>Therefore, the whole fabric of society will be willing to do dangerous/dirty/monotonous work, while receiving the same pay as the guy that sits on his ass all day doing nothing
Genius!

4chinners are too ugly to have children. That's why they fap ro Lolicon.

>Muh superior Aryan genetics.