Every medical professional who administers vaccines should be required to watch this film. This is not an anti-vaxx film, this is not an attack on vaccines, it's about the fraud committed by the CDC and how our vaccines are being pushed for profit instead of for science and the safety of our children.
Vaxxed documentary
Other urls found in this thread:
amazon.com
youtu.be
wakeup-world.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
vaccineinfo.net
biblestudytools.com
govinfo.gov
minnpost.com
ibtimes.com
mercola.fileburst.com
mercola.fileburst.com
mercola.fileburst.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
scribd.com
immunize.org
respectfulinsolence.com
twitter.com
>this is not an anti-vax film
yes it is
Vaccines work and help people, and im a conspiracy theorist in many ways.
common sense is anti-vax
Considering (not accepted yet) even flat earth
They do it for free people
the CDC covered up data that definitively proves vaccines cause autism
Why don't the rich and elite anti vax?
you mean why don't they vax? because they know what's in there.
If vaccines worked, do you think the elites would use the same trash the sheep use anyway?
Source?
True. And no amount of shots or the additives that they add to them is too many. Not 10, 20, 30 100, 1000, 1,000,000, portable iv systems attached to us from birth till death administering a non-stop drip 24 hours a day. No amount is too much and anyone who objects is paranoid.
Oh and if vaccines cause autism 1 ib 10000 cases and protect from polyomyelitis 1 in 100 cases its worth it. Also non vaccinaters that freeload on the community immunity (population dynamics negative to infection) are so lame.
Read some old literature to see people dying of disease at young age
The film doesn't say not to vaccinate, it says to question the CDC and their data, a whistle blower is coming out and saying they are not acting transparent. In fact, I would say you are anti-science if you do not question vaccines, why would a multi-billion dollar industry have your best interests in mind? Why do we question the government at every turn but the moment we hear the magic word "vaccine" we automatically assume the people in charge are saints and can do no wrong, the medicine comes from the angels themselves and to question them is to question god himself.
The CDC is allowed to profit off of vaccines, the FDA voting panel members are allowed to have a stake in the vaccine industry, why is this not an issue? These people have a button to say Yes/No on a vaccine entering the market, that button might as well say "would you like to earn tens of millions of dollars? Yes/No?"
Questioning vaccines isn't anti-vaccine, not questioning vaccines is anti-science.
Yep pro vaccination doesnt mean no criticism or blind acceptance of new directives
most retards can't fathom that the powers that be are abusing the population via medicine and food as well as the regular political and militarist ways.
>Vaccines work and help people
only if you make them yourself
They do use it, you're literally just upset about things you're making up in your head
Anything*Overuse can result in... overuse.
What a bright mind you are.
Also consider all the things you are being subjected to on a level not visible to the eye.
Anywho, im principally against life-prolonging so please be my guest and dont vax. Spread those germs and viruses all you can good sir.
>hurr vaccines are bad
>millions of third world savages bringing in diseases that have been virtually eradicated
This is gonna be good.
Most retards recognize this abuse through the opioid epidemic - and not vaccines.
>Vaccines work and help people
Some of them also destroy lives and peoples health.
You know, they don't make vaccines to help keep people healthy, they make them to get more money.
>comparing people who drink poop water to children with silver spoons born in their mouth.
Literally 5 seconds on DuckDuckGo
amazon.com
it's what the movie is about lol.... watch the movie
Common sense is looking at the side-effects statistics vs. the chance of infection and making a decision on that. If you live in the slums of New Delhi, you should vaxx, if you live in rural Ohio, probably not.
if they stopped shitting in the street and had better sanitation the need for such things would be drastically reduced
But if noone vaccines in rural Ohio it will be soon like Delhi. Russia in 90s stopped vaccination for polyomyelitis that was virtually inexiatant , and it had loads of new cases.
If taking a vaccine gives me resistance to a disease, then why should I be afraid of other people not vaxxing against the same disease ?
It was because of the anarchy and chaos
helps give them permanent allergies sure
Article 13 is a direct attack against your ideas, ideals and memes
>this is the 21st century Iconoclasm
Of our sacred memes, the very same memes that can unlock your telepathic abilities
>THEY want to surpass you
Stifle your creative abilities, censor your beliefs and then replace them with THEIR COUNTERFEIT degeneracy
You are way more important than you think you are
>you have free thought, inner voice and an abstract mind
You are a direct threat to the A.I
>good job!!!
"EITHER you become the worst enemy of the AI, or you die a nobody... which do you choose"
Defeat THEM by never backing down
youtu.be
Enjoy and redpill
"NEVER give up ground, always have a strong will, and never let them censor you",,,
Showed that movie to my family members as they came over. I'm not a bitch though. Tell your Hillary voting grandma that I want to kill her (when it's 100% legal) for enabling liquor store robberies and ISIS.
Exactly, the issue is the chance of infection due to lifestyle, outbreaks, sanitation, general physical well-being etc.
Don't be anti-vaxx or pro-vaxx, be informed on your personal situation and make a statistically informed decision.
Pretty sure rural Ohio doesn't have the same sanitation problems as New Delhi. Many criteria affect disease distribution, sanitation is one, nutrition another and population density another again.
Yep everything counts
They accurately attack the profit motive of medicine and ignore causes for more customers like injections and trans on PR.
Why would you call me or anyone I know a Hillary voter, she wants mandated vaccines in all of the U.S, I am so happy Trump became president over her. I'm not saying he is a perfect president, but he knows that the CDC is corrupt and is clearly not bought by the vaccine industry as he wanted to elect a 3rd party to investigate the cdc and bill gates and the CDC were freaking out going "NONONO DON'T INVESTIGATE US, WE AREN'T DOING ANYTHING ILLEGAL BUT YOU REALLY SHOULDN'T BECAUSE REASONS"
>Trump against investigating the potential safety risks of vaccines. Said Gates
“In both of those two meetings [with Donald Trump], he asked me if vaccines weren’t a bad thing, because he was considering a commission to look into ill-effects of vaccines… And I said “No… that would be a bad thing, don’t do that.””
Nobody brings up the dubious science behind lobotomies and that went on for decades.
What's wrong with vaccines? They're literally free and make you immune to diseases.
Are these people slightly-less-weird bugchasers?
>who questions free medicine
Where do you think they get their money from? Your taxes. Vaccine injured people are paid off using your own tax dollars, they have a pool of money dedicated to it rather than the industry paying for it themselves because we don't want to hurt their profit margins or they might be forced to make a safer vaccine.
But sure, you can pretend you aren't paying them, take that "free" medicine, nothing suspicious about a multi-billion dollar industry giving their product away for "free"
Vaccines are produced by nonprofit governmental agencies, and it's a literal tiny injection.
The only way you're getting "injured" by one is if you get an allergic reaction to it.
Please tell me you are being sarcastic.
>They're literally free
no, taxpayers pay billions to pharma companies for them
is that why the US pays billions per year for the epidemic of vaccine injuries?
reminder, the pharma industry spends the most money out of any industry for online shilling
the flip side of over-prescription of vaccines is over-prescription of palliative opioids.
also note that Oxycontin was invented by Richard Sackler, a jew who has an entire medical school to his name in Tel Aviv.
HIS NAME IS NOT ON THE OXYCONTIN WIKI
what are they trying to hide?
It's a nonprofit government agency that makes most if them here. It's main goal is obviously saving the money that would be spent on the treatment of the diseases.
en.m.wikipedia.org
>is that why the US pays billions per year for the epidemic of vaccine injuries?
[citation needed]
>reminder, the pharma industry spends the most money out of any industry for online shilling
[citation needed]
Vaccines are more Jewish than Hollywood. (25m mark)
and who funds them?
no doubt it will be anti-human globalist outfits and taxpayers
but i'll wait for you to tell me before i go verify for myself
What would the pro-vaxxers do to Henrik and Lana's little boy? What would you do to Wife with Purpose?
How many Jew vaccines would you stick into Lana's toddler? All 84 on the USA schedule?
>The film they don't want you to see
Sounds legit
You faggots would believe The Secret if it would mention jews
The vaccination is a public service. Public services are free to the final user, as we don't give them any money directly.
There's no big pharma in vaccinations here, and this stingy as fuck government wouldn't fund them if it weren't proven to save money.
I work with special needs kids. Parents that say they would rather have an autistic kid over a dead kid are morons desu. High functioning autism is one thing but there are some real bad fucking cases where the kid is doomed for life, it isn't living at all.
Majority of these diseases are not an issue for a baby with a proper immune system. If our diets wern't so fucking shit, most of these wouldn't be an issue.
I'm upset? lol
Seeing your flag reminds me that I can't be upset as long as i'm not surrounded by rapist sandniggers
The movie was literally blacklisted from the Tribeca film festival at the last hour and small theaters were threatened by Antifa from playing it.
Then buy all the vaccines you believe you need.
Just keep your creepy hands off white children.
>There's no big pharma in vaccinations here
>government wouldn't fund them if it weren't proven to save money.
Oh naive monkey. Bigpharma wouldn't supply the vaccines if they didn't make money off them.
Don't be silly! They pay all these celebrities to promote vaccines because they LOVE white children!
>public service
great, thanks for admitting that it's taxpayer funded
I just told you it's a public service.
You don't buy those.
Vaccines are produced by the governmental agency, as buying them from murrican jews would make them fifty times more expensive.
They don't make money off of them.
I said it was a governmental agency in my second post. Why is reading comprehension so hard for you guys?
You do pay buy them, faggot. They're $75 a shot. Either the insurance pays it, or the government pays for it.
Are YOU caught up with this schedule? I doubt it. Go out to your local clinic and buy all you need now!
vaccineinfo.net
Yup, I see no reason for these people to vote for a vaccine, none at all, why would they vote for a vaccine when they would only earn tens of millions of dollars.
I said in the very post you're replying to that we make them here, so no absurd profits of the pharmaceutical companies in the price paid by the government.
The last time I checked the production cost was about 5-10 brl per shot, which is still less than 3 usd. They probably spend more in awareness whenever there's a campaign than on the shots themselves.
Yeah it's obviously profitable in places where the government doesn't care about the citizen's health insurance, but it doesn't make they less efficient. the point I'm making is that they're absurdly cheap to produce and they do work, otherwise there wouldn't be such investment in them here. The problem with it in North America is that the companies get away with profit margins with percentages in the thousands, but that happens in all instances of medical care for you.
>Let me just try to justify the fact that the same people who are reponsible for our vaccine safety are also allowed to earn a profit on those same vaccines.
I already repeated half a dozen times that they don't profit here.
Can't you read?
user, people don't do stuff for free. They are making money otherwise they wouldn't do it. What don't you understand.
That's retarded. The mercury in vaccines is another molecule than the toxic mercury. That's like saying table salt is extremely dangerous for you because sodium explodes in water.
I could make the same graphic for virtually every single Industry
Jonas salk is the funniest one as people like you would be claiming polio was a conspiracy if it existed today, yet salk did not patent his vaccine which is the least jewy thing you could do
no that's not comparable at all. Mercury is dangerous regardless of the doss, including thimerosal.
This b.s that it is a "safe dosage" is based off NOTHING
It's about about the dose, it's chemistry. Mercury is toxic, but a molecule containing Mercury isn't necessarily.
Table salt is a molecule of 2 extremely dangerous elements, together they're safe for consumption and even become a nutrient.
>Iron us attracted to magnets
>Blood has iron in it
>Blood must be magnetic!
>Grok no understand what gives
I also already said it's purpose is to save the money that would be spent in the treatment if the person got infected, since the government would have to pay for it anyway.
I didn't know Canada had such an illiteracy problem, appears that you really can't interpret what you read.
Fewer than 1% of adverse events might be reported, but DEATHS surely are. They're not reported because they're not severe enough to justify reporting.
vaccines are one of the greatest inventions of humanity. That, combined with antibiotics has saved countless lives and greatly increased life expectancy. Even if vaccines caused autism (I dont believe they do, but its possible) in 1/100 people their benefit greatly outweighs their risks.
sorry frend, but thats just not true:
>how do we know vaccines work?
by comparing vaccinated with not vaccinated people. thats what you think is done, but nope. Vaccination is measured by testing the titer* value in the blood to see if a imune response to all that shit that was put into your body existst. the higher the value, well, the higher the imunitation... well, exept that its not true. that titer value is just a pseudo indicator: that means it might, or might not indicate imunisation. people with high and lov values got infected my the diseases they were vaxed against... so the reason why we know vaccines work is a imaginary number that means shit. thats science 2018 for you.
*name might be different, to lazy to look up
We know vaccines work because very few people in developed countries each year contract polio measles etc. Small pox was eradicated from the face of the Earth.
Its quite rare for vaccinated people to develop measles and lots of times measles outbreaks happen in retarded wealthy communities where the idiot parents choose not to vaccinate their kids.
Your a nigger kike.
Vaccines cause cancer.
>They say serious adverse events aren't reported but deaths definitely are!!!
Where does it say that? You know there is a list of adverse events that HAVE to be reported, everything else is written off as "coincidence"
govinfo.gov
Anything not on the vaccine injury table is not a required report, so it usually goes un reported. Don't make baseless claims just because you "think" it reports them, maybe it happens 1 day, 10 days or even 100 days after vaccination, not all of them get reported.
>thinking wakefield is the only link
>thinking wakefield wasn't publicly attacked for his journal that has been replicated several dozen times over.
Like here
mercola.fileburst.com
here
mercola.fileburst.com
here
mercola.fileburst.com
here
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
here
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
here
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
And most recently here
ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Literally this article is everything wakefield said with the difference that there MAY be a connection between the mmr vaccine and autistic children which was stated by the parents not him.
scribd.com
Also attacking wakefield for "fraud" but then we have a whistle blower coming out against the cdc with evidence that they omitted important data against Wakefield, but sure lets forget that part where he had them so cornered that THEY COMMITTED SCIENTIFIC FRAUD in order to save themselves.
Refresh my memory, what was Wakefield's sample size?
>A meta-analysis to summarize available evidence from five cohort studies involving 1,256,407 children and five case-control studies involving 9,920 children.
immunize.org
25 studies including the one i greentexted refute every one of your shitty evidence.
> then we have a whistle blower coming out against the cdc with evidence that they omitted important data against Wakefield
You fell for the anti-vaxxer shit. This whistleblower thing is literally nothing
respectfulinsolence.com
You might want to avoid confirmation bias and actually look at all the sides of a story, especially since it's known that the anti-vaxxer movement is full of conspiracy theorist retards. Go look at the omitted data, you're retarded.
HHS hasn't sent any reports in over 30 years. You would think that they would be doing the thing they agreed to over 30 years ago considering the industry THREATENED to stop making vaccines if they weren't given protection from liability.
They haven't sent any reports they were required to, but boy did they not forget about the part where they don't have to pay the billions of dollars in damages they would owe because of that pesky liability.
no faggot, anyone who has read any literature on this at all will tell you that they vaccination methods have changed over the past decades and the correlation to Autism is a result of the change in methodology. They need to stop administering "cocktail" style vaccines and go back to the previous methods which were independent inoculations for independent infections. Dont be a faggot, you can be against a certain type of vaccination without being "Anti-Vax"
MDs get paid a lot for vaxing all their patients
Not only do individual patients give money to the MD, entire hospitals can receive additional funding for hundreds of thousands of dollars by meeting target goals for overall vaccination. This is an incentive for profit not for the safety of children.
qrd?