>Gewiss, ich habe unterschrieben, dass ich 2 Millionen Juden umgebracht habe. Aber ich hätte genausogut untershrieben, dass es 5 Millionen Juden gewesen sind. Es gibt eben Methoden, mit denen man jedes Geständnis erreichen kann — ob es nun wahr ist oder nicht.
(Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and a half million Jews. But I could just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.)
avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/04-15-46.asp >The 'final solution' of the Jewish question meant the complete extermination of all Jews in Europe. I was ordered to establish extermination facilities at Auschwitz in June 1941. At that time, there were already in the General Government three other extermination camps: Belzek, Treblinka, and Wolzek. > 2,500,000 victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning
1. Treblinka was built in April 1942 so it couldn't have been used as a extermination camp during June 1941. 2. Wolzek is a camp that doesn't even exist. 3. There are no official records that support the 2 500 000 claim.
Whoever wrote this "confession" was not a high ranking SS-officer.
archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/november/holocaust_110910 >Driven by crooked Claims Conference employees, former employees and other conspirators would recruit people—some unwitting—who weren’t eligible for the program (mostly individuals of the Jewish faith in the Russian immigrant community) to take part in the fraud. >To make it appear that applicants were eligible, identification documents were often altered (for example, a birth date was changed to make it appear that applicants were born during or before World War II) and fake Nazi persecution stories were often made up.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thies_Christophersen >Christophersen, a private in the Wehrmacht, was deployed as a "special leader" by the Waffen-SS during World War II >The widely known phrase "Auschwitz lie" (German Auschwitzlüge) can be traced to Christophersen,[8] whose 1973 book of that name disputed the existence of gas chambers at the Auschwitz concentration camp
youtube.com/watch?v=1oEd0fRsq1U >Zyklon B consists of pellets that the Germans allegedly dropped through holes in the ceiling >Fred Scheifler says Zyklon B was dispersed through showerheads
>"survives" 11 concentration camps >claims to be an eyewitness >not even once did he see pellets being dropped through holes in the ceiling
Type that into google translate. you will see on the last word that aus means remove. But ausrotten somehow means exterminate? I think they purposely changed the definition
Carter Lopez
Nope "ausrotten" means exterminate remove in the sense of moving something away is "entfernen"
Andrew Morgan
>le gaslighting kike Reminder: an army of well funded, well organized jew shills patrol the internet in effort to shut down any counter-jew discussion and to promote the globalist anti-white jew agenda.
archive.is/sMsxH >Israel’s Online Shadow Operations >Numerous well funded, organized projects by and for Israel work to flood social media with pro-Israel propaganda, while blocking facts Israel dislikes. The projects utilize Israeli soldiers, students, American teens and others, and range from infiltrating Wikipedia, Reddit and Jow Forums to influencing YouTube. Some operate out of Jewish Community Centers in the U.S.
youtube.com/watch?v=XNWF9CeoZdE >"Defamation" – Documentary about how acusations of anti-semitism are used as a JIDF tool to silence goyim who criticize anything related to jews.
Hitler teamed up with Zionist Jews to make the antizionist jews leave germany.
You know that most of the antizionist jews were the ones who were in camps right?
Connor Davis
If you "translate" the posen speech translate the whole sourde not just the parts that fit your narrative >I am talking about the evacuation of the Jews, the extermination of the Jewish people[1]. It is one of those things that is easily said. [quickly] "The Jewish people is being exterminated[2]," every Party member will tell you, "perfectly clear, it's part of our plans, we're eliminating the Jews, exterminating[2] them, a small matter". [less quickly] And then along they all come, all the 80 million upright Germans, and each one has his decent Jew. [mockingly] They say: all the others are swine, but here is a first-class Jew. [a few people laugh] And ... [audience cough] [carefully] ... none of them has seen it, has endured it. Most of you will know what it means when 100 bodies lie together, when 500 are there or when there are 1000. And ... to have seen this through and -- with the exception of human weakness -- to have remained decent, has made us hard and is a page of glory never mentioned and never to be mentioned.
John Butler
The whole speech becomes a figurative call for removal of them. You don't talk about evacuation if you want to kill all the Jews.
>The whole speech becomes a figurative call for removal of them. You don't talk about evacuation if you want to kill all the Jews. Sure thing buddy Lrn2read
Adrian Reyes
t. Judenevakuierung means "kill six trillion Jews".
From your text picture >I am talking about the evacuation of the Jews, the EXTERMINATION of the Jewish people why talk about exterminating anyone if its just about some evacuation? lrn2read
Austin Clark
Like I said: figurative expression. I guess you suffer from autism and is incapable of understanding context. Too bad for you.
There is no point in using evacuation as a word for murder, you know. Even Goering talks about forced deportation of Jews during the Nuremberg trials.
>Like I said: figurative expression read the whole speech its not figurative he even mentions the past experience killing people >Most of you will know what it means when 100 bodies lie together, when 500 are there or when there are 1000. And ... to have seen this through and -- with the exception of human weakness -- to have remained decent, has made us hard and is a page of glory never mentioned and never to be mentioned.
>There is no point in using evacuation as a word for murder There is no point in talking about extermination and dead bodies that made you and your men hard if its only about evacuation
Learn German and learn to read
Nathaniel Cooper
How do you know he talks about Jewish bodies and not German ones? His speech was made during the war.
The Jewish people is being exterminated[2]," every Party member will tell you, "perfectly clear, it's part of our plans, we're eliminating the Jews, exterminating[2] them, a small matter". [less quickly] And then along they all come, all the 80 million upright Germans, and each one has his decent Jew. [mockingly] They say: all the others are swine, but here is a first-class Jew. [a few people laugh] And ... [audience cough] [carefully] ... none of them has seen it, has endured it. Most of you will know what it means when 100 bodies lie together, when 500 are there or when there are 1000.
Because i can read and understand context :^)
Matthew Brown
No, you don't. He doesn't say "Jewish bodies" anywhere. He talks about Jew evacuation but not Jewish bodies.
You still have a hard time grasping what actually is written.
i've never really understood what the point of holocaust denial is t b h.
Ryder Powell
Judenevakuierung is an euphemism for extermination as stated in the second sentence of the speech you imbicile >I am talking about the evacuation of the Jews, the extermination of the Jewish people
Afterwards there is only talk about extermintaion of jews and how its easier said then done, as his men know >It is one of those things that is easily said. [quickly] "The Jewish people is being exterminated[2]," every Party member will tell you, "perfectly clear, it's part of our plans, we're eliminating the Jews, exterminating[2] them, a small matter". [less quickly] And then along they all come, all the 80 million upright Germans, and each one has his decent Jew. [mockingly] They say: all the others are swine, but here is a first-class Jew. [a few people laugh] And ... [audience cough] [carefully] ... none of them has seen it, has endured it. Most of you will know what it means when 100 bodies lie together, when 500 are there or when there are 1000. And ... to have seen this through and -- with the exception of human weakness -- to have remained decent, has made us hard and is a page of glory never mentioned and never to be mentioned.
You have not the slightest grasp on this text and still you try to spin it to fit it in your narrative.
Hunter Long
Most of the
>nazis and fascism are bad keep giving money to the banks
is based on
>the holocaust happened because these bad goys didn't love their jewish bankers and became nazi and killed 6 trillion jews please dont ever be nazi and try to have a direct labor system or racial purity again otherwise 6 ultrabillion jews will die per second
when you look close none of it really makes sense
Carter Perez
>euphemism
Yeah, no. If he talks about how they will exterminate the Jews then he doesn't need to talk about evacuation.
He makes it quite clear in the second part of the sentence and in the rest of the speech but apparently you are either unable or unwilling to understand even the slightest bit and just keep on spinning and spinning muh judenevakuierungen
>the jews and the november criminals brought about the defeat of germany in ww1 and all the weimar era suffering and moral rot was also all da jews >da jews so terrible and deceitful and definitely not mostly conservative german citizens >the nazis were great, they fucking hated the jews and that was great >the nazis definitely rounded up dem evil jews and and germany was then great and everything was great >the nazis were great and hated the jews and rounded them up but kept them in pristine conditions and looked after them and gave them swimming pools the nazis were great they hated the jews >the nazis were nice and kindly and hated the jews and definitely didn't kill any of them but the jews are lying about it now so it's great that the nazis killed so many of them haha to the gas chambers the nazis were great throw them in the ovens
part that confuses me.
Jaxson Wood
why talk about extermnation if its just about deporting jews? as said before you just keep spinning around the same disproven point
Landon Sanchez
I think you're conflating two groups of people which is why those ideas sound so disconnected.
There are historians and people who are probably nazi who think it never happened. (And either like the truth or think it should have happened)
Then you have dumb neo-nazis who think that "The ethnostate11!!" and "superior aryans!!1" (who lost the war) are going to somehow have meaning in their lives while they continue to do nothing meaningful.
I think it's a more simple story.
>bunch of bullshit causes WW1 >prussia loses >people are forced to pay, makes everyone very poor >jewish bankers exploit this and get negative sentiment >jewish germans try to do a civil war >doesn't work, people react negatively >hitler does his rise to power >his ideas make everyone not poor, they really like him >he is crazy after WW1 and is personally mad at jews for stopping him from going to art school >tells germans that jews are bad and the problem >this is part true (shitty bankers/elites/merchants) and part prejudice (random jews) >germans remember bad things jews have done >decide to not care because everyone is being given amphetamine and is psychotic at least slightly >round them all up!!! >march in street!!! >hitler is super crazy because of amphetamine now >decides that germans are superpowered people because of their descent from aryans and other mystical nonsense, vril, thule, etc. >attach mysticism to political party from start >this isn't necessarily false, USA had the Masonic slant to their uprising >does blitzkrieg >works perfectly >takes all of france >works perfectly >decide to get all jews out of europe now >put them in camps during war >make horrible choices in war because amphetamine (if he had bombed the british fighters instead of London they would likely have won) >out of resources to deal with jews, typhus breaks out, no food >dont like them anyway, divert resources to front lines >elites in britain see this as a means to create Israel >they do so
Jordan Mitchell
He's right, though.
Charles Miller
(cont...)
>jews, especially rothschilds meme about how Hitler was the worst (because he BTFO the banks) but NOT because of that reason but rather the jews getting killed >make up a lot of shit about death camps >people actually DID die so it's not easy to disprove >wrangle confessions out of nazis you catch >meanwhile USA takes their scientists back to the USA and for some reason they don't even care they were nazi at all (weird) >rothschilds pay royal family to give them israel and fulfill the meme prophecies in the torah (just like christians they have a hardon for self-fulfilling prophecies) >balfour declaration is made, Israel created >germans were kinda crazy but not horrible in the end, some of them truly were psychopaths and truly did evil stuff >others just wanted to make a great new Rome or great nation >wasn't an extermination/death camp but jews DID die >but they didn't really make that happen in almost all cases >just nothing to feed them >jewish bankers/merchants were actually huge assholes >normal jews were just random normal jews >money moves around as usual and back to business >don't fucking talk about the holocaust meme gets created to stop the banks from ever getting fucked again
And here we are.
Sound about right? No one was really amazingly moral or amazingly evil in my story. Just a bunch of events that got capitalized on because they could.
Noah Green
Göring used the term judenevakuierungen in 1941 in a letter to heydrich when the plan of shipping the jews to madagasker was thought to be impossible and shifted to deport them to the east were gehttos and camps were built
Angel Gray
>>bunch of bullshit causes WW1 >>prussia loses >>people are forced to pay, makes everyone very poor >>jewish bankers exploit this and get negative sentiment >>jewish germans try to do a civil war >>doesn't work, people react negatively >>hitler does his rise to power
by civil war are you referring to the revolution of 18/19? if so, your version of this era's events is, to put it politely, fanciful.
Hunter Kelly
I think he means the part about figurative expressions. It kind of makes more sense than the other way around, like you described it.
