>British colonise a country
>becomes prosperous, safe, and considered one of the best places in the world to live (Canada, America, Australia)
>Spanish or Portuguese colonise a country
>becomes a violent, poor shithole (Central and South America)
Why is this?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
spain and portugal where filled with muslem shitskin already, so they came here to fuck up and rob the country not to inhabbit like british
They mixed with the natives
Nigger
True. Guyana, Belize and Jamaica seems quite prosperous to me.
Moorish blood
they fucked a bunch of natives and created el atrocidads
Brits cleansed the region of non-whites while the Iberians bred with the non-whites. The results were predictable.
Had the Iberians simple wiped out the non-whites Latin America would be a relative paradise on earth.
Madre de dios!
Racemixing
1. anglos have a superior culture
2. south America is a mix of Europeans, Africans and savage natives
Sadly this. Belize is full of niggers but the're Brit Bong niggers so they're not as savage as say Haiti and the French niggers who ate their patrons. Compared to them the Spanish niggers on the same island the Dominicans are quite civilized. Very strange.
>savage natives
>offered Spanish tourists a welcome
>get arms and legs chopped off because some refused to believe in le Jesus
>Land gets taken over and enslaved for years, natives are killed and burned alive because Jesus said it’s ok
Yes yes, truly animals
>We totally weren't a bunch of heart eating savages who will skin you alive making ISIS look like a bunch of boy scouts
Nope sorry the Moors and the Spaniards are way more honourable. You don't see this shit happen in Spain. Even Morocco is better then Mexico.
>one exterminates natives
>the other tries to make more christcucks through racemixing
Both Portugal and Spain got their hands dirty with the Goblino making.
Sadly now those same goblinos are encroaching upon lands that are not theirs, IE, the US.
The natives of South America managed to unite hundreds of different tribes that had been at war with each other for hundreds of years, without having an official language. Something that Europe has struggled to do for thousands of years.
To across all of that away because they occasionally practiced human sacrifice to their idea of a god (Sun) during rituals, and specifically only during rituals, is beyond absurd and retarded.
What about India, middle east and african colonies, also Jamaica and caribean ones?
Spain and Portugal never contributed anything to modern society
They just lie around taking siestas and the fact that they did that on a boat a few hundred years ago and crashed into valuaboe land somehow means they're famous or something
>>becomes a violent, poor shithole (Central and South America)
>Why is this?
And why you guys are always making the same questions? Spain and Portugal never populated any of our old colonies only with our people, because we never had the numbers to do it. So how could you expect those places would look like us? of course not. It was seen by our ancestors like just some land to extact resources, not to create a country there.
Most of your current country was a spanish colony
Goblino making is not exclusive to us. The ones affecting North America, sure.
Regardless, one would think lesson learned. Guess not.
But the main issues for us was numbers. The UK had people to spare, we really didn't. Maybe Spain had a little more, but still not enough.
Literally not settled
the goblins always projecting.
They had the sacrifces every single month. They had to fight constant wars to capture more people to sacrifice. I would see how an EU lover would like that though. War mongering demons.
>We knew about this land we were just too pathetic and lazy to exploit it in any meaningful fashion
Strange your one power is having babies and you couldn't even settle the west? Pathetic.
>peaceful natives
lmao, the natives were practicing mass genocide, rape, cannibalism, human sacrifice, mutilation, etc. And still the population only declined because of disease something no one really controlled.
Then it was the Catholic priests that demanded the Spanish "integrate" the natives and breed with them.
All of them were improving until they got their "independence". Australia anc Canada arw majority white, so they are still first world, but those countries that whites ruled as a minority and handed back to the shit skins after independence are now once again turning into trash heaps
I don't remember where I found the document, I'm sure someone will know what I am talking about, but the Portuguese explorers had a diary of around the time they discovered Brazil.
All they did was compliment the native women about how feminine and clean they were, basically bad mouthing roasties here.
Kind of like the yellow fever I see so much here.
The areas that weren't cleansed of non-whites obviously remained shit
Most of your current country was a muslim colony.
I would rather live with the nigs of Jamaica then the spics of Cuba. Hey your culture isn't so bad like I said the blacks in the Dominican Republic are 100s of times better then the ones in Haiti so at least you're not France! Also India has a space program does Spain?
our population was very low compared to the british
>still believing 15th century anglo defamation and lies
go tear down some Colombus statue amerimutt
When Portuguese and Spaniards came to America, they found a continent filled with natives. When Brits came, they found pretty much only empty land. More then 90% of Native Americans lived South of Rio Grande.
95% of it was uninhabited by Spaniards, only New Mexico had a high population of pure Spaniards (about 30,000 people when America invaded)
Non-Iberians were only ever a tiny percent of the population in Iberia they had a minimal to non-existent genetic impact. Iberia has been about the same for thousands of years.
Shh... You are a fucking embarrassment.
>All they did was compliment the native women about how feminine and clean they were
many portuguese were famous for not taking a single bath in their lives... they were shocked to see people smelling like fruits after arriving from a 6 months travel on a putrid boat filled with diseased sailors
i dare you to say you are able to resist to kuruminha!
population 1500
Iberia- 8.5 million
British Isles- 5 million
en.wikipedia.org
Considering 90% of the natives were wiped out by disease without a Spaniard having to lift a finger they should have been able to replace the entire native population. Instead the Catholic priests demanded that they breed with the natives and integrate them into the "Catholic family".
Because the Anglo countries were able to industrialize soon after the industrial revolution.
That's a myth bathing was common in the medieval era
Common law and personal freedom.
>British colonise a country
>becomes prosperous
nah, its pretty much well documented. Don João VI for an example only took one bath in his entire life. by medical orders, and they needed people to hold him down. same with a bunch of other royals
The Spanish and Portuguese fucked Indians and niggers. The British didn't.
It got flooded by immigrants from the former spanish colonies
I was talking about the settlers, people in the british islands were starving and dying, so a lot of them preffered to risk and look for a brighter future in america
This. Only yesterday I was explaining that South America was fucked up as the Spaniards fucked the natives and the slaves rather than taking women over to my 10/10 pale skinned Indian girlfriend after I had just smashed her. I chuckled at the irony.
chile,argentina and southern brazil are pretty developed with high hdi
We all know that this is not true.
We literally own the most prosperous part of South America.
We should have annexed Argentina.
Aristocratic habits are not necessarily the same as the rest of the population. The aristocracy was much dirtier then the general population. They never had baths because of their retarded etiquette rules, that did not apply to the rest of the population.
Dumb spic, you can't just compare colonization in the 1500s in a highly populated area with colonization in the 1600s and 1700s in almost uninhabited land. Ship journeys were longer, food preservation was worse and only male spaniards and portuguese went to the new world because of the difficulty of bringing their families entailed
this book has some ideas
Boo fucking Hoo. You made a bunch of total shitholes. Well done.