Embryonic IQ selection: The debate/concern on IQ science is about to go nuclear!!

>Although it’s still taboo to talk about, some medical scientists are trying to figure out how to use the polygenic intelligence scores to pick the smartest embryo from an IVF dish, choose the best sperm donor, or discover fetuses at high risk for an expanded menu of cognitive disorders, including autism.

>Dalton Conley, a sociologist at Princeton University, says as soon as the IQ predictions reach the double digits—something that could occur very soon—we will need to have a “serious policy debate” about such “personal eugenics.” One concern is that IVF is expensive. That could lead to a situation in which the wealthy end up using IQ-test technology to pick kids with select genes while the poor don’t, leading to an unequal society that Conley calls a “genotocracy.”

>Others suggest that genetic models of intelligence will be used to compare races, ethnic groups, or people from different parts of the world. In an editorial about the genetics of race published in the New York Times on March 23, Harvard University biologist David Reich cited the new genetic IQ predictors and cautioned that “all traits influenced by genetics are expected to differ across populations.”

>technologyreview.com/s/610339/dna-tests-for-iq-are-coming-but-it-might-not-be-smart-to-take-one/

What the FUCK are we going to do about this Jow Forums? Embryonic IQ selection is on the fucking horizon and due to PC culture only the rich might get access to it. No way we can expect the gov't to subsidize this because than that would be acknowledging that races differ by IQ which would confirm that the racist were always right.

But at the same time, if we only allow the rich to abuse this tech than majority of the population is going to get FUCKED, regardless of race. Even a 100 IQ is basically nigger status to someone with an IQ of 130+. And you know IVF tech will get better as demand increases, we can't have only the rich exploiting this sort of world changing tech.

Attached: 1524198965946.png (392x353, 87K)

A nigger flag poster is concerned about the implications of IQ scores and genetic testing - shocking.

Attached: 83B9C7D4-17ED-4C9E-8811-FEFA3A5437A8.jpg (474x285, 53K)

>all traits influenced by genetics are expected to differ across populations
Jow Forums was right again

Attached: myth 7.png (1056x927, 194K)

I was shitposting earlier and forgot to switch back to normal. All nigger flags are just white guys shit/cuck posting for fun.

The day I've been waiting for. What the fuck now science? People are going to start talking about low black IQs like your geneticists have been for 30 years in their ivory towers away from the unwashed masses.

Shit is about to get real. We are at a turning point of history.

>The day I've been waiting for.

You've been waiting for the Rich/high IQ to horde tech that will make them even smarter and richer?

Well I personally would take a more egalitarian approach to using this tech. I was waiting for them to do endless research on genetic IQ differences and then re-realize they're not evenly distributes across groups. They've been doing mad science about IQ and genetics for years. It's only one step away from saying races are different because each are genetically different.

>Well I personally would take a more egalitarian approach to using this tech.

I agree. And it seems the best egalitarian approach is for this tech to be subsidize heavily by the gov't. Imo, low IQ parents should receive this free, and be heavily encouraged to do so by society. But the issue is that the left and society as a whole may reject any politician pushing this policy for ideological reasons. Just read below:

>Others are holding back. The largest company offering direct-to-consumer DNA health reports, 23andMe, says it’s not telling people their brain rating out of concern the information would be poorly received.

>Several educators contacted by MIT Technology Review reacted with alarm to the new developments, saying DNA tests should not be used to evaluate children’s academic prospects.

>“The idea is we’ll have this information everywhere you go, like an RFID tag. Everyone will know who you are, what you are about. To me that is really scary,” says Catherine Bliss, a sociologist at the University of California, San Francisco, and author of a book questioning the use of genetics in social science.

>“A world where people are slotted according to their inborn ability—well, that is Gattaca,” says Bliss. “That is eugenics.”

I am worried that only the rich will get to use this tech because left/society might ban together to prevent our gov't from subsidizing it for everyone We have SERIOUS problem on our hands!

Well alright we'll just wait for the based Chinese to leap ahead of us. They're going to become the biggest super power in the world with IQ enhancing technology while we twiddle our thumbs and discuss ethics.

i'm a married gay, we are starting surrogacy, and we are no joke going to select an embryo on the basis of genetic intelligence.
not larping. the title of the paper is "Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals" (I can't link it bc I get flagged as spam but just google it).
the "supplemental tables" link at the end is an excel file that lists all of the genetic loci that they found that influence intelligence and how strong the effect size of each one is

The Chinese have been doing embryo selection for years already. We're late to the party.

Don't forget that China is going hard on AI too, and they have ZERO concerns about using AI tech for warfare. Throw in IQ enhancing technology on top of that and you have a recipe for the emergence of the most powerful empire to have ever existed. The West needs to wake up now before its to late.

The author is a Chinese-American.

We are absolutely fucked.

In Nostradamus' prophecies he said the third person he deemed an anti-christ was supposed to emerge out of China. He said, "He will command the greatest army in the east". I imagine it would be China by virtue of them having more people than anyone else.

we already had eugenic fertility up until like, the Victorian Era. the welfare state is probably what made it decline.

Keke kkk
I'm going to do this with my wife
Why wouldn't you give your kid a massive advantage

Yes and that will matter in 12-15 years or so when the embryos have matured to adulthood.

And we can't even get 100 responses on Jow Forums of all places. We're absolutely fucked. Meanwhile the NPC meme is everywhere.

me? I'm white and we're getting a white egg donor

the author of the study

>I was shitposting earlier and forgot to switch back to normal.
How about you fucking kill yourself faggot.