>& Humanities
What's up with the current western ideology crisis?
Can't modern right-wing shitposters understand that the actual "redpill" as they call it is that humanity itself is composed of manipulable and manipulative retards?
Both the West and, for example, Islamic world are full of idiotic people who blindly believe whatever "truth" others invent for them, both have degenerates and good guys, both have extremely violent histories. Why can't people understand that violence and emotional stupidity is their universal nature?
White people are violent, black people are violent, brown people are violent, whatever. Why do they put "whites", which are pretty much a social construct, on a saint pedestal?
The actual final revelation is that 95% of humans are stupid, ambitionless, selfish cunts, regardless of skin color and ideology.
The stupidity of pro-"white" ideologies and nationalism
Other urls found in this thread:
independent.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
brainlet: the post
Its fear based tribalism.
>The actual final revelation is that 95% of humans are stupid, ambitionless, selfish cunts
thats rather generous. You must live somewhere nice
>Can't modern right-wing shitposters understand that the actual "redpill" as they call it is that humanity itself is composed of manipulable and manipulative retards?
Hi Jew.
Based and nonpilled.
For real tho, I agree. It's because of people gathering towards those deffects that races are put on pedestals or toppled over.
Human biodiversity is why
White people are less violent
>White people are less violent
Hmmm.
>White people are less violent
Literally two extremely violent and devastating world wars of the last century were their fault
Conflicts can make non-violent people do heinous acts, but they are not violent people in the same sense as lets say urban blacks are who just jump random people on the street. That's the kind of violent I'm afraid of. Not the would kill for his country violent, but the taking it out on random people becase its fun kind of violent. I'm less afraid of even the killers that leave manifestos, even they try and tie in some relevance. With urban african americans, it's just senseless, beast-like violence.
Counting the wars, the amount of western men during the 20th century that had killed another human was around 2%. That's actually pretty close to the rate among urban afro-americans today.
The true redpill is that social constructs as well as religions, cultures and individual humans all are subject of natural selection for tens of thousands of years and all this strugle is being natural selection executed on multiple levels, which are many, for example human/social/cultural. The actual state is what natural selection of religions, cultures and individuals has led to since the inception of life on earth.
>but they are not violent people in the same sense as lets say urban blacks
Ah yes systematically slaughtering millions of people is definitely not as violent as a bunch of urban criminals who held you up for your wallet, totally makes sense.
White community makes you think of a suburb with barely any violent crime so no whites are not violent people.
Amerindian andean villages are more peaceful than eurangutan settlements.
>the would kill for his country violent
Also lynch, behead, hang, gas, burn alive, bomb entire civilian populations, burn on a stake, blow from a gun, and impale for his country violent
Oh white people, oh so empathetic and civilized
Theyre not. Most people who take part in war never kill anyone, and most that do, do it out of conformity, not because they wish to. That's why white civilians are not as violent. But black people are.
>the absolute state of freshmen in uni
Pic related, it's OP moments before this post was made
>White community makes you think of a suburb with barely any violent crime
A RICH white community does. Don't confuse quality of life with skin color. Arabs in UAE are also extremely non-violent and peaceful.
No theyre not, Amerindians are among the most violent people on the planet. South America is a hotbed of violence, with areas that are worse than war zones.
You just dont hear about the violence. Do you think it will make it to Dubai news if an Emir or someone beats up someone or kills them? Fuck no. Do you think rich gulf arabs are above killing people? Hell no.
Completely wrong.
Even all eurangutan tourists will confirm this fact.
All Amerindian andean villages are more peaceful than eurangutan settlements, excluding the ones with eurangutan terrorism involvement.
>dude nothing matters we're all just stupid monkeys
post modernists need to fuck off
Nothing black people like the bantu havent done. Get off your high horse. Were talking about civilians. Normal people living normal lives. Sadly for blacks it often means living a life of urban war.
>See white people have been violent in the past, that means they are more anti-social and violent overall with or without war as an influence.
>See we're all one human race! White people do war too!
Imagine being this much of a brainlet.
I'd like to have a source for that statement. Give me some insight with proofs.
>jews
>people
Bare-knuckle boxing is literally part of Andean christmas celebrations you tit.
>All Amerindian andean villages
>*Sacrifices people to gods*
>*Entire civilizations disappear due to war and famine*
>*even to this day has problems with cannibalism*
Pssh nothing personal kiddo
Your post reeks of self-righteousness and this "I've pulled the wool from my own eyes" attitude.
First, saying that "...world are full of idiotic people who blindly believe whatever "truth" others invent for them,..." is pretty loaded. I'm going to guess you're implying that people are better off finding the truth on their own. Which would be ironic considering that you also said people are manipulable, so when you have individuals who try to find the truth themselves it's going through the lens of self-interest, evaluating the world based on what you yourself have observed. If you're implying that people need to find THEIR OWN truth, that's just flat out retarded. Dogmas are a natural part of any collective. Yes, they should be as subject to skepticism and criticism as anything else, but they are a good way to understand the world outside of your own head.
>rich
Nope I have been to white areas in America and the contrast in violence between them and black suburbs is unsettling. Even the most white cities in America dont have anywhere near the level of violence as say 30% black cities like Chicago. Btw ITS ONLY 30% BLACK.
telegraph.co.uk
Dubai courts are a joke. If youre a wealthy local, youre gonna get off pretty much anything.
What the g*rmans did was not war, it was genocide. Enough with the comparisons, we can see right through your bullshit.
>greeks practiced fighting events therefore they were violent savages
Got it.
Less years practicing that than europe and all eurangutan tourists will confirm this truth.
All Amerindian andean villages are more peaceful than eurangutan settlements.
Rich black people commit more violent crime than poor white people.
>oppress every other country for centuries, stealing their riches, spending their taxes and killing those who oppose you
>build a peaceful civilization from other nation's resources partially destroying them in the process
>spout shit about "whites" being peaceful and non-violent
lmao
Yeah, this girl is definitely a jew, right?
...
Under orders. Just like black people took orders from their Kangdom of Da Homeys to kill other blacks and enslave them. But were talking about a normal life in the neighborhood, not a world war. Why cant black people live in peace during peace?
>blacks had space technology before evil whitey took it away
everytime, nigger
>could've lived a happy life and given birth to beautiful blondies
>instead was gassed and burned by G*rmans
The biggest redpill out there is that the krauts are the actual Jews
It's true, get over it.
>Jow Forums calling someone a brainlet
Lmao!
Those damn Swedes sure stole a lot of shit from black people, how dare they live in such comfort.
>other civilizations always explicitly means black
what's up with your obsession with niggers? want that bbc?
T. (((Fellow white)))
We'll join the Universalist bandwagon after you
Because its mostly black people who have a victim complex toward whitey
>>oppress every other country for centuries, stealing their riches, spending their taxes and killing those who oppose you
>>build a peaceful civilization from other nation's resources partially destroying them in the process
hold up are you on about arabs or aztecs here?
>OP talks about people as a whole
>all Jow Forumstards scream about muh blacks
And that's how you know Jow Forums consists of boomers
are you 20, or 30% nigger mutt?
I'm 0% white.
she is lesbo not jewish, so yes she gets gassed
Their victims weren't black but the deluge comes to mind.
Whatever you say shekelberg.
my condolences
but there is a cure, see pic
A war against a bigger nation is oppression?
She has a pole badge mongoloid.
Boy, black men's penis is not that big.
You really are obssesed.
I'll post more.
these got gassed for being lesbians and criminals, bismillah hitler knew what he was doing
Wow you sure showed me! Wtf I hate being white now.
you can literally see the jewishness in them
Gas yourself.
And you will get tortured for being a psychopathic bacterial slime.
Pic related is art.
Because they are Jews? There's literally written "Jude". Your point?
SEETHING
>aztecs
Actually Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans.
How is this hard to get?
>the absolute state of non-whites
Anna Wajcowicz was murdered in the Warsaw uprising, she bravely fought for the Poles.
You are going to be punished one day, I guarantee it, hopefully, I will be the one to do the deed.
Another Polish qt who was slaughtered by the g*rm virus.
I punish ur mom everyday with my aryan loverod
Here's your mum here, doesn't she look gorgeous?
rate than europeans:
>europeans
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)
>from aurignacian-antelian to start of crop development: 9000 years(30000BC-21000BC)
>from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 10500 years (21000BC-10500BC)
>from neolithic revolution to earliest use of copper: 5000 years (10500BC-5500BC)
>from neolithic revolution to earliest use of tin bronze: 6000 years (10500BC-4500BC)
>Amerindians:
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 5500 years (16000BC-10500BC)
>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 5000 years (16000BC-11000BC)
>from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 7000 years (11000BC-4000BC)
>from neolithic revolution to copper: 3300 years (4000BC-700BC)
>from neolithic revolution to earliest use of tin bronze: 4700 years (4000BC-700 AD)
-"2003a. Tiwanaku Period (Middle Horizon) bronze metallurgy in the lake Titicaca basin: A preliminary assessment. En Tiwanaku and its hinterland, T 2. A. Kolata, (Ed.), pp. 404-434. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D. C."
-"1997. El bronce arsenical y el Horizonte Medio. En Arqueología, antropología e historia en los Andes: Homenaje a María Rostworowski, R. Varón y J. Flores E. (Eds.), pp. 153-186. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima."
-"researchgate.net
-"Historia de América Andina: Las sociedades aborígenes"
-"link.springer.com
-"journals.plos.org
-"whc.unesco.org
-"es.wikipedia.org
-"en.wikipedia.org
Therefore Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans.
I wonder how would Jow Forumstards react if one day the actual nazism came into power and they found themselves together with their families, their women, and friends in a gas chamber, undressed. Would they cry for humanity?
@5292539
This is some pretty strong bait, but I'll reply to it either way
>human beings being manipuable and manipulative
>this somehow has anything to do with how human beings form social groups or have instinctual xenophobia
People instinctively like to be around people similar to themselves, and dislike being around people with no similarities to them at all. All arguments are essentially just justifications or logical extensions of this thereafter.
They'd piss and shit themselves while squealing like the little girls they are.
Considering Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans, replacing all europeans with Amerindians in the Americas will be for the greater good.
>the Nazis did bad things so every single nazi movement is bad and will do the same thing!
So is every capitalist bad because America used atomic bombs?
Is every communist bad because of the Holodomor?
The thread is about a modern generalization that is white supremacy and its accusation towards other "races" i.e. Jow Forumstard "redpills", not about simple tribalism
>older is better
ur grandma certainly wasnt in bed
see pic
Friendly reminder that most Jow Forumstards would have been gassed as they are both mentally ill and retarded .
en.wikipedia.org
reported for doxing ur family
That is precisely how they critique Jewish power. Could this perhaps be a projection?
The proper definition of white identity would be: “A series of cultural and social norms, enforced by a common moral code, where the honor of the individual is based on his ability to contribute to the community. The most prized contributions are those that advance the greater whole of the collective, and the individuals who make these contributions are receive places of honor among the larger whole. A key aspect of this is the mutual contract between the individual and the collective, with each having an assumed duty to the other. A symbiotic relationship between the individual and the collective serves to propel society in a positive direction, with the greatest men being those who gave the most to the collective, while also receiving the greatest honor from the collective. A man who gives himself over to contributing to science, art, philosophy, statecraft and other high intellectual pursuits is seen as sacrificing himself for the whole, and is rightly rewarded with great respect. Just so, a man who gives himself over to contributing to society in smaller ways is also viewed as a positive figure in society, as is respected based on his contributions. The nuclear family serves as the primary vehicle of the individual to define his role in the larger society, which is strictly hierarchal, and within which authority is respected as a matter of course.”
This is of course something separate from individual culture, which differs from nation to nation. There is, however, an underlying similarity between various white cultures which can be defined as “white identity.”
Historically, white identity was never really defined as “white identity,” because people did not think in racial terms, generally because they did not encounter other races.
When we did encounter other races – first the various Moslem hordes – they were defined more by their behavior, which was linked to their cultural zeitgeist of Islam, which we contrasted with our own cultural zeitgeist of Christianity.
Although it was understood explicitly that they were fundamentally different creatures than ourselves, there was no science of evolutionary biology at the time, so things were not looked at in those terms. However, it remained true that “Christian” meant “white” and “Saracen” meant “not white.”
So “white identity” was just “Christendom,” which at the time was an all-encompassing social, cultural and political paradigm. It was a combination of pagan rites and spiritual practices and cultural codes of honor with Greek moral philosophy, and it worked very well for us.
Ironically (perhaps), in the modern era it was evolutionary biology that served to weaken Christianity as the cornerstone of the white European racial group. This, combined with the fact that during the colonial era, there was a program to convert non-whites to Christianity, made it so that “Christendom” no longer served as an appropriate definition of “white identity” – even while all the traditions and definitions of whiteness were inextricably linked to Christianity.
There was then in the late 19th and early 20th century an attempt to reframe whiteness – and non-whiteness – in terms of evolutionary biology. Germans were particularly big into this, but then they had this thing, and it ended badly, so it was deemed morally reprehensible for white identity to be framed in terms of evolutionary biology.
However, what it means to be a white person did not simply stop existing, despite the fact that neither Christianity nor biology could be used to define it in academia or scientific literature. We were hit with the myth that white identity does not exist, even while it was the water we swam in.
Everything about the post-war social order was based on Christianity, and what is considered traditional and acceptable morality remains a form of “cultural Christianity.”
However, the concept of white identity has since been framed as a kind of spook, even while aspects of implicit Christian morality are being used as weapons against us, because our psychology is evolved to respond to these emotional stimuli.
“Humanitarianism” is in itself a perversion of Christian morality, with the concept of charity being universalized to apply to biological out-groups. The humanitarian dream is to employ Christian morality as a means to negate the existence of the white men whose biology created the Christian moral paradigm as a means to advance civilization.
The Christian imperative to take care of others has been applied to people who are biologically incapable of responding in kind, and thus we have with the non-whites a host-parasite relationship.
I would posit that anyone who drops basic bitch "redpills" with zero/terrible argumentation is either an idiot or a shill, and it doesnt really matter which
Same would go for that one /lefty/pol fag who's only task in this thread it seems is to repeatedly bump a bait thread with his own incendiary bait so that other shills/idiots will see as an excuse to 'drop redpills' to drive this to bump limit, upon which I'd bet some totally unrelated user will make a similar thread of the exact same content and do this all over again
Or just sent to a concentration camp and worked to death.
See here >anti social, unemployed
>homosexuals
>white people are not violent
After they were domesticated by a desert religion...
t. NIGGER TANKIE