Is it normalization of pedophilia the next step in their agenda?

I'm sure a lot of people want it but they won't be able to. For one, most people find it unacceptable behavior -- even if they don't say it. Some people are violently against it too. The other issue is that those in power who have been blackmailed because of their sexual interests will no longer be beholden to it.

Not pedophilia dumb fuck

You have absolutely no reading comprehension.

Most pedos are homo. A 14yo girl has tits and ass and is legal for everyone to fuck in most countries. A pedo wants a 9. Your dick doesn't even fit in any hole they might have at that age.

I agree that they are sick human beings and their attraction is fucked up. I am only saying I dont believe they CHOOSE to be attracted to the demographic they are attracted to. Not even saying we shouldnt murder them, but I believe it's a mental illness.

>Nobody would volunteer to become a social pariah for their sexual beliefs
Uhh.... actually they would.

That's another catagory of mental illness.

Its like saying "nobody would set themself on fire." People still do it, but any sane individual sees it and realizes it was stupid and that they could never go back to their normal life.

It doesn't matter what a 14 y/o looks like, they don't have a solid grasp on how sex works and are children mentally.

If you think it's ok to fuck 14 y/o's boys or girls

kys

Attached: 1520806825265.jpg (1024x1024, 118K)

When you accept the concept of "sexual orientation" it is only natural to see Pedophilia as normal within that worldview.

In reality, there are those that adhere to the natural order of the universe and feel attraction to mates with which they can breed, and then there are deviations which are a result of vanity and/or literal demonic possession.

Attached: db7e6d752d9084ab6bbab85bb12100ab.jpg (571x800, 534K)

All females are mentally children. A 14 year old girl is almost done with puberty and should be married already or be married soon and be preparing to breed with her husband who should be around 10 years older.

Attached: kys pedo faggot.gif (480x270, 308K)

You're mentally ill and support degenerate modernist practices that are designed to destroy the white race.

Attached: 2018-08-19 14_50_47-Mozilla Firefox.jpg (3756x1969, 1.93M)

people who think fucking a toddler and a post-pubescent girl are equivalent are purposely muddying the water.

if the white race relies on fucking 14 y/o's we deserve to go extinct

sandniggers fuck children

"Think" is a strong word for the brain processes of such individuals.

>It should still be treated as a mental illness, but so should homosexuality.

The drop of homosexuality from the list of mental disorders happened at the end of the 1980s, after a barrage of attacks in the 1970s against this classification like in America. I don't think it's a coincidence, that the timing of the drop matches the cultural change towards homosexuality.
It just seems to be another slow march through the institutions from leftists, that changed it.

The reason given for this decision nowadays is, that the treatment didn't have any affect and was considered cruel. But I have no clue as a layman, why you instead got an affirmative position towards homosexuality.
I mean they still love to publish studies to show, that there is absolutely no risk for gays and children grow up just the same in their households and other propaganda like that. They've turned it all into a clinical test, but with the people out in the real world.

Thanks for reminding me this video is out there. I was telling someone this is the next step after gay marriage and the slippery slope was real. I was told i was full of shit and that 10 year old drag queen was “cute” like I showed them a picture of Mickey Mouse.

Pubescent humans are not children.
>(((we))) deserve to go extinct
I married my wife when she was 14 and will happily see my daughters married younger than that if fate permits it. My clan will produce many warriors to combat your tribe, demon worshiper.

She has such a nice ASMR voice.
Honestly what she's saying shouldn't be controversial.
If someone has a bad attraction but doesn't act on it, we shouldn't treat them negatively.

If everyone was as wholesome as Mr. Rogers, being sexually attracted to children would still be an issue. However, taking a younger wife and growing together, and eventually having sex for the purpose of procreation is something else entirely. Imagine if you could wed a 11, 15, 17 year old and the whole purpose of the years before 18 was to nurture your love and status until you get to the point where you're self sufficient to have kids. Then you have 1/2/3/4 kids and then stop having sex, raise your children and then grow old and die. The problem with today's whole concept of love/having children is that those who have the status to have kids will have kids and those that don't have the status will have kids, but a lot of the smart people who struggle through life, end up not having kids because they're either distracted by work and entertainment or they're just plain old by the time they want to have kids. I assume that this agenda is somehow trying to make it okay to lower the age of consent so that this can be a possibility and even if that's the fact. I still wouldn't agree with it. Because there's no one in this world that you could convince me should be wed to an underage girl or boy and won't take advantage of that situation.

The UK police have been trying to teach their citizens that raping children is not a crime in the EU for a while now

Pedophilia has a wall to jump that other things didn't, which is consent. In a consent-oriented liberal culture it's very difficult to tell two adults that they can't have gay sex. Why not? We're both into it and we're not directly harming anyone, so why can't we? There isn't a good liberal answer to that. But there is a strong liberal answer to the pedophile, which is "kids can't meaningfully consent, so it's wrong."

There is nothing wrong with liking kids.

>Jews wants to fuck children
Prolly

This is true and how society always worked until about 80 years ago. You would become betrothed to a young lady and not consummate the marriage until they were pubescent and nubile.

reminds me of a segment on Tucker Carlson where he interviewed a liberal who was pushing the idea of asking a baby for consent to change their diaper. It takes on a pretty sinister twist now if the true intent is to teach babies consent early so that they'll be able to consent to sex at a much younger age

Pedophilia and child rape are not the same thing. One is a state of mind, one is an action.

I deny the concept of sexual orientation, but those that adhere to that belief system have no reason to not accept Pedophilia as valid right alongside Homosexuals.

Your fear makes it sound like you believe children have the capacity if properly educated.

Technically is legal in Europe. So idgaf what you coping retard wrote. Girls at that age were married in Christian countries a century ago.

I believe that liberals believe it

I genuinely don't get how Jow Forumstards can rationalise liking lolis and their whole "young anime girls" thing but not accepting that pedos who do not act on their impulses.
Cognitive dissonance is huge on Jow Forums...

It's newfags and boomers from reddit and facebook.

>Transgender is not a mental disorder - Science
>Pedophilia is a mental disorder - Science

You should give your daughters a chance to grow up a bit more, before you lock them into anything.

>To differentiate the two is ignorance.
Yes, both need to get the rope.
And both are basically the same anyway.
Degenerate.
Unnatural.
And one is a part of the other.

>lock them
Humans reach the age of reason around 7. My daughters will be perfectly capable of making their own decisions when they reach puberty and begin being courted.

The shepherd does not use his arms to physically control his flock. My job as their father is to guide them and protect them from wolves.

Yes, but they won't try and take it mainstream until they regain significant political power. I'd expect to see such an agenda present itself outside the US first, say in Sweden or Germany, where there is a large enough portion of the population that would agree, either religiously or politically, or both.

This guy understands what I am saying.

>Homosex is too - irl experience

Wait because I was quick to respond. Transgender is schizo.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924933815313663

>Your dick doesn't even fit in any hole they might have at that age.
It's really baffling how much ignorance there is on the anatomy of little girls. With a few months of stretching beforehand and enough lube it's possible to have intercourse with girls as young as 5 or 6 and for them to enjoy it as well.

Where else in nature does pedophilia appear? I know homosexuality does appear with animals, but pedophilia?

That is until you ask if they're okay with incest. At which point they completely flip out and say it's immoral and wrong.

It seems as if consent, which is basically just a legal term, is the rationalization they use. What's underlying their worldview is perceiving everything in terms of oppressor and victim. Permitting incest would mean permitting father daughter relationships, which implies power imbalance and exploitation.

Attached: pedonormalization.png (1280x1241, 389K)

Bonobo monkeys, incidentally the species with dna that's closest to our own.

I predicted that this would be the next step.

Animals start mating the moment they are physically ready. Humans are the only animals who have to wait +6 years after puberty and in many cases they decide to mate when is already too late i.e women start trying to get pregnant in their 40s

this.

The only cure for this is true isolation. Everything must go.

>Thus will truly be the moment I snap. Mass shootings will be inevitable.

Sure, kiddo. You pray on videos like these to justify your rage, like any fascist-personality you get it off on the fantasy of murdering people. It's not that pedos make you shoot at people -- it's that you already are a degenerate anti-social thung who just lurks for something that would justify his violent outbursts.

You lurk for a "scandal" to rationalize your violent pathologies.

Attached: cuntwell.jpg (614x768, 72K)

Spot on. These threads are plagued by homicidal LARPers.
>People will have thoughts of murder with no justification and will see nothing wrong in that.

Your defending pedophilia? Wow your so smart.

When the innocent are oppressed by savage NPCs, it's up to the player character to protect them.

What do you mean, it pretty much used to be normal and legal the last few hundred years.

We have more medical knowledge now, and it's probably best to wait to until girl's finish puberty(around 15) to begin breeding safely. Marriage before then shouldn't be a problem though.

Attached: 1536337281203.jpg (948x1017, 162K)

Are we confusing ephebophilia with pedophilia again, Ahmed?

You're confusing your own terms, brainlet.

Attached: 1497131359853.png (936x920, 559K)

>Your defending pedophilia?

Retard tier straw-man. I studied criminology. And the violent outbursts of self-proclaimed "moralists" who scream "I'm-ma gonna start shooting people if these libruls go too far!" are self-explanatory of their own pathological condition.

>TEDx tries [...]
TEDx is independently organized.

Friend told you this?

2D dosnt count.... all 3 are made for love.

All women are made for love, just different kinds at different stages.

>hebe

Get that jap shit out of here.
pre-pubescent - pedo
post-pubescent - ephebo

These are the terms, now piss off pedo.

Are there really people who wouldn't fuck left and middle? I find that really hard to believe. Come on now, Jow Forums, be honest.

Sorry you're biologically illiterate, but that's not my fault.

This is why getting triggered by pedos on an anime board is pretty ironic, desu.

2D lolicon IS NOT 3D pedophile
2D cute trap IS NOT 3D disgusting transsexual

Attached: 1525511342552.png (1124x1136, 1.21M)

Left is honestly a bad example for Pedophilia. That girl is clearly pubescent and ready to marry.

The right is fine. Prove me wrong. Pro tip:You cant

>biologically illiterate

You're the one using weeb shit to make a retarded point. Not exactly someone who should point fingers now, are you.

They don’t choose it, it’s the result of childhood sexual abuse. You’re more likely to become a pedo if you suffered ongoing abuse as opposed to a one off attack but it also depends on how it gets handled

I thought your IQ was high enough to grasp human development stages with a simple visual aid, but it seems to have been too complicated for you.

Attached: 1529190938622.png (1745x1386, 2.02M)

Satan approves of my hebe fetish.

I know its bait but
>If someone has a bad attraction but doesn't act on it, we shouldn't treat them negatively.

>If someone is genetically predisposed to murder but doesn't act on it, we shouldn't treat them negatively.
The problem here is that they don't dare out themselves as a possible murderer/pedo because those are the biggest red flags in a society.
We should not treat them like they're preferences are legitimate or normal, but instead, treat them like they've got a mental illness and give them put them in places where they can eliminate their urges.

>incarcerating people for thought crimes

Attached: 1518939926103.png (544x638, 619K)

>Is it normalization of pedophilia the next step in their agenda?
I would think polygamy, especially with all the moozlims flooding in

making you think democrats are trying to normalize pedophilia is the next step in the Russian agenda to brainwash you gullible fucks.

...

Attached: 1483167144365.jpg (300x300, 17K)

Fucking Pikeys, not even once

>The problem here is that they don't dare out themselves as a possible murderer/pedo because those are the biggest red flags in a society.
I just mentioned that the problem here is that we CAN'T incarcerate people for that stuff yet and so we need a way to deal with them directly instead of just dealing with the results of their actions.
I imagine if we attempt to incarcerate people for stuff they haven't done yet it'll turn out like that movie Minority Report.

>treat them like they've got a mental illness and give them put them in places
How do you think we treat the "mentally ill"? Do you think we ask their permission to (((treat))) them?

its the result of the state of their congenital neurology, from the womb

>I fully believe it isnt a choice honestly.

physics does not and cannot care what you or anyone believes, nor about anything

(neurology is physics)

>deserve

subjective

>How do you think we treat the "mentally ill"? Do you think we ask their permission to (((treat))) them?

that depends on if they are a danger to themselves and or others

if not, nothing is forced upon them

I don't know how to deal with juice at all, but a doomsaying won't reveal a solution to us. We've got to create one for ourselves.

stupid moron

they skipped polygamy and went straight to polyamory

>that depends on if they are a danger to themselves and or others
So a judge's "I know it when I see it" subjective feefees?
What solution? What problem?