Peterson is fighting the good fight. He can’t go full retard otherwise he loses all credibility with the people he’s converting, so to speak. It’s to early to know for sure, but arguably, Peterson might be driving folks to jones.
Charles Gray
I hope so. I just wish he'd cool it on the telling (white) people to avoid collectivism crap.
Jason Gonzalez
Jones trashes white identity too. Gotta look deeper. If you’re from the northeast, the name of the game is ethnic identity. Gets more complex when you’re from the south.
Anybody know where to get EMJ's books for reasonable prices in Canada?
Landon Gray
it's not but sections are being serialized in Culture Wars magazine. This month's section on St. Peter and Logos is excellent. A fantastic supplement to the Catechism. There was also another great chapter a few months ago about the cult of Baal, and heroes slaying Baal (Gilgamesh, Theseus, Moses) being the opening point to Logos and the requirement to become a great civilization. Keep thinking about that chapter.
Parker Jones
oh ya. i remember now someone said charpters come each month with the magazine its going to have about 2000 pages, right?
Ryan Jenkins
I just pirate his books. sorry EMJ but I'm poor and you're a crypto-socialist so I'm sure you will understand
Yet he pushes the importance of Logos. You're a dumb fuck, aren't you?
Go say three hail marys and 2 our fathers.
Wyatt Jenkins
sometimes I think peterson only started talking about Logos to sap some of the EMJ fans. we know that peterson goes after the alt-right. he's said as much himself. I never even heard of the concept of Logos until I found EMJ in 2014, then a few years later I was shocked to see peterson talking about it too.
in reality that's probably because I don't read any greek philosophy or academic websites. maybe people are talking about Logos all the time and I just don't see it, but I kind of doubt that.
Hudson Smith
>Yet he pushes the importance of Logos. Peterson's definition of Logos is not the same as EMJ's, at all. Peterson does not even believe in God, much less of the divinity of Jesus Christ. You're literally defending an agnostic atheist who blasphemes the Lord Jesus Christ: Peterson teaches a masonic interpretation of Jesus Christ as being a metaphor for personal transformation, not Logos incarnate.
>Go say three hail marys and 2 our fathers. Perhaps it is you who should repent for defending an anti-Christ false prophet (Peterson).
1 John 4:3 >and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world.
Matthew 7:15 >“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.
At least in my uni all students are required to take a rhetoric course which is basically a class on how to make and present arguments. There are three pillars which form the base of an argument: >Ethos Basically arguing from authority or experience e.g. taking a doctor's health advice >Pathos Arguing based on emotion e.g. MUH FEELS. >Logos Arguing based on logical conclusions and statistics e.g. using hard data to back up a claim
Pathos is the main pillar from which (((media))) makes most of their arguments because it's easy and extremely powerful. It's why they love showing pictures of dead children as morbid as it is.
