The new EU law that passed lets creative people have more of a chance to get their content out without getting throttled

>no more can big companies, Sony in particular, block you out by 'claiming copyright' on youtube or other music sites

Attached: 1517496687076.gif (280x211, 1.92M)

white in sweden is a meme at this point, ishmael

its post like these that make me not miss any EU countries if they get banned from here

The OC renaissance is upon us.

You have no idea how it feels to be genetically superior. Wherever I am people turn their heads and light up.

Like: "Wow! A blonde tall white person! Amazing!"

I fucking love travelling because of that feeling, you know? Wait. You dont know :)

this isnt about muh starving artists
its about hyperlinks and not being able to call some media outlet for absolute trash
as a citation

this. they have no idea what theyve done. we will never again even referance old jewish tv shows, music, or msn. the whole narrative will be ours

Attached: 1517596815690.gif (272x198, 2.78M)

>travelling
going the distance of a couple states

Attached: 1524935864381.jpg (470x470, 31K)

Good analogy for Yank freedom to be fair. Don't act like you're better off though.

This, inshallah

Attached: norf.png (556x712, 16K)

"genetically superior"

Apparently that means jackshit since you just fucked your country up anyways.

governments are complete trash at any cultural works embrace internet as a culture not as a policy

WW3 and the destruction of Sw*den when?

Attached: angry natalia.jpg (604x343, 23K)

I went through the article as well. Literally fucking nothing

No more piracy means art and entertainment are once again for the rich only while the working class peasantry lives a grey and boring life, if they don't commit suicide.

i use torrentday. i wonder what country they are in

Attached: 1515468370541.jpg (615x580, 52K)

Lindy for prez, the future will be Beige

Attached: 1490203481081.jpg (600x429, 165K)

>>the new EU law that passed lets creative people have more of a chance to get their content out without getting throttled

If anything it's the opposite. Filtering only copyrighted content is a technical impossibility, so now people have to go through extra hassle to prove that their content isn't.

>>no more stealing stuff through torrenting like a nigger

It does absolutely nothing to torrents.

>>no more are artists FORCED to watermark their drawing in case some faggot steals it

They still have to prove it's theirs. Meaning watermarks.

>>no more can big companies, Sony in particular, block you out by 'claiming copyright' on youtube or other music sites

Now it means the site that hosts the file must have a pre-existing filter that prevents showing copyrighted material. Instead of Sony removing content from Youtube, it never gets there in the first place.

>>big companies like Google, Facebook and Youtube will now be forced to pay extra

And you think they won't try to get that money by monetizing their service more aggressively? I hope you like ads and paywalls.

If they can't stop me watching Premier League football for free, I doubt they can stop much desu

>>no more stealing stuff through torrenting like a nigger

You are retarded if you think youll effect this at all.

Lindy beige

End them rightly with an mg42 katana

>brazil
>talking about fucked up countries
I am a marvel of genetics. I rather spread my seed as I have already done. No need to get mad. People like you are made by men like me.

oh yeah im sure it will be fully implemented over here sven

you are from finland why do you support it?

Hey that image is copyrighted, you're in violation of article 13, stay in your home while the internet police will apprehend you and send you to prison.

"Ironically, this use of the copyright monopoly doesn't fall far from the original invention of copyright, as devised by Queen Mary I when she created it on May 4, 1557: the purpose was to suppress anything that wasn't Catholic Approved. Elizabeth I, who succeeded her on the English throne a year later, quickly repurposed copyright to suppressing anything that wasn't Protestant Approved. The entire construct has never really strayed very far from the original purpose of suppressing freedoms of speech and opinion.

(Surprised at this? Copyright wasn't created on April 10, 1710, as the copyright lobby likes to claim. It was reinstated on that date, after having lapsed for fifteen years after the Glorious Revolution, when people had had enough of censorship for a while.)"
stallman.org/falkvinge/free-sharing.html

"She shared the concern of the Catholic Church over the printing press. The public’s ability to quickly distribute information en masse was dangerous to her ambitions to restore Catholicism, in particular their ability to distribute heretic material. (Political material, in this day and age, was not distinguishable from religious material.) Seeing how France had failed miserably in banning the printing press, even under threat of hanging, she realized another solution was needed. One that involved the printing industry in a way that would benefit them as well.

She devised a monopoly where the London printing guild would get a complete monopoly on all printing in England, in exchange for her censors determining what was fit to print beforehand. It was a very lucrative monopoly for the guild, who would be working hard to maintain the monopoly and the favor of the Queen’s censors. This merger of corporate and governmental powers turned out to be effective in suppressing free speech and political-religious dissent.

The monopoly was awarded to the London Company of Stationers on May 4, 1557. It was called copyright.

It was widely successful as a censorship instrument. Working with the industry to suppress free speech worked, in contrast to the French attempt in the earlier 1500s to ban all printing by decree. The Stationers worked as a private censorship bureau, burning unlicensed books, impounding or destroying monopoly-infringing printing presses, and denying politically unsuitable material the light of day. Only in doubtful cases did they care to consult the Queen’s censors for advice on what was allowed and what was not. Mostly, it was quite apparent after a few initial consultations."
stallman.org/falkvinge/history-of-copyright-part-2.html

Lindy sure has grown over the years don't you think

Attached: killer beige.jpg (1688x728, 214K)

i gotta take your word for it

>no more stealing stuff through torrenting like a nigger
Good, now besides attendance at cinemas tanking it’s also not free on the web anymore and you can’t make memes about it. I hope Netflix is arrogant enough to hike prices as a result of this, this will cost jews the culture war.

euros cant click on the hyperlinks

>artists deserve to be paid

WRONG

Art should be free and no one should be obligated to give a shit about "artists". Paying artists is for literal goys. I will never do it.

>Genetically superior
Enjoy that for the next 8yrs Sven. You’ll be lucky if the next generation is even close to 56%.

Your next generation is going to be a bunch of blue eyed, lightbulb head half Somalians.

>Tripfagging to write this
Neck yourself.

"The monopoly was awarded to the London Company of Stationers on May 4, 1557. It was called copyright.

It was widely successful as a censorship instrument. Working with the industry to suppress free speech worked, in contrast to the French attempt in the earlier 1500s to ban all printing by decree. The Stationers worked as a private censorship bureau, burning unlicensed books, impounding or destroying monopoly-infringing printing presses, and denying politically unsuitable material the light of day. Only in doubtful cases did they care to consult the Queen’s censors for advice on what was allowed and what was not. Mostly, it was quite apparent after a few initial consultations.

There was obviously a lust for reading, and the monopoly was very lucrative for the Stationers. As long as nothing politically destabilizing was in circulation, the common people were allowed their entertainment. It was a win-win for the repressive Queen and for the Stationers with a lucrative monopoly on their hands."

stallman.org/falkvinge/history-of-copyright-part-2.html

Reminder that memes are socialist

Attached: memes.jpg (750x997, 106K)

Are you mad that I'm special and you're not?

Lol.

Taking extra effort to piss into a lake of piss does not make you special brainlet

Attached: 7DA42E6F-8041-4B11-944B-F1B6EA32518F.png (657x539, 110K)

undisputable the best and comfiest channel on youtube

Attached: Download (27).jpg (225x225, 8K)

>when you fail at damage control

Kill yourself

He's not.

Best part about article 13 is that we mutts will soon be able to quite literally weaponize memes that if you steal and repost will get you arrested/throttled/banned/watch listed. Feels sooooo good to have the 1st amendment.

>Trying to regulate actions that are, by purpose and definition, outside the law.

It's meme ban
Ceterum censeo Bruxellae esse delendam

Thanks for the (You), you have a tiny dick and you're afraid to be special as well. Sucks 4u lmao.

Nothing wrong with it Jensen,except the part of torrenting.
Nothing a VPN can't solve however.

muh spandau

Attached: 1536358214550.jpg (500x499, 20K)

I had this happen to my channel. I recorded a record from 1939 and used it as back ground music on my video. I shit you not sony claimed it was their recording and had my video taken down.

I provided further evidence and my shit was restored, but fuck them and fuck youtube for allowing big companies to use bots to mass report videos.

You Muricans are pathetic at this point,i swear.
Be it Left/Right/Center.
Nigger/White/Muxican you are truly pathetic now.

almost every majority white country is expected to become minority white within the next 35 years. Just ponder on that, (((who))) benefits?

We're all fucked if we dont do something, Sven.

we've been cows in cages for a while mate

>no more can big companies, Sony in particular, block you out by 'claiming copyright' on youtube or other music sites
Absolutely no way takedown abuse will happen if current DMCA restrictions are tightened down to one hour.

Attached: 1465584189987.png (271x243, 32K)

So we're better because cucks like you know we're not free? lol Swedes are cucked af even by euro standards.

Any law passed buy the fucking EU is wrong because it was just supposed to be a trade deal!

FUCK YOU GLOBALIST FAGGOTS>

>destroying the entire internet because muh starving artists
>oh no my sonic oc got stolen from DA

Attached: le disapproving finn now in technicolor.png (635x441, 17K)

God Sweden get your shit together. Seriously its like every day you wake up and think how much stupid shit can I say today? Will I have time between rapings to shill for big government?

I guess the good news is that you probably wont be able to post here anymore now that the law passed.

this just in. swedish cuck tries to make their oppression seem like gods gift to civilization. In all honesty no one cares if your art gets stolen, boo who, go cry about it

All of your leaders will be hunted down and killed. Wait and see.

When creating art is only a financial drain on the artist, dont expect anybody other than low IQ commie degenerates to do it. Good plan, retard. I bet you have another thread open complaining about muh end of white civilization.

> "Omg modern art is so degenerate, where are the good painters?!?!"
> "PAYING FOR ART?!?! U THINK I'M A COMMUNIST?!"

Meanwhile liberals:
> Wow I love modern art, I'll buy all your paintings!

"Conservatives"
> "Woi is everyone painthung modarn art?!?!"

That is BAIT, right?

Not a single dollar will be handed to "creators" by anyone. There are millions of free pictures out there and drawings. And platforms like Youtube already take down copyright infringing videos and buy licenses from famous arists. Sure as fuck they won't pay anyone more for being some poor beggar folklore singer.

It's a Swedecuck, of course it's not bait.

>free use no longer exists
>even if you credit the author and provide source
>still get fined or arrested

Memes are ancap.

is this anything more than an excuse to implement stronger surveillance?

wouldn't it be kind of pointless if there weren't some provision to deal with torrents and other p2p protocols? maybe that's coming down the line.

>Sweden

Live from the cuckshed

No we just get fired from our job and have mobs of people harass us.

No more swedes, germans, or brits shitting up this fucking board anymore. I hope canada passes similar laws too

How do you kids know about my Lindy he's my guy not yours redditor

Attached: 1536775990129.jpg (662x393, 35K)

R8 my OC

Attached: Lloyd2.jpg (1065x859, 142K)

Sure, but when the left tries to do it, it's still not funny

Not done for personal fame or monetary gain. Memes are the highest form of art, alongside toilet graffiti.

Attached: 1513964540350.png (2518x1024, 277K)

Um as a burger they are the ones who make it great we are just degenerative jiggawatts

does lindybeige post on here?

Is there any level of abuse and oppression not enthusiastically embraced by the swedes?

Attached: 1487701401291.jpg (600x400, 39K)

I hope it was reefer blues

The death of irony and satire - the biggest weapons against tyranny - is upon us.

Attached: hmm.png (300x105, 24K)

EU basically banned picturing Muhammad for everyone.

haha torrents aren't stealing dipshit. to steal, you must take something from someone. torrenting doesn't take a creation away from its creator, it creates a digital copy.

Free advertisements?

Intellectual property is a jewish scam double nigger

Sorry in advance if any Euro's get jail time for looking at this.

Attached: 1527868364189.png (800x694, 1.08M)

Lol.

What kind of fairytale land do you people live in to be so naive?
Im starting to think importing third world problems might actually be healthy for you.
Because right now youre basically adult children

You really should visit Sweden. They are adult children and senile old ladies there.