Women are less inclined to evil than men

Women are just weaker, which is the reason why they commit less murder and things of the like

Whoever believes this has never heard women talk about their interactions with other women. They'll tear down other people for the simple joy of hurting others.

Thread ended here, you can all stop arguing.

Agreeable means you like your in group and hate everyone outside of it.

Same way you explain more male geniuses and achievement, greater male variability.
Women cluster near the mean, there are more men at the tails.

>less inclined to evil
>women

pick one.

Attached: 5b4a02905fb4c.jpg (630x730, 124K)

>women are MORE agreeable than men
That means most women are sheep and can't think for themselves. This in turn means that women have a much higher chance of being an NPC and bending to the will of evil

Bingo

They aren't inclined to much at all. Few achievements, whether good or bad.

This is men's world, they just seem to live in it. But they're meant to be followers, nature deemed it necessary.

Doesnt still explain the psyco rates and more agreeabelness
Most of power today has nothing to do with strenght. Infact women social intellegence gives them egde in that regard

>Women are less inclined to evil than men

cringe and bluepilled

women are just less competent in general and less ambitious

i dont know if they are more or less evil but they are certainly more frustrating

...

Men can tell when they're being evil, and so choose it. Women are incapable of even recognizing right from wrong, so they are innocent in a way. This doesn't mean they create less evil in the world, but that they will always fabricate justification for their actions.

I believe you 100%

Women only transact. Everything is this for that, everything is about value, and see all action as give and take. Men understand to create, that more arises from effort and this genesis is sublime. As they understand to create they also have a better understanding of what it truly means to destroy.

Women are just as evil as men, it just manifests in a different way.

> women dont mature meme
How do you expain the fact that they mature FASTER than males? Also women have as high IQ as men and in terms of EQ are superior, leaving your reply with no relevancy

I think that you really dont give them credit for their own agency.

>incorrect grammar
>memeflag
Pretty sure you’re not qualified to judge what makes someone “successful” in modern society, retard.

Attached: B3E8816A-533C-4719-98DE-8E57775E613E.png (1200x820, 55K)

It's an evolutionary trait. Men are stronger and have more testosterone so they will take more risks. However, OP is a faggot because he only mentioned the bad part of taking risks.

See

The Bible warns men against womens jezebel spirit, eg Eve gets Adam kicked out of the garden of Eden, Potiphar's wife, Beheading of John the Baptist, Sampson and Delilah, Book of Proverbs, etc.

Jow Forums thinks being a penisnigger is ok

Woah, I guess niggers are even more superior since they're the most aggresive. Thanks senpai, that really made me think.

Like whites

Smaller fruits tends to mature and rot faster and IQ doesn't work if you don't take risks, which proves right and confirms you as a moron.

>"How do you expain the fact that whites are MORE agreeable than blacks?"
>"Nigs are feral. No self-control."
>"How do you expain the fact that women are MORE agreeable than men?"
>"Hurr wymin don't understand it's more complicated blah blah blah"

Why do penisniggers get so assblasted by this comparison? Ya'll say "men have actually contributed" yeah while enslaved to their desire to fuck pussy. Nigs contributed a lot while they were enslaved too. Goes both ways you fucking hypocrites.

Attached: tumblr_inline_nnqg0aq3371rylcqa_500 (1).jpg (500x382, 40K)

same reason why women enjoy rape.
if they didn't they'd suffer gene death.

Its true only in some part. The other part is that women are feel more empathy and are willing to hurt ppl as much. Also the fruit expample doesnt apply as women live longer

Arent*

These numbers are so shocking. It's a genocide every year from January to December.

Whew. Penisniggers. You have to go back

Me tienen hasta arriba estos pelotudos.

Yeah thats huge imagine if their mothers had male brain relative lack of empathy toward their own children and others in general would certunally multiply them

are u dumb that means that they will even try to make evil men happy
thats why it takes good men to stand up to evil ones enabled by women

Spounds 100% made up by you just now

Unlike cruelty to the weak, it deals little damage, unless you are a wagecuck, or rich and wasteful. If that’s how women give you problems, you can’t defeat the jew.

>women arent the incarnation of evil

dont know how that works with jewesses tho

I havent told you that all men are evil and vise versa like bigots from Jow Forums do. I just told you that you hate women laballing them as evil but males are much more inclined to evil than women
Literally google them up, some of them are wide know facts

>Women are less inclined to be evil
>women are MORE agreeable than men

Neither of these are true, and your perception of these traits as reality is largely responsible for why they are not true.

Women appear more agreeable to you because you have been whipped into not arguing with them. You are blasted 24/7 by the media and liberals that to argue with the viewpoint of a woman in a public space as an excuse to be crucified. As a result, women have been allowed to become more and more evil, doubling down on the above precedent to pursue even more selfish agendas. These are your female psychopaths: they lack the physical strength/skill needed to overpower, so they drown their targets in societal shame / emotional conflict until the target commits suicide or is thrown in jail.

Men commit the vast majority of crimes because of the definition of crimes and the need to commit them. Women can collectively use the power of social shaming to force others to do what they want while rarely being punished if they are caught in a lie. Men on the other hand have very few ways to force others to do things without the threat of violence because society collectively views men as less credible due to woman's manipulation, and the use of violence in any form is largely punishable under the law.

You will find that the vast majority of male crime is largely the result of female pressuring, whether it be from mental instability induced by broken single mother households to manipulative spouses withholding affection until their boyfriends/husbands do as they say. This is how women have always achieved their ends and is largely the reason that until recently women were not given direct political power. Woman's deviance is the source of savagery in society and when in direct control of a country they will send it off a cliff just to get what they want.

Dude you must actually be retarded, or you’re pathetically bad at baiting people.

Women are in now way equals of men: because of their empathy they lack ambition. They lack the capacity to hurt people, partly because of this empathy but also because they’ve evolved over millions of years to be the more passive of the two. Can you not see how generations of physical weakness and ineptitude in a system dominated by physical force can affect the psyche? It doesn’t matter if that’s the driving force behind today’s society (it is, though, because almost all confrontations are backed up by the threat of physical violence a la Cold War) because the permanent mental training from their original societies can’t be overcome just because now that threat doesn’t exist AS MUCH.

Also it’s been said before, but weakness does not equal strength. Women are weak and unlikely to act because of this, but this does not mean they won’t utterly destroy everything in sight once they gain power. This is actually what’s happening with the SJW movement, women and “oppressed” minorities are taking control by guilt tripping those in authority by convincing them they are “good” and “innocent”, but immediately upon getting any little bit of power they annihilate values and systems set in place BY MEN that work intelligently and that consistently produce valuable hierarchies. It could just be a painful transition stage, but chances are overcoming that much biological history is just impossible, and that instead giving power to women the right thing to do is to allow women who conform to values men have rise above the rest of their masses. This will invariably mean women remain as a minority, since most won’t have what it takes to rise to that standard, but it does mean only the women who have the good masculine traits like ambition, hard work, honesty, excellence in craft, actually make it to the top. The rest should remain as they are: weak.

>Less inclined
But harder to bring to justice

Less of them isn't better if the few are more evil and harder to stop

Attached: 1536990012033.jpg (891x1048, 399K)

Women are evil yes, but no crime is justified whether it be man or women. “Necessity” plays no part, you commit a crime and you are punished.

>1 post by this ID
Are you shills even trying anymore?

Are you fucking insane? You obviously don't know much about women. Women don't commit the most crimes because men do it for them. Women want money, men provide it. Put some women in a room long enough and there will be a row, every time.

Agreeable as a personality trait doesn't mean nice and nonviolent. It means they go along with whatever the consensus seems to be and don't rock the boat. If the consensus is to behead all EU supporters and meme flaggots, they'll support it.

>How do you explain the fact that women are MORE agreeable than men?
>Women are less inclined to evil than men
you tore your own argument apart in the first sentence, dipshit

Ever heard of abortion

Yeah inability to commit crime does not equate with innocence

Ding ding ding we have a winner

there's less women psychopaths cuz when they go on their psychotic rampages people assume it's normal since they are all like that
women commit less crime cuz when they go on their psychotic rampages they are 90 pounds and deal 0 dmg so people don't get hurt or killed

I'm not trying to say the men shouldn't be held responsible, but the definition of crime needs to be expanded to include the means that women use to create societal disorder if they are to have political power.

Like manipulation and stuff? Absolutely so. We need to expand our conditions for what’s defined as “partner-in-crime”. The only issue is doing this without damaging free speech.

Define evil

Autism unleashed.

women are less evil, more often
men are more evil, less often

Sure

Attached: 151494924618.png (875x702, 935K)

>Evil
Wanna define this for me?

I’m not even an incel man. It’s just foolish to assume women are the same as men, and the baseline assumption that women are virtuous by default due to their oppression is wrong.

>gypsy that sympathizes with manipulative women
No surprises there

Unfortunately since women have no qualms throwing freedom of speech under the bus to silence men, time is limited to enact some form of control.

I know it’s very concerning. I mean if you’ve ever read “The Crucible”, it might be time just to start charging women for crimes they encourage/permit before this gets out of hand. Not to mention the psychological damage a woman can do to a man, it’s just absurd the law favors them so highly.

because they never during our whole evolution had to defend shit. they always had the pussy between their legs as a ticked for survival. men just got killed

Attached: 1522788295920.png (890x768, 241K)

bad gypsy
based gypsy

This.
Evil literally has no objective value.
What is the ultimate evil to me is communism, and the ultimate good is monarchism.
For communists, this trend is completely reversed.

Attached: 1503924756947.jpg (326x315, 19K)

50 million child sacrifices since roe v wade?

>moral relativist
repent all ye wicked

Attached: 7D6117E9-2417-4CEA-9113-E12BAEA4E373.jpg (400x402, 68K)

I believe you 100%

agreeable and evil aren't mutually exclusive you dunce

read paradise lost by milton. its not the same as being a moral relativist. we must always be self-critical.

Women made my youth a hell. Was an adult virgin. But I learned from it and managed to fuck more women than most men of my age.

Aggression without intelligence to guide it just leads to living in mud huts and never progressing past the technology needed for periodically raiding neighboring villages.

Attached: dq9vltr19fpy.jpg (1199x463, 74K)

It has a second book too. Paradise regained.

Attached: 220px-Cover_of_Paradise_Regained,_circa_1671.png (220x370, 116K)

Didnt read, women are empathetic making the less evil. Risk taking and in some case unablity surely take into account but you guys just spir thatl lines only to relativise my point. Being more empatetic= being able to do less harm to other people= less evil

be more like

Attached: AF9C7CC5-70FC-427B-A61D-E4ACA4D29CDE.jpg (478x487, 94K)

better yet read Beyond good and evil by Nietzsche

>Nietzsche
hahahahahahahaa
I’ve read it. You’re a retard if you think he puts forth a good argument in there for moral relativism. Nietzsche thought the death of God was an absolutely tragic thing. Stupid gyp.

Being more empatetic= being able to do MORE harm to other people, manipulate and exploit them more efficiently

> surprise, surprise, that is EXACTLY what women do

Attached: 1536775304115.jpg (750x812, 207K)

>stupid+aggressive = smart+aggressive
maybe if you actually did think you wouldn’t post stupid shit like this on fourchan.

I will read that.

Bullshit.

Being socially intellegent is one thing and being empatetic is the other

No see the reason you’re wrong is that women aren’t capable of doing evil not because of their empathy, but because of cowardice and no strength. Empathy and strength aren’t mutually exclusive, anyway, as men are absolutely as empathetic as women. The difference is men’s empathy and reason can exist separately: I.e. women let mercy taint justice while men do not.

>How do you expain the fact that women are MORE agreeable than men?
easy: hypocrisy.

???
So women aren’t intelligent to you, mr white knight?

the good argument in there is that normie NPCs should shut the fuck up and do what the intelligent and strong ubermensh tell them to do. The superhumans shouldn't need to constrain themselves would forgiveness or humbleness or generally slave mentality and behaviour. from my personal experience with my normies NPCs in my life I 100% agree with Nietzsche. and you are probably an untermensch if you didn't get what he said and meant

Attached: WOKE.png (476x408, 104K)

Technically I am Hungarian and not exactly a model citizen. Also a decade older than that fag and I outearn him too.