There are $15,000,000 dollars worth of infrastructure in this picture. Where's the tax base to pay for it...

There are $15,000,000 dollars worth of infrastructure in this picture. Where's the tax base to pay for it? Do you really think those tacky strip malls are going to pay that much in property taxes? Half their land is unused parking.

My point is: this way of development is copied over and over again in North America, and Americans still wonder why their cities are crumbling, why their local governments choose to build a $50 million dollar bypass next to an already existing bypass, but still having to lay off police and firemen, shut down libraries, underfund schools. Detroit was just an early adopter of this system. All of America will become Detroit in the next couple of decades, just wait! Plano, TX, Carmel, IN, Naperville, IL? If you think these towns are /comfy/ and nice, just wait and see when their bills come due. They're the Baltimores, Chicagos and Gary, Indianas of the future.

Attached: Urban-Sprawl-5.jpg (2978x1177, 3.25M)

Sigh.. what should be build instead superior euro faggot?

>Where's the tax base to pay for it?
Hasn't been born yet hence borrowing with bond measures that pay interest.

Youre just salty because your entire country is smaller than the average state

By building beautiful, walkable neighborhoods that capture value. You don't build wealth by moving 18,000 cars at 70 miles per hour through your city. You build wealth by incrementally building a community where people thrive and prosper. Think how much money and value per acre US cities would create if they were build like pic related? Your nation would be close to debt free.

Attached: community_about.jpg (653x298, 90K)

You don't have to build infrastructure around cars. Cities should be built to prioritise pedestrian travel. Just look at Amsterdam and Copenhagen for examples of well-designed cities.

There’s plenty of tax base to pay for that. White areas are high-producing and filled with economic activity. America is a rich country. We abandoned our cities to the niggers because they are horrific to live around.

How many niggers live in Amsterdam and Copenhagen, pray tell?

No YOUR CITIES should be built to prioritize pedestrian travel.

I don't get why you euro faggots refuse to understand that the USA is not Europe.

>walkable neighborhoods that capture value.

Pure fucking ignorance, the world is not norway.

We dont want to live on top of each other like ants I can buy 500 acres of land for the cost of an apartment in your country

Try and explain that to the developers and city officials who bulldozed orchards and put up heavy industry and particle board apartment shitholes and condos and attached housing pieces of disposable garbage along prime riverfront property.

It is the will of the stupid dictating how we live. Why we live. I blame many others for my own isolation. Fuck this gay earth.

like paris for example

Attached: parisslum.png (700x359, 496K)

If you exclude places where 0,0001% of Canadians live, like Nunavut and the Northwest Territories, you have a higher population density than Norway.

We sadly build this way too, but I'm focusing on North America, because you're the biggest culprits of it.

Attached: european mistakes.png (1897x967, 2.97M)

But then they will get overtaken by nig nogs within 5-10 years and we have to spend all that time and money building the exact same thing again

>By building beautiful, walkable neighborhoods that capture value.
The trouble is we have niggers. If a place is walkable, they will walk there and destroy it. A lot of the things that doesn't seem to make sense with the US, ie, infrastructure or bad public transportation, will make sense once you see them through the lense of niggers. Avoiding niggers without pointing out the problem of niggers or appearing racist.

There's no reason why you couldn't have cities like ours if you wanted to. I went to Los Angeles a few months ago and it was a complete nightmare. It was almost impossible to get anywhere without a car

OP seems retarded desu senpai

There is nothing wrong with high density living. It's actually quite cosy desu

How is it better to have to drive everywhere?

>There's no reason why you couldn't have cities like ours if you wanted to
Niggers and to a lesser extent, beaners. There be your reason.

>You don't have to build infrastructure around cars.
Yeah I'm not taking the bus and walking everywhere like a poor person

Privacy you faggot.

The US has plenty of cities built like your cartoon, eurocuck. They're all in debt.

eurocucks should all be gassed.

How is driving somewhere better than walking?

You're not even half right! Places like this ,if left NIGGERLESS,will be just fine! Niggers are what has destroyed urban America. If they spread enmasse to the suburs,we're doomed. Crime ,Drugs and abortion help keep them in check ! Worry about the dunecoon invasion of Europe asshole!

>Where's the tax base to pay for it?
Driving on the highway in the back mong.

>$15,000,000 dollars worth of infrastructure
infrastructure is managed by the government for public use.

Stores and restaurants are NOT infrastructure!

Pic related - cool infrastructure.

Attached: USP (4).jpg (660x437, 71K)

They're talking about pedestrianising George Sq in Glasgow, it can work as long as arrangements for delivery vehicles and emergency services are in place.

The nearest big city's to me are 5 hours away by car(portland and san francisco) it takes 10 hours by bus. Public transportation is slow and you cant bring anything with you.

Attached: kek.jpg (1024x576, 97K)

Texas is sweat on your balls hot most of the year, if euros had their way everyone would walking around in the heat like a bunch of homeless faggots.

Lol wut? Oh maybe because euro cars are little toys unless you buy a BMW or lambo?

It's beautiful. I wanna go to Cracker Barrel and drink an XL coke. God bless America.

Attached: min-joon-tears1.png (800x450, 296K)

Not an argument. I don't see Norway as a particuarly good example of good urbanism anyway. We have the same problems as you do, but to a smaller extent.

>walkable areas = slums

Right. How exactly do you think America became a wealthy and successful country before mass-automobilization? It certainly wasn't what you're doing now. Cities going to the casino and putting it all on red (i.e. big shovel ready sites and tax-free zones to attract development).

Most nigs live in underserved areas with value businesses few and far between. Have you driven through some black neighborhoods? They're filled with empty parking lots, shuttered buildings and extremely expensive infrastructure to serve cars going at 45 mph through them. Look at examples like Glenwood Park in Atlanta as successful walkable neighborhoods. There are even better examples out there, you just have to look.

Attached: Braine58.jpg (468x299, 38K)

American suburbs (not unlike vaccines) are an example of an idea being too successful for its own good. Just as vaccines eliminating disease lead to the anti-vax movement, suburbs successfully isolated whites from the horrors of living with minorities for three generations now. See back in the 1940s and 50s whites fled to suburbs and built communities that only people with cars (read: money) could live in. Unfortunately this worked so well we now have people who forgot that the reason their ancestors fled was to escape the crime. Yes, cities work great when their populations are people, but when 45% of the populations are literally mentally retarded and unable to form a civil society, it just spoils it for the rest of them. Cities do not work in America, and will never again work in America, and depending on Norwary's immigration policy, may stop working for you.

Unrelated to cities, but semi-related to my first point, the anti-vax movement is actually really small. The vast majority of the infections being reported and blamed on the movement are immigrants from countries without vaccines. Because immigrants can do no harm, however, the media needed a boogy man to blame.

Your tax base is in the mansions, high-rise penthouse apartments, and hi-tech designer smarthomes. The owners of all the businesses you see in that picture are the ones who exploit their workers, crush unions before they start, and lobby against a minimum wage keeping pace with inflation.

They are robbing the poor of the purchasing power to support the economy, the least they can do is pick up the slack themselves.

>impossible to get anywhere without a car
This is true. Before I started driving all the time I couldn't get to where I wanted to go. It was 30 minutes plus walk to the gym, which I used as a warm up of sorts. Now that I do drive all the time, things have become much easier. Cant even use public transit because of all the undesirables.

I can get in my car and drive to nome alaska turn around drive to argentina turn around again and drive to new york city.

you just know 14 of those 15 million $ where squandered, used for bribes or "lost"

>You don't build wealth by moving 18,000 cars at 70 miles per hour through your city
actually you do, transit time and ease of mobility is a huge factor in economic performance, by building a highway or a transit line you connect millions to each other in job markets and reduce lost time. it's really funny hearing puny shitholes like norway try to explain to the most powerful economy in the history of our species how to do things.

It just werks

SUV for potholes
2nd amendment for protection

>cities like ours
Nah, you can keep londonistan.

woops.

Attached: 1522179640739.jpg (1018x767, 171K)

>doesnt live in a strip mall
youre doing it wrong

But where's your proof? You only say this with the assumption it's true, because this is what you've been force-fed by modern conservative rhetoric (I'm a conservative, but I'm a stout opponent of the suburban money-hole). Look at the data for Cobb County, Georgia for instance. It's one of the fastest growing, most beautiful (by Jow Forums standards) suburban counties in America. But still, despite all this growth, it's in a huge money hole. It's quickly on the trajectory of going bankrupt. You see this same pattern all over America.

Attached: Cobb+4.jpg (748x443, 179K)

truck of peace bait

What's it like having modern technology and fast trains? I can't fathom it.

Usually the corporations pay a share of the infrastructure costs. At least 50%.

Why don't you sort your own government out before trying to fix others.

german urban starter pack
Check

Attached: germanriver.jpg (1000x642, 200K)

Long term development doesn't work when niggers are legally allowed to move in and shi t a place up

I'm sorry, but Americans actually like owning land. Euroserfs can just enjoy their cuckpartments and proximity to the racial underclasses.

Earth is flat.

got trains for those too

Attached: 1485123047454.png (800x800, 97K)

He's right you know. The way boomers run our cities is criminally irresponsible.

This looks like the downtown of every non-niggered city I've ever been too here. Maybe slightly more European in aesthetics and not enough mutts, but it's there.

we have those dreams too hans

Attached: meanwhile.jpg (500x374, 68K)

As a traffic engineer, your sheer ignorance is astounding. I've never said transportation is unimportant, in fact, I think it's as important as you do. The difference is that I want government to seperate between a road and a street. Because today, cities build something called a stroad, a street-road hybrid. It's roads like pic related, build at highway standards to move large volumes of traffic between neighborhoods, while at the same time attempting some wealth creation. They're enormously expensive to build, and they're extremely low yielding investments. Norway is a suburbanized country, and I actively try to talk some sense into the planners and engineers I work with. Here, just like in the US, there is a huge belief that moving cars fast is the number one priority, all the safety and cost problems be damned!

Attached: Screen+Shot+2018-08-03+at+10.11.27+AM.png (1000x424, 590K)

Now replace Muslims with Mexicans and times it by 20 and you have America

Bring back the horsecar.

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1920x1280, 482K)

Americans really don't understand how horrible living most of them do is to people who aren't used to it.

Also, they can't conceive of an urban neighborhood that isn't overrun with subhumans. Its a shame. It really is quite comfy.

It looks like this because of you.

Agreed. All of the mostly white/asian towns on the outskirts of my city look like that. Beautiful places, just costly.

OP the answer is when you give jews enough money and power they will keep fucking hookers who make jewish bastards who become politician puppets for the jews who wind up becoming even more rich and more jewish and more powerful and eventually the world is ran by a bunch of perverted jewish bastard mutts who do not know how to be responsible or sane and they do things like ruining the planet because they are jewish and deserve a swift death in order to preserve the dignity of our people.

What an offensively stupid post.

I didn't realize I was so powerful, and you were such a cuck.

In the US before 1913 income tax was 1% and all public services were funded with tarriffs. Fuck taxation. It is theft.

Strawman.

Attached: straw-man3.jpg (815x1087, 693K)

Our country is like 30 times the size of yours. Neglecting to build proper highways and overpasses would be a detriment to transportation and the economy.

Replace Mexicans with Chinks and you have Canada.

Ignore the retards responding to your post.
You are absolutely correct.

i wish i could live in the US and drive everywhere, i fucking love driving. just driving with some good music on u feel amazing. ohwell

Attached: 1516301000905.jpg (319x331, 13K)

I hate urban sprawl and it will be the death of our nation
Way too much energy is wasted in inefficient transit, and nobody is investing in Nuclear or other renewable energy sources that would save oil for the cars we inevitably need to drive hours back and forth each day to suburbs or the sticks

Attached: 1536298184578.jpg (640x640, 46K)

>just wait and see when their bills come due
House the coal, pay the toll!

What an excellent argument, I think you're on the verge of changing my mind!

Attached: maxresdefault (2).jpg (1920x1080, 66K)

>In the US before 1913 income tax was 1% and all public services were funded with tarriffs. Fuck taxation. It is theft.
EVERYTHING WAS BETTER BEFORE THE FIRST WORLD WAR

FUCK SERBS

This makes sense in counties the size of New Hampshire. It does not make sense in a country the size of a continent. Hell some of our cities are potentially bigger than entire provinces in Europe.

there's walkable, then there is completely impassable

Attached: oxford.jpg (851x564, 150K)

this man knows

Attached: 1521420215296.jpg (409x409, 35K)

based

Christ that looks like a drag to live in. Almost like a Favela.

>non-sequitur about immigration

Same
Thats why I barely do anything in Vienna. It is impossible to use your car and the public transport is full of disgusting shitskins

Attached: 1535285076912.jpg (460x488, 58K)

I don't see where I talked about national intercity transportation. I'm talking about urban development. Europe does a good job of connecting urban centers without running highways through the hearts of the cities. Unfortunately, we do that in Norway though.

Me too. But I also love a good cheeseburger, that doesn't mean I'm going to eat one at every meal.

The suburbs should be more closely embedded into the cities.

Of course, since property value skyrockets the cities and landlords inevitably demolish beautiful low density housing to increase profits.

Nothing wrong with commercial strips. Euros just are confused by car dominated layouts

No one wants to be that close to shitskins and faggot liberals.

Agree - Europe, especially in northern European countries, has superior public spaces and public transportation, which makes life letter for everyone. It's like having a citywide yard - you can go anywhere you please in quality public spaces. You can walk, run, bicycle almost anywhere without dealing with motorized traffic. etc.

Attached: Helsinki public space.jpg (1000x690, 128K)

You can still have roads, but it doesn't mean you have to run highways through your towns and cities.

yeah our country used to be like this, than nimby fuck rich people didn't like bums and low lifes using their infrastructure, so they huddled together to shut down public transportation and create a network of highways and byroads so you can get in your goy mobile to drive to the destination - so the scumsuckers are partially immobilized and out of sight.
Too bad the oversight was "if you can't see it the problem goes away" short term solution. Now you gotta feral niggers and sandbaggers all over the place and they can drive.

It's all moot, because you're next to a bunch of shitskins. Even if you just had your own kind this is not how everyone wants to live, RIGHT next to each other

damn, america looks like that? where are the paths?

You're wasting your time trying to argue with these people Norgebro

Never believe that Americans are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The Americans have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse - by deliberately giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of any debate. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

>There are $15,000,000 dollars worth of infrastructure in this picture.
Why are roads so damn expensive, you can build a mini motel or 5 story condo building with that money. Shits whack...

You can walk across Europe in 2 hours

ALMOST HEAVEN
WEST VIRGINIA

Attached: 1523865934064.png (1054x526, 38K)

Norway is 1500% larger than New Hampshire, but that's not the point. The US has a higher population density than Norway, and that includes everything from Alaska to the Rocky Mountains, the empty Midwest and West Texas. The size difference argument is bullshit. Besides, I'm not even talking about transportation in the nation as a whole, I'm talking about in cities. Despite my opposition to suburban sprawl, I still support the interstate highway system, as long as it does what it was designed to do: connect cities, not destroy them.

Nig

i swear they only hire the dumbest fucking people to shill online.

BUT MUH CARSSSS! MUH HUGE TRUUUCKSSSS!