When will the alt-right have a truly radical leader, a definitive manifesto...

When will the alt-right have a truly radical leader, a definitive manifesto, and an actually cohesive political movement? Where's our Madison or Marx?

Attached: alt right.jpg (1920x1080, 180K)

The alt-right does not need a leader. Leaders get taken out.

What the fuck is the alt right? Is that that gay ass spencer fag and his nonsense?

PATIENCE, user.

That's dumb. We need someone to rally around. All we got right now are some dumb YouTubers who spend more time trying to make money to continue spreading the good word at each other's expense instead of coming up with something eloquent that puts words to our needs and wants. Marx took like what? Over a decade to write Das Kapital and then died before he finished it? Where's that guy?

The best we've done is just come up with memes to demonize our opponents, instead of defining ourselves.

It's a catch all term invented by jews to target attacks

Everyone is Goebbels. Don't need a leader.

Attached: med_1492444952_image.jpg (583x500, 64K)

Never, because you fags are too obsessed with purity spiraling nonsense.

You cannot target the indefinite, you cannot attack or discredit someone when there are no leaders.

Yeah, that's great and all, it really is. It's beautiful. But what about when we need to start leading people? Coming up with economic agendas? You can't open source inspiring men into voting and fighting for you and your cause.

Attached: 1527683291181.jpg (354x395, 20K)

All these big brained nibbas love gettin superchats too much. They have no time to write a book I guess.

Attached: anuddashoah.png (715x432, 518K)

We're more of an underground guerilla movement right now. We can only start moving up once we have numbers on our side.

Renember Charlotesvilles and how they got outnumbered by the leftists there, and the massive amount of white trash that showed up? We don't want that to happen there, retard rallies fuck us over.

First, we need some popular support for our ideas. Then, we can start considering a leader.

Then you don't understand the end goal, victory is unlikely, but destroying them with us is achievable.

Attached: 40456283_1204188889718854_1597444752817520640_n.jpg (677x748, 65K)

Okay, but what about intellectuals?

That is some defeatist talk right there. History is on our side.

I think we need our ideas to be more normalized to getting figureheads right now.
Intellectuals need funding and most big corporations are against us, so we can't really do much unless Henry Ford 2.0 spawns out of nowhere.

we have the bible and jesus

>a leader
>in anti-white state
It would be the same like a Lithuanian partizan proclaiming he is leader of partizans in front of NKVD soldiers.
You should really adopt the mentality of political dissidents because that is what you are and the system hates you and want to destroy you

>intellectuals need funding

Marx was a poor museum guard.

>Eastern European trying to talk sense about an American political movement

Karl Marx had a wealthy, upper middle-class dad who owned vineyards. His friend, Engels, also gave him money to help him get by. This basically made it possible for him to write about how evil capitalism is because he thought his wealth was unearned.

Unless we get lucky and we get someone who had a wealthy dad get into white nationalism, it's not gonna happen until we get some public support.

Leaderless resistance can only go so far. If we intend to build a movement rather than simply hamper the left, we will need some form of leadership and cooperation. You'd think this would be obvious to a board so flirty with fascism and collectivism.

Attached: yurigiffy.gif (560x400, 242K)

If Marx was so well-off due to his father and helped by Engels, then why did he keep working at that museum? I guess all the FFs including Madison were pretty well-off, though.

Greg Johnson just released the manifesto, retard