How do we solve the gypsy question?

What should be done with the Roma people, who mostly inhabit European countries, and are mostly not economically viable and are culturally detached?
No meme answers like genocide, glue factory, sell them to China, etc. Only realistic solutions to a serious problem.

My suggestion: the jewish solution. Give them their own ethno-state somewhere, even if it means forcing some locals to fuck off. They can live there by themselves, and perhaps when they are in charge of their own state and their own interests, they might turn out to find a productive mood.

Attached: 1537198578968[1].png (255x170, 10K)

Other urls found in this thread:

instagram.com/gypsytraveler90/
youtu.be/1ayCxyaqB4A
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It is over.
instagram.com/gypsytraveler90/

Sell them to Chinese glue factories to be genocided by unsafe working conditions.

Attached: Gypsy Holocaust thumbie.png (1440x1872, 932K)

Hey, you, redpill me on the foundation of the gypsy faith. Is it true you believe your religion was founded when one of your ancestors stole the nails Christ was crucified with?

Our religion is called pupincurism.

yeah that shit, tell me what's up, I want to know if I should make "gypsys have literally always been thieves" jokes or not, I like to keep my banter factual

You are being trolled, but are too dumb to notice.

How are gypsies even a problem? What do they do that makes them so hated as a group?

force them to integrate - must go to school, must work and no gibs. The austrians did it, the socialists did it and so can we

I appreciate your attempt, Bulgaria, but I don't take advice from knockoff vampires. Maybe the gypsy knows more than you about the divine aspects of stabbing each other to the point of sexual release

Welfare queens similar to many minorities in the west. However since they live in demographically declining countries, they also fuck up the government campaigns to promote childbirth. If a government pays a stipend to all mothers and other child subsidies, gypsies just have 8-12 kids (not exaggerating) and basically use them as a passive income, while not educating them and not raising them properly.
Also rampant crime, drug and alcohol use, that lowest form of religious fundamentalism, where not only are you medieval in your views, but your views are also just plain theologically wrong, etc.

If you've ever come across a broken down RV in the woods that reeks of cheap beer and the lingering fear of being shot with a makarov, you've found the lair of the elusive gypsy, and you would do best to flee the area before he takes your job and anything of value you have in your pockets

Only ovens. Settling down gypsies mostly failed, their culture must be kill. Physically if needed.
They are worse than niggers.
Their culture is to leave as nomads, steal, beggar, cheat, shit (Indian ancestry), rape, rob, kill, etc. Not even USSR managed to settle these fuckers.
I mean, they are plain awful. Niggers and abos look civilized compared to them.

>The austrians did it
Yeah, in the 18th century, under an absolute monarchy and disregarding human rights. Good luck doing that now.
>the socialists did it
The socialists' inability to do it is why we are here today. If they had "done it" we wouldn't be having this conversation. And need I remind you that the same socialists caused a million bulgarian muslims to move to Turkey, from where now they influence our elections in a negative way and did terrorist attacks all across the 1980's, because socialists forced them on fear of torture to change their names to slavic ones? Socialists were worse than modern liberals at integrating minorities.

We just dye them blonde, like Romania did a few years ago. Problem solved.

Attached: soc_g_romanians_worldcup_576.jpg (576x324, 68K)

The bozgors DID IT

>>(Gypsies) first appeared in Hungary in the 14th and 15th
>>Gypsy groups were even granted privileges, first under King Sigismund(1387-1437) and King Matthias(1458-1490), right up to the beginning of the 18th century.
>>Maria Theresa enacted a decree prohibiting the use of the name "Gypsy" and requiring the terms "new peasant" and "new Hungarian" to be used instead.
>>She placed restrictions on Gypsy marriages,ordered gypsy children to be taken away from Gypsies, so that they could be raised in hungarian "burgeouis" or "peasant" families.
>> Joseph II prohibited use of the Gypsy language in 1783.
>Gypsy population end up assimilating in Hungarian society, in 19th century
>new wave of Gypsy immigration in the second half of the 19th century

They can do it again
>SEND ALL GYPSIES TO PANNONIA

Attached: 1438538974827.jpg (480x360, 17K)

Attached: 1537099175953.png (1011x2239, 3.69M)

Attached: 1438170408689.png (1598x960, 845K)

make them disapper during the night,no one will notice

>Give them their own ethno-state
They already have it

Attached: 1535556637556.jpg (800x600, 63K)

eugenics

Look at these gypsies:
youtu.be/1ayCxyaqB4A

Attached: 1537123996533.jpg (492x359, 52K)

kek That's a Romanian? Looks like some elf. No wonder, their genetics are shit tier.

...

you don't
muslims and africans will solve that problem ones they occupy europe

combine every single shit tier minority and you got them

notoriously unstable and moody, less inclined to nigger tier ooga booga and more to the arab style shifty ooga booga, they're literally legit awful

The solution is internal. My dad's family are British Roma, been here about 200 years now, and it clearly made a world of difference. Those scum you see over in eastern Europe begging on the streets would get smacked about by any member of my family for that sort of behaviour. It's melalo, dirty, to do something like that. The way they live is disgraceful and they should feel ashamed, in the face of their own blood and God himself. They won't change unless people in their ranks change and they get a proper king to give them a slap round the mui. It's fucking indecent what they're like.

No u
See:

Attached: 1536750874357.png (900x630, 981K)

There are obviously roma equivalents to Thomas Sowell fromt he afro-american demographic, but its not the most frequent outcome.
I saw gypsies when I was in London, or people that looked like gypsies to me. They were the same as the ones home - wearing all of their money as clothes and jewels, plastic bags for all their possessions, sitting in front of beautiful public places and reducing their aura, and begging tourists or trying to sell glass imitation jewels to anyone who looks like a chum.
In Berlin I saw a gypsy with a sign "do you speak english", and I thought they need help so I went to talk to them. Turns out they wanted money, and in broken english begged me, thinking I'm an american tourist. When I moved away they started cursing me in multiple languages, including broken slavic.

Berlin and London are supposed to be the type of cities that break down all foreigners and turn them into the international mush of "european man", rather than where you came from. Yet when I was there I saw many failures to do so with eastern people (pakistani, arab, turkish), and specifically with the people I recognize to be roma based on their presentation and features. I think you will find that what succeeded for your family fails for most.

This.
They are the only thing in Europe that literally everyone hates regardless of nation, across all political spectrum.

You really need to install an additional brain lobe. Whatever you got right now it's not working.

Already have a passport, it's as poor as Romania the difference being cleaner towns and cheaper prostitutes.

Yes this.

^Let them migrate to US ennmasse. ^Or, if you want purity, shit and giggles - buy them land in Pakistan or Bangladesz or india. ^Promote religious movement "gypsy exodus" in diaspora. ^Watch gypsy+sikh vs islam crusades.

It's a balkan folk tale that a gyprie made the nails that were used to crucify Christ, that's why they're all cursed since then.
All gypsies here are Christians, there's no gypsy religion.

First things first.
>Mandatory population census.
Refusing to participate results in expulsion from the country together with the whole family. Number of gyppos must be determined and most census data is wrong since many do not participate in them.
>Mandatory IQ tests for all gypsies
Some IQ tests put average IQ of gypsies at 60. This is about the same as the worst sub saharan blacks and that's a huge problem. Gypsies with below country average IQ should be sterilized, we'll come to this later.
>No gibs
Gypsies thrive in modern times because they get gibs as minorities and gibs because they're poor af. They marry their daughters illegally at age 15-16 and she starts pumping kids right away. By refusing gibs, or lowering it significantly, the problem would be lowered.
>Public shaming
Start a massive propaganda campaign shaming certain gypsy behaviour with hopes that they will stop marrying their daughters at age of 15, allow their children to finish schools, etc. You do not specifically target gypsies rather give an overall image of a what a healthy family is. This would probably not bear great fruit with gypsies, but will bear some and is useful with native population as well.
>Harsh stance against smuggling
Gypsies are cunning little buggers and they love to smuggle things in and out Germany or Austria. Any person found smuggling something will have their citizenship immediately revoked and have his family kicked out as well.
>Mass soft sterilization
Now for the fun part. South Korea has already done this with great success. In order to stop their baby boom government implemented mass soft sterilization and it worked wonders. Gypsies usually live in the outskirts of the city. These places are dirty, poor, etc. It's absolute squalor. It wouldn't be surprising that some sort of epidemic were to happen there. Now if it was natural or we made it - doesn't matter. The cure would contain something that would decrease fertility in men/women/both.

>Gypsies with below country average IQ should be sterilized

Mate, near half of the people are bellow the country average, by definition.
And non-voluntary sterilization is how you get bombed. Do you want to get bombed and liberated from your government's oppressive rule?

>I saw gypsies when I was in London
They definitely aren't natives, then. Cities are anathema to British Roma. Even the Irish travellers here (that people think are gypsies but aren't) would never set up in a city.

Most British Roma families I've met are like my family. There are still scummy members or small branches that act distastefully, but they're pretty much ostracised when that happens. Probably at a higher rate than native whites here, I can freely admit. Average intelligence isn't exactly awe-inspiring, either.

Gypsies really need to work on their image. I get the impression that the number of people that would sit back and not lift a finger to stop the next pogrom against gypsies is many, many times higher than the number of people who would happily watch the Jews get done

Give them a chunk of (Southern) Ireland.

Culturally they'll fit right in

They might even improve the average IQ

>Mate, near half of the people are bellow the country average, by definition.
Yes, but they are natives. They get a pass for being dumb fucks, but if we're to really crank up our eugenics, they would have to go. Also average doesn't mean half is above half is below, usually in stats average values are the ones that are present the most. Values above and below are deviations, which cancel each other resulting again in the average value already present.
>And non-voluntary sterilization is how you get bombed.
True, but who would know? Do you think that some Western fag follows the Gypsy population in Balkans? Hell we don't know it ourselves. And Gyppos are simply too dumb to notice what's going on. They would see that they're having fewer children and would realize that something is wrong, but where it went wrong, they wouldn't know.

Kek

Your impression is correct. The sort of racism (at least, what would be called racism is anyone dared aim it at blacks or Muslims) that gets thrown at gypsies is insane. There's a town near me that actually has signs up around the place that forbid gypsies and travellers from being there, put up by the council too. There's still open hostility (between gadjo, non-Roma, never to our actual faces) about gypsies in Britain like it's completely fine, while these same people can't even say the word "black" without worrying they'll be arrested for a hate crime. The disconnect is unreal. I remember my driving instructor one day going on this massive rant about how gypsies are scum and dangerous because we drove passed a site (a nice site, too), but he didn't realise my dad was one. It was too awkward for me to say otherwise. I've got people at work who warn everyone to put down the car park barriers because gypsies "have been spotted nearby", or who openly say things are "pikey" or they've been "gypped".

The only thing stopping another Porajmos at this point is our social cohesion and affinity for fighting.

I don't think its worth the risk of the whole world retaliating violently. If you want sterilization, make it voluntary.

>risk people (low IQ, genetic problems, mental illness) get an offer from the government after checkup
>"if you sterilize yourself, we will pay you this much money in bulk"
>seems like a lot to a private person, but is much lower than the lifetime cost of having low quality people and their children
>some will accept, some will decline, but overall and over time the genetic problem will be reduced, and the monetary burden of hosting it too

This isn't anti-gypsy, its anti-orc genetic hygiene. I don't want to target races, its impractical, it gets you bombed, and its immoral (every race has outstanding individuals in it that would unfairly suffer).

I feel voluntary eugenics promoted by government bribes is the way to go, the kind of people you want sterilized are more likely to accept a wad of cash to get sterilized, since they probably need it and value short term gain much higher than long term legacy. Just make sure all the paperwork is in order, that they are advised and understand the procedure, etc, so that they won't show up crying in a BBC documentary a decade later, and you get bombed.

That can work as well. Low IQ people are poor in general and do not have long term plans.
I do not like targeting specific groups of people either, but Gypsies really can not be civilized. They have lived with us for couple of centuries already, and the average one is yet to behave like a normal person. There are good qualities about them, like their talent for music or love for animals, but overall they are more a burden than a positive. Ideally they would live as servants, a lower class, but you can't have that today.

I don't get how the western idea of gypsies moved from "adventures romantic nomads, who travel from place to place, no care in the world, dancing and signing and making love" to "criminals who want to steal your kid and dog".
There were no large scale events to trigger it, like there are for blacks or mexicans in the USA, and for arabs in Europe. From where I stand, gypsies are the same today as they were 50 years ago, but their image dropped sharply.
I think you might be getting some collateral damage from arabs rocking the boat here in Europe. I know local turks get that.

Both images have always coexisted just as other groups also have aspects about them that are liked and disliked, just that gypsies are in general more disliked than other groups.

In Russia we have 2 types of gypsies: feral and "gypsies of the theater". Roma theater was built by Bolsheviks in 1920s and it became gypsis cultural and job center. Many gypsis were forced to settle down, forced to integrate and have job. Even many of them join the red army in ww2, thought gypsis culture is pacifist in their core. Comnmies didn't finish their job (it took centuries to change mindset of whole ethnicity) but still theater gypsis is a big group and they are pretty ok

We've always had a fair amount of negative press, what with freedom of movement also meaning a fair amount of freedom of consequences. Theft was (and still is, to be fair) high amongst gypsies. But Irish travellers sealed the deal, mostly. There was a flood of them after the potato famine in Ireland and then after both World Wars, and they stuck around. Problem was that while they travelled like gypsies, they weren't culturally similar in any other way. Their behaviour led to people thinking all travellers are that way, and the misidentification of gypsies and travellers meant there was much tarring with an identical brush. It doesn't help that eastern European gypsies have degenerated to the state they are now, and then we had bollocks like My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding on British TV to really drive home the message.

My more paranoid side says this was a concerted effort by The Powers That Be. They don't like a lifestyle that affords so much freedom, which is why they're making it harder and harder to live that way. Most of us are in houses now and only go travelling about in the summer, and even that's being targetted by councils.

Radu pls, your Gypsies are building fucking palaces, like they are the ruling elite of Romania. Deport all Gypsies to Romania, that is the most natural place for them. Even the word Romania comes from the word Roma, Romania is the Land of the Gypsies.

Attached: romanian architecture5.jpg (1024x768, 577K)

Romania comes from Romanus, meaning Roman person. Rom in the Romani language is unconnected and just meant man, and Roma was plural. It's a coincidence.

> thE WoRd RoMaNIa cOMeS fRoM tHe WoRd ROMa
Pathetic Atilla, pathetic
Is Român for you

Attached: c7ea3e2c4afa765a4fbde1e534d064d77a213372748bd73fd4da92db75f19f41.png (552x390, 72K)

Those houses are never finished, kek there is a black market for the materials they buy from Romanians with stolen/begging money they made in the EU

Attached: 1537120344215.jpg (455x280, 94K)

We get that all the time too.
>bulgar comes from vulgar!
>slav comes from slave!

Nevermind that the roman for slave is servus, while the roman for slav is sclaveni, totally different words.

gypsies are based and redpilled. wh*Teys are being massacred by niggers and Arabs while the eternal gyp chills out, steals a beer and watches Europe burn.

And of course WHITE Nordic women enjoy the thrill of being shown their place by superior BLACK MUSLIM penis.

Attached: 9DEDF4A4-A159-4F4A-9FEF-128A9C3FB7BF.jpg (564x544, 30K)

THE UPDATE IS BACK!

why do they have a fucking wheel in their flags?

If anything, slave came from Slav, by way of Greek, then Latin, then French, and finally English. Mostly a historical thing, since a lot of Slavs were indeed enslaved. We have a similar thing with gypsy, which stemmed from a misidentification with Egyptians, because of the similarities with tanned skin.

Amazing titties at 1:45

I don't think so, since the people who enslaved slavs were turkic and arabic. Maybe the "viking" people trading on the russian rivers too, to sell slavs to the Persians for steel.
Why would people who never saw the slavs as slaves have a word for slave associated with slav? And why would this etymology, lost for centuries, suddenly appear when Britain and Russia are competing for colonies in Asia?

I think its anglo propaganda against the russian empire that went out of hand, and its a coincidence that the words slave and slav sound similar. A much more likely etymology, and one that all slavs know of, is "slovo". Slovo is the spoken word. Sloveni are people you can speak with. Nemci (mutes) are people you can't speak with, and its still how most slavs call the germans. It makes no sense if slav meant slave, why would the opposite of slave be mute?

They have recently illegally ocupied a commerce near my building
In spain we kind of had integrated our own gypsis but with the shengen treaty all of the romanians and hungarian gypsis have come here and no politicians wants to do anything, this motherfuckers used to drug kids to beg

Nice vpn moshie

It was the Byzantine Empire that enslaved them, which is why the Greek word for slave is connected to Slavs. Romans took it from Greek, and French took it from Romans, and the English took it from the French.

Pedophilia punished by mandatory castration.
Gypsies would extinct in two generation.

>venezuela calling others dumb

The Byzantine empire didn't enslave them, it governed them. Enslave has a very different meaning, even more different back then. The idea that a whole people can be slaves is a modern one, because of the west african slave trade and the american colonies.
And even then, if you read people like Theophanes the Confessor, slav is "sclaveni". Its sclav, not serv. The root is different. And in the same chronicles you get stuff like "the romans (byzantines) liberated the slavs from their rus (kievan rus) occupation". Liberated, as in brought back into the empire, where they are citizens and belong. Nobody talked about slaves other than people who owed money, or were born into their parent's debt.

Ok.

Sorry if I come off as a rabid nationalist, this is just a pet issue for me. I've had this argument before and I've gotten pretty bitter about people denying to look at sources, and insisting on what amounts to urban myths.