What's the history of Postmodern Neo-Marxism? What did it split off from?

He was born on jersey

Owned by the UK you desperate little frog.

Attached: brainlet2.png (645x729, 78K)

youtu.be/s4c-jOdPTN8

You are living under a fucking rock if you don't think Western "left-wingers" apply intersectional theory to practically everything.

Most inhabitants are ethnic french

The Frankfurt school actually, google the history of critical theory

It started as cuprium of orthogonal pyramidism, but then hebephilic Austro-agnostic cisanalists transmuted Agroleninist post-xenomophism into stochastical coprolit.

His father was British, he even served in the Royal Navy.

*critical theory

Samefag.

doesn't exist, just more conspiartard delusions.

its a joke

EXTREME radical centrist here. Cultural Marxism is a right wing meme but there is definitely a different form of Marxism that sprouted in the 20th century that was different from original Marxism and overtook it as the dominant school of Marxism.

Attached: Opera Zdjęcie_2018-09-07_032217_boards.4chan.org.png (622x99, 10K)

>different form of Marxism that sprouted in the 20th century that was different from original Marxism and overtook it as the dominant school of Marxism.
Indeed, it is called Communism with Chinese characteristics.

shopped

It briefly emerged from the Frankfurt school but went basically nowhere. It would later become a buzzword for internet right-wingers to throw at everything even vaguely leftist starting around 2017 or so.

His mother was born on jersey

Attached: June.jpg (340x358, 70K)

Fucking literal cringe at this leftypol NEET. Nice catch.

Attached: 1534299030000.jpg (800x450, 61K)

Dad Brit, mother born in British territory.

Norman french mother who dominates his genes

Specifically the concept of intersectionality. I'd say it's the reason why people think Colin Kaepernick, a man who grew up with a well-off upbringing and is paid millions to throw a ball around/ makes additional money from sweat shop corporations, is some sort of hero because he is a black guy who kneels down. Imagine explaining this to leftists almost two centuries ago.

Lmao

Memerson doesn't know what he is talking about as always.

samefag

>Memerson
not an argument

Attached: not an argketnt.png (500x365, 73K)

as always the left doesn't even attemt to refute a SINGLE point he makes, instead using petty insults in a weak attempt to deflect. sad

His mother has English, scottish and Irish ancestry, no french
Do your research faggot

Based Celt.

Fine here is a real argument.

Marxism is a general description of the philosophical and socio-economic theory of Karl Marx, entailing such concepts as the materialist conception of history and his critique of capital. Marxism is generally applied to those influenced by this theory, though this often differs among later thinkers as to what views they emphasis and which they criticize.

"Post-modernism" does not refer to any single theory or even a well-defined set of theories. Originally a term borrowed from art criticism, it's come to be used to refer to a number of French philosophers, also called "post-structuralism," from the 1970's and 80's. There's little in the way of a singular project shared by these philosophers other than a critical attitude toward a variety of modern concepts. This attitude isn't all that unique to them and fits pretty well in the critique of metaphysics that's characteristic of 20th-century philosophy in general.

There's no real connection between Marxism and post-modernism other than an influence of Althusser's structuralist Marxism, more in its structuralist method of critique than anything uniquely Marxist, and the philosophers called post-modernist are generally left-leaning, though no more radical than European academics of the time. Orthodox Marxism is an explicit target of so-called post-modern critiques.

Here is the rebuttal [].

>fucking up a reply this badly

>postmodern neo-marxism isn't REAL marxism
and we're back to square one
youtube.com/watch?v=HXBjVau1w7Y

samefag

>postmodern neo-nazism isn't REAL nazism
two can play this game

Attached: maga_pepe_large.png (362x480, 241K)

Cavill is a deceptive name because it obviously sounds French, but it's actually an old English habitational name from the part of Yorkshire his father was born in. He's not just English he's fucking oooooooooooooooold. Roots that go deep into the soil.

Are you brainlet? Marxism can't be post modern because it is a branch of modern philosophy.

Attached: The+Mainstreams+of+Modern+Philosophy.jpg (960x720, 109K)

Rip them all down

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1024x426, 28K)

that's why it's neo-marxism retard
here's an overview in written form
codecprime.com/partner/content/2250805-jordan-peterson-explains-how-communism-came-under-guise-identity-politics

this why i dropped philosophy in college.

times hav changd -- no mention of existentialism here

>liking lotr
The absolute state of /hishis/

>Squeky Memerson
>No actual argument besides: "We all agree, I'm right, right?"
lol

Postmodern philosophy rejects meta-narratives. Marxism is a meta-narrative. Postmodern Neo-Marxism is just bullshit.

>desire to have an enemy as pathetic as them
Leftists are pathetic, the altright just blows it out of proportion.

The majority seem to take it with a pinch of salt at best if they aren't openly critical of it, only on certain tumblr blogs do they use it every sentence. Unless you've been looking solely at tumblr blogs and clickbait there is ample proof, a quick search reveals this.

theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/30/intersectional-feminism-jargon
socialistreview.org.uk/384/limits-intersectionality
www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-womens-march-washington-white-black-perspec-0113-20170112-story.html

>Do not try to treat this board as Jow Forums with dates.
>do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago
Getting back on topic... Current "identity politics" is a recent thing and it is based on demagoguery, semantics and pseudointellectualism which was not invented by anyone, it exists in various shapes and forms and has been around since the dawn of civilization. Adorno and the Frankfurt School didn't open a pandora's box in the 60s which eventually culminated in modern identity politics. This or something like this would exist with or without Adorno because the core reasons for its existence are still here, the internet, frustrated angry people, the benefit of putting an academic-seeming gloss on your opinions and, of course, actual racism and actual sexism which was a big problem in the past and still exists to a degree, unless you now want to argue no one was whipping niggers and beating wives in the past.

The silly conspiracy theory is a meme.

Attached: btwash.jpg (1000x568, 98K)

>Postmodern Neo-Marxism?
Moar Buzzwords OP

Not very realistic pic. The postmodern neo-marxism doesn't look like a kike

Attached: 2zjf8li.jpg (489x394, 106K)

What's it like looking like Cavill and have all the money you need?

>Post-modern neo-marxism

First you're going to have to explain what the fuck this means

My guess is that whatever you're trying to meme, it has literally nothing to do with the proletariat taking the means of production.

As i understand it, postmodernism is a deconstruction technique that is used by Marxists to push their Marxist agenda. Anyone can use postmodernism to deconstruct any narrative/story/information. It just seems to be quite useful for Marxists because their ideas are so retarded. For Marxism to work you have to have a universe were all conclusions derived by humans are subject to bias and thus not true. In postmodernism the concept of truth becomes not solid because the universe is merely a construction of information gathered by our sensory organs, this sensory information is then interpreted by our brains and can be subject to our internalised biases. You can then turn "truth" into "my truth" you can make race a social construct, and you can make equality tangible because inherently all humans are the same.

Are you fucking kidding me? Listen to NPR for a day and realize that they approach nearly every fucking thing from the perspective of intersectionality. EVERYTHING is about looking at society through race and sex for them.

They choose concepts that pull heartstrings as their core, so they don't really need a logically coherent ideology, it just has to pull the right heart strings to sing a song of overthrowing the patriarcy.

French don't look like that. Henry looks Central Euro

He doesnt look like a stinky troglodyte so he cant be French

His Father from an old roman town on the border of wales, a nation inhabited by Romanized Britons. stock. you can tell that Cavil gets the majority of his looks from non-angloids

anyone who dabbles with politics anno domini christi and doesn't turn it into art is a fucking faggot who needs his head split by a hammer

According to his biography on IMDB, he only has English, Irish and Scottish ancestry

Attached: 1509175062628.png (1366x768, 1.97M)

Do you think Queen Elizabeth or Prince Phillip would put down German on a census form? come on.

Doesn't surprise me that they'd despise kraut blood

French philosophers fused who were primarily influenced by Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger started making overtures about Marx because it was fashionable at the time and now that's apparently what Marxism is acc. most leftists

>marxism is intersectional
Do you even know what that word means? Marxism purports class hierarchies as the basis of all exploitation. That's completely incompatible with overlapping types of oppression being separate from economic standing. You can't be a female or gay CEO under Marxism and be regarded as oppressed.

It split off from post-expressionist impressionist romanticist liberalism

It's an umbrella term for anything the far-right dislikes about modern society. They literally treat postmodernism, moral relativism, moral nihilism, consumerism, marxism, liberalism, atheism and feminism as synonymous. It's easier to strawman broad movements that have a history of diverse disagreements that way.

>muh far right
Funny how I never see people like you complain about the far left in threads like these. I wonder why...

Why would he complain about people who don't use the term OP is asking about?

>haha yeah dude it's just crazy talk just don't think about it mang dude just relax and think about like other shit lol haha don't question academia its all fine haha just don't think about it man go watch some mainstream media haha it's all fine just turn your brain off man HAHA lol just don't think about it

Because they're the ones that fall under it

>people don't whine about leftists on Jow Forums
What fucking crack are you smoking? Communism gets blamed for anything Jow Forums dislikes. The OP in this thread is a prime example, as is Peterson.

Post-modern neo-Marxist is a completely senseless label, it's the equivalent of classical-liberal national-socialist

>don't think about it mang dude just relax
Calling someone wrong is not telling them to "turn their brain off". If they're wrong, they're fucking wrong.
>don't question academia
So what, Peterson isn't an academic now just because you agree with him?
>go watch some mainstream media haha
We're on the mainstream media right now. Jow Forums is one of the most popular sites in the West. 12 rules for life was a bestseller. You just contrive everyone who disagrees with you as being "the mainstream", but your definition of "the mainstream" is liberal talk show hosts that haven't been relevant since the late 00s.

It's pretty funny, if you go back and read a lot of Marx's opinions he would've been well to the right and probably the far-right today. He was a pragmatic nationalist and deeply conservative about social and sexual issues

to english parents

surnamedb.com/Surname/Cavill

>This interesting surname is of English locational origin from "Cavil(le)" in the East Riding of Yorkshire. The placename is recorded as "Cafeld" in the Early Yorkshire Charters (959) and later as "Cheuede" in the Domesday Book of 1086

Attached: normans1.png (1132x155, 23K)

This is a bit of a simplification. He was an atheist, generally (morally) against colonialism while considering it a necessary stage of history, and apathetic towards the bourgeoisie. Most people from the 19th century would seem "sexually conservative" today, but that is outside of their original context. I'm sure that modern representative democracy would have seemed borderline anarchistic during the high middle ages, too, but that's the nature of societal change.

Oh boy here comes the Marx apologist

>Yeah dude Marx was totally on our side haha

>Most people from the 19th century would seem "sexually conservative" today,
He spoke out against degeneracy, end of story

>clarifying the views of a man within his historical context is the same as advocating those views yourself
Fuck off brainlet.

Alt right is literally a meme created by Hillary though

He very rarely commented on sex whatsoever.
>end of story
Calling someone a faggot in the 1800s hardly makes him right wing.

Ironically, far-right is also umbrella term that's even broader and bigger strawman. But it's easier to strawman broad movements that have a history of diverse disagreements that way...

Richard Spencer's blog "alternative right" existed since the turn of the decade.
Why do you feel the need to lie?

Because I honestly couldn't care less about burger stuff

Far-right is an umbrella, yes. But it's an actual term that some people describe themselves by. Postmodern neo-marxist is not, and it doesn't just describe loosely grouped political ideologies like the terms "far right" or "far left", but a hodgepodge of vague allusions to political, philosophical and social trends grouped together by a rehashing of the old conspiracy theory of Cultural Bolshevism. Saying that trans rights are fundamentally the same as Maoism is one example actually invoked by Peterson. It's as dumb as shoehorning neopaganism and fascism together as if the latter somehow fundamentally springs from the former. I wouldn't be surprised if at least one leftist has done that, but that doesn't mean I support such meaningless blanket terms and bad faith in political discussions.

>latter somehow fundamentally springs from the former
I mean former from the latter.

>conspiracy theory of Cultural Bolshevism.
>conspiracy theory

Yet you care bout Hillary Clinton? Huh...

>Saying that trans rights are fundamentally the same as Maoism is one example actually invoked by Peterson.
They're not the same, but they do share a lot of characteristics and are fundamentally alike. They stem from the same sprout.

>He very rarely commented on sex whatsoever.
He has an entire section dedicated to bashing cucks.
yeah just ignore it lol