Rundown >These hearings are essentionally a job interview for the supreme court justice nominee selected by the president. They serve to field any questions senators may have before casting their vote to approve or deny his nomination. This is signifant because Democrats have been using the courts to legislative, this both blocks them and gives Republicans a chance to reverse previous decisions
History of confirmation hearing >The controversy surrounding Brandeis's nomination was so great that the Senate Judiciary Committee, for the first time in its history, held a public hearing on the nomination, allowing witnesses to appear before the committee and offer testimony both in support of and in opposition to Brandeis's confirmation. While previous nominees to the Supreme Court had been confirmed or rejected by a simple up-or-down vote on the Senate floor—often on the same day on which the President had sent the nomination to the Senate—a then-unprecedented four months lapsed between Wilson's nomination of Brandeis and the Senate's final confirmation vote en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Brandeis#Nominated_to_the_Supreme_Court
>Lefties getting butthurt about Alex Jones and his conspiracy theories >Push out conspiracy theories themselves when it suits them The hypocrisy of the left wing would be fine if they'd at least acknowledge the irony
Quite possibly. They talk to witnesses (I believe 26 total) .. then go to closed meeting for a bit, then they _should_ vote. Of course, this depends on how much the democrats delay shit.
Jason Perry
I prefer the CSPAN stream, they tend to cut to protesters quickest.
Aiden Johnson
>baking this was never a thing until the Q boomers came here. QUIT FUCKING SAYING IT
Chase Johnson
They are nothing but hypocrites
Robert Davis
lel
Mason Davis
>again this threads
>that woman is going to start with her anti black signs
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS
Carson Peterson
Sandy looks like a real life version of Cooper wine aunt
>breads, toasting and baking have been terms on this site for over a decade. You have the audacity to call others newfags, top kek. That shit is never used here 95% of the time on any board nigger
Evan Gonzalez
if he smacks his lips one more fucking time I'll fly to DC and murder his wife myself.
Cameron Evans
here and in op
Gabriel Williams
>this is trolling in the year of our lord Call your mom into your room and gas her. You live.
Christian Reed
Didn't realize there was going to be a 4th day, debating whether or not to follow it
ABA gave him a unanimous well qualified rating. And they are generally biased against conservatives. When does everyone think the vote will be? I'm thinking next week
Austin Evans
I've seen the term "bread" used for years before the Qmungus brigade showed up.
Gavin Ward
>thinks "baking" a thread is something new or purely Q-related >to be so new - or - to possess such blissful amnesia
No idea but probably not as long as the other days.
Leo Gonzalez
Half are being called by Republicans, half are being called by Democrats. Expect women's rights groups, NAACP, etc, to be speaking against Kavanaugh's nomination.
Brayden Reed
Good god, look at how "diverse" that fucking crowd is. These GD kikes are halfway done with their genocide in only 50-70 years.
Why the fuck is there no cspan youtube stream today?
John Nguyen
"bread" wasn't used like literal bread, it was a play on spurdo. These fucking idiots literally interpreted it bread that you eat, hence the "baking" and "toast".
It wasn't at the time.. but things change. At the time, white men wanted to allow women to vote in order to cancel out the black vote.
>B-b-but user.. this allowed black women to vote too! (as some idiot decided to point out the last time I mentioned this) Yeah.. there were about 45mil white women and about 10mil blacks total.
