Is pay for sex morally wrong?

If the money is being used to fund a drug habit and you're aware of it, yes. If it's just a poor girl in a poor country trying to get by and help her family, no problems. It's really only immoral if you're doing it when you're in a sexual relationship already.

Hmm, what makes you think that?

So is marriage by that way of thought.

Attached: 1527278546536.jpg (300x300, 31K)

No. And marriage is a false institution handed out and enforced by the government which no longer has meaning so those other fags can fuck off

one way or another, you're paying for sex.

Slightly based and redpilled

So once you are married it's ok?

Fucking whores is great, you should try it.

Nice meme my friend.

Depends on the time, place, your community. Too bigger blanket statement friend to mean anything there.

The real question is if it counts towards a man's n count. If a man has sex with 100 people but 95 of them are prostitutes can he still brag about a 100 n count?

Its sad

who cares?
put benis in bagina and get on with your life

Tell me about it!

no. how sad.
marriage is to join in a union specifically to acquire the strength to raise a family.

Only if those hookers cost a thousand bucks an hour. Because that's kinda equal to the amount of effort required to bang a girl these days if you aren't Chad. Normal, 50 bucks for a blow job hookers don't count. Sorry bud.

I personally don't think so, nor I count them. You paid for a service, bang was not attained by skill.

But then again, neither is most of the Tinder whores.

not as a business transaction. bribery on the other hand, is pathetic as shit

Yes.
Copulation is the cause of offspring. The attitude one carries toward copulation will carry toward the natural outcome of the act. Thus, paying for children with a stranger will lead to devaluation of children from beloved family into cold commodity.

Still licking Drumpf‘s balls, hm? The blue wave is coming, how does that make you feel?

>Is pay for sex morally wrong?
I don't care, it's a cuck thing, and having sex with cuck is clearly morally wrong.

>Pay $500+ on dates, presents, and dinners
>Buy $7000 ring
>Pay for $35,000 wedding ceremony
>Pay for $1.1 million dollar house you now have to move into
>All just to have sex with a woman
It is morally wrong.

You pay one way or another. In fact, just straight paying to fuck is probably one of the most honest ways that a woman gets something for selling her twat. Gold digger housewife bitches are probably the most despicable cases.

Yes if it's low class street hookers, because they're usually girls being forced into it. It's fine with high class escorts.

Yes, because it encourages the whorish behaviour.

Only with your wife and with the intention of reproducing. Contraception is not allowed so be prepared to have 13 children. If she is loyal, all of them will be of your seed.

Depends on what your moral framework is.
You're a hue, and so most likely a Cathcuck, so yes.

> (OP)
>>Pay $500+ on dates, presents, and dinners
>>Buy $7000 ring
>>Pay for $35,000 wedding ceremony
>>Pay for $1.1 million dollar house you now have to move into
All just to further your genetics, your honor, your name, and your future.

It's totally worth it.

yes and posting porn is mortally sinful as well

Attached: 1527184587679.jpg (2952x2497, 929K)

yes it is.....

Attached: uhh.webm (610x616, 1.91M)

No but ur a loser hahahajakhajajaja.

Think about how will all this ungrateful literal bitches talk about men when they have the guts of writing their putita's chronicles.

I dont want to give a whore any of that. For a fucking nut. Nah.

Pd: If you are abhorrent or maybe clinically aspie I feel you bit y'know, give a try to the gym or some SSRRIS

>pharma jew

Yeah its better than the

>Serotonin recaptation nanojew

Interesting thought, not sure I agree.

What I mean is, it depends on your community standards. Pre-marital sex isn't (arguably) directly harming unassociated parties, so whether or not is acceptable or not depends on the society. Some societies consider any alcohol degenerate, but in the west nobody believes a glass of wine with dinner is bad.

christfag detected

If I say yes, will it make a fucking difference to you?

Of course! Your opinion is all that matters to me

Attached: yes.jpg (960x660, 126K)

Not like that matters, lmao. If you're a single getting an Escort from time to time is more economically than feeding thots in a restaurant and hope that you'll get some sex.

Women and men attach to the first partner. It's not only by subconscious memory narrative, but by smell, sound and feel. There is no substitute for your first sexual act, and it doesn't disappear. You're designed to remember, literally as long as any of your DNA is in the population, and if you believe in a heaven, forever.

>Serotonin recaptation nanojew
Care to expand please I'm interested and google was not much help

Attached: 40533157_1085857084909692_8213310563376168960_n.jpg (802x798, 149K)

>will bad cause bad

if you want to elevate women above their roles as mothers, if you want to enable whorism, then yes it is very wrong and the cause of all the things you complain about regarding feminism and suffrage etc etc. are you an NPC user? you seem to have a problem with thinking

Attached: 1536449411258.jpg (800x668, 52K)

Lmao

99% of sex workers are 30-40 year old roasties , and theyre all mostly fat.

Goto any gym and you'll see 1000x more attractive women.

Yes, because it makes women falsely believe they have value.

Of course, user. It's hedonistic in it's nature and therefore a sin, if you're a religious fag. Men pay women for sex either way whether with money or time, or attention, or your sanity, but at least when you have a partner you pay them to have your children too.

That's not "elevation" its degeneration. It's pretending your DNA in the female form is best treated like commodity.

You always pay for the sex.
The question is whether part-time contracts are better that permanent contracts.

I never saw a difference between pay & dinner and movie then drinks... seriously, what’s the difference?

Yes, because the combined wisdom of thousands of years is too much to be considered even in a humanist mind. We're so much smarter with all our augmentation tech, we can just augment everything away!

Only if you respect women.

Yes, having sex outside of marriage is morally wrong. Therefore by extension, paying for sex is also wrong.

>he doesn't fuck asian hookers
What's wrong with you?

it's kinda pathetic, be a chad and pussy lands in ur lap faggot

>Hanz bring up ball licking
No wonder

Yes, promiscuous sex is very damaging. We really should be doing a better job of warning about the psychological dangers. But I don't think it's society or the state's role to force anyone to behave in a particular way. We default to mostly monogamy just fine. The issue is people not having kids (white people)

In your case, nothing, since you disrespect your own genetics before you come to the table.

Women aren't genetically as variant, they have two X.

Except that one of the contracts don't have a clause which entitles the female to all of your belongings. I'll let you figure out which one yourself.

Fuck no nigger lmao name, honor, genetics mean shit in the US no one respects it and the future is bleak.

The one on the left is a man 1000%

So the only options is be a virgin or get married?

Who do you think protects prostitutes and gets a cut of that sweet cash? Niggers and jews. Not to mention, it's demoralizing for the women who 9 times out of 10, spend a chunk of what they earn on drugs, filling the coffers of niggers and jews doubly.

not all of us are disgusting shitskins that are only capable of getting sex through arranged/forced marriages

What if wife completely changes her personality after giving birth, completely deletes sex from the relationship ?

Yes.

No she is just juiced up

I don't know what coastal hell you live in, but most of the US is still very much about name, family, and honor. You've been hanging out with Union Teachers and fuckups on TV and the interwebs, spunky.

Besides, even if you're right about your own neighborhood, when was it ever epic to say, "I'm just following the crowd to this bridge where we're all gonna jump!"

It used to be profitable to have kids. Policies and economics have reversed that trend. Fix the policies and economics of the situation, reduce debt and young couples will rapidly settle into homes and have kids again.

I want to fuck a Brazilian in the ass so fucking bad. I don't even care if it's female or female (male) at this point

yes, but if you are not getting any, you have to pay or be super-model-hot.

Morally wrong because it damages the individual or because it affects society at large? Or both?

>and with the intention of reproducing
AND YOU BETTER NOT FUCKING ENJOY IT
ffs why do you have to suck the fun out of everything?

Nah, usually depression its caused by that shiet. Its a neurotransmissor. These guys are liberated in between sinapses, thats the way of neurons of sending a message, any of it, from movement to pain pressure all that shit.

Welp, anxiety and stress are closely related to serotonin and epinefrine. well, this guys usually go from one neuron to the other and send a message, they occupy their place, the message is sent, so this guys "stop working".

BUT

When you have a recaptation of serotonine, the serotonine enters, collaborates with the signal that the body tries to send buuut this fuckers get in, het out (this should be it...) but then... they get in, get out, get in, get out. So they send "stress", gets you fucked and you hate everything and became depressed.

Bit if you tale a little of the pharma jew, you can solve it. Its not a one day cure. The first month is horrible, but eventually things fall into place.

>nurse

maybe a psychiatric can shut my mouth in a pair of things and be a better source.

p.s. it's less degenerate than paying for a BLACKED.COM subscription

tradcucks gonna tradcuck.

Go to Brazil. Can bang a fucking really hot one straight up the shit pipe all night for a hundred bucks.

Rare. Are you the Jersey pedo?

Spoken like a true beta. I haven't had to "pay for sex" my entire life. Women will pay for the date if you're Chad enough.

Both.

So most men are betas then? Because I'm pretty sure that on most dates women expect the man to pay. Even Chad.

Or at the least 50/50 it

Test

It's sucking the fun to have a family that gives a shit about your welfare. It's sucking fun to not have herpes and warts and aids by the time you're 20.
Yes, so much "sucking" going on in watching your grandchildren grow up...

No but my mum was molested by him.
Small places eh

Doesn't everyone?

agreed, the fuck is wrong with the other replies to this comment, pol is slowly becoming like /b/ now

I'm not religious at all but we are seeing the effects of unbridled promiscuity, so yeah...I gotta agree with you. Still won't stop me though. Unless I can find a girl I actually like.

You're not a guy worth liking, so why should she bother? You're not going to dedicate to learn one woman well, you'd rather shortcut. No right thinking woman would want you with that mindset.

did you even read what I replied to you fucking retard?

Morality has to have some practical use , something to prove it's a positive thing.
>Is pay for sex morally wrong?
Yes because of the high risk of STIs.
Yes because it encourages women to sell/rent their sex organs instead of getting into marriagess.

Just fuck a delicious trap.

So I'm undesirable to all women because I've had sex before marriage? Okay bud.

>So once you are married it's ok?
Sure why not?