Redpill me on nazi engineering. How did the germans recover so quickly from the first World war...

Redpill me on nazi engineering. How did the germans recover so quickly from the first World war, and how did they become to be so advanced? Their war machine is worthwhile of study even today.

Attached: Landkreuzer-P-1500-Monster-570x437.jpg (570x437, 67K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3HWxKahieBY
youtube.com/watch?v=1HtHHchg508
youtube.com/watch?v=VXeiBHz-v-Q
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The instant the treaty was signed, they began rearming. No matter who was chancellor in the late 30's- early 40's they'd have gone to war, even if they'd gone communist.

They missed the point. War machines were too complex to actually work. In a large scale conflict like WW2 mass production is key and more important than technical perfection.
Also they should have invested all efforts in nuke tec instead of wacky stuff like giant tanks or weird planes. Even V2 rockets, being awesome things, were too expensive and too complex to be of any help
Moreover, brits came across with radar and sonar, which helped massively to defeat the Reich

Mefo bills were used to pay shell corporations, mostly in Scandinavia to first build and be the "buyer" of goods they were making. Much like brits hid tank development by pretending they were liquid storage tanks, Germany pretended they were making farming and building tractors which weren't banned.

Lack of standardization was the only real tank problem. Three different classes used three different sets of parts. Their "wacky" experiments led to modern warfare, space travel, digital computing, and everything else.

They were forbidden to have tanks etc. But they were trained in secret in Sweden.

>Nazi Germans
>good engineers
It takes only one look their gas chambres to debunk this myth

Attached: gaschambrecomparison.jpg (840x894, 266K)

>The instant the treaty was signed, they began rearming.
What trearty you spastic? Rearmaments started in 1935 and were below the level of Britain or France, both whom signed at Versailles to stop the armaments race. Britain stopped for a while due to another treaty with the US, but they started going strong with the navy in 1930. France never stopped rearming and had the biggest/strongest ground based military in the world basically. Britain even feared French planes could attack London at one point, and that was already 1928-1931.

To the east you had the soviet maniacs, while Austria and Italy also weren't and a good stance with Germany really. When you have maniacs around you, and you start as the last guy to join the game, you suddenly become bad guy?

because Germans used to be good at engineering (Anglos too)

And Hitler quit the treaty of Versailles so Germany could use their ressources for themselves

youtube.com/watch?v=3HWxKahieBY - here's one narrative to look into

Germany wasn't at its full capacity in the first world war. It still lacked in industrialization compared to Britain.

Official rearming began in 35, secret began right after the treaty of Versailles. Is your own history illegal?

You mean it only takes the knowledge of german engineering to debunk the gas chamber myth.

>war economy
You press money, start building weaponry / infrastructure, everybody has a job, everybody happy until the inevitable
>day of the rake

Entire country where jews where driven out and everyone driven to advance a white humanity, big surprise, an economic and technologic powerhouse. Now what you see is what legally retarded gibs me dat niggers breeding out of control with kikery ruining everything they touch

youtube.com/watch?v=1HtHHchg508
1939 was the year humanity peaked

Attached: 1452422685396.jpg (2048x1536, 556K)

And then the slavic Russian untermenschen destroyed them with their mass produced tanks.
What a failure.

>War machines were too complex to actually work.
No they weren't.

Literally the only problems they had were a lack of resources (oil, coal, steel) and a lack of manufacturing capacity.

Germany did not have the manpower nor resources, nor manufacturing capacity, to allow for a numbers game. They had to focus on making effective equipment and part of that entails experimenting and iterating.

Germany didn't lose the war because they spent resources on wunderwaffen, they lost because they were fighting virtually every other world superpower in existence all at the same time. Honestly the fact that they swept through France and Poland with as few losses and as quickly as they did was astonishing.

german engineering was shit. what good is an aesthetic tank, when it breaks down after 50 miles and you can't even repair it in the field?

What are you talking about? By the time WWI begun Germany was the most industrialized nation in Europe. The German position in Europe before WWI was actually much more favorable then their position pre-WWII. This was one of the reasons Britain was so eager for war with Germany in the first place. By the turn of the century it had become clear that the German Empire's economy would eclipse that of the entire British Empire.

You mean like most tanks then? They all need near constant maintenance, even now.

The UK industrialized almost a century ahead of the entire rest of europe.

White people.

>How did the germans recover so quickly from the first World war
start from about 15-20 minutes
youtube.com/watch?v=VXeiBHz-v-Q

because national socialism fucking works

careful there hans, we wouldn't want you ending up in jail now

...

Money, money, money. Replace (((their))) currency with your own. Britain under King Willem did it before with Rome. Then they build the greatest fleet the world had ever seen and Britain became Great Britain. We can also do it by destroying the dollar and the euro

the ayy lmaos

I'm aware. And the Germans closed that gap in less than fifty. It isn't even disputed that Germany's economic position in Europe frightened Britain terribly.

Haunebu is found , German MSM newspaper .

Attached: 9F6C7D54-8C18-42A6-948D-6D66FB916D4B.png (2224x1668, 3.65M)