Is Assad the good guy? Why would he gas his own people? Before Trump, Obama primarily focused on destroying ISIS. Now that the Islamic State has been reduced to a few towns along the Euphrates, does Trump need a new target to fuel the Military Industrial a Complex and (((them)))?
Is Assad the good guy? Why would he gas his own people? Before Trump, Obama primarily focused on destroying ISIS...
There were Christmas trees in the town centers of areas controlled by Assad. He is protecting the Christians of Syria from the wahhabi jihadists. That alone makes him the good guy. Have any of the places he has bombed been christian? There's your answer.
obviously
Animal Assad must go
Not exactly the best of evidence but sure. A lot of my colleagues joke about how I’m a “Nazi” for supporting Assad. I genuinely think he’s the lesser of two evils, by far.
>choose between an autocratic, but stable government which respects those of differing religions and a mixed bag of islamists, communists and gurellia fighters with zero political experience
What makes you say this? Assad didn’t excite terrorist attacks in Paris. This was because of ISIS.
>Why would he gas his own people?
Cause he's an antisemitic nazi! never forget the 6million goy now kill him for the glory of Israel
>Is Assad the good guy?
Yes.
Trump doesn't give a shit about Syria. He's just desperate for war to lift him past the incredibly difficult re-election that's coming. Same reason Bush went into Iraq: a second term is well worth having future generations hate you.
he be a good boi
How so? He told his supporters he wouldn’t intervene in overseas conflicts. Doesn’t this only hurt him further by going against his promises?
>Why would he gas his own people?
Because he is an alawite shia muslim and most of syria are sunny muslims. He don't give a fuck about them and doesn't mind gasing them here and there.
Nah he's a cuck for Israel, that's why he cares.
And Bush did what he was told. Same group.
>Why would he gas his own people?
are you fucking retarded? why would he gas a neighbourhood when he won the fucking battle? jihadists gassed the civilians to force an international response to kill assad/create a no fly zone when they were going to lose aleppo and damascus.
>Obama primarily focused on destroying ISIS
Are you fucking retarded?
Obama focused on arming the FSA. The FSA sold those weapons to isis/surrender/go to al nursa. Israel used ISIS to fuck with the syria gov and the country was a fucking trainwreck during years
Nice shit post you faggot npc. Obummer yet isis run rampant. Trump took isis out in less then a year.
Israel wants assad gone because he is a strong nationalistic leader that protects and unites muslims and christians.
Israels military strategy is essentially divide and conquer, drive muslims against muslims etc.
They feared Saddam because he was a strong militaristic leader, and they feared that he would unite/ally with Iran and Syria. Thats why the US invaded Iraq, not because of 9/11 or terrorists.
Israel doesnt care about Americans, they only care that they get their state.
Only undecided voters (lolbertarians and disgruntled leftists) are against dying for Israel. They're also more likely to drop Trump anyway. Conversely, the huge NPC base that crawls out of the woodwork during wartime will more than make up for it.
Has anyone have a video of ISIS on the floor twitching and dieing from a chemical attack ?
The US military is the cuck for Israel. If Trump could press a button and never hear the word "Israel" again, best believe he would press it.
9/11 was VERY convenient for Israel. It enabled them to push America to countless wars and military expansion in the middle east.
Also interesting that there are actual recorded messages from an anonymous sender urging all jewish businesses to evaquate the twin towers the day before 9/11
How do we get the military to wake up from the cucking
You need to understand the history of Syria to know why he does things like this. During the French mandate the French quelled the massive wave of rising Arabism by implementing a divide a conquer strategy among the various religious and ethnic groups in Syria.
The French knew that under a united banner of "Arab" the Syrian populace could most likely easily overthrow them. So they played on difference in the populace to fragment the unity. They knew that the alawites were the largest minority group in Syria, so they promoted them to positions of power as they knew it anger the Sunni and Christian demographics and Balkanize the region and serious hinder the united Arab movement.
That's what Assad is doing. He's consolidating power by fragmenting the opposition and support from him by playing on the basic human character of looking for difference in one another rather than similarities.
It's not a case of good or bad. It's politics.
>all jewish businesses to evaquate the twin towers the day before 9/11
thats fake
Only a few executive jews received 'the call'.
Give them a real challenge. Muttis talking about the "global democratic order" really drives home how complacent the military has become. They want the whole world to be a playground of toddler states, chaperoned by themselves. Only a serious fight or obstacle will teach these people a soldier's real job. Unfortunately that's how world wars keep happening, they are the price of arrogance.
It's all about the russian and american pipelines to Europe. Also the (((millitary industrial complex)))
>Why would he gas his own people?
Why wouldn't he? Those people are wanting to overthrow him. This was the same justification given by Saddam in the 1980s.
>B-b-but.. he's winning the war!
Yeah.. and he'd win it a lot faster by using chemical weapons. He'd lose fewer people in his forces by using those weapons. What's your point?
>Why wouldn't he?
MUTTCOM gets a new moral outrage to justify more illegal strikes. Every time this happens it costs millions in damage and air defense munitions, not to mention Assad could be assassinated or suffer a full-scale invasion, ruining everything he's accomplished in over 6 years of war.
Your argument is one that is convenient. It's illegal because no one has any justification to stand up for the people (ie: UN resolutions). They can't get justification because one of the entities carrying out those attacks .. has veto power and has used it numerous times in regards to Syria.
I stopped reading at your first sentence because.. well, pic related. It's you.
>reading only one word
pic is you.
Just kidding, you actually read the whole post but were only able to respond to a single word. The fact is, USA couldn't care less about international "law." We are currently suing the ICC to get out of Afghanistan war crime charges.