Libertarians and national socialists are very different, but we have something that we both hate, communists. So let's get together to get rid of the liberals and after we fight each other.
What Jow Forums think about this?
Libertarians and national socialists are very different, but we have something that we both hate, communists...
Brody Evans
Ayden Cox
Fuck off you statist shit, we don't want you
Bentley Gonzalez
>libertarians should just abandon their beliefs and become our personal army to enact political violence for fascists, aka the thing they detest
Brandon Perez
>communists
I will stand with any man, side by side in opposition to pinko faggots and their degeneracy.
Andrew Torres
natsoc and marxism are two sides of the same authoritarian, people-killing shitstorm
Brayden Howard
Well said
Isaiah Thompson
>we both hate, communists
Fuck off!
Christian Thomas
Hudson Ramirez
This
Angel Ross
You can't stop Marx without help
Hunter Walker
Who is "we" ?
Ryder Ward
That's the plan. We've got to build an alliance to defeat the current enemy, progressivism/Marxism/Judaism, and sort out the future we've won afterward. I think even communist sympathizers could be temporary allies, if they're against this multiracial, anti-white, prog madness.
Jose Jackson
Only Paleolibertianism and Paleoconservatism are acceptable political beliefs
Easton Hill
gimli is suppose to be a kike you fucking idiot
Logan Murphy
>That's the plan. We've got to build an alliance to defeat the current enemy, progressivism/Marxism/Judaism, and sort out the future we've won afterward. I think even communist sympathizers could be temporary allies, if they're against this multiracial, anti-white, prog madness.
I would rather stomp out any shreds of Communism from american politics and then attempt to find "half way" with other political parties. I have respect for Just about every party in the USA aside from the Democrats, who are nothing more then a den of commies....Our current 2 party system is fucked beyond all fixing, and the only way to really fix it is to totally destroy one of the 2 major parties, so other parties can fill the void.
Commies are scared because right now they are on the edge. If they don't win now through violence or the polls, they will have lost. 4 more good years under good leadership will erase their dreams.
Isaac Howard
Fascism is not national socialism. Fascism puts the continuity of the state above the continuity of a particular demographic. Like the US does. National socialism puts the continuity of a people, or race, about the continuity of the government.
The first 6 points of natsoc germany were all about RACE, not the structure of government
1. We demand the union of all Germans in a Great Germany on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples.
2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated.
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population.
4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be a countryman.
5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.
6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens. We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen.
youtube.com
Oliver Hall
this
Jaxon Allen
Plenty of far right people were former libertarians, including here. The ones that won't work with you just wanna jack each other off. They're ignorable. Let them play fedora-man.
Aiden Howard
This tbqh.
Gavin Perry
Yeah, I should have said
National socialism puts the continuity of a people, or race, ABOVE the continuity of the government instead of 'ABOUT' the continuity of the government
Benjamin Parker
Alot of libertarianism is veiled white nationalism.
Advocating freedom of economy and smaller government, regardless of the logical economic theory, is defacto advocating to free white populations from the yoke of gibs grabbers. Advocating for greater gun ownership is by-inlarge advocating for defence against blacks and hispanics.
Then there's the meta to Ancapism, where if one competing group refuses to break the NAP when they can get away with it, or at least have a good chance to, then they will be eventually outcompeted by other groups which will abuse the NAP when it's convenient.
Basic free market, just like if a corporation refuses on moral grounds to lower wages in accordance with the market value of their worker's labour then other corporations without any moral qualm will simply out compete them and abuse their disadvantage. Utility is more important than arbitrary morality, and in the end, the more predetory corporation will grow more and create more jobs as a boon from it's success; it could, however go the otherway, perhaps loyalty of the workers and quality of life from higher wages will increase productivity, the point is it's the market which decides which "morality" will survive.
Likewise, if whites in Ancapistan refuse to break the NAP when doing so would directly benefit them (perhaps a premptive violation may offord security ogainst other groups doing the same for example) then they are putting themselves at a disadvantage to the groups which will break the NAP if they can get away with it.
If whites refuse to organise and make their communities racialy exclusive, they will be compromised and taken advantage of by other groups which do. You know, all of them.
Nolan Gray
David Collins
>we