Be brown user

Ok wtf

She fetishized you for the colour of your skin, and the associated stereotype.
That's what thots do.

Let me guess, she probably identifies as left-leaning and socially liberal right?

Claims to abhor racism in all it's forms?

If so, she's as fixated on race as any White Supremacist, which naturally precludes you from ever having a "real" relationship with her.

No matter how much of your true self you share with a woman like that, she'll only ever see you as a sex object.

Black men are objectified by white women.
I'm convinced all the white thots in the social justice movement are literally just fishing for BBC.

>brown user
>German flag

nice

> invented English
> "it's forms"

Attached: image.jpg (1125x1358, 604K)

Kill me pete

Attached: 1502944563612.jpg (444x444, 123K)

Jeeze, well I guess that nullifies that anons entire post. Glad I don't have to think of a reply now.

The jews also used it to destroy american black culture as well. They went from soul train to Natural Born Killaz. The greatest trick the devil ever played is convincing the world he didn't exist. The greatest trick the jews ever played was convincing people they were white.

why aren't you dating a brown woman? arab women are literally the prettiest women are the planet..

She's just saying your dick too small

Attached: F31727A7-CE86-4F5F-A478-C78B59CCDFC1.jpg (430x217, 27K)

I'm a blacksmith by trade.

Not an (((English Major))).

STEM, trades, or death.

You just a cuck with tiny cock. Skin with shit COLOUR doesn’t make you special

this
/thread

('s) is not just plural, its also possessive.

forms possessed by racism

user's stupidity. =/= user is stupidity.

(you)

Have you tried just to B urself?

>STEM, trades, or death
Commercial electeician. Headed out the door for the standard 7am-330pm.
We do all the underground conduit type shit. $27 an hour. Not bad for a "wage cuck" as the loser neets would say

's is never possessive you retarded faggot, what the fuck? Stupid nigger.

Attached: image.jpg (640x798, 242K)

>qt
Nope you dated a stacy

Jelly, I'm in a dead field, but I knew that when I took it up.

It's special to me though, so it doesn't matter if all I can use it for is supplementing my bennies with minor canal boat repairs.

Fuck up bitch.

Attached: image.jpg (992x564, 307K)

Now I think about it, I have google.

"The general rule is that the possessive of a singular noun is formed by adding an apostrophe and s, whether the singular noun ends in s or not. The possessive of a plural noun is formed by adding only an apostrophe when the noun ends in s, and by adding both an apostrophe and s when it ends in a letter other than s."

Basically, fuck you retard.

That rule doesn't apply to the word its, period. Fuckin' pathetic that you don't know the intricacies of your own language, faggot. Lmao, IQ of 85, pussy?

Attached: image.jpg (1200x675, 432K)

This is good bait

>TFW I have an english degree and I work in a machine shop
Law school seemed like a waste of time.

You're trying very hard to elicit an emotional reaction from a stranger on the internet.

Were you ignored as a child?

I'm getting a sort of needyness vibe from your posts.

But by all means, keep shitposting, (((it's))) telling of your inner nature.

cho ass up nigger, no one cares.

Attached: image.jpg (680x655, 139K)

>too white
>not too German
Fake and gay

What the fuck, faggot? The word is neediness, how retarded are you? Fuckin' can't spell, don't know your own grammar, bitch, get the fuck off the site and go pick up a book you moron.

Attached: image.jpg (800x1135, 504K)

You probably embraced the white culture so much that she didn't expect you to be so civilized, rather thinking she was dating a gorilla with a big dick.

But anyway you dodged a bullet there desu.

Attached: e5upSHu.png (512x380, 216K)

>nigger
>too lazy to type "shut"
the lady doth protest too much

Stop posting, homo.

Attached: image.jpg (1534x1422, 185K)

You are telling me about yourself with every word you type.

None of it is flattering.

She wanted to be slapped around so she could blame all her mental shortcomings on the abuse she hoped you would provide. Why didn't you hit her user, she was asking for it.

t. reddit-spaced faggot whose country gave birth to international jewry

Attached: image.jpg (600x600, 116K)

Kill me, pete.

I'm getting an image.

It's an image of a small sad man with few friends and a dead-end job he hates.

Personal development seems to have stalled at some point in the teenage years.

Possible autistic spectrum disorder, going by the obsession with form over function.

May be a student of (((English Literature)))

Is certainly an ass-blasted faggot who can't troll to save his life.

You have to spin webs of intentional logical fallacy, not flame insensibly like you're on your period.

Come on mate, step up your game, you can do better than this, right?

>brown

Flag checks out.

This psychology shit never works on Jow Forums mate, don't waste your time

Freudian bullshit isn't real psychology.

Kill me, Pete.

He's as good as telling me this shit himself.

And to be honest I'm more of a Jungian by proclivity.

His behaviour is archetypical - he is a broken Timonist lashing out indiscriminately.

Jung is retarded too.

t. I read the Red Book.

Human psychology is retarded.

And Semiotics is a pretty big part of how we integrate concepts into our world-view.

Plus, he gave us ideas like "the collective unconscious".

Modern psychiatric methodologies are if anything even more retarded.

They don't even bother with real patient analysis in the CBT model.

Kill me, Pete

Attached: file.png (1365x767, 962K)

Hello there, my white countryman

Attached: file.png (768x768, 879K)

Kill me, Pete

Thank you for showing me the CBT model. I got nothing from a therapist because she was using it, but I didn't know why that didn't work until now. One good turn deserves another so I see your CBT and raise you the PAS.

The CIA's chief psychologist from 1950 to 1974 John Gittinger created the Personality Assessment System. Personality is mostly determined from the interrelation of IQ subtest scores, sex, and life experiences. The CIA uses it to make psychological profiles on world leaders and to guide their interrogations. There is far too little on it, but you can find a lot on the PAS Foundation website pasf.org

Neato burrito.
I'mma look that up.

CBT was adopted in the UK, and presumably elsewhere precisely because it's a system that promotes minimal investment in the patient - it's not so much effective as "cost effective".

Did your (((CBT))) consist mostly of long sessions where you dredge up your deepest personal troubles and end with being not-sosubtly told to cease and desist engaging in wrongthink?

In broad strokes, that was how mine panned out.

>As if non-Freudian psychology wasn't also complete bullshit.

Attached: milk.gif (480x256, 2.87M)

That is how it worked. She said I wasn't emotional enough, which ironically pissed me off although I didn't chimp out, and then asked if she should be using the cognitive-behavioral approach or something else. I told her I didn't think I was qualified to answer that. I now realize that she wasn't either. The only real benefit I got from that therapy was the placebo effect of being able to tell myself I was trying to make a positive step.

I found PAS later by chance and it actually helped. It isn't the Myers-Briggs because it has more validity and every personality sucks. Some are also worse than others. When you read yours it will hit you like a ton of bricks. I'm glad I read it because if I didn't know how I was messed up I had no chance of fixing it.

Maybe you have a small dick?

That's what we get for dabbling in pseudo-science I'm afraid.

I mean, when psychiatric medicine has a worse cure-rate than fucking homeopathy, you know something's deeply wrong with the foundations of the system.

They seem to know this, because they revise the entire subject every decade or so and make up a new DSM to go with it, but it's just a bait and switch tactic to distract from the fact that they have made zero progress towards understanding the human mind ibn any objective sense.

it's all just constructs, and constructs of constructs.

For my money they probably won't get anything right until they figure out a way to read the chemical flux of a still healthy and living human brain.

I'm afraid that I disagree. Very often in disciplines there is a more effective methodology that isn't used. The reason being that the current methodology has political support. Shitty psychology as it exists doesn't cure anyone, but it does help sane people feel better. If scary people can be explained away as the consequence of Freudian complexes or if sad people just aren't trying to be happy hard enough that says something reassuring. The hard truth is scary and it scares the beneficiaries of the current lie the most.

Sounds like a lark, I haven't found anything that really (((Triggered))) me in ages.

In defense of Jung though, I think his approach to attaining a sustainable state of mind through confronting and integrating your "Shadow", sounds superficially similar to your description of PAS - though perhaps less formalized and more idiomatic.

Tell me if I'm whiffing here, I'm gonna google PAS after I make coffee.

I must admit, I spent nine years being worked on by various therapists, they all concluded that I was in some way "abnormal" but no clinical label was ever applied.

I realized this was because they were waiting for ME to indicate what I fuckin "identified" as, whether that be autistic, traumatized or personality disordered.

I chose none of the above, because to me it indicated that their conceptual schema was arse-uppards, and promoted feels over reals in the most literal sense.

I mean, the decision to pathologize certain naturally occurring human traits is basically just normative ethics, and normative ethics are localized, not universal and fluctuate over time.

Not saying that there aren't valid areas within the field, but it's so lumbered with shitty practice and the exact sort of political bullshit you're talking about that I feel the better more useful areas of practice need to distance themselves from it.

Like Chemistry emerging from Alchemy.

Women are the worst niggers

What is your heritage?

Jung's methodology was shit, but that doesn't mean he was 100% wrong. His methodology was to have vivid hallucinations and then to interpret their broader meaning. After recording these hallucinations in his Red Book he would engineer a study to prove them. Jung also spent a lot of time studying religions and I suspect that he successfully distilled some of the wisdom in their teaching. Basically he was a better historian than a scientist.

I hate the long-winded explanations that the PAS guys use so I'll try to give a brief summary. There are three levels to personality those being cognitive, procedural, and social. You have a basic type, which you are born with and always revert to under stress. You can compensate wherein you by second nature have learned to suppress, although not necessarily repress, that trait. You can also modify which is when you make a conscious decision to act a certain way.

Cognitive: Internalizer or Externalizer
Internalizers retreat within themselves to think, if they are thinking they move around less, and in the extreme they are autistic. Externalizers interact with their environment more, they can't tune out distractions, and in the excess they are hyperactive. The IQ subtest to tell them apart is digit span which is remembering a series of numbers. Internalizers do that better and are way better at remembering them backwards. That's because internalizers don't need context to remember things.

cont.

Luckily I only had 6 sessions before I was told to fuck off basically. Salvagable parts exist for sure, but you get it.

Procedural: Regulated or Flexible
Regulated people are easy to train because they learn by the numbers. If you show him how to do something he will do it exactly like you showed him. However they struggle at grasping the big picture. Flexible people are harder to train because they have to understand to learn. They need the big picture. If someone is flexible they cried very easily as a child and thus in men have often learned to suppress this. F compensated people are trying to be mean, R people don't mean to be mean. The IQ subtest that tells them apart is block design wherein the tested person has to rearrange blocks exactly as they were shown. Flexible people try to figure out new ways to do it and take too long.

Social: Role Uniform or Role Adaptable
A role uniform person settles into the same role every time. If they've learned to compensate for it they can be somewhat socially competent outside of an ideal situation. A role adaptable person makes great first impressions and in the excess can be conman. Adaptable people often get along better with acquaintances than friends because they haven't let down acquaintances yet. The IQ subtest that tells this is picture arrangement. Adaptable people can intuitively tell how a picture fits together much faster than role uniform people. This caused a lot of fuss when first revealed because prisoners out did Harvard students at arranging cartoons from the New Yorker, which all the Harvard students subscribed to. Prisoners are overwhelmingly A because they are more fun. Good students are more often U because they aren't disruptive.

>white woman that would be race mixing with a brown person.
so all of them?

>acting too white
The niggerdom on this board has reached critical mass

Attached: 1536129259306.png (650x676, 582K)

If she dumped you for not acting like a chimp then she probably wouldnt have been good for you anyways

Just fucking wow.

Attached: 1528255173160.gif (499x499, 747K)

The reason CBT didn't work with me is that I was missing part of their schema. Thoughts, behavior, and feelings all influence each other in a circular pattern according to them. They couldn't make sense of someone who didn't use feelings as much as they were supposed to so I was made to screw off.

>dating (((white women)))

Well, could you interpret this hallucination?
I hallucinated with an ultraorthodox Jewish boy (around 8 years-old) with signs of retardation due to XXY trisomy, who did a small jump then flexed his enlarged chest muscles as if he was a chicken.
What does it mean?

Attached: ultraorthodox_boy.jpg (680x455, 90K)

where da wyte bitchez at, yo...?

Attached: image.jpg (491x498, 24K)

sounds like you dodged a bullet, be happy

I can't interpret that to save my life because it makes no sense to me. I assume that it is related to a sexual fantasy you have, but I don't know.

Jung would write about that story in his journal. Every character would be deeply affected by meeting him. Afterward he would draw a couple of lessons from it. I can't make one up here without it being total horseshit so I won't.

Zounds!

Well, I'm pretty evenly split between Internalizer and externalizer, as I tend to retreat into my brain under pressure, but am very suceptible to distraction.

I'm more flexible than regulated for sure, if I don't understand what ends I'm working towards I can't deal

And I'm certainly more uniform than adaptable - I'm not really a visual learner, and I have a pretty niche set of abilities and proclivities.

I'm on the site right now, it's all pretty interesting, will go deeper.

Clinical trials were slap-dash for CBT in the UK, they were carried out over periods of less than half a year for expedience, and few if any follow-up studies were done to see if the feel-good effect was remotely persistent.

I'm pretty down on CBT in general as I see it as a cost-cutting tool for a failing national institution - as the NHS provides psychiatric services on more or less the same basis as medical ones, excepting that it tends to ignore you outright until you indicate signs of being a danger to others.

Looks like my guesses based off your descriptions were in roughly the right ballpark; took the first test.

Overall profile:IFU

Intellectual Dimension: Internalizer (I) with relative strength (1-20) of 8
Procedural Dimension: Flexible (F) with relative strength (1-20) of 4
Social Dimension: Role Uniform (U) with relative strength (1-20) of 18
High Activity Level

That is le autiste according to my testing on the inhabitants of Jow Forums. These questions are to figure out your adjustments.

Were you forced to socialize at a young age? Are you a dick?
Do you have a niche wherein you are socially regarded?

I'm EcFcAc which means I'm way up my own ass, good at research, but bad at intimate relationships.

>be white user
>start dating dis qt girl
>a few weeks later she dumps me for "acting too black"
wat da fuq niqqas
wat da hell wrong wit women dat dey b believin not acting like a wyteboi is a bad thing? baka

>>>africa

whiter than you baphomeht

Kill me, Pete

Be careful around fire with that strawman of yours

Kill me pete

>beautiful women want nothing but big-dicked chimps who can rave and shit
kms

user's Post begs to differ, retard. the 's is how you know it's his, otherwise many anons post.
see the difference?
learn english for fucks sake

Niggas unironically need Jesus

lol all this projection and reddit line breaks. jesus christ dude, just end yourself already, no need to drag it out.

holy shit lmao

Attached: kek.jpg (500x333, 96K)

Autist is debatable - I got tested once and came out smack bang on the points border between NT and Cybertronian, I'm going through the adjustment levels right now.

Wasn't socialised as a kid, I'm forgiving of faults other than malice and generous with material goods, but blunt and highly critical so "dick" is up in the air, I'm pretty asocial, but my house is usually swarming with guests, whom I tolerate.

Shit man, it's not like I had to grapple with his intense academic rigor.

Anyway, I razzed him and he took off, so he either got bored shitposting or I hit a nerve.

Either way, he's not shitting up the thread, and actual conversation is flourishing, so that's a win for me.

Don't make me razz you pal, I'll razz you but good.

I might even post frogs at you.

Did you have to learn to be tough? I did and it was well described as being sensitive about being sensitive.

Not sure I'd call myself tough, but I'm belligerent when prodded.

Combative even, I suspect this stems from a deep personal insecurity due to peer-group rejection.

I'm more likely to engage someone verbally or intellectually, but if things turn physical I compensate for my own perceived weakness by out-escalating the challenger.

So yeah, laying it out like that, I wouldn't describe myself as tough.

Rooster Cogburn I am not.

I suspect that you aren't very organized then.

Hello Moshe, how are things going in Jewland today? Raped any kid yet?

this, holy shit

Quite correct, my organizational skills are objectively sub-par.

Overall, I'm seeing this is similar in format to MBTI, and I can see the application of both, as the methodologies don't seem to be mutually exclusive.

MBTI I usually come out as an INTP, this method appears have factors MBTI doesn't account for though.