Different races are different sub species

Why are humans this special snowflake on the planet that has all these differences but are still considered the exact same species?

Meanwhile in nature people are all too happy to say "oh look here is a new subspecies because of is minor change in how their teeth line up"

Just accept it, there are many different sub species of human and none of them are exactly the same and saying so is not only racist but it is ignoring any qualities those with differences may have that others do not.

I hate PC culture.

Attached: main-qimg-7d9dc51097f82bc8a5bbccddf295bf79.png (602x709, 487K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/EP0R9VunZxw
unz.com/book/kevin_macdonald__the-culture-of-critique/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/1000genomes/
pastebin.com/SJs8G4JA
sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204741.htm
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002700
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup
theapricity.com/snpa/racesofeurope.htm
jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/5/398.long
tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf
nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1786/20133222
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466230
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12969463?dopt=Abstract
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03382.x/abstract
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00384.x/abstract
digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1393&context=icwdm_usdanwrc
journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070&type=printable
jstor.org/stable/2460058?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14655871
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.174.698&rep=rep1&type=pdf
sociology.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1043/2008_Reconstructing_Race_in_AJS.pdf
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr/_doc/Coll.Antropol.28(2004)2_907-921.pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x/abstract
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/on-the-concept-of-race-in-chinese-biological-anthropology-alive-and-well.pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660290308/abstract
bio.miami.edu/mccracken/reprints/condor-113-747.pdf
pnas.org/content/92/10/4259.full.pdf
science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6228/1352
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11815945
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC534810/pdf/pbio.0020442.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1180234/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951706/
mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/7/707.short
researchgate.net/profile/Warren_Johnson3/publication/227663576_Phylogenetics_genome_diversity_and_origin_of_modern_leopard_Panthera_pardus/links/53ecffa80cf2981ada112c1a.pdf
uff.br/gefras/artigo 83.pdf
eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/Ecol406R_506R/PUMA_for_Culver_lect.pdf
jstor.org/stable/2387512?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
bearproject.info/old/uploads/publications/A 28 Nuclear DNA.PDF
eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/ecol406r_506r/garcia-moreno1996-wolf.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11472538
researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Kyle/publication/12035218_Genetic_structure_of_North_American_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/0fcfd50ec27bb60633000000.pdf
researchgate.net/profile/Carles_Vila/publication/12080301_Genetic_variation_and_population_structure_in_Scandinavian_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/54f2b60e0cf24eb87949009d.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11050551
mbe.library.arizona.edu/data/1995/1206/13forb.pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00852.x/abstract
research.amnh.org/~rfr/paetkau99.pdf
jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/1/108.full.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22391749/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776623/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795070/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933725/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593038/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938855/
people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/three_laws.pdf
isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic185351.files/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
webspace.pugetsound.edu/facultypages/cjones/chidev/Paper/Articles/Plomin-IQ.pdf
atavisionary.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Heritability-of-interests-a-twin-study-Lykken-bouchard.pdf
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289609001561
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289607000244?np=y
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470
researchgate.net/publication/268806252_Inferring_Human_Phylogenies_Using_Three_CODIS_STR_Markers_CSF1PO_TPOX_and_TH01
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X17300694
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379417300914
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268116300890
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X14000138
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2027/full
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437116303429
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jeea.12171/full
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Oh wow look at all of these different species of wolves.

Attached: 1dc00f6a11c21cd7dbd63cee91e03e06.jpg (770x671, 89K)

Ignoring those differences will eventually be the downfall of humanity. Diversity is indeed strength, so long as those diverse populations are left intact to continue with that diversity. Everyone fucking commingles and the right disease shows up and poof. Only thing left are going to be some goddamn pygmies in a forest as everyone else will now have become susceptible to the same shit.

based and redpilled

We just haven't been isolated for long enough to diverge significantly from the root stock, also phenotype=! genotype. It WOULD have happened eventually, if say, the Ice Age lasted an extra million years or something prevented diffrent populations from finding each other altogether. Evolution pretty much stopped after agriculture and animal husbandry became a thing desu.

That's obviously a Slav/Chink at the top

Attached: nauseating_muscle_shots.jpg (696x400, 37K)

Where’s that meme that the difference between wolf and coyote is the same as white and black?

Attached: A72AC7E6-8792-4B71-9314-2007B55F75DC.jpg (650x975, 219K)

Lol why is that Jew the photo for the Caucasoid? Subtle plant I guess, you assume that by sneaking that in you’ll make a small chip towards Zionist tolerance. Not gonna happen.

Aged bait but people still download it

human diversity is a beautiful thing worth preserving and egalitarianism is the biggest threat to diversity.

hi ausbro, what did you search at google? i want to find skull design of my race too..
>race: Malay

probably somewhere between caucasoid and australoid if we are to believe what (((brembrige))) says about islanders

what race are south/native americans? abbos? indians? islanders? theres got to be some formal name for them because none of those fit into caucasoid, negroid, or mongoloid

I am pretty sure mainstream tries to claim Australian Aborigines are just basically africans.

GIYF

It's a shame 'lurk moar' is a dead meme.

Aren't south/native american mongoloid?

OP is a simpleton that doesn’t even understand evolutionary biology nor taxonomy

Attached: 327F1603-F2F7-470B-8661-4A0F28A99A61.jpg (645x729, 67K)

Uhh

Attached: major-human-races-tree.png (450x668, 76K)

>caucasoid wearing jewshit
OY VEY U IZ SAYING WE WUZ WHY PEOPLE AND SHIT

Neanderthals and modern humans are subspecies. Races are subsubspecies, aka. races.

100% agreed. How can someone look at a black person and Asian person and think they are one of the same species is beyond me. And while we might be sub sub species of each other, the differences are vast, especially when operating in a society where the affect is multiplied.

It doesn't actually matter whether races are species, subspecies, or subsubspecies, when deciding their political significance.

Why did someone photoshop a jewhat on that german?

Thank God I'm in one of the two races uplifted by evolution.

When the falls you will be made an example for Asia. Don't worry, you will live on in our history, Whitebros.

This video has the most simple argument to prove we are different species.

Read the description of it too

youtu.be/EP0R9VunZxw

proud to be Malay. also, i dont hate chinks and pajeets anymore.. the real enemy is the jew.. if you hate other non-jews, the jews have successfully eliminating multiple races at once..

What does Jow Forums think about 'Out of Africa' migration?
Looking at how primitive these abos and niggers are I don't think so they migrated lol, they haven't stepped a foot outside their jungle and we are made to believe they wuz travelled thousandz of kilometrez and shiet?
I believe they are where they are because of continental plates moving and thus got isolated from their other relatives (India and Australia have abo population, same dogs and were once connected to madagascar)

Attached: Screenshot_20180920-155109.jpg (1080x1920, 587K)

Malay/Malaysian isn't a race, just a nationality, you guys are mostly mix between white capoids and some missing ancestor

Attached: images (30).jpg (307x479, 34K)

100 years ago race realism was commonly accepted. The reason it isn't today is because of 20th intellectual movements spearheaded by Jews such as Franz Boas, an anthropologist whose intent was to totally suppress evolutionary theory in the social sciences. MacDonald covers this in Chapter 2 of Culture of Critique, read it here: unz.com/book/kevin_macdonald__the-culture-of-critique/

Attached: KMtrilogy.jpg (1200x746, 155K)

He's not ethnically jewish, just a model, here he is dressed as a monk

Attached: Nuevo Imagen de mapa de bits (3).jpg (260x320, 28K)

?
Should I believe an indian? or multiple publications stated that "malay is a race"?

1 minute ago
>Poos are bros
Now
>I'd rather trust (((publications)))

Jesus christ, the aboriginal skull...

Also what race are jews and arabs?

thank god indians in my country are a lot smarter..

The masters that rule us (the slaves) want a raceless, dumb, genderless, nationless population. This plus continued use of guided devolution will create a permanent gap between them and us forever condemning humanity to be the slaves and play things for the elite. Diversity is our strength is a tongue in cheek play on words against us. It really is "our" strength, if you are a part of their group.

>Country is multi-racial
>"we're a race not a nationality!!"

Missing ancestor is probably a mix of Dravidians and South-East Asians.

Poos are about half Aryan (Yamnaya) and half Dravidian.

>south/native americans?
Mongoloid
>abbos?
Australoid
>indians?
Caucasoid
>islanders?
Polynesian

>Thinking the continents drifted that much in the last 200K years
shiggy diggy

>you believe in evolution right?
>"yeah"
>you believe that organisms create biological traits to adapt to their environments right?
>"yeah"
>so do you believe that each race is separate and distinct in their biolgy?
"FUCK OFF BIGOT NAZI SCUM, WE'RE ALL ONE PEOPLE"

Attached: 1532099702772.jpg (1242x1504, 1.38M)

Attached: 1488069648283.png (1080x3566, 793K)

These 200+ alleles are all present in at least one third of the European population.
These 200+ alleles are all known to increase intelligence with genome-wide statistical significance.
These 200+ alleles are all known to influence genes linked to the nervous system.

SNP (allele) Distribution
rs72845663 (T) Europeans are 176% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs66493370 (A) Europeans are 358% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs62383977 (T) Europeans are 388% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs61854130 (A) Europeans are 319% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs61816194 (T) Europeans are 467% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs61527214 (A) Europeans are 164% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs61372148 (T) Europeans are 260% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs59692040 (T) Europeans are 130% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs56146203 (A) Europeans are 195% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs56131188 (T) Europeans are 307% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs56115971 (A) Europeans are 193% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs34389480 (A) Europeans are 2605% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs17608413 (T) Europeans are 109% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs17266097 (T) Europeans are 1218% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs17106817 (T) Europeans are 145% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs17048855 (A) Europeans are 595% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs16950305 (G) Europeans are 100% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs13428598 (T) Europeans are 417% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs13413443 (T) Europeans are 1394% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs13270346 (A) Europeans are 2178% more likely to have this allele than Africans

(continued in the next post)

rs13116036 (T) Europeans are 2719% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs13071190 (T) Europeans are 289% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs13019313 (A) Europeans are 145% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs13004882 (T) Europeans are 2165% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12919084 (T) Europeans are 236% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12814021 (T) Europeans are 187% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12799722 (A) Europeans are 148% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12773994 (T) Europeans are 107% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12712784 (T) Europeans are 718% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12701207 (T) Europeans are 154% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12567360 (A) Europeans are 183% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12548560 (A) Europeans are 100% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12491181 (T) Europeans are 830% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12404086 (T) Europeans are 797% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12208753 (A) Europeans are 158% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12146618 (T) Europeans are 359% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs12136092 (A) Europeans are 799% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11864066 (G) Europeans are 421% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11793831 (T) Europeans are 350% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11775314 (T) Europeans are 443% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11768845 (T) Europeans are 210% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11685902 (T) Europeans are 318% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11576565 (A) Europeans are 1131% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11210394 (T) Europeans are 960% more likely to have this allele than Africans

(continued in the next post)

rs11192147 (A) Europeans are 188% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs11125721 (A) Europeans are 1437% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10953137 (G) Europeans are 130% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10889949 (T) Europeans are 115% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10863246 (A) Europeans are 387% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10821977 (A) Europeans are 559% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10821080 (T) Europeans are 439% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10786832 (T) Europeans are 196% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10740140 (A) Europeans are 316% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10476217 (G) Europeans are 163% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10432638 (A) Europeans are 1274% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10411958 (T) Europeans are 144% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10402747 (T) Europeans are 227% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10401883 (T) Europeans are 106% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10233848 (A) Europeans are 142% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10205421 (G) Europeans are 338% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10124571 (T) Europeans are 286% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10078630 (A) Europeans are 389% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs10057590 (A) Europeans are 164% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9933476 (G) Europeans are 260% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9889827 (T) Europeans are 201% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9682919 (A) Europeans are 233% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9611186 (G) Europeans are 119% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9607805 (T) Europeans are 136% more likely to have this allele than Africans

(continued in the next post)

rs9556702 (A) Europeans are 1639% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9513780 (T) Europeans are 261% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9397806 (A) Europeans are 113% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9388490 (T) Europeans are 121% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9387711 (T) Europeans are 139% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9328534 (T) Europeans are 176% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs9309922 (T) Europeans are 108% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs8056960 (C) Europeans are 336% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7963801 (T) Europeans are 2981% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7896910 (A) Europeans are 2007% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7779072 (T) Europeans are 229% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7624274 (A) Europeans are 231% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7575938 (A) Europeans are 128% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7534577 (A) Europeans are 535% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7403957 (A) Europeans are 485% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7199601 (A) Europeans are 275% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7197830 (A) Europeans are 360% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7195605 (T) Europeans are 216% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7156431 (C) Europeans are 110% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7131627 (A) Europeans are 290% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7131440 (T) Europeans are 290% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs7016874 (A) Europeans are 1788% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6917204 (T) Europeans are 169% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6887429 (A) Europeans are 132% more likely to have this allele than Africans

(continued in the next post)

rs6885410 (A) Europeans are 262% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6873367 (T) Europeans are 120% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6833433 (A) Europeans are 123% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6823836 (T) Europeans are 1034% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6799337 (T) Europeans are 277% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6779442 (G) Europeans are 112% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6760964 (C) Europeans are 110% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6752813 (T) Europeans are 644% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6732160 (A) Europeans are 110% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6721148 (T) Europeans are 269% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6708515 (A) Europeans are 299% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6708046 (T) Europeans are 136% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6585426 (T) Europeans are 122% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6546857 (A) Europeans are 104% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6546856 (T) Europeans are 418% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6535809 (A) Europeans are 650% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6534338 (T) Europeans are 197% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6503513 (A) Europeans are 178% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs6119267 (C) Europeans are 757% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs5001573 (C) Europeans are 134% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs4985417 (A) Europeans are 1305% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs4954174 (A) Europeans are 109% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs4941735 (T) Europeans are 180% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs4916751 (T) Europeans are 139% more likely to have this allele than Africans

(continued in the next post)

rs2819336 (T) Europeans are 248% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2710691 (T) Europeans are 382% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2678897 (G) Europeans are 311% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2640564 (T) Europeans are 232% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2615333 (T) Europeans are 131% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2543489 (A) Europeans are 147% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2430926 (T) Europeans are 393% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2364543 (T) Europeans are 113% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2279574 (A) Europeans are 102% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2250660 (C) Europeans are 300% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2221534 (A) Europeans are 584% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2164553 (A) Europeans are 258% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2164552 (A) Europeans are 258% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2099744 (A) Europeans are 123% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2084131 (A) Europeans are 468% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2049741 (T) Europeans are 188% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs2005827 (A) Europeans are 1490% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1963395 (A) Europeans are 544% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1956334 (A) Europeans are 169% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1906252 (A) Europeans are 158% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1893907 (C) Europeans are 167% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1729799 (T) Europeans are 340% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1599180 (A) Europeans are 252% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1521162 (C) Europeans are 925% more likely to have this allele than Africans

(continued in the next post)

rs1519799 (A) Europeans are 589% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1487445 (T) Europeans are 183% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1487441 (A) Europeans are 156% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1408579 (T) Europeans are 1487% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1405238 (C) Europeans are 231% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1317885 (T) Europeans are 199% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1291823 (A) Europeans are 1050% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1291817 (A) Europeans are 179% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1167827 (A) Europeans are 1092% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1167800 (G) Europeans are 344% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1144709 (C) Europeans are 168% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1085639 (A) Europeans are 177% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1083845 (A) Europeans are 574% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1050847 (T) Europeans are 539% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs1016678 (A) Europeans are 121% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs943262 (C) Europeans are 108% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs918765 (C) Europeans are 148% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs889169 (A) Europeans are 285% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs872123 (T) Europeans are 188% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs803379 (T) Europeans are 866% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs801742 (A) Europeans are 433% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs761718 (A) Europeans are 659% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs737665 (A) Europeans are 125% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs736471 (T) Europeans are 136% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs708915 (T) Europeans are 256% more likely to have this allele than Africans

(continued in the next post)

rs708913 (A) Europeans are 341% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs685958 (A) Europeans are 733% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs628594 (A) Europeans are 119% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs604149 (A) Europeans are 403% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs602512 (A) Europeans are 388% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs589249 (A) Europeans are 658% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs482818 (C) Europeans are 191% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs324885 (A) Europeans are 340% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs241558 (A) Europeans are 750% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs229168 (C) Europeans are 134% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs215603 (T) Europeans are 113% more likely to have this allele than Africans
rs159428 (T) Europeans are 4192% more likely to have this allele than Africans

There you have it. I estimated 200+ and indeed there are 200+ alleles that meet these requirements.

What race is pic related?

Attached: ayylmao.png (716x500, 521K)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/1000genomes/

That's one hell of a social construct.

Arctic wolves are based and redpilled

bump

equality is a lie

-This thread needs a reboot-

Attached: reboot.jpg (1024x576, 133K)

"White nationalists" are the reason nobody wants to talk about race and science.

Attached: 1537166154769.png (1056x1672, 262K)

>yeah, you are right, but we won't do anything about it
>i would rather destroy civilization than admit white nationalists have a point
Mental illness.

Caucasian, just inbred and with adaptations to living in the desert.
Definitely non-caucasian blood in many of them though.

It's not destroying civilization. Stop reading the Daily Stormer.
If anything, white nationalism would be what causes the outbreak of another war. Imagine the Yugoslav wars but x100.

I don't read the Daily Stormer, piece of shit. I read the FBI Uniform Crime Report. Blood is on your hands.

Attached: america has a demographic problem.png (1106x413, 78K)

You parasite liberals carry on about how you have exclusive access to 'science' and 'facts' all day, but then the truth comes out when you say shit like this. You have no interest in facts and only use science to enforce your emotional opinions when it suits you.

You will deny and outright attack science when it goes against your lefty narrative like it has with race and global warming.
Go choke on Bill Nye's sex junk, faggot.

Well, this is level 1.

Level 2 is, what you thing are subspecies, they are different species. At least 4: European white, Negroid, Mongoloid, Australoid.

Subspecies (race, bred) exist inside species. For European white species, at least 3 main subspecies (races) exist: Nordid, Alpinid, Mediterranid.

Between species, hybrid species exists. American Indians, for example. New hybrid species is American Nigger, stabilised mix between African Negro and European white.

Dont stay in the middle. Classify people same way as animals and valla, suddenly all matches.

Attached: world species.jpg (2875x2079, 1.11M)

modern eurolets look totally unimpressive compared to paleoEuro chads

Attached: loschbour.jpg (512x582, 46K)

European species with subspecies (races) plate.

Attached: European white species.jpg (1200x2200, 646K)

Attached: here Anon.jpg (800x600, 137K)

Look Pacific Islanders.

Attached: here Anon 1.jpg (1156x1120, 264K)

South native americans are predominant Mongoloids.
North native americans are hybrids between Mongoloids and Europeids (genocided Solutreans).

Attached: Injuins.jpg (1312x1848, 357K)

Homo sapiens and Homo Neanderthalensis are different species.
Hybrid species between those two are semites.

Attached: Neanderthal Smithsonian reconstruction.jpg (288x288, 18K)

Attached: just a social construct.png (1120x2442, 402K)

they're all good doggos who deserve fresh mongrel meat and belly rubs.

We wuz Lemurians and sh-

pastebin.com/SJs8G4JA
Enjoy.

*Hybrid species between those two are semites*
What? Oh no you're retarded

All semites are 80% Caucasoid race with up to 20% Homo Neanderthalensis admix.
Also, Caucasoids =/= white. Term "Caucasoid" include white European species and all hybrid species on Europids borders. Like Turanids, Orientalids, Armenids, etcetra (pic related).

Attached: Caucasoids non-European.png (1408x1138, 812K)

Caucasoid is superior, and I’m a negroid.

Recognize the similarities?

Attached: 1533909566900.jpg (940x950, 301K)

Wrong. Caucasians are neanderthal-sapien hybrids. Mongoloids are denisovan-sapian hybrids. Our evolutionary history predates sapien migration out of Africa through this interbreeding which is largely what separates us.

No you faggot. All full blooded caucasians are aryan.

You can believe to jew Varg, I dont care.
Caompare pic related with Also.
>Geneticists now show that a Cro-Magnoid individual who lived in Southern Italy 28,000 years ago was a modern European, genetically as well as anatomically. They conclude that the Neandertal people, who lived in Europe for nearly 300,000 years, are not the ancestors of modern Europeans.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204741.htm
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002700

Attached: jew Joseph Shwartz.jpg (593x716, 96K)

Meant for

Reminder that Africans are the true pure homosapiens and everyone else are mutts. That homosapiens are retarded and violent and it is our neanderthal DNA that separates us into an intelligent, civilized subspecies.

Homosapien = Congoid
Homosapien + Denisovan = Australoid
Homosapien + Neanderthal = Caucasoid
Homosapien + Neanderthal + Denisovan = Mongoloid

Attached: main-qimg-c93ae6395903db6b3f75cc26fd599a1c.png (864x648, 112K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup

Attached: World_Map_of_Y-DNA_Haplogroups.png (3000x1900, 1.52M)

So Hamnites are Aryans, lel. Arabs are Aryans, lel.
Son, you need some lessions on preboasian anthropology.
I am good user, so here:
theapricity.com/snpa/racesofeurope.htm

(1997) Barbujani et. al., find a human genetic distance of ,155. There are no recognized subspecies.

jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/5/398.long

(2001) Kim et. al., find an Asian dog genetic distance of ,154. There are eleven recognized subspecies.

tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf

(1994) Roy et. al., find a North American coyote genetic distance of ,107. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.

nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html

(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic distance of ,033. There are three recognized subspecies.

rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1786/20133222

(2014) Jackson et. al., find a humpback whale genetic distance of ,12. There are three recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466230

(2008) Lorenzen, Arctander & Siegismund find a plains zebra genetic distance of ,11. There are five recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12969463?dopt=Abstract

(2003) Pierpaoli et. al., find a European wildcat genetic distance of ,11. There are three recognized subspecies and five biogeographic groups according to (Mattucci et. al., 2016).

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03382.x/abstract

(2007) Lorenzen et. al., find a Kob antelope genetic distance of ,11. There are two to three recognized subspecies.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00384.x/abstract

(2003) Jordana et. al., find a south European beef cattle genetic distance of ,068. There are eighteen recognized subspecies.

digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1393&context=icwdm_usdanwrc

(2004) Williams et. al., find a red winged blackbird genetic distance of ,01. There are twenty-two recognized subspecies.

journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070&type=printable

jstor.org/stable/2460058?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14655871

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.174.698&rep=rep1&type=pdf

sociology.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1043/2008_Reconstructing_Race_in_AJS.pdf

collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr/_doc/Coll.Antropol.28(2004)2_907-921.pdf

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x/abstract

lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/on-the-concept-of-race-in-chinese-biological-anthropology-alive-and-well.pdf

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660290308/abstract

bio.miami.edu/mccracken/reprints/condor-113-747.pdf

pnas.org/content/92/10/4259.full.pdf

science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6228/1352

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11815945

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC534810/pdf/pbio.0020442.pdf

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1180234/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951706/

digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1393&context=icwdm_usdanwrc

tau.ac.il/~geffene/PDFs/15-Mol_Biol_Evol_1994.pdf

(1997) Wise et. al., show that the genetic variability within humans is 0,776. There are zero recognized human subspecies.

mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/7/707.short

Also, there is a big difference between Caucasoid (species) and Caucasian aka Mtebid (phenotype).
Back to school you go.

(1997) Wise et. al., find a chimpanzee genetic variability of ,63. There are four recognized subspecies.


researchgate.net/profile/Warren_Johnson3/publication/227663576_Phylogenetics_genome_diversity_and_origin_of_modern_leopard_Panthera_pardus/links/53ecffa80cf2981ada112c1a.pdf

(2001) Uphyrkina et. al., find a leopard genetic variability of ,58. There are thirteen recognized subspecies.

uff.br/gefras/artigo 83.pdf

(2001) Eizirik et. al., find a jaguar genetic variability of ,739. There are nine recognized subspecies.

eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/Ecol406R_506R/PUMA_for_Culver_lect.pdf

(2000) Culver et. al., find a puma genetic variability of ,52. There are six recognized subspecies.

nature.com/nature/journal/v415/n6871/full/415520a.html

(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic variability of ,66. There are three recognized subspecies.

jstor.org/stable/2387512?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

(1998) Paetkau et. al., find a North American brown bear genetic variability of ,5275. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.

bearproject.info/old/uploads/publications/A 28 Nuclear DNA.PDF

(2000) Waits et. al., find a Scandinavian brown bear genetic variability of ,687. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.

eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/ecol406r_506r/garcia-moreno1996-wolf.pdf

(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a coyote genetic variability of ,629. There are nineteen recognized subspecies. They further find a Gray wolf genetic variability of ,574. There are thirty-seven recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11472538

(2001) Girman et. al., find an African wild dog genetic variability of ,643. There are five recognized subspecies.

researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Kyle/publication/12035218_Genetic_structure_of_North_American_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/0fcfd50ec27bb60633000000.pdf

(2001) Kyle & Strobeck find a North American wolverine genetic variability of ,55. There are two to three recognized subspecies.

researchgate.net/profile/Carles_Vila/publication/12080301_Genetic_variation_and_population_structure_in_Scandinavian_wolverine_Gulo_gulo_populations/links/54f2b60e0cf24eb87949009d.pdf

(2001) Walker et. al., find a Scandinavian wolverine genetic variability of ,325. There are three recognized subspecies.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11050551

(2000) Polziehn et. al., find an elk genetic variability of ,395. There are seven to eight recognized subspecies.

mbe.library.arizona.edu/data/1995/1206/13forb.pdf

(1995) Forbes et. al., find a bighorn sheep genetic variability of ,6235. There are three recognized subspecies.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00852.x/abstract

(2000) Reinartz et. al., find a bonobo genetic variability of ,535. There is one subspecies.

research.amnh.org/~rfr/paetkau99.pdf

(1999) Paetkau et. al., find a polar bear genetic variability of ,68. There is one subspecies.

jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/1/108.full.pdf

(1999) Wilton, Steward & Zafiris find an Australian dingo genetic variability of ,445. There is one recognized subspecies.

eebweb.arizona.edu/courses/ecol406r_506r/garcia-moreno1996-wolf.pdf

(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a domesticated dog genetic variability of ,5085. There is one recognized subspecies, and there are many breeds.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22391749/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776623/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795070/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933725/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593038/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3938855/

people.virginia.edu/~ent3c/papers2/three_laws.pdf

(2000) Turkheimer presents his Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics and explains their meaning.

Turkheimer begins by stating, "The nature-nurture debate is over. The bottom line is that everything is heritable, an outcome that has taken all sides of the naturenurture debate by surprise. Irving Gottesman and I have suggested that the universal influence of genes on behavior be enshrined as the first law of behavior genetics (Turkheimer & Gottesman, 1991), and at the risk of naming laws that I can take no credit for discovering, it is worth stating the nearly unanimous results of behavior genetics in a more formal manner."

The Three Laws are as follows:

? First Law. All human behavioral traits are heritable.

? Second Law. The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of genes.

? Third Law. A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families.

In short: no one is born tabula rasa.

isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic185351.files/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf

(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.

They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.

During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.

webspace.pugetsound.edu/facultypages/cjones/chidev/Paper/Articles/Plomin-IQ.pdf

(2004) Plomin & Spinath discuss intelligence in the wider context of genetics, genes, and genomics.

Their discussion is multi-faceted; their analysis illustrates proof of the genetic heritability of intelligence, the immense weakness of environmental explanations for intelligence, changes in heritability during development, a multivariate analysis of IQ and various testing metrics, gene expression profiling, and genomics.

This is an excellent compilatory piece.

atavisionary.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Heritability-of-interests-a-twin-study-Lykken-bouchard.pdf

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289609001561

(2009) Rushton & Jensen refute erroneous claims made about the nature of the Flynn Effect and its relationship with the Black-White IQ gap.

In their conclusions they state, "We conclude that predictions about the Black–White IQ gap narrowing as a result of the secular rise are unsupported. The (mostly heritable) cause of the one is not the (mostly environmental) cause of the other. The Flynn Effect (the secular rise in IQ) is not a Jensen Effect (because it does not occur on g)."

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X

(2001) Rushton & Rushton show evidence for racial-group differences in the form of brain size and structure, IQ, and musculoskeletal trait variation.

Their analysis shows significant variation in both the structure and sizes of the brains of Negroids, Caucasoids, and East-Asians. In addition to this, they have found differences in the skull shapes and structures of the races, alongside differences in average height and weight and all parts of the bone and muscle structures from the neck to the feet.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289607000244?np=y

(2007) Shatz analyzes the relationship between IQ and fertility.

They find that IQ is negatively associated with total fertility rate, birth rate, and population growth rate. This means that higher IQ populations are less fertile than lower IQ populations.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470

(2013) Michael Woodley, Jan Nijenhuis, and Raegan Murphy conclude that Western IQs have declined by an average of 1,6 points per decade since the Victorian Era.

Higher IQ people are more productive, healthier, and are more creative. The reduction in IQs across the West has been met with a marked decrease in average productivity and general health despite vast increases in average wealth, nutrition and access to healthcare.

The cumulative reduction in IQ is between 12,45 and 13,35 points or roughly one standard deviation on a normal IQ bell curve. This represents an eight-fold reduction in the number of geniuses and a counter to the Flynn Effect.

The resultant decrease in IQ is attributed to dysgenics in the form of outbreeding and negative mate selection within populations. The importation of migrants of different races and ethnicities preempts the outbreeding and subsequent loss in IQ. This effect has sped up as migration has increased.

researchgate.net/publication/268806252_Inferring_Human_Phylogenies_Using_Three_CODIS_STR_Markers_CSF1PO_TPOX_and_TH01

Attached: sppp.png (386x548, 31K)

Attached: maoa.jpg (1136x2200, 812K)

>Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals?

> In 40 species of wild vertebrates, darker pigmented individuals are more aggressive and sexually active.
> Cross fostering studies and pharmacological dose manipulations establish the role of the melatonin system.
> We review the human literature within and between populations and find similar relationships with pigmentation.
> Darker individuals average higher levels of crime, sexual activity including HIV/AIDS, and lower IQ.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840

Attached: blackrace69.png (1472x2024, 673K)

Multiculturalism leads to low-trust and observably low-functioning societies.:
>The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.
>In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogeneous settings.
archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/

From a biological standpoint, multiculturalism is unsustainable. Eventually the disparities between groups will cause shifts in demographics. Lower birthrate groups, which are lower because they are K-selective compared to others, will eventually be demographically replaced in an egalitarian society, or even worse, a society that puts the economic and social interests of the r-selected above the K groups, which is what we have now. This is only amplified with infinite immigration-based economic expansion policies that the west has.

Plus a whole host of other problems:
increases Poverty
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X17300694

decreases voter turnout. Study of 650 elections around the world.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379417300914

lowers charitable giving within communities, creates problems for fundraisers and policy makers
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268116300890

strong negative impact on economic growth
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X14000138

lowers innovation
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2027/full

immigration, a factor of wealth inequality in the USA
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437116303429

associated with civil wars
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jeea.12171/full

Attached: nigabstract.png (697x8275, 1.87M)

www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf

Attached: iq and race.png (1522x1033, 242K)

Genetic distance is based on indexes, like Fst. Those are not directly comparable since they are indexes, and not metrics. To make this comparison directly, you would need to pool all of those samples together and index how much distance is between each group within vs between. Stop pretending to understand genetics because you can google a research paper, not understand how to read it, and only pluck out a single number from it.

What, you actually expect people on here to genuinely care about research and not confirming what they actually believe? For shame, user. I’ll bet that nobody even clicks on the spam that’s posted here, just perpetuates it.

>it has never been done

Attached: myth 6.png (1047x625, 117K)

I love the morons here who think you can do complex population genetic analysis in microsoft excel.

see: additionally, the genetic distances are valid when compared on a within-species basis. of course dogs and humans are different species. the point is that human subspecies are not considered separate subspecies even though their within-group distances are greater than other scientifically-defined groups with recognized subspecies

obfuscate more, you dishonest jew bastard.

>samefagging this hard