So, who you thingk wrote the NYT op-ed?

So, who you thingk wrote the NYT op-ed?

youtube.com/watch?v=gQKyseJxMmQ

Attached: 1536510459051.jpg (799x544, 64K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_controversies
nytimes.com/2017/07/04/world/asia/north-korea-missile-test-icbm.html
foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/09/pence-slams-disappointing-obama-speech-says-hed-take-lie-detector-to-prove-didnt-write-nyt-op-ed.html
washingtonpost.com/politics/fbis-no-2-was-deep-throat-mark-felt-ends-30-year-mystery-of-the-posts-watergate-source/2012/06/04/gJQAwseRIV_story.html?utm_term=.bd466916c87d
townhall.com/columnists/phelimmcaleer/2018/09/06/relax-president-trump-new-york-times-has-history-of-exaggerating-seniority-of-anonymous-officials-n2516340
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

barron

an editor for the New York Times, one if their staff because that op-ed was so pretentious only a fool woukd think someone on his staff woukd write that nonsense

I think NYT didn't verify the author.

The author is going to be revealed at some point. Nobody, let alone the NYT would be that reckless.

oh you dumb fucking leaf, haven't you learned ANYTHING in the past two years?

Attached: 1514618509241.jpg (1307x1001, 767K)

What should I have learned that deals with the topic at hand?

that the press has been lying even before Trump was elected, or are you completely ignorant of that fact?

Attached: Screenshot_20180816224849.png (720x1280, 610K)

So you're saying the NYT piece is a fabrication?

Talking to you, fuckface.

yes, you dumb piece of shit

So you think the NYT would risk the real, actual consequences of falsifacation, not the least of which would be fatal damage to their credibility?

Yup

a nyt jew

Well then you're a child that wants to believe what makes you feel good.

you're talking to yourself?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_controversies

What did the NPC leaf mean by this?

Yes

Attached: Capture.png (1290x566, 85K)

NYT

lol, what's the wikipedia jew's problem?
that it says duly elected?

Yes brainlet, that is one of their most recent controversies. It's an article about controversies. If you look through it, many of them are about how they published false stories and then had to redact them or issue corrections. Truly you are a blight upon this board, and your brain does not work properly.

Here is my favorite in recent years:
nytimes.com/2017/07/04/world/asia/north-korea-missile-test-icbm.html

"Correction:

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article attributed incorrectly a Twitter statement to the North Korean government. The North Korean government did not belittle a joint American-South Korean military exercise as “demonstrating near total ignorance of ballistic science,” that statement was from the DPRK News Service, a parody Twitter account."

You people are emotional babies with no understanding of facts, logical thinking or a basic concept of the way the world works. There are repercussions with actual real life libel laws and credence that in no way would the NYT risk.

An anonymous opinion is not published as fact nor does it have any legal bearing, which is why that it was done that way. You are calling other posters here emotional in order to project your own insecurities about your ability to argue. Grow up, you're wrong and no one cares.

You sound like a 12 year girl. Listen, Brittany, have you noticed the administration taking it as fact? foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/09/pence-slams-disappointing-obama-speech-says-hed-take-lie-detector-to-prove-didnt-write-nyt-op-ed.html

Anyone can take anything as a fact, that doesn't prove anything. I can take it as a fact that you're a shill, but I don't have proof so that doesn't confirm anything.

Low quality response.

Yes because they won’t get caught.

How so? Please expand?

>The author is going to be revealed at some point.
No they won’t.

>Anyone can take anything as a fact, that doesn't prove anything.
Because everything that doesn't suit you is a lie?

You made the assertion they will be revealed. Why do you think that?

Because ...

no one
its a fake to make it look like they still have influence and to divide.
NYT either made it up or got scammed

Brilliant. Have any of the other leakers been revealed?

Because everything comes out. By law if required.
washingtonpost.com/politics/fbis-no-2-was-deep-throat-mark-felt-ends-30-year-mystery-of-the-posts-watergate-source/2012/06/04/gJQAwseRIV_story.html?utm_term=.bd466916c87d

oh yeah, lefty media would never resort to lies and deceit

they never gay Hillary debate questions in advance
they never invented an entire story about a frat boy gang rape
they never interviewed their own people posing as angry protesters

>oh yeah, lefty media would never resort to lies and deceit

No, there are problems with Left media, all media. But to think that the NYT would invent something like this when all would do is put them in legal peril and destroy their cred is deeply insane.

user, the Donna Brazile fiasco is every bit as bad as this one and it had no repercussions for CNN whatsoever
they will absolutely get away with it, at worst they'll throw one person under the bus and carry on as usual

Yeah well, you're insane. Have a nice day.

bye felecia, dont let th door hit ya where satan split ya

You OTOH sound fully normal and well adjusted.

yea yeah, bye bitch

Attached: seroquel.jpg (650x377, 13K)

this isn't even remotely libel, and the only way for this hoax to be confirmed is for someone at the times to admit writing it. see what they've done? "i'm an anonymous person in the trump administration". since it could be anybody, there's no way to prove it's not real, ergo the times has to make no retraction. and even if they do, they'll say they were misled by the author and it's not their fault

You are a child that has no idea.

By now I'm used to seeing mental illness up close on pol, but you people really come out for the Trump threads.

Trump himself or the whole thing is a fake

Do you have an actual guess though?

...

>how would this help the little kike?
Nope. It’s not Jared.

The leaf is right -- the NYT obviously didn't write it -- but you can't tell Jow Forumstards anything. They're just like Breit-tards.

>credibility
Kek

>believes the nyt lies
>child
>feels good.

The pic is a joke. Jared is the last person in my mind. Fucking weasel is most likely hoping to get out with his money and liberty, at any cost.

You seem strongly of the opinion that the article was legitimate and not jew york times trash so why do you enlighten us all as to who you think wrote the article.

I have no idea.

Then stop bitching when anons offer their opinion.

Attached: 1453397965046.png (400x381, 108K)

New York Times Has History of Exaggerating Seniority of Anonymous Officials

the “Paper of Record" misrepresented an intern/junior employee as a senior official to push an agenda.

townhall.com/columnists/phelimmcaleer/2018/09/06/relax-president-trump-new-york-times-has-history-of-exaggerating-seniority-of-anonymous-officials-n2516340

I'm only bitching at the fuckheads that can't believe the piece is genuine. Nothing to do with the author's identity.

That chinky bitch who hates old white men. You know, the boss.

I have an anonymous source familiar with the matter that says you're a massive faggot who sucks cocks.

>This makes it true in your eyes

I don't understand why the NYT expects us to take their word for something when they quote anonymous sources. It's the 21st century, there should be a cryptographic solution to this shit.

>an ominous, gutless coward
kinda

Sessions, Rosenstein, Wray, and Mueller wrote it. Corrupt sociopaths don’t think they’re evil when they’re committing evil, they think they’re the real victims.

Its a very real possibility the article is fake. It reads like r/ politics fan fiction. The other possibility is that Trump himself plated the story possibly to remove Woodward hit job of a book from the news cycle. If true it succeeded. The idea that its genuine is honestly pretty remote. At best it might be some low level nobody having a larp and exaggerating their access or importance but its not Mattis or Pence or someone like that.

Attached: 1536267492242.png (847x951, 96K)

>but its not Mattis or Pence or someone like that.
How so? Please, do go on.

I have nothing further to add on the subject. Refer to for my thoughts.

Yeah people never lie under oath right?

So, you claim it's not Mattis or Pence and when asked to expand you can't or won't. Saying stuff is easy, isn't it?

kikes did it

Attached: 1536445347981.jpg (750x750, 65K)

Vince McMahon

Prove me wrong then.

The onus is on you here, you fucking gnat wit.

if you apply occams razor it was most likely a coup d'é·tat attempt by the New York Times.

Attached: 1535776250292.gif (500x275, 763K)

>You really think journalists would lie to us? REALLY?
Guy...

Attached: 1509159552375.png (571x618, 29K)

No it isnt. You asked for opinions without offering your own so got my opinion. Take it or leave it.

Uh, you get that that is a photo op on the studio tour that anyone can do, right? It's for kids. She's just some crazy 'entrepreneur' who has 10 jobs to hide they're a pretty unremarkable person. You see them all the time here in NY.

I'm not sure if you recall the comment you made a half hour ago stating that Mattis and Pence didn't write it. I asked you to explain why and you won't. Then, amazingly, asked me to prove you wrong.

spotted the liberal faggot

>they never invented an entire story about a frat boy gang rape
wut?

Duke lacrosse

When you got nothin', bust out the hate and fear.

you do realize that's one of the women from the New Mexico camp, right?

>implying you've had anything this entire thread
he's justified, your non-sequitors aren't

unless you're doing some sort of retard safari, these "debates" aren't worth your time, leaf.

Trump supporters are in a cult, logic has no place in their worldview, and you need to speak at a 5th-6th grade level in order for them to understand you, since that's about the average for how Daddy Trump talks to them

Attached: 1530591548081.jpg (484x443, 24K)

I've got the idea that the NYT piece is real and actual. Not one person in this thread has any argument better than saying "No, it's not".

Attached: Khazar.png (1447x397, 584K)

What's your point? She doesn't work for CNN. She went on a studio tour. If she had a photo with Mickey Mouse would you say she works for Disney?

For real. But I've got a lot of time on my hands and an urge to rub it in their faces.

>who wrote it?
>who released the tape?
>to whom my concearn
It’s Trump. Holy hell Jow Forums I’m disappointed. He has a history of extremely similar shenanigans.

you've got an idea with no actual proof, you know who else has any actual proof? the New York Times, so as far as I and jist about every other user ITT, this was a fucking waste if a thread and if you expected it to turn into anything other than shitposting, you're a delusional idiot
no shit, that's not the point

some larper nobody you idiots

too bad you have nothing to rub except your own ignorance

Kushner is the Triple H of the Trump administration

Oh it’s really written by a senior White House official. But I’m also equally sure trump either wrote it himself or told someone to write it. Now he gets to go around giving lie detectors to everyone. Lol.

mccain you dum fucks

Only rural and suburban Grugs voted Grumpf. City grugs all voted Grugary

Attached: Grug posting.jpg (1024x630, 106K)

Kushner or Ivanka paid someone to write it for them (because they're both legit retarded). They know daddy is going down and they want to segue back to their empty socialite existence in Manhattan / New Jersey / Hamptons

I have proof it's Jeff Sessions, notarized papers and signatures from cabinet members.

Let me grab it and I'll share it here