Vaccines so safe you can't sue them

>Oftentimes the vaccines are a weakened or inactivated version of the virus, so the body learns how to fight the virus without the chance of growing ill.

So they literally give us the virus to help us fight of diseases? What if that person who got vaccinations wasn't even going to get the disease in the first place? Why shoot up shit in your body when it's not even guaranteed people would even get catch a disease like measles

Measles has gone down, this is true, but we are seeing a MASSIVE increase in autism, chronic illnesses, cancer and sids (sudden infant death syndrome) and it's still growing and it's a mystery that we don't know why evne though the increase in vaccines follows it perfectly. We don't have any proper studies looking at long-term health and we don't have any injury reporting system to catch these injuries, VAERS is our only reporting system and it accounts for 1% of all serious adverse events, meanwhile the CDC refuses to do long-term studies and even admits it on their web page.

How are we supposed to know if vaccines are causing these issues if we don't test for it and we dont have a reporting system for it?

Attached: Autism 86% correlation with vaccine doses.jpg (1267x1920, 692K)

HHS was supposed to be conducting safety studies & reporting to congress every 2 years, which they haven't! Bobby Kennedy jr & a non profit called ican, took them to court to find this out

Dude, adjuvents like aluminium, are pretty messed up, especially considering it is a neurotoxin, a dr did a study on autistic children's brains & found large amounts had accumulated there
& Adjuvents aren't the only concern.. how about glyphosate? (Active ingredient in roundup) aborted fetal cells? Polysorbate 80? etc

Not about being pro or anti vax, it's about whether you want to give your government the power to enforce a medical procedure on you, without choice or informed consent

Watch the high wire with del bigtree (find on YouTube) a weekly show covering this topic quite extensively

I'm just gonna start this before people whine "BUT VACCINES SAVED US FROM POLIO"
thinktwice.com/Polio.pdf
>When national immunization campaigns were initiated in the 1950s, the number of reported cases of polio following mass inoculations with the killed-virus vaccine was significantly greater than before mass inoculations, and may have more than doubled in the U.S. as a whole
>Doctors and scientists on the staff of the National Institutes of Health during the 1950s were well aware that the Salk vaccine was causing polio. Some frankly stated that it was “worthless as a preventive and dangerous to take [26:142].” They refused to vaccinate their own children [26:142]. Health departments banned the inoculations [26:140]. The Idaho State Health Director angrily declared: “I hold the Salk vaccine and its manufacturers responsible” for a polio outbreak that killed several Idahoans and hospitalized dozens more [26:140].
>[26:142-5].
In 1976, Dr. Jonas Salk, creator of the killed virus vaccine used in the 1950s, testified that the live-virus vaccine (used almost exclusively in the U.S. from the early 1960s to 2000) was the “principal if not sole cause” of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since 1961 [44].
>In 1992, the Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published an admission that the live-virus vaccine had become the dominant cause of polio in the United States [36]. In fact, according to CDC figures, every case of polio in the U.S. since 1979 was caused by the oral polio vaccine [36].
> However, an independent study that analyzed the government’s own vaccine database during a recent period of less than five years uncovered 13,641 reports of adverse events following use of the oral polio vaccine. These reports included 6,364 emergency room visits and 540 deaths (Figure 3) [47,48]. Public outrage at these tragedies became the impetus for removing the oral polio vaccine from immunization schedules [36:568;37;38].

Attached: page4.png (1080x4152, 3.27M)

DPT BONUS
>A 1992 study, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, validated earlier findings. Children who received DPT (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) injections were significantly more likely than controls to suffer paralytic poliomyelitis within the next 30 days [16].
> In 1995, the New England Journal of Medicine published a study showing that children who received a single injection within one month after receiving a polio vaccine were 8 times more likely to contract polio than children who received no injections. The risk jumped 27-fold when children received up to nine injections within one month after receiving the polio vaccine. And with ten or more injections, the likelihood of developing polio was 182 times greater than expected [17].

Attached: 1532318336678.jpg (720x720, 38K)

No long term studies? Seems like they're trying to hide something. If vaccinations are so great and safe why wouldn't they do a long term study to prove to anti vaxxer that they're actually wrong? Haha what are they afraid of us finding out?

They refuse to do long-term, true saline placebo controlled sutdies and vaccinated vs unvaccinated. They fight tooth and nail to make sure these studies are never done becuase of pic related.

Attached: img.jpg (1378x1911, 664K)

Dimitri, covert op is aborted, go hot! The piggie knows!

These sound like made up bubble boy diseases only kids who didnt get outside and eat enough dirt get

In 1962 1 in 60,000 children was autistic
In 1982 1 in 6,000 children were autistic
Today 1 in 60 is autistic
When we are old, 60% will be autistic

Yes, they are creating NPCs on purpose, a golem army

It's because the vaccinated are the "bubble boys" afraid of the "deadly" chicken pox and measles.

youtube.com/watch?v=o7zwNZOg8mE

They'd rather risk injecting numerous untested chemicals into an infant baby than to have it maybe get slightly sick for a week.

Attached: Measles death rates vs vaccination.jpg (1920x1243, 523K)

If I understood your link correctly..polio vaccination was probably the main cause of why aids and cancer sky rocketed in America? And people only got the polio because of bad diet (e.g. eating too much sugar)

>What evidence is there to support anti vaxxers?
their bank accounts, it's a wealthy tech movement

Think whatever you want, you can think vaccines are dangerous, you can choose to ignore what data says and believe vaccines are the saving grace of humanity.

Just think for yourself and research, don't let your government force you to inject your baby with toxic chemicals that they profit off of.

Attached: bluepilled2.jpg (960x960, 105K)

mush higher rates of all auto immune disorders

why does the vaccine court operate under gag order?

Big mystery right here.

Attached: 1534283306611632851769.png (619x173, 140K)

they're injecting GM viruses that live with you forever, dormant or active, each doing various things to control/monitor you, change your behaviour, determine when to give you diseases, or kill you, etc.
it's still experimental, so lots of collateral damage, but that's what they're working toward, genetically modified mind control viruses in every citizen (slave)
youtube.com/watch?v=-gfTqfVeLHw

>the industry THREATENED to stop making vaccines

next time, let them stop making the damned vaccines.

They are nothing but a cash cow, and a vector for chemical warfare.

The primary causal factor in reducing and eliminating diseases of the past, was SOAP.