"Enemy combatants receive equal rights under the Constitution?!"
>"Yes."
"Illegal aliens have Constitutional rights?!"
>"Yes."
Well this is depressing.
"Enemy combatants receive equal rights under the Constitution?!"
>"Yes."
"Illegal aliens have Constitutional rights?!"
>"Yes."
Well this is depressing.
>"Enemy combatants receive equal rights under the Constitution?!"
Who asked that question? They know what's coming...
wow its almost like the rule of law doesn't give a shit about your feelings
Why? All you care about is whether he's going to allow Trump to be impeached. Literally nothing else matters to you idiots.
link?
This is why the wall is so important. If they can not get on our land, they are NOT afforded protection under our constitution. They don't get a hearing. They don't get a trial. So on and so forth.
Senator Cornyn did.. and Kavanaugh answered it correctly. Any person on US land is afforded the same protections as everyone else. It's this part of the 14th Amendment:
>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Senator Cornyn
I can't wait until Trump declassifies the Mueller documents and labels traitors as enemy combatants
But that would make brown foreigners sad. Can't have that! Please leave your guns and penis in the bucket on your way out. #BLUEWAVE
>enter illegally
>vote to get more welfare
It's that easy!
>Enemy combatants receive equal rights under the Constitution?!"
So if somehow we get invaded we're fucked.
>enemy combatants have the right to keep and bear arms!
Makes sense when you really think about it.
Nigger you're taking it out of context.
Article 14 applies to states, and prevents them from restricting other Americans of rights within the state.
" All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>implying we wouldn't say "fuck their rights" the minute one of our cities is bombed
Martial law would override this.
He's not giving the full context. An American Citizen can become an enemy combatant. No matter where you're at, Americans are protected from the US government by the constitution. Thus, enemy combatants have rights under the constitution. Non-American enemy combatants have no rights.. as long as they're not on our soil.
>we
Sure, what about the rabid leftists?
This is the thing about Kav, he is a literalist. He just follows the law whatever it happens to be. This can be good or bad depending on what laws you plan to propose or implement.
>Americans are protected from the US government by the constitution.
LOL, ask the sandnigger obama droned.
We tore up 2 entire countries for 2 skyscrapers. The think Americans care about other countries rights. Lol
The Supreme Court has said you're full of shit numerous times. Here's one quick example that comes to mind: Plyler v Doe. Let me know if you need more.
This. As much as I oppose it, this was the purpose of placing a prison at Guantanamo Bay - it is not on US soil and prisoners there are not afforded constitutional rights.
If he said this, then why is everyone kvetching that Kavanaugh is this week's Annuda Shoah?
that's just what he has to say publicly
Anyone who fights for the rights of an invading enemy deserves the same treatment as those enemies
>why is everyone kvetching
The jew cries in pain as he strikes you.
Go back to twitter nigger
"Enemy combatants receive equal rights under the Constitution?!"
>"Yes."
"Are you gonna say shit if you find out we tortured people?
"No"
FTFY
>thinks the SC allows/blocks impeachment
>(((Their))) Supreme Court
ftfy
The one whose family sued the US government and won?
Nope, this one:
They sought an injunction preventing the targeted killing of al-Awlaki, and also sought to require the government to disclose the standards under which US citizens may be "targeted for death". Judge John D. Bates dismissed the lawsuit in an 83-page ruling, holding that the father did not have legal standing to bring the lawsuit, and that his claims were judicially unreviewable under the political question doctrine in as much as he was questioning a decision that the US Constitution committed to the political branches.
Did they file in a court of fed claims as well?
>putting abstractions like "rule of law" above the concerete material reality of what most benefits your race and nation
>saying what needs to be said in order to be confirmed
Also the Constitution is set in stone, blame the WHITE MEN who let birthright citizenship be a thing
WHAT?
HE DIDN'T SAY GAS THE JEWS RACE WAR NOW 1488?
This doesn't mean what you think it means you morons. They have a right to due process, but that due process still includes deporting their asses.
Yup, fucking sucks.
>and a hearing, attorney, etc.
>implying they don't just put 50 illegals in a courtroom and read them some stock legal jargon
mercurynews.com
>Enemy combatant here legally gets legal rights
>Illegal immigrant doesn't get legal rights
Seems fine to me
they have equal protections of law and due process. its still illegal to kill illegal aliens
They have due process rights when on American soil.
That's all he means.
Pretty much all humans on the planet are Americans now though. They just need to step foot in America. (Thanks Jews)
the supreme court is the most zogged out branch of our government, fuck them. Judicial review is bullshit, it's not even in the fucking constitution