Is tanning degenerate?

Darker skin protects against skin cancer.

However, skin tanning is actually your skin responding to damage caused by the sun. So tanning = skin damage. It's basically a temporary scar.

Scientists are working on a way to achieve a tan without the damage though. There are very promising creams and lotions that give you an honest to god tan without any of the associated cellular damage.

Imagine, you step into your shower, rub lotion all over your body and face, wait a few minutes, and later on your skin develops a healthy Mediterranean bronze.

That's what I'm waiting for. I actually love laying out in the sun, feeling the warmth on my body, listening to the birds, smelling the outdoors, etc. It's lovely. But again, tanning = skin damage. I tan pretty easily but I'm super pasty right now because I've been avoiding it.

Attached: 1528281076368.jpg (645x773, 94K)

(((they))) try to make whiteness seem unappealing but sorry light skin will always be the standard of beauty world wide.

i want to rub my face against that degeneracy tbqh

Attached: 1536507640008.jpg (500x500, 46K)

Fuck off shitskin

Tanned skin looks cheap and working class. Clear, pale skin looks civilised and classy.

Attached: 1535813274300.jpg (1200x1200, 188K)

i'm italian and can drink milk.

pol btfo

That's naturalistic bullshit. You can regulate that sans any sun. And tons of tan people are vitamin D insufficient anyways- the more than you are the harder to make vitamin D with a set amount of sun.

Avoid UV at all costs or look like a bag of leathery shit

>It's proven addictive
Source?
>Why a woman would brown her creamy skin is beyond me, though
Because they are told it looks attractive and other women do it.

>Coping this much

women should have lighter skin, but men should have darker skin from working outside and doing manly things

if your girl has a tan it better be because shes a surfer or goes on safaris

Tanning is not only degenerate, but it makes your skin look disgusting over time. UV exposure is responsible for like 80% of skin aging. Always wear sunscreen on your face every day of the year.

I live in Florida and have sun all year long, if you go outside you will get tan you retarded fucking snow monkey. I would worry about the cultural adaptations first and vitamin D regulation last.

There's nothing wrong with going outside and getting a tan from enjoying outdoor activities. Tanning only for the sake of tanning is narcissistic.

>I live in Florida
You have to be below 65 y/o to post here

But for them it's not going outside, it's them subjecting their skin to hours of unprotected exposure to the sun's rays on purpose either on a beach or in a tanning bed.

Either that or he's a spic

>Roasties are so obsessed with hating their white heritage that they will go to a beach and give themselves skin cancer just to look more like Abdul
Tanning is a natural body function that white people have.
It has nothing to do with race.

>However, skin tanning is actually your skin responding to damage caused by the sun. So tanning = skin damage. It's basically a temporary scar.
Should we stop building muscle too?

If its artificially induced with steroids, yes. Muscles don't give you cancer or make you look like a third worlder.

Building muscle doesn't increase your chance of getting cancer.

Attached: Capture.png (610x217, 114K)

>t. fatass

t. cuban

Miami is the literal definition of le 56%. I laughed so hard going to the beaches. Would much rather be on the great lakes if I want to see good looking women.

You don't get cancer but you still have to break your muscles for them to develop.
They don't make you look like a third worlder but they do make you look like a poor and ignorant construction worker or sailor.

>Jow Forumsacks are not following the rules of the board
No waaaay man, please tell us more!

But consuming excessive amounts of protein does have negative health effects. Doesn't mean lifting isn't a net benefit.