What is the problem of having a small population

what is the problem of having a small population,

Attached: 40064475_1630827900350297_5276662554892959744_n.jpg (721x960, 79K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/huwattogohann/status/1030770250604634112
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

You lose in a war.

give it to me straight
is that a dude?

nope, thats the turkish cosplayer, i forget her name

wtf I love Mount and Blade now

The problem with small populations is that your army's small, and that makes it difficult to swing your dick around.

The problem with *declining* populations is that you can't pay the interest on all the debt you're in.

Businesses have to compete for workers.

you have to import immigrants to help circulate the economy and inevitably youl spiral down into poverty because thats what immigration results in.

>kvetching intensifies

/thread

Isn't it better than workers competing for businesses?

Absolutely nothing. The only thing large populations are good for is to progress technology faster. But that isn't necessarily a good thing.

The Anzu chick? If so kudos on this cosplay I didnt recognize her.

In what sense? If you mean the overall human population, it has slightly increased risk of being able to be wiped out all at once by something dumb. But on a nation/tribal level it means you get rolled by people with more people.

Not if you're the business or a politician living from donations by the business.

wtf I love Turks now

this chick is a weeb, what a gay visual kei poster in the background

Nukes change the game.

Why not be a micro-state of a few thousand that holds the world to ransom with nuclear warheads?

but goy, think about the GDP!
and don't you need africans to continue the japanese lineage?

Because how did you get into that state in the first place? We know how nukes work and they still aren't easy to make and the big boys that currently have the nukes don't like upitty little bitches making them.

ill do you one better, nigel. why not create a doomsday device in your shed and use it to hold the entire world ransom, thus effectively becoming the global dictator?

if anyone here believes having more people is inherently good and you must do it for "the economy" kill yourself

it's not anzu it's a jap, use image search next time

some jap i don't recognize
twitter.com/huwattogohann/status/1030770250604634112

But it is inherently good. Like said, if everyone has roughly the same genes, a virus could effectively wipe out the population. At best, with a small gene pool, you get teeth like the Brits or enough toes to count up to twelve. Looking at you, Carolinas. And that's not even taking into account the infant fatalities that can occur from so much inbreeding.

>Shitskins outnumber you and will never stop outbreeding you.
>The intelligent don't reproduce which just leaves idiots for the future generations.
>Welfare can't exist if the future population is smaller than the previous generation.
>Country with bigger population just has to overwhelm you by sheer numbers by sending massive hordes of "refugees" in to outbreed you.