Britain is about to make travelling a crime

independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/terror-laws-home-office-designated-areas-three-clicks-human-rights-border-security-bill-a8525666.html

>A new lawthat could seepeopleimprisoned for up to 10 years if they enter“designated areas”abroadis being proposed by the government.

>“Entering or remaining in an area” designated as a terror risk by the home secretary would become a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act 2000

>The human rights group Liberty called the proposals “deeply concerning”.Gracie Bradley, its policy and campaigns manager,said: “Keeping the public safe from terrorism is an important and difficult task. But making travel a crime is the wrong approach

Attached: 140301663.jpg (1038x1038, 83K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/LKMk1
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

So this is why they left the EU...
The ruling caste is going to establish extreme anti terrorism laws. And then go for the death penalty, which is not possible in the EU.

Pakistani coups are expansions are scary.

do it. it is not until full absurdity is reached hat the sheeple will wake up and fight.

Attached: 1984_is_now.jpg (780x438, 161K)

The same government will still bring in people from those "terror risk" areas and go after their own people if they call them terror risks

Theyre just trying to see what they can get away with at this point

liberate us from the jews

Attached: Malaysia-Singapore-Mahathir-Mohamad-Lee-Hsien-Loong--960x576.jpg (960x576, 86K)

This
Sad but true

Is the passport the travel license? Or will there be a new travel license? Exceptions made for people visiting family or go for work in such places? Such as a doctor for MSF?

I anticipate no muslims will be punished under this law. A British doctor, business person, or former soldier will be punished. The irony of a British who fights with the Kurds is punished when a British who fights with IS.

This is unironically going to apply to places like Russia and "Trump's America"

If it's like for people going to ISIS territory and stuff like that, good. It would be better to hang them when they try to return, but jailing them works fine.
Maybe they'll jihad their fellow convicts and serve as a deterrent against domestic crime, that could maybe be useful.

This will be used to prevent white brits from escaping their loving democratic republic of bongistan.

Thing is, I can see this working in the short term to prosecute people coming back from helping DAESH.

However, it sets a bad legal precedent for the future.

Jailing then would just let them indoctrinate their fellow convicts.

Maybe they go in U.K. Prisons for 10 years and convert more to Islam. Invite more to violence. US and European prisons are a joke.

So could our wall.

based
now we need pakis to murder them in their sleep while they cannot escape
Polish expats will inherit british isles

Poor britbongs are banned from having a rhodesian safari.

Attached: 1508610271095.png (418x408, 103K)

>implying they're not there helping Da'esh with full approval of the government
How are the White Helmets going to learn to larp as doctors without the UK at hand?

This is actually a good thing, morons. They don't plan to jail people for going on vacation to Spain. In recent years a lot of goat fuckers traveling to Syria to be a terrorist could not be prosecuted due to lack of evidence of them being directly involved in terrorist activities. With a law like this, you don't need a video of the suspect beheading someone, because the fact he was there is already a crime, easing the burden of proof resting on the prosecution. It's just a crutch for convicting people you knew where up to no good, but don't have direct evidence tying them to a crime. We all know a muslim going to Syria in the last few years didn't go just to sight see.

NUKE
CHELTENHAM
NOW

>Be Syrian
>Flee to England leaving wife, mother, kids in Syria
>Apply to be refugee
>Get gibs
>Go on vacation to Syria to visit family.

No, you need to stop and think how the globalist buffoons will use this.

The UK is in danger of white flight emigration. First it'll be shitholes, but quickly enough free nations will start going in the list.

It'll be a neo-iron curtain. The soviets didn't want people fleeing, so they threatened to kill anyone who did. Now the UK is threatening to jail anyone who tries to leave the UK for particular countries. In 10 years, it'll be for trying to leave the UK, period.

This is par for the course under global communism, which is what globalism really is.

why are you guys getting mad at brits for doing something good for once? this is just going to be used to arrest terrorists who meet up with their buddies in middle eastern shitholes.

>TRUMP: You can't come in from these countries:
>OMG FUCKING BASED GOD EMPROROR
>MAY: If you're a citizen and you go to these countries you can come back...But to a jail cell.
>NINTEEN AITY FOOR HELP HELP

>prophet??

I understand you are worrying about the legal precedent, but I doubt they will just make a list with countries for no reason. It will be reserved for terrorists hotspots. And think about, why make it illegal to go to a nation the Brit would flee to? The Brit in question wouldn't be going back in the first place.

Ah salami laker to you too.

Its 100k per year to house them in the current prison set ups and our government is broke. If we get out of the ECoHR next year we can use a piece of rope instead.

Can someone explain to me what this post is trying to say? Im usually good at deciphering retardation but this post is pretty out there.

i think he's confusing citizens and foreigners, saying our banning immigration from shitskinistans is the same as Britain banning its citizens from going to those places

It's not banning anyone from leaving, it's banning them from returning from terrorist shitholes. Learn to read.

Yeah those two things are completely different in practice, retarded memeflag.

The dumb part is anyone who goes there gets welcomed back.

That, and to cast the illusion that the goyim are willing laborers

Attached: 1536352664513.png (969x875, 665K)

this also means if we go to south africa to hep fight for fellow whites we'll be jailed for 10 years should we return lol

archive.fo/LKMk1

Trump's law would only prevent new migrants from entering the USA, non-citizens have no rights.
May's bill would prevent citizens (with rights) from travelling where they please.

The issue is that they will eventually ban travel to areas that aren't even terrorist hotbeds such as Iran or China.

So long as it only applies to shitholes where terrorism is ripe it's a good law. These people travel to ISIS get trained up in how to be a retarded human landmine and are sent back home to their state funded homes and gibs.

Also:
If you have family in one of those shithole countries you should not be in the UK in the first place. This is a good law. No reasonable human being of western descent should have any need to travel to most of those shitty countries. That's only immigrants visiting families, thots going to burn coal, bleeding heart leftists going for volunteer missions, or pedos and pervs going for sex tourism.

I doubted that they would flood our countries with millions of useless retards, but they did.
Just because you "think" something wouldn't make sense doesn't mean the globalists aren't ten steps ahead of you.