Yes, "globalization" is probably inevitable, but not as the Globalists envision it

I'm not even taking a position on whether this is good or bad, I am simply observing natural trends in human behavior. For the time being, I urge everyone to remain separate and to remain patient. The key to successfully navigating this issue is time. We must allow the necessary duration for this process to play out naturally, without impatiently seeking to speed it up. The most disastrous path is to attempt a forced integration within our lifetimes. That is a sure recipe for world-wide violence and untold suffering. We must accept that our granchildren's grandchildren will still not be living under a single global culture, but they will be miles closer than we are currently.

Soon, everyone will be comfortably wealthy and choose their appearance on a daily basis. Then, governments will merge with charities and fade into the shadows.

You vision will fail and most likely cause the death of the planet. What ever being that created this place will not allow such an abomination, you may get close but it will be snatched from your grasp, just like last time. Maybe as the final brick is being set.

Attached: babel.jpg (354x142, 13K)

I would ask to know more. What parts of my assertion do you deem inaccurate?

History and nature love genocide my dude. Groups will fight to dominate and survive. Most naturally find mixing repulsive because they instinctually understand that it is the end of their own kind.

Our countries would more or less remain homogeneous to specific groups if not for jews trying to force this meme you've bought into. Now it's almost assured that there will be enormous bloodshed in the formerly all European lands of the world.

Can you explain whether you mean "Globalists" or "globalization" itself? And can you explain why?

I don't believe there is a evo-biopsych rationale which precludes my conclusion. I am actually drawing on both disciplines in making this assertion (as well as historical trends). Can you explain your reasoning?

Do you think borders are just arbitrary or do they tend to delineate specific genetic groupings' held territories?

People don't like to mix. Even with all of the propaganda virtually all groups have a strong in-group mating preference (see pic related). In voting patterns, people except for gaslit and browbeaten whites tend to vote their own racial interests.

How in the fucking world do you see this gay nonsense of people just "naturally" deciding to mix themselves into an ugly brown mongrel just happening?

Attached: datingexclusions.png (1600x682, 1014K)

For the record, I oppose open borders, and I denounce what has happened in Europe. This is entirely the wrong approach and the proof is seen in the currently observable consequences.

The plan was never to force interbreeding among the races to create a single race. That was the exoteric propaganda fed to the masses. It was a divide and conquer strategy to foment racial tensions and ultimately a civil war. It's part of a bigger picture, political theater. If you have the time listen to this and if you have more time keep following that rabbit hole on my channel.
youtu.be/CPpfdI-Q4VE

I half agree
A world government would be a lot worse than a single race

but a single race is still very bad

I see no reason to oppose such an outcome. My only caveat would be to ensure that the method by which this comes to be involves no force or coercion.

The Tower of Babel was a warning against the very thing that I oppose: forcing multiple cultures to cohabitate. Such is not my vision. I actually have no preference for outcome. My focus is on the method. If I am entirely wrong about the result, and distinct cultures choose to remain separate, then so be it. I simply urge that natural processes be allowed to play out without artificial manipulation, however well-intentioned such "Globalist" manipulators believe themselves to be.

90%+ of white, black, and latina women exclude asians, and ~40% of asian women... Holy shit

Are you a beige supremacist spurg suggesting the Fabian socialist’s plan of dead slow cultural manipulation and transition? If you look at the entire history of mankind to this day we end up at separate cultures and races still in existence. If the blending you suggest is so natural there would be many examples of this. Even with the rampant conquests wars and invasions throughout history we still see distinct racial groups that have maintained solidarity through all that. You are buying into the economic liberalism utopia and it’s a false god. Everything changes and that is the one thing you can count on, including our current failing state of political affairs. There will not be a thousand year reign of the current world order and the current agenda being pushed will be looked back on in the future as a tragic curiosity of the past or not even recorded and maybe at best carried in legend as some sort of Atlantis depending on who inherits the earth

I certainly agree that this has been the result of attempts to force integration unnaturally. I even allow that this may be intentional, though I remain skeptical. I am looking at the bigger picture and speaking to "true believers" who embrace globalism as a desired result. To them, I urge patience, and beg them to allow natural processes to achieve this result (if that is indeed the result of non-interference). I think we are speaking to slightly different subsets of issues under the broader topic.

Yeah I don't get why the east asian women have an outgroup pref. It doesn't make sense since any argument people tend to make for that would also be true of other women but they don't have that preference.

It's a real mystery.

I get it, anything more complicated than superficial black and white dialectical bullshit goes over your head. I just told you your definition of globalism is basically a psyop. Do you not understand words? The action is in the reaction you fucking retard.

The same way I am a mixture of Scottish, Polish, German, French and Cherokee. This happens over thousands of years as cultures once separate and distinct in their geographical regions eventually expand and encounter other cultures. This process is exceedingly slow and partially and function of growing populations spreading out. The only thing I see which could preclude this inevitable outcome is a drastic reduction in global population, shrinking the lands occupied by distinct groups such that they no longer naturally interact with people outside their immediate area. Sadly, I don't see any evidence that humans will achieve a reduction in population without external pressure (ie; it won't be done by choice).

You realize they live in a quasi fascist/communist society that controls their birth rate and this has a massive social effect. Also Chinese culture relating to family is very different than European western culture. They rely on the man of the family supporting his parents and also his wives parents. This leads to very selective breeding habits and obviously they would try and Mary the most financially successful man they can. The people of China have on average a preference for male children so as to be supported in their old age and you see abortion as a major factor and so they have more men than women

As much as I enjoy the diversity of multiple races and cultures, and have no desire to see them all eradicated by such homogeneous blending, I'm not so sure that a worldwide monoracial monoculture would necessarily be a bad thing. At the very least, I believe it to be inevitable, for good or ill.

This. If blending together was a natural trend there would be no need for endless propaganda and forced inclusiveness.

That's the Chinese for the last ~30-40 years only. It doesn't explain Japanese (who in the US the women have the highest rate of marring whitoids) and Koreans, and the Flips etc.

I'm 100% Germanic ancestry. We don't like to mix and even the Roman historian Tacitus noted this.

>Are you a beige supremacist spurg
I am not.

>...suggesting the Fabian socialist’s plan of dead slow cultural manipulation and transition?
I do not endorse any plan for achieving this outcome, I merely believe it to be the natural outcome which will obtain over time (a LONG time, if left alone).

>If you look at the entire history of mankind to this day we end up at separate cultures and races still in existence. If the blending you suggest is so natural there would be many examples of this.
There is ample evidence that many cultures and "races" have already blended, and that this trend continues.

>Even with the rampant conquests wars and invasions throughout history we still see distinct racial groups that have maintained solidarity through all that.
The definitions are becoming increasingly fuzzy specifically because of blending. So-called "pure" racial stock is becoming increasingly uncommon. Remember also that the world population has never been so high, nor have so many people been able to travel alnre blend on this scale before. We are entering uncharted territory. Even so, the compass still points North.

1/2

>You are buying into the economic liberalism utopia and it’s a false god.
I am not applying an ideological lense to this observation. I have no desired outcome. If I were to be proven wrong, so be it. I am mostly concerned about the method not the end result.

>Everything changes and that is the one thing you can count on, including our current failing state of political affairs.
True. And I steadfastly oppose the "Globalist" push to force integration within our lifetimes. That path is a disaster, as we already see.

>There will not be a thousand year reign of the current world order and the current agenda being pushed will be looked back on in the future as a tragic curiosity of the past or not even recorded and maybe at best carried in legend as some sort of Atlantis depending on who inherits the earth.
I belive you are correct, and I share your opposition to the methods currently being employed to accomplish a forced blending when we should be allowing several thousand years to allow it to happen naturally (if it does happen, as I believe it will).

2/2

There are those among the "elite" who desire to see this blending accomplished within their lifetime. Whether or not they believe themselves to be well-intentioned, this plan is folly. Far better that they were patient and accepted that this will happen eventually, but that they will not live to see that day. What is unnatural and requires such force, is the accelerated RATE of change, not the change itself.

You are no longer someone I wish to converse with.

I believe most "races" will remain distinct for a long time yet to come. I'm talking about very long-term trends. Thousands of years of SLOW blending.

Ya that’s interesting in relationship to the Japanes, I haven’t had a chance to talk in depth with a Japaese person. I worked with a Chinese guy in Vancouver and it was very interesting talking with him and we got into this a lot, he tried to sell me on the idea of him getting me a Chinese wife quite often. They really want to gtfo of China if any chance arises

I don't understand why anyone has a problem with the term races. In real terms it's basically just the same as a term we use for animals, subspecies.

These are all evolved differences. They're real and very profound and when you try to mix people together you get all sorts of bad results.

Attached: racednablood.png (1280x720, 1.39M)

This. Based leaf.

So we're just arguing timing? I don't understand why you're saying several thousands of years.

Without special means, I can be almost anywhere on the planet in less than a day. I can talk to almost anyone in less than a minute. This site started as Westerners celebrating Jap culture. I'm pretty sure half of Africa has University of Michigan t-shirts for some reason.

Economically, all our logistics chains and financial systems are intertwined. Unless forced by authoritarian government there's no way Apple would spend billions to recreate everything needed to make an iPhone here. They'd still have to important some rare elements. And of course that product would cost many times what it does even with tariffs. Our service economy is about getting money from the software side anyway.

Anyway, if you're in this century on this planet and want to do anything beyond live in a cave eating bats, you're already a globalist because this ball was rolling a long long time ago.

Attached: aXm4491xjU.jpg (650x650, 119K)

It seems that some people are under the mistaken impression that humans have "finished" evolving, and that natural selection is no longer an operative force.

I think I have a better idea of your position here now. One thing I think we in the west have a problem with, and this is probably a world wide phenomenon is inability to really try and view the world through other cultural lenses. I think you are right there will be more instances of miscegenation as there is increased contacts between different peoples but also there is huge cultural and racial in group preferences within people. Everyone has to think they are the good guys in the struggle in the world and as the world population grows ever greater there will be more conflict based contact imo. We in the west have our liberal lense to view the world through and our set of moralities and I think we sometimes assume those views are shared by other peoples and cultures. I think the west’s desire to globalize is just our current form of cultural colonialism. This whole one world thing is an echo of the Christian religious culture and the belief that we are all equal under god. This view is not shared by the vast aggregate of the worlds population as they have their own cultural lense to interpret the world. Some in the west think this one world is good and moral but you have billions of people to mentally colonize and convert to fully agree. White western people are only 9% of the worlds population if I remember correctly and our culture and civilization is being invaded en mass buy foreign peoples/culture who don’t share such an open view of the world. At some point if the trend continues we will loose control of our own destiny and we will be at the mercy of a foreign value set. If it’s Islam then potentially there will be a mixed world due to their inclusive religious beliefs but I highly doubt they will be capible of pulling that off

Sure, it's going to continue. Destroying evolved differences and making a mystery meat univsal world mongrel because you are wed to retard ideologies isn't smart, though.

Very well-said. I don't think I have much to add other than kudos.

I would dispute your assertion that the eventual state of being a monorace of "mystery meat mongrels" across the globe is necessarily a bad thing. I don't see skin color being as important as culture, while recognizing that these things have been tightly linked in the past. The changing biological blend will render these things increasingly less interwoven, as our DNA becomes more intertwined.

Trading between cultures/races, across borders, is a small (though critical) piece of the puzzle, but this should not be conflated with Globalism as an ideology or globalization as a phenomenon being described here. It is possible to trade with other cultures while remaining separate and distinct in all other ways, though this requires both cultures seek this end result of maintaining such distinctions. Though trade itself does lend momentum to globalization, it is not synonymous with being a Globalist in the modern parlance.

fuck you

Why?

>one love
shut the fuck up, life is about money not love

It’s not just a skin colour thing and goes much deeper. People and their genetic makeup is like a handshake with culture. The most successful people participating within their culture have generally had the most children and thus perpetuate the culture. The future belongs to those who show up for it as they say. I’m sure we can all recall people through our lives we’ve seen who are social outcasts for whatever reason and they tend to not do so well in the babie making business. Look at the general culture in the Middle East as an example. They have had their cultural/religious belief system and it’s quite authoritarian. That will definitely directly effect breeding patterns in their society. China could be considered as well. They have had their communist revolution and for say the last 80 years they have culled off 10’s of millions of their own people and then instituted regulations on the number of children. That’s a dramatic genetic bottleneck that effectively culled off the pro liberty types and has left the people that are pro communism or at least the types that keep their mouth shut and head down and go with the flow.

>races SLOWLY blend, becoming more and more homogeneous, until a single global monoculture arises
With the Jews are the spiritual aristocracy
t. Kalergi Plan

Globalisation is about being friendly too eachother, not racemixing so there is one race of abomination since the mixing and forced "evolution" would be way too fast and cause unseen or planned damage to mixed human life.

And just being friendly with eachother doesnt seem to be a possible solution either since most people are stupid and like to fight, if u let people do there thing they will start doing bad degen things like child predation, trans, gay stuff etc, u need some kind of ruler and only a godlike figure or very dominant/likeable person can rule and sort out the freethinking that leads to bad ends in hands of idiots.