Why's there not a single picture of antartica? what did the nasa mean by this?

why's there not a single picture of antartica? what did the nasa mean by this?
google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=satellite picture of antarctica&tbs=imgo:1

Attached: 1517784598167.jpg (900x675, 125K)

Because they are hiding God's true creation.

Attached: image.jpg (1583x2048, 391K)

Attached: 1524643311485.webm (720x480, 817K)

Attached: 1528489079495.jpg (948x3880, 668K)

Attached: 1511054477948.jpg (996x1528, 738K)

"Where were you when I laid the foundations of the Earth?"
-God

because nobody is stupid enough to convince the willfully retarded flatneets of what is plainly obvious to anyone with reasoning skills.

*stupid enough to spend the money to convince the willfully retarded...

>why is it so difficult to get a satellite into an extremely high polar orbit?

Because you know how they found "Atlantis" in Africa or whatever? They're scared people will discover the ancient ruins in Antarctica and start asking too many questions.

Attached: 1520519341417.jpg (4359x2970, 3.26M)

Attached: 1520586081492.jpg (960x960, 141K)

I dunno i still wonder, especially its center, btw mods will ban the thread.

>amerifats spend billions of dollars a year for poor CGI pictures of the earth

SAD

Attached: 1536687900692.jpg (1344x960, 304K)

Its not flat earth btw, i guess its mostly military experiments

Attached: 156651561651651615.jpg (808x3821, 691K)

Earth is flat.

Attached: 1518814783544.webm (720x480, 2.71M)

Attached: As if it needs to be demonstrated in the first place.webm (1920x1080, 1.97M)

Attached: 1506158723925.webm (1280x720, 2.95M)

Attached: 1509254010368.webm (720x480, 2.5M)

Attached: 1515840467726.webm (640x480, 1.74M)

Attached: 1535782229984.webm (640x480, 2.31M)

Attached: 1507847997534.webm (640x480, 2.66M)

Attached: 1507271989923.webm (640x480, 2.53M)

shills will delete this thread in 5..4..3..

Attached: 1536874176506.jpg (2048x2048, 1.04M)

Reminder this thread SHOULD be deleted.
MODSSSSS

Attached: how to deal with flat earthers.jpg (1000x720, 201K)

because there's a big ass hole in it leading to the hollow earth dumbass

santiago to sydney is 14 hours 20 minutes

Also pilots could take longer routes that are planed by (((them)))

You are a subhuman jew

Sure a pilot could travel a longer path, but they can't travel farther in a shorter amount of time.
Retard

oops

Attached: 1532662239009.gif (2083x3811, 2.73M)

>never flies over the south pole once
Because they can't

no one is claiming that map you used is even accurate, we don't have a proper map of the flat earth

Attached: flightpaths.png (800x400, 555K)

oh no.

Attached: Gleason-flat-earth-map-distances-do-not-compute-meme.png (640x566, 731K)

>we don't have a proper map of the flat earth
gee, i wonder why.

Attached: mt-rainier-shadow-cast-upwards-mountain.jpg (640x480, 68K)

why is the horizon an abrupt line rather than slowly fading out towards the vanishing point as a function of atmospheric diffusion?

why do buildings dip below the horizon as a function of distance?

why can't i see the nearest cities over the flat plane?

why do mirages exhibit curvature?

Yet we have a fully functional map of the globe, which nobody has any problems with, except for people who think the earth is so small they should be able to see its curve with their naked eyes.

Attached: PerSpeCtiVE.png (244x207, 10K)

Cameras cannot capture the full horizon.

Holy Shit . bottom pic in bottom right corner. Holy shit.
I fucking finally found that mutha fucker
WALDO

>Cameras cannot capture the full horizon.
So you're saying that NASA's cameras are actually lying to us?

Attached: 1518807375088.jpg (1190x859, 74K)

>we don't have a proper map of the flat earth
If the flat earth model is so useless that no one traveling across the earth has ever needed a flat earth map then what use is your model? Why is it consistently wrong?

Attached: Azimuthal.png (800x800, 302K)

so you're saying we can see all the way to the edge of the plane?

Fresh

Good post
Shills btfo
Secret space program hidden by NASA (Hebrew for "to deceive") is real

National Socialist and Nordic Saucers will wipe out Israel when they try to launch nukes.

Attached: 1506005367730.png (395x398, 114K)

the "squares" are all actually the same size its just really hard to make a ball flat

Attached: thumbshowmecurve.png (1600x929, 960K)

if you stood on a 10 mile runway that was dead straight (no curvature), you wouldn't be able to see people 10 miles down. Humans have a limited field of view, we can only see so far. Objects appear to "vanish" into the horizon as we move away from them

Attached: 156156165165.png (1005x345, 198K)

When is Iron Sky 2 supposed to come out?

Attached: 165615615615561615.jpg (639x722, 73K)

Attached: 8918914189189.jpg (1268x713, 299K)

Attached: 156615165615615.webm (500x281, 955K)

is that about a nazi moon base? Space is fake and gay and nobody has ever nor will ever land on the moon since it's not terra firma.

Flights from New Zealand to South Africa would fly over Antarctica but no airline currently flies that route.

Attached: 1456156561651615.webm (1920x1080, 1.67M)

Attached: 1511053892382.jpg (1600x1200, 406K)

Attached: 1516097461011.jpg (495x495, 45K)

Attached: 145615984.png (630x708, 88K)

yeah you said that earlier today. "humans have a limited field of view". "field of view", however, means the outward extents of what you can see. the solid angle of what you can see. nothing to do with distance.

>Objects appear to "vanish" into the horizon as we move away from them
even the webms with three hundred trillion X magnification that you fags spam clearly show buildings partially dropped below the horizon. your explanation?

Attached: 1524446904785.jpg (2592x1936, 2.5M)

Attached: 1561561656151568.webm (1920x1080, 1.3M)

Attached: 1535603821737.webm (1280x720, 2.9M)

Attached: 1516735779290.webm (682x384, 3M)

nobody believes that.

Attached: pontchartrain.jpg (1080x1080, 243K)

Attached: 1522059507547.webm (1920x1080, 2.92M)

Attached: 1510807756829.webm (1280x720, 2.73M)

Attached: 165165165156.webm (1920x1080, 1.11M)

Attached: 1534598157649.jpg (2928x1423, 191K)

Attached: 1508449283339.webm (426x238, 548K)

Attached: Collage-pontchartrain-metabunk.jpg (1200x628, 244K)

Attached: 1524207087267.webm (1008x494, 2.82M)

Attached: 1506886917000.webm (764x426, 38K)

Attached: moon-orientation.jpg (1080x1080, 184K)

Attached: 1535991391908.webm (762x426, 562K)

Attached: Perspective alone vs perspective plus curvature.jpg (1920x926, 202K)

Attached: 1523185861217.webm (1280x720, 1.72M)

Attached: 1514019936851.webm (890x454, 867K)

Attached: 1533184589655.jpg (1600x1067, 601K)

Hollow earth

Attached: 1511883964632.webm (884x492, 1.24M)

Attached: 1533564942672.webm (884x492, 1.88M)

Attached: 1527617523356.webm (884x492, 2.24M)

There is a portal to earth 2 in Antarctica

Attached: 1517013652371.webm (884x492, 1.22M)

Attached: 1531031879207.webm (884x492, 619K)

>"No one is allowed to go past this line in Antarctica."
Interesting how that's the only thing that virtually every nation on Earth can agree on.

Attached: reducedAntarctic_zps19951cb1.jpg (700x540, 72K)

Attached: 1561568165615.jpg (1010x727, 100K)

Attached: 18984968196.jpg (1600x1066, 235K)

Attached: 1517622631208.jpg (1600x806, 260K)

Attached: 165165615.jpg (1269x623, 88K)

Attached: 1532377102448.jpg (800x3784, 643K)

why is there a horizon?

Attached: 156165615165615.jpg (1280x720, 223K)

im not sure what your point is here, but for those curious, what you are seeing is heavy atmospheric distortion. That is why putting telescopes into space where there is no distortion is highly useful, and for ground based major telescopes they look for locations with less light pollution, and calmer weather.

Because a flat earth still has a horizon?

Attached: This retard hasn't heard of the southern cross.jpg (1240x825, 178K)

Attached: RETARDED FLATNEETS DONT KNOW HOW TO USE A SEARCH ENGINE.png (1306x777, 804K)

perspective