Would Japan under communism, in contrast to neoliberalism, be better for Japanese people?

>Would communism be better for X
No, the answer is always "no".

Attached: never let evil take root.jpg (1024x576, 108K)

They have state control because they have always had state control. Whether it's called imperial, militarist, or communist makes absolutely no difference. There is no way to unite the disparate regions of China without an overwhelming central authority. Xi Jinping is better understood in the context of a chinese dynastic emperor than a communist, just as stalin is better understood as as a russian czar than a communist. Ideas don't matter. Geography & nationality do.

Lmao, title is fake, it is just a legal requirement to change papers, and this is just from your screen.
> Lol, go to Shenzhen, lots of niggers.
Can I read more?

"Russian" socialism has indeed failed, but Chinese is doing fine.
> muh not real socialism

There's no such thing as real socialism, just like there's no such thing as real capitalism. There are only interests, and how you choose to pursue those interests. Anything else is PR.

Also, China is not doing fine. They had a good 30 years, but that time is over. They're hitting the same wall the Japanese hit in the 80s and have yet to recover from fully. Only difference is Japan didn't have a billion people still in grinding poverty when they hit that wall. China's GDP per capita is south american tier, and the entirety of their government's legitimacy rests on "things will get better if we are in charge." The second that stops, or even slows down (as it is right now), the government loses their ability to govern.

Attached: chinese_fdi.jpg (916x318, 52K)

No

Attached: 1537004526318.jpg (1024x576, 166K)

Was communism ever better for anyone?
The answer is no btw

> There's no such thing as real socialism, just like there's no such thing as real capitalism. There are only interests, and how you choose to pursue those interests. Anything else is PR.
That's oversimplified.
> The second that stops, or even slows down (as it is right now), the government loses their ability to govern.
How then haven't Maduro lost the ability to govern yet.

In many cases, and in many cases it is average.

Russia was much better as USSR than prior or after.

He has. Do you not see the rampant inflation, absolute inability to fund anything, and massive waves of emigration? Besides, Venezuela is not China. They had elections. They chose Chavez. The Chinese did not choose the CCP.

Maduro, like Xi, has lots of money and lots of guns. That'll work for a while. But eventually you get tossed out, or people just stop listening to you.

>chinese socialism
so rabid capitalism and lack of regulations?
>Russia was much better as USSR than prior or after.
Of course life is better when you have colonies and occupy other countries.
Russia, and the rest of the blocc had no links to the global economy. Technology, and science stagnated. It might have seem okay because you occupied half of Europe. so it was better than in the rest of the blocc - everything went to Russia back then.
Now look at yourselves, you are poorer than Poland which you've occupied for almost 40 years.

Attached: 1537140381921.jpg (1024x576, 135K)

Communism is internationalist and doesn't affirm race, so no. They need national(racial) socialism(nationalist economic and government policy based on the perpetuation and psychic and physical well being of the race, not merely profit).

>Of course life is better when you have >colonies and occupy other countries.
>Russia, and the rest of the bloc
Novak, you drunk? USSR was puting shit tones of money in "colonies" and third world.
>Now look at yourselves, you are poorer >than Poland which you've occupied for >almost 40 years.
You live on EU subsides. And since you are not going to take rapefuges, soon you will lost gibs money.

it would be better for japan but not better for the world

Fuck off that kid saved literally millions of lives neck yourself commie scum

North Korea style, yes.

However, they'd be closer with China, and their immigrant population is mostly Chinese. Therefore their racial purity would probably be decreased compared to now.

The culture of overworking (plus mass marketed sexual degeneracy) would be removed.

I have been to Shenzhen, your statement is false.

Nationalism is inherent in asia, even chinas revolutionaries were natiobnalists and so were the commies in japan. so yes, they would be, they wouldn't have allowed a population decline they would have bred them and groomed them to be the most terrifying fightimng force on the plaent.

god save the japs ching chon ping pongs

> Would Japan under communism, in contrast to neoliberalism, be better for Japanese people?
what are you, a retarded zoomer? you claim you're from russia.. have a fucking look at how communism worked for your country, faggot. communism destroyed it and cost millions of people's lives.

This is an interesting question.

Observe what communism has done for the countries that have had it and are currently recovering from it, now look at Japan, where communism was never allowed to take root.

I have never been to Japan and I have been told that they are a collectivist type people, or have collectivist social tendencies, do you think they would have been able to make it work?

No.
However, neoliberalism is always a latent threat.
The nips have always been perverts and deviants, desu.

The Japanese Communist party was heavily linked to the Chinese and USSR. They would have been just another commieblock shithole, regardless of the people.

North Korea was arguably more advanced than South Korea in what, the 80s? And it was decimated during the Korean war. Kim Il Sung went full Stalinist and rebuilt Pyongyang on the bones of thousands of workers driven to the edge, all with huge emphasis on patriotism and cultural icons of national pride. Of course, they fell apart along with every other socialist country with the fall of the USSR (Cuba is another obvious example of a socialist country that had a horrible decade in the 90s). All of their supply chains were wrecked.

But I just bring that up to say that the Asian tiger nations do/did have a different cultural background. They also had an extremely enervating narrative. Japan lost the war and was in ruins, but that could be used to bolster their resolve to rebuild and come back to national pride. The DPRK had the same kind of thing. I think Japan would have been able to pull through if it had been another soviet satellite, and with three socialist nations in the regions (albeit, Mao had huge blunders that I don't think could have been resolved by different circumstances. They were just bad decisions) I'd imagine it is possible DPRK would have seen even more growth, and Japan could have achieved admirable growth. They probably would have been just as fucked when the USSR collapsed. Also, it is possible they could have formed a similar leader cult culture, given the significance of the emperor during the imperial phase.