Thoughts on women's political views?

They don’t matter

they should reflect those of the man in her life. father or husband

i screen shotted the image myself so i already know it's not fake

I don't care what they have to say about anything.

refugees welcome

I like women who aren't SJWs. Women like Ayaan Hirsi Ali are great. Not too conservative and nowhere close to the SJW madness.

My mistake, read the video subtitles wrong.

They need
the seed

>mfw ive had severe yellow fever for years
>mfw i realize i havent felt for a white girl in years
>mfw i just did

Attached: why-should-our-movement-care-whether-women-are-pleased-with-it-or-not-their-opinions-are-useless-if- (621x648, 86K)

Attached: 1536435313033.jpg (1280x863, 276K)

Everybody should think like that
>oh we are so sorry for what we did to you minorities :(
>please, come into our country and make yourselves at home!
>...oh, t-the crime rate is spiking... and once beautiful towns are now no-go zones...
>this was a mistake!
Instead, our governments pretend nothing is wrong and import even more while telling us how good it is.

Women will never be radical, they care about people's opinion too much.
Once a stance is publicly accepted though they can and will support it. We need them as they make half of votes.
We need to convince them that love, family and virtue are worth fighting for.

They can't imagine the horrible consequences of their actions because they can't think like a man

They can't imagine trucks of peace, rape gangs, etc

It's that simple. They have to see and experience it for thenselves

mixed bag but generally self destructive.
of course you're always bound to get the femfuhrer like Ann Coulter but those are few and far between

I know there has to be a white girl out there who will at least be open to the idea of helping me raise beautiful white children. Problem is, i have no idea where to look. Is it my geographic location? Or is there some sort of nazi dating sight? All the grils i've ever been with only lasted for about 2 seconds because they'd say something about guns being evil or some shit and i'm gone.

Attached: 1536934531889.jpg (600x458, 97K)

it is an incredibly easy sell

You have to fight hedonism surrounding them.
It's literally everywhere.

>reminder
aryan pussy is the only reason to live

times are changing lads
can you feel it

Attached: 1536756742421.png (581x859, 449K)

Women think with their emotional hearts, not their rational heads, and therefore should be stripped of voting rights.

>Sharp girls.
>sins of the past
not really

women rule. theyre based

Attached: 1139720_1.jpg (630x630, 31K)

>times are changing lads
>can you feel it

NOPE!!!

The future is kiked and doomed

I knew a natsoc girl from Arizona who was incredibly pro-Trump, red pilled and admired Hitler but she suffered from all the other flaws of being a woman and I had to eventually tell the thot to fuck off forever because she was unbearable in every way but politically.

Poolan' is stronk, poolan' is Nr1!1!

Attached: 1583638756303.webm (640x360, 1.9M)

booooo

This

That gif is pure propaganda.
It was one summer camp for kids of SJWs and other libtards that want to be "european" and "open".
Yeah, we have those idiots here but they're less than 1% of our population.

All women are NPCs, they're only for fucking and rape.

Based

youtube.com/watch?v=9a0U5_UulsE
youtube.com/watch?v=jEUXxLlVKLw

Attached: whitesuicidewomen.jpg (1158x1000, 550K)

>We need them as they make half of votes.
If we ever get to a position where it is possible to sway their votes, we would have to be truly idiotic to keep up the sham that is democracy.

I kinda feel bad for the intense denazification...
we literally mindbroke a population to where they enjoy their own twisted self flagulation

yep

Democracy is not bad, we just need to limit the amount of people who can vote.
To white males, that is.

It always serves to make citizens enemies and to obscure blame for failure. It is an exercise in selling mediocrity to the masses.
While restricting the vote to white male landowners would be better, it's still leaving the door open for inevitable decay into what we have now--politicians expanded the franchise in the first place because they were simply creating new votes for themselves.

At most, local matters should be self-decided and the people could petition their issues. But ruling and defending the nation can never be democratic (and I say this only in the narrow definition--it's impossible to have a pure democracy alongside mass media).

So many Aryan qts

The problem with monarchy or oligarchy is, their private interests will easily trump the states'.
I'm afraid there is no good answer to the government question, all forms have many flaws.

Fuck people, man.
But I support a monarchy inasmuch as blatant abuse of power will result in blame being attributed more easily to its source.
A democracy diffuses blame and lulls people into complacency.

The monarchy's problem is that while you can easily attribute blame, you can't do anything as the monarch holds all the power.
If he's easily controlled by the people he's not much of a monarch. That was literally what happened to the Commonwealth, weak king and a lot of private interests.

Control, not so much, but revolt, yes. It takes a lot to provoke an uprising, as it should.
I mean, we both know that human nature will lead to decay no matter what.

Can I seed her?

>