What will America's next political party look like and why?
Muh likely contenders:
>far-left breaks away from Dems
>Punished Trump: cast aside by a reborn, centrist Republican Party
>A truer centrist, middle-class, libertarian party to pull from the non-extremes of both parties.
Other urls found in this thread:
Fptp: "pssh nothin personnel kid"
>What will America's next political party look like and why?
There will not be a "next political party"
This. The entire FPTP system (combined with party politics) creates a two party system. We see this in America, we see this in the UK. In America, the best third parties and independents can do is steal votes from other parties. In countries like the UK, the best third parties can do is form a coalition if the two main parties are relatively weak (see: the status quo in May's cabinet).
What's more likely to happen in America is that the Democrats will become more and more left (we already see it happening: Occasio-Cortez is the result of socialist entryism into the Democratic Party) whereas Republicans will increasingly become the party of "angry white men". Eventually the Democrats will come out on top purely because of demographic realities. Combined single women, minorities and nu-males will become the majority.
What will be the final nail in the coffin for the Republicans (and therefore white America) is the moment Texas becomes a Blue State. Texas is traditionally the Republican's California: the big, highly loyal state that gives these respective parties a large number of electors (for presidential elections) or voters (for house of representative elections). However, even in Texas we already see that the big cities (Houston, Austin) are rather blue and the only red remnants are in the more rural parts, which are for the moment the majority of its population. The more Mexicans swarm Texas, the bluer it gets until it's no longer a Red State. That's when the Republican party as it exists today is dead.
This is why so many people feared that if Trump lost the elections, there'd never again be a Republican president. Clinton wanted to give FULL CITIZENSHIP to all of the roughly 11 million illegals in America at the time. That would go a log way towards making Texas a blue state.
Trump actually has pretty decent approval from minorities. I could see a significant number of them (20% of blacks, 40% of asian/hispanic/other) coming over to the GOP to form a sort of Amerimutt nationalism focused on common values and civic institutions.
Maybe a return to the values of the 50s. English-only education, Christianity, and respect for originalist constitutionalism.
>A truer centrist, middle-class, libertarian party to pull from the non-extremes of both parties.
Sounds gay.
Not gonna happen user.
I'm working with some people to organize a National Capitalist Party locally, so look for that I suppose. We're all pretty dissatisfied with the Libertarian Party being just DUDE WEED LMAO and we're working on fixing it.
>Trump actually has pretty decent approval from minorities
Decent sure, but the majority of minorities will remain Democrat voters. Not because their values resonate with them (do you really think ghetto blacks are concerned with the LGBTQAI+ movement? Or that they want more Spics moving into their neighborhood and competing with them for low wage jobs?) but because the Democrats are most likely to give them gibs. The Democratic party's voter base is an unholy coalition between various groups that have one thing in common: their desire to plunder the public purse. That's what brings women, "sexual minorities", racial minorities and basedboys together.
Listen buddy, it's a noble cause but you're not going to win elections. You're not going to get the women behind you, you're not going to get the minorities behind you. A party like yours could only work in a majority white country where only men can vote.
Look at France. Despite socialist movements having grown in popularity there since the 1840s, the majority has always been "radical" in one form or another (in French politics, "radical" mostly meant free market capitalist libertarians more or less). The French model was something among the lines of "free market, but with a small safety net and some standards for the working class" as a means to appease the rising socialist influence (we see the same thing under Bismarck in Germany: small concessions to stave off socialist uprisings). When does French public spending shit the bed? The 1950s, when women get to vote.
Free market capitalism cannot prevail as long as women hold the ballot.
A monarchy.
It's time for America to transform into a rightful empire to beat it's self back into shape.
I don't know. There were polls out showing Trump approval among Hispanics was just about as high as whites.
Majority of minorities will probably stick to Democrats, but I think a decent proportion will come to the right.
i guarantee absolutely fucking nothing will come of your efforts. have fun larping though.
That's not true, retard.
It is true though. "Hispanics" are not a monolith either, some groups within that group (Cubans, Mexicans, Argentines) are quite conservative.
If there is one group that I'd concede will always be mostly Democratic, it would be blacks. But Hispanics, Asians, and mixed people are up for grabs.
I would agree that the majority of minorities will stay Democratic. But I could see a significant chunk of minorities coming over to Republicanism. Many are benefiting from the strong Trump economy and wish to see less immigration, just as most whites would.
At the end of the day, America is not an ethnostate like the European nations are. Any nationalism here is going to be based on shared values, common culture, and strong social institutions.
They are subhumans and they should be forcibly removed and one day soon they will be.
Libertarian
Maybe the European states will do that, but it's not going to happen here. While I'd love an all-white America as much as anyone, it's not going to happen. People are strongly individualist here and focus more on culture and attitudes than race.
A nationalism based on common culture may not be perfect, but it sure beats what we have today.
The religious right has fucked Christianity beyond recognition.
Let me be clear, a free market economy and government non-intervention has absolutely nothing to do with egalitarianism, suffrage, or democracy. We've all seen what happens when you rely on public consensus for the approval of your actions, you get nowhere. I do not put stock in consensus. I am not trying to win over the public and slowly lead us out of the darkness through painfully slow and inefficient reformation. I prefer the Senator Armstrong approach of tearing out the problematic forces and let people say what they want. Call me a LARPer if you want, but at least I'm not just sitting back behind my computer passively watching things collapse.
>Gamers Unite!
All you need is the right people to get into office, you're """culture""" doesn't matter, Americans don't have any real culture anymore, at least the American culture that exists isn't anything more than consumerism, stuffy protestant churches, and shitty twang pop music.
>but at least I'm not just sitting back behind my computer passively watching things collapse.
You say that like it's a good thing. The system IS going to collapse as long as women get to vote and I for one would rather see it collapse today than tomorrow. The faster it collapses, the faster we can start rebuilding (and hopefully drawing lessons from the failings of previous generations).
You're fighting to transform a rotten system. I want to see it all torn down so we can build something new and better on its remnants, drawing lessons from the past for a brighter future.
Socialist party, centrist latino party, crazy racists from olde America party
Culture does matter. And what I'm talking about reviving is classic American culture - originalist Constitutionalism, cultural Protestantism, rule of law, etc.
Believe me, I'm not a fan of modern American culture either. And it would necessarily be reformed under a sort of values based nationalism. And a values based reform is much more realistic than waiting for a day of the rope.
>You're fighting to transform a rotten system. I want to see it all torn down so we can build something new and better on its remnants, drawing lessons from the past for a brighter future.
I don't think you understand. This path does not end well for you, or anybody else. My plan is to tear the government out and replace it with a better one. Just waiting for society to collapse on it's own will lead to massive destruction and decay. Not to mention, if the government goes without an immediate successor, you're left with a power vacuum that everyone with a gun and some friends is going to try to fill. A lot of people are going to die, and only the most proactive now will have a chance of surviving then.
You seem to not know about human psychology. You think people are going to finally see the failure of their government and suddenly jump ship to your side? People are going to go to the streets with their bullhorns and T-shirt cannons, announcing to their communities that the previous government failed because they didn't do enough and if you trust them they'll reform everything exactly how they want. The same tyranny, the same freebies, the same everything, but even more incompetent and unstable.
Nambla will dominate the political scene in America in my lifetime screencap this
It will do for a while, but I still want a day of the rope. Right death squads are only around the corner.
youtu.be
How to you intend to have the government force your values based culture on an unwilling public?
Won't happen.
We live in a two party first past the post system, and everyone in politics knows it.
If smaller parties ever become relevant on a national basis, they will be an entirely regional phenomena.
Totally untrue. He had 27% Hispanic support in 2016, Its currently down to 18% Black support around 8% You could be partially right if tariffs hit enough white voters, then their support might fall to 18% too. Not likely, because of brainwashed people like you on (pol)
It's a fun meme, but I don't see it happening here unless there was some sort of economic disaster. Even then, it would probably be politically based, not racially based.
I don't intend to have government force values. I would much rather have society step up and promote those values. Much like we did in the 1950s and prior.
Starting with the Boomers in the 1960s, Americans sort of gave up on protecting their culture. We need to instill that sort of cultural pride and protection in our citizenry again.
I don't know which polls you are sourcing, but the ones I've read (Quinnipiac, which is fairly moderate) has Trump support from Hispanics in Florida at 54% and in Texas at 46%. Both are pretty solid numbers which could keep those states red in the long haul.
>it would probably be politically based, not racially based.
Yeah, fuck off shill, you are a retarded dope. In anarchy birds of a feather stick together, and whites would stick together, things would naturally divide themselves based on racial and political lines.
I think in general whites would stick together, but there would probably be non-whites who joined the coalition they saw as winning.
>A truer centrist, middle-class, libertarian party to pull from the non-extremes of both parties.
This would be the worst possible outcome.
The asswipes of the far left and far right want to be obeyed. They are welcome to go fuck themselves.
Why you gotta Reddit up Jow Forums bruh?
You have to go back