Does skin color have anything to do with IQ?

The Negroid shows his low IQ, he didn't say lighter skin people weren't violent in the past but A LOT less than niggers like you, even today you monkeys act like savages.

>So you think white people were never savages at some point in history? That's ridiculous.
Why would it be ridiculous? historical documents (not what (((historians))) say but actual documents from back then) hint at that. Also IQ being mostly racially inherited, it just didn't appear out of nowhere, it was already here to begin with. High IQ = stable societies.

It's your claim that is ridiculous. Are you a cuck or a kike?

What I am asking is, is it possible that darker skinned people can become more civilized over time, just like lighter skinned people have obviously become?

Well it's [current year]. You tell us.

There is a correlation, but no causation.

>historical documents
Savages don't write documents. There's a large chunk of human history, for all races, that has no historical documents because people were savages.

The truth is - we have no fucking idea.
This kind of research is kinda forbidden and it's hard to measure.

Well obviously, that didn't work in ass-freezing, crime ridden Detroit. They're still dumb, sucking in all the free gibs.

>There's a large chunk of human history, for all races, that has no historical documents because people were savages.
Or you now, could just be that we didn't discover them because time takes its toll and nothing is eternal.
We constantly discover new shit that's older than the last. Don't be so disingenuous.

While savage niggers were still sucking the shit out of Cow anus, the Caucasoid was creating written languages, most got destroyed but then you know who or by the church after converting to Christianity

Not really. Smarter people only have 1-2 offsprings, while dumb people breeds like rabbits. If anything, everyone will get dumber overtime

Not necessarily. There's more variation between individuals within groups than between groups themselves. Race or skin color doens't tell the whole story. Instead you have to delve into geographic origin and ethnicity. There is a story there. Subsaharan Africans and Austra-aboriginals score low on IQ and quantitative intelligence testing while "races" and ethnicities from northern latitutdes tend to score relatively high.

I've also noticed that, Mexicans, Spics, Nigger, Muslims, Indians all have INSANE numbers of children

So you think white people have always had civilization, from the beginning of human history, and never had any period of savagery, and that they even created documents that would prove it but we just haven't discovered them yet? And you are calling me disingenuous?

They're correlated because both have a causal relationship with the same third factor, which is climate.

idiot "white people" didn't exist at the time. jesus how dumb are niggers?

Based retard

>Not necessarily. There's more variation between individuals within groups than between groups themselves.

Lewontin's fallacy. Found the fucking Marxist.

We can't even quantify what's the beginning of humanity. What makes you think you can say civilisations didn't exist? Do you have any proof? Because as far as we CAN reach, we have proof that there was.

Stop drinking the kool aid.

>Eskimos are light skinned
>South Africans have medium skin
This chart is useless, it tries to hard to correlate color with latitude when it is more complicated. Values probably include Whites or mixed instead of native populations alone.

idiot, read the map a little more carefully.

No, indians are very intelligent. Native Americans are as well. Yet they are brown-red. Niggers are brown and dumb, but it's actually insane just how dumb and ugly abos are.

>Lewontin's fallacy
You should learn more about this before you go name calling. The truth is that race no longer produces a scientific consensus because the entire concept of "race" has been subsumed by new science. Specifically, genetics. Genetic testing allows us to group individuals and groups more accurately than ever before. "Race" is simply too blurry and imprecise to hold up to modern scientific scrutiny. Holding onto "race" as a scientific concept is like insisting the automobile fad will die out and horseshoes and stables will make a roaring comeback.

>It says native, that means it is.
Don't believe everything you read

Attached: girl_copper.jpg (360x472, 34K)

white people are best at the organized violence, desu familam

due to environment. those in colder climates had to have the forethought for a lot of things. e.g. housing, clothes, heat, and food.

Wrong it's not even a race .. those just consolations like the shoo size and hart attack probability you can find lots of correlation.
Causation it's different thing, skin color came from amount of exposure to direct sun light, over generation evolution adapt by increasing in production of melatoin in skin. the same by widening nose to adopt for dry thin air. Natural selection and evolution.
What makes Norden People and Asian ( Chinese and Japs ) get Higer IQ than Mediterranean and African is other factor, mainly diet.
Nord was much colder than equator area tribes living there for much longer has taste for mainly fat from animals when our African ancestors has more fruits and veg in diet.

youtube.com/watch?v=seciYFjRWeE
Watch this !!! Red meet is truly Redpiled .

Attached: rabbits.jpg (1600x1000, 90K)

LEARN ENGLISH FIRST, second, Italy has the highest IQ in Europe and they sure aren't "Norden" dumb ass

>when our African ancestors
WHAT? stop there you fucking retard
where did all these mindless fucks come from, /POL? used to at least not be filled with niggers before

You’re correct but there is a correlation between skin color and race. Brown street shitters don’t have high IQs because they work in IT and read off scripts and never actually help anybody

The northern part of Italy have the highest IQ, the rest of the country have average to below average IQ

Attached: DpQ9YJl.png (700x700, 21K)

Even the most northern part of Italy isn't "Norden" and where the fuck did you learn English. And that's not true, not even remotely close the truth.

there are only about 3 genes that code for skin color
there are hundreds that code for IQ

you're wasting your time if you think there is any link to skin color and intelligence outside of the fact that different populations tend to have different skin color and also different IQs unique to that population

You wouldn't call Japanese white but they have an IQ comparable to North Western European

Attached: 1537058933170.png (1137x1311, 247K)

>correlation between skin color and race
as there is for pretty much every trait and race

the genes that code for skin color have no relation to the nervous system, you could use CRISPR to make a North European child have the same skin color as a Nigerian, but that wouldn't change their genetically determined IQ

also you'll have to look at more phenotypes than just skin color if you want to accurately identify a race

Or maybe IQ is good for empires and civilization. IQ is heritable, that is fact, likely as much as 80%

Attached: SAT_Scores_Graph.jpg (1186x644, 177K)

Everything is connected, idiot. Skin color is obviously something important, just go look at an IQ chart come back and look at this map. ill just post it. Hong Kong 107 109 Asian
Singapore 105 109 Asian
North Korea 105 106 Asian
South Korea 106 106 Asian
Japan 105 106 Asian
People' Republic of China 101 106 Asian
Taiwan 104 106 Asian
Italy 102 103 white
Mongolia 99 102 Asian
Iceland 98 102 white
Switzerland 101 102 white
Austria 102 100 white
Luxembourg 101 100 white l
Netherlands 102 100 white
Norway 99 100 white
United Kingdom 100 100 white/nigger
Belgium 100 100 white
Canada 98 100 white/nigger
Estonia 98 99 white
Finland 97 99 white
Poland 99 99 white
Germany 102 98 white/nigger
New Zealand 100 98 white
Sweden 101 98 white/nigger sand
Andorra 97 98 white
Australia 98 98 white
Czech Republic 97 98 white
Denmark 98 98 white
France 98 98 white
Latvia 97 98 white
Spain 97 98 white
United States 98 98 white/nigger
Russia 97 98 white
Hungary 99 97 white
Belarus 96 97 white
Malta 96 97 white
Ukraine 96 97 white
Slovakia 96 96 white
Uruguay 96 96 mostly white
Moldova 95 96 white
Israel 95 96 debatable white
Armenia 94 96 white
Portugal 95 95 white
Georgia 94 95 white
Kazakhstan 93 95 Asian
Romania 94 94 white
Vietnam 96 94 Asian
Bulgaria 93 93 white
Argentina 95 93 mostly white
Malaysia 92 92 Asian
Greece 92 92 white
Ireland 93 92 white
Cambodia 90 92 Asian
Brunei 92 91 Asian
Cyprus 92 91 white
Republic of Macedonia 93 91 white
Thailand 91 91 Asian
Lithuania 96 90 white
Albania 90 90 Turk
Bermuda N/A 90 Asian
Kyrgyzstan 88 90 Asian
Croatia 90 90 white
Bosnia and Herzegovina N/A 90 white
Mexico 88 90 spic
Turkey 90 90 sandnigger
Chile 93 90 spic
Laos 89 89 nigger
Mauritius 83 89 spic
Costa Rica 90 89 spic
Cook Island N/A 89 spic

Ecuador 83 89 spic
Suriname 89 89 spic
Samoa 88 88 island spic
Bolivia 86 88 spic
Guyana 84 88 spic
Myanmar 87 88 spic
Azerbaijan 87 87 sandnigger
Brazil 87 87 mutt spic
East Timor N/A 97 spic
Iraq 87 87 sandnigger
Tajikistan 87 87 Asian sandnigger
Turkmenistan 87 87 Asian sandnigger
Uzbekistan 87 87 Asian sandnigger
Indonesia 88 86 Asian sandnigger
Kuwait 84 86 sandnigger
Philippines 86 86 Asian sandnigger
Seychelles 83 86 spic
Cuba 85 86 nigger spic
Tonga 86 85 nigger
Fiji 85 85 Asian spic
New Caledonia N/A 85 Asian spic
Kiribati 85 85 Asian spic
Trinidad and Tobago 82 85 nigger
Yemen 83 85 sand nigger
Belize 84 85 nigger
Peru 88 84 spic
Iran 84 84 sandnigger
Marshall Islands 84 84 Asian spic
82 84 streetshiter sandnigger
Panama 84 84 spic
Paraguay 85 84 spic
Colombia 87 84 spic
Puerto Rico 84 84 spic
Afghanistan 83 84 sandnigger
Federated States of Micronesia 84 84 Asian spic
Saudi Arabia 83 84 sand nigger
Solomon Island 84 84 island spic
The Bahamas 80 Island nigger
United Arab Emirates 83 84 sand nigger
Vanuatu 84 84 spic nigger
Morocco 84 83 spic nigger
Jordan 85 83 sand nigger
Venezuela 86 83 sand nigger

You are a retard who doesn't understand genetics or statistics. If there was more difference within group than between groups, it would be impossible to differentiate ethnicities with any statistical significance. And yet genetic testing can accurately and precisely determine your racial background and in fact the vast majority of people can easily determine someone's ethnicity with the naked eye.

>italy
>white

Higher melanin content in animals is generally a sign of higher aggression. This also correlates to Africans as well. Africans may be older than Europeans and Asians, but they are more primitive as a whole.

Attached: it's not just skin color.jpg (940x690, 95K)

oh, I forgot they are black.

>who doesn't understand genetics or statistics
I love how you accuse me of what you are guilty of.

Simple fact: Caucasians, there are pure Caucasians from ancient hunter-gatherer Indo Europeans, all come from the same ancestors all different in ways but more closely related than to any other people on the planet. The Afro-Asiatic Semitic people have their own line of Ancestors

Europeans, Persians, north Indians, and others, the people responsible for basically all human achievement, all descend from the Proto-Indo-European people, who are fundamentally different than subsaharan Africans and other early groups who migrated from Africa along the Arabian coast line and southern india (who all happen to be dark skinned). Modern Arabs are not ethnically the same middle easterners who made discoveries in math and science, those were all Persians, closer to Europeans than Arabs. Unfortunately many PIE civilizations have been destroyed by race mixing with the inferior darker people, like the middle east. PIE people are generally lighter skinned than niggers who are basically walking monkeys, which explains the skin color-IQ correlation.

Not directly, although there is a correlation because they share a third factor, which is geography.

As you go further north:
>less sunlight -> lighter skin
>short growing season -> use of animal products, particularly milk(which is why Northerners are more lactose-tolerant) -> more calories and nutrients available to boost brain development -> higher IQ
>long winters during which food is scarce -> need for long term thinking to store food -> higher IQ

This is why Africans and Aboriginals have the lowest IQs, followed by the Middle East, then Europeans and finally Asians. These are not the only factors since otherwise the Nordics would be the smartest ethnic group but I'd say they account for a fair bit.

>Albania 90 90 Turk
>turk
Nice bait

lmao you Iranian mudslimes always say the most retarded shit on this. You say the Arabs are not the same as from before but the fact is Iranians are not either, over 1000 years of Islam inbreeding and mixing with those Arabs, don't even get me started on "north Indians: literally a cluster fuck of race mixed poos and the funny thing is you are all Indo Iranian Indo Aryan a completely different branch of Indo European. Just take a look at Indias and Irans IQ same as every other sub human

lol @ france being white.
Demographics are changing big time, we'll be minority within 8 years.
t. white in france.

He's right though.
It's baffling anyone can dare to say there's more difference between two whites than between one white and one nigger.
Genetic diversity, as in quantity of eye/hair colours, sure. That's in race diversity.
But as long as you can tell and nigger and white apart from a fucking mile away, how can you say that a nigger and a white are genetically closer to each other without laughing? It's pure nonsense like saying fire is wet.