Why are humans this special snowflake on the planet that has all these differences but are still considered the exact same species?
Meanwhile in nature people are all too happy to say "oh look here is a new subspecies because of is minor change in how their teeth line up"
Just accept it, there are many different sub species of human and none of them are exactly the same and saying so is not only racist but it is ignoring any qualities those with differences may have that others do not.
Ignoring those differences will eventually be the downfall of humanity. Diversity is indeed strength, so long as those diverse populations are left intact to continue with that diversity. Everyone fucking commingles and the right disease shows up and poof. Only thing left are going to be some goddamn pygmies in a forest as everyone else will now have become susceptible to the same shit.
David Bennett
based and redpilled
Ayden Nguyen
We just haven't been isolated for long enough to diverge significantly from the root stock, also phenotype=! genotype. It WOULD have happened eventually, if say, the Ice Age lasted an extra million years or something prevented diffrent populations from finding each other altogether. Evolution pretty much stopped after agriculture and animal husbandry became a thing desu.
Lol why is that Jew the photo for the Caucasoid? Subtle plant I guess, you assume that by sneaking that in you’ll make a small chip towards Zionist tolerance. Not gonna happen.
Ryan Torres
Aged bait but people still download it
Ryan Jenkins
human diversity is a beautiful thing worth preserving and egalitarianism is the biggest threat to diversity.
Jaxon Evans
hi ausbro, what did you search at google? i want to find skull design of my race too.. >race: Malay
Andrew King
probably somewhere between caucasoid and australoid if we are to believe what (((brembrige))) says about islanders
Isaac Lee
what race are south/native americans? abbos? indians? islanders? theres got to be some formal name for them because none of those fit into caucasoid, negroid, or mongoloid
Dominic Kelly
I am pretty sure mainstream tries to claim Australian Aborigines are just basically africans.
Kayden Lewis
GIYF
It's a shame 'lurk moar' is a dead meme.
James Long
Aren't south/native american mongoloid?
William Murphy
OP is a simpleton that doesn’t even understand evolutionary biology nor taxonomy
>caucasoid wearing jewshit OY VEY U IZ SAYING WE WUZ WHY PEOPLE AND SHIT
Michael Davis
Neanderthals and modern humans are subspecies. Races are subsubspecies, aka. races.
Luke Reyes
100% agreed. How can someone look at a black person and Asian person and think they are one of the same species is beyond me. And while we might be sub sub species of each other, the differences are vast, especially when operating in a society where the affect is multiplied.
Adrian Hughes
It doesn't actually matter whether races are species, subspecies, or subsubspecies, when deciding their political significance.
Jackson Butler
Why did someone photoshop a jewhat on that german?
Brandon Green
Thank God I'm in one of the two races uplifted by evolution.
When the falls you will be made an example for Asia. Don't worry, you will live on in our history, Whitebros.
Parker Cox
This video has the most simple argument to prove we are different species.
proud to be Malay. also, i dont hate chinks and pajeets anymore.. the real enemy is the jew.. if you hate other non-jews, the jews have successfully eliminating multiple races at once..
Caleb Powell
What does Jow Forums think about 'Out of Africa' migration? Looking at how primitive these abos and niggers are I don't think so they migrated lol, they haven't stepped a foot outside their jungle and we are made to believe they wuz travelled thousandz of kilometrez and shiet? I believe they are where they are because of continental plates moving and thus got isolated from their other relatives (India and Australia have abo population, same dogs and were once connected to madagascar)
100 years ago race realism was commonly accepted. The reason it isn't today is because of 20th intellectual movements spearheaded by Jews such as Franz Boas, an anthropologist whose intent was to totally suppress evolutionary theory in the social sciences. MacDonald covers this in Chapter 2 of Culture of Critique, read it here: unz.com/book/kevin_macdonald__the-culture-of-critique/
? Should I believe an indian? or multiple publications stated that "malay is a race"?
Jacob Davis
1 minute ago >Poos are bros Now >I'd rather trust (((publications)))
Ayden Moore
Jesus christ, the aboriginal skull...
Also what race are jews and arabs?
Jeremiah Adams
thank god indians in my country are a lot smarter..
Joshua Bailey
The masters that rule us (the slaves) want a raceless, dumb, genderless, nationless population. This plus continued use of guided devolution will create a permanent gap between them and us forever condemning humanity to be the slaves and play things for the elite. Diversity is our strength is a tongue in cheek play on words against us. It really is "our" strength, if you are a part of their group.
Christopher Rodriguez
>Country is multi-racial >"we're a race not a nationality!!"
Missing ancestor is probably a mix of Dravidians and South-East Asians.
Poos are about half Aryan (Yamnaya) and half Dravidian.
>Thinking the continents drifted that much in the last 200K years shiggy diggy
Parker Turner
>you believe in evolution right? >"yeah" >you believe that organisms create biological traits to adapt to their environments right? >"yeah" >so do you believe that each race is separate and distinct in their biolgy? "FUCK OFF BIGOT NAZI SCUM, WE'RE ALL ONE PEOPLE"
These 200+ alleles are all present in at least one third of the European population. These 200+ alleles are all known to increase intelligence with genome-wide statistical significance. These 200+ alleles are all known to influence genes linked to the nervous system.
SNP (allele) Distribution rs72845663 (T) Europeans are 176% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs66493370 (A) Europeans are 358% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs62383977 (T) Europeans are 388% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs61854130 (A) Europeans are 319% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs61816194 (T) Europeans are 467% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs61527214 (A) Europeans are 164% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs61372148 (T) Europeans are 260% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs59692040 (T) Europeans are 130% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs56146203 (A) Europeans are 195% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs56131188 (T) Europeans are 307% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs56115971 (A) Europeans are 193% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs34389480 (A) Europeans are 2605% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs17608413 (T) Europeans are 109% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs17266097 (T) Europeans are 1218% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs17106817 (T) Europeans are 145% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs17048855 (A) Europeans are 595% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs16950305 (G) Europeans are 100% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs13428598 (T) Europeans are 417% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs13413443 (T) Europeans are 1394% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs13270346 (A) Europeans are 2178% more likely to have this allele than Africans
(continued in the next post)
Ethan Collins
rs13116036 (T) Europeans are 2719% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs13071190 (T) Europeans are 289% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs13019313 (A) Europeans are 145% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs13004882 (T) Europeans are 2165% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12919084 (T) Europeans are 236% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12814021 (T) Europeans are 187% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12799722 (A) Europeans are 148% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12773994 (T) Europeans are 107% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12712784 (T) Europeans are 718% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12701207 (T) Europeans are 154% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12567360 (A) Europeans are 183% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12548560 (A) Europeans are 100% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12491181 (T) Europeans are 830% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12404086 (T) Europeans are 797% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12208753 (A) Europeans are 158% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12146618 (T) Europeans are 359% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs12136092 (A) Europeans are 799% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11864066 (G) Europeans are 421% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11793831 (T) Europeans are 350% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11775314 (T) Europeans are 443% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11768845 (T) Europeans are 210% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11685902 (T) Europeans are 318% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11576565 (A) Europeans are 1131% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11210394 (T) Europeans are 960% more likely to have this allele than Africans
(continued in the next post)
Ian Collins
rs11192147 (A) Europeans are 188% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs11125721 (A) Europeans are 1437% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10953137 (G) Europeans are 130% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10889949 (T) Europeans are 115% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10863246 (A) Europeans are 387% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10821977 (A) Europeans are 559% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10821080 (T) Europeans are 439% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10786832 (T) Europeans are 196% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10740140 (A) Europeans are 316% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10476217 (G) Europeans are 163% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10432638 (A) Europeans are 1274% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10411958 (T) Europeans are 144% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10402747 (T) Europeans are 227% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10401883 (T) Europeans are 106% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10233848 (A) Europeans are 142% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10205421 (G) Europeans are 338% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10124571 (T) Europeans are 286% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10078630 (A) Europeans are 389% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs10057590 (A) Europeans are 164% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9933476 (G) Europeans are 260% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9889827 (T) Europeans are 201% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9682919 (A) Europeans are 233% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9611186 (G) Europeans are 119% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9607805 (T) Europeans are 136% more likely to have this allele than Africans
(continued in the next post)
Josiah Brown
rs9556702 (A) Europeans are 1639% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9513780 (T) Europeans are 261% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9397806 (A) Europeans are 113% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9388490 (T) Europeans are 121% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9387711 (T) Europeans are 139% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9328534 (T) Europeans are 176% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs9309922 (T) Europeans are 108% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs8056960 (C) Europeans are 336% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7963801 (T) Europeans are 2981% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7896910 (A) Europeans are 2007% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7779072 (T) Europeans are 229% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7624274 (A) Europeans are 231% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7575938 (A) Europeans are 128% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7534577 (A) Europeans are 535% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7403957 (A) Europeans are 485% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7199601 (A) Europeans are 275% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7197830 (A) Europeans are 360% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7195605 (T) Europeans are 216% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7156431 (C) Europeans are 110% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7131627 (A) Europeans are 290% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7131440 (T) Europeans are 290% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs7016874 (A) Europeans are 1788% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6917204 (T) Europeans are 169% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6887429 (A) Europeans are 132% more likely to have this allele than Africans
(continued in the next post)
Christian Wilson
rs6885410 (A) Europeans are 262% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6873367 (T) Europeans are 120% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6833433 (A) Europeans are 123% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6823836 (T) Europeans are 1034% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6799337 (T) Europeans are 277% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6779442 (G) Europeans are 112% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6760964 (C) Europeans are 110% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6752813 (T) Europeans are 644% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6732160 (A) Europeans are 110% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6721148 (T) Europeans are 269% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6708515 (A) Europeans are 299% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6708046 (T) Europeans are 136% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6585426 (T) Europeans are 122% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6546857 (A) Europeans are 104% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6546856 (T) Europeans are 418% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6535809 (A) Europeans are 650% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6534338 (T) Europeans are 197% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6503513 (A) Europeans are 178% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs6119267 (C) Europeans are 757% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs5001573 (C) Europeans are 134% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs4985417 (A) Europeans are 1305% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs4954174 (A) Europeans are 109% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs4941735 (T) Europeans are 180% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs4916751 (T) Europeans are 139% more likely to have this allele than Africans
(continued in the next post)
Julian Bennett
rs2819336 (T) Europeans are 248% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2710691 (T) Europeans are 382% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2678897 (G) Europeans are 311% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2640564 (T) Europeans are 232% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2615333 (T) Europeans are 131% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2543489 (A) Europeans are 147% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2430926 (T) Europeans are 393% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2364543 (T) Europeans are 113% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2279574 (A) Europeans are 102% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2250660 (C) Europeans are 300% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2221534 (A) Europeans are 584% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2164553 (A) Europeans are 258% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2164552 (A) Europeans are 258% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2099744 (A) Europeans are 123% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2084131 (A) Europeans are 468% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2049741 (T) Europeans are 188% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs2005827 (A) Europeans are 1490% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1963395 (A) Europeans are 544% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1956334 (A) Europeans are 169% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1906252 (A) Europeans are 158% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1893907 (C) Europeans are 167% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1729799 (T) Europeans are 340% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1599180 (A) Europeans are 252% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1521162 (C) Europeans are 925% more likely to have this allele than Africans
(continued in the next post)
Julian Bailey
rs1519799 (A) Europeans are 589% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1487445 (T) Europeans are 183% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1487441 (A) Europeans are 156% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1408579 (T) Europeans are 1487% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1405238 (C) Europeans are 231% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1317885 (T) Europeans are 199% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1291823 (A) Europeans are 1050% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1291817 (A) Europeans are 179% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1167827 (A) Europeans are 1092% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1167800 (G) Europeans are 344% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1144709 (C) Europeans are 168% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1085639 (A) Europeans are 177% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1083845 (A) Europeans are 574% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1050847 (T) Europeans are 539% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs1016678 (A) Europeans are 121% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs943262 (C) Europeans are 108% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs918765 (C) Europeans are 148% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs889169 (A) Europeans are 285% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs872123 (T) Europeans are 188% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs803379 (T) Europeans are 866% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs801742 (A) Europeans are 433% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs761718 (A) Europeans are 659% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs737665 (A) Europeans are 125% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs736471 (T) Europeans are 136% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs708915 (T) Europeans are 256% more likely to have this allele than Africans
(continued in the next post)
Robert Fisher
rs708913 (A) Europeans are 341% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs685958 (A) Europeans are 733% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs628594 (A) Europeans are 119% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs604149 (A) Europeans are 403% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs602512 (A) Europeans are 388% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs589249 (A) Europeans are 658% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs482818 (C) Europeans are 191% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs324885 (A) Europeans are 340% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs241558 (A) Europeans are 750% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs229168 (C) Europeans are 134% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs215603 (T) Europeans are 113% more likely to have this allele than Africans rs159428 (T) Europeans are 4192% more likely to have this allele than Africans
There you have it. I estimated 200+ and indeed there are 200+ alleles that meet these requirements.
>yeah, you are right, but we won't do anything about it >i would rather destroy civilization than admit white nationalists have a point Mental illness.
Jayden Allen
Caucasian, just inbred and with adaptations to living in the desert. Definitely non-caucasian blood in many of them though.
Ryan Martinez
It's not destroying civilization. Stop reading the Daily Stormer. If anything, white nationalism would be what causes the outbreak of another war. Imagine the Yugoslav wars but x100.
Eli Reed
I don't read the Daily Stormer, piece of shit. I read the FBI Uniform Crime Report. Blood is on your hands.
You parasite liberals carry on about how you have exclusive access to 'science' and 'facts' all day, but then the truth comes out when you say shit like this. You have no interest in facts and only use science to enforce your emotional opinions when it suits you.
You will deny and outright attack science when it goes against your lefty narrative like it has with race and global warming. Go choke on Bill Nye's sex junk, faggot.
Jason Reed
Well, this is level 1.
Level 2 is, what you thing are subspecies, they are different species. At least 4: European white, Negroid, Mongoloid, Australoid.
Subspecies (race, bred) exist inside species. For European white species, at least 3 main subspecies (races) exist: Nordid, Alpinid, Mediterranid.
Between species, hybrid species exists. American Indians, for example. New hybrid species is American Nigger, stabilised mix between African Negro and European white.
Dont stay in the middle. Classify people same way as animals and valla, suddenly all matches.
*Hybrid species between those two are semites* What? Oh no you're retarded
Luis White
All semites are 80% Caucasoid race with up to 20% Homo Neanderthalensis admix. Also, Caucasoids =/= white. Term "Caucasoid" include white European species and all hybrid species on Europids borders. Like Turanids, Orientalids, Armenids, etcetra (pic related).
Wrong. Caucasians are neanderthal-sapien hybrids. Mongoloids are denisovan-sapian hybrids. Our evolutionary history predates sapien migration out of Africa through this interbreeding which is largely what separates us.
Hunter Evans
No you faggot. All full blooded caucasians are aryan.
Connor Bell
You can believe to jew Varg, I dont care. Caompare pic related with Also. >Geneticists now show that a Cro-Magnoid individual who lived in Southern Italy 28,000 years ago was a modern European, genetically as well as anatomically. They conclude that the Neandertal people, who lived in Europe for nearly 300,000 years, are not the ancestors of modern Europeans. sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204741.htm journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002700
Reminder that Africans are the true pure homosapiens and everyone else are mutts. That homosapiens are retarded and violent and it is our neanderthal DNA that separates us into an intelligent, civilized subspecies.
So Hamnites are Aryans, lel. Arabs are Aryans, lel. Son, you need some lessions on preboasian anthropology. I am good user, so here: theapricity.com/snpa/racesofeurope.htm
Cameron Roberts
(1997) Barbujani et. al., find a human genetic distance of ,155. There are no recognized subspecies.
(2003) Pierpaoli et. al., find a European wildcat genetic distance of ,11. There are three recognized subspecies and five biogeographic groups according to (Mattucci et. al., 2016).
(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a coyote genetic variability of ,629. There are nineteen recognized subspecies. They further find a Gray wolf genetic variability of ,574. There are thirty-seven recognized subspecies.
(2000) Turkheimer presents his Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics and explains their meaning.
Turkheimer begins by stating, "The nature-nurture debate is over. The bottom line is that everything is heritable, an outcome that has taken all sides of the naturenurture debate by surprise. Irving Gottesman and I have suggested that the universal influence of genes on behavior be enshrined as the first law of behavior genetics (Turkheimer & Gottesman, 1991), and at the risk of naming laws that I can take no credit for discovering, it is worth stating the nearly unanimous results of behavior genetics in a more formal manner."
The Three Laws are as follows:
? First Law. All human behavioral traits are heritable.
? Second Law. The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of genes.
? Third Law. A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families.
(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.
They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.
During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.
(2004) Plomin & Spinath discuss intelligence in the wider context of genetics, genes, and genomics.
Their discussion is multi-faceted; their analysis illustrates proof of the genetic heritability of intelligence, the immense weakness of environmental explanations for intelligence, changes in heritability during development, a multivariate analysis of IQ and various testing metrics, gene expression profiling, and genomics.
(2009) Rushton & Jensen refute erroneous claims made about the nature of the Flynn Effect and its relationship with the Black-White IQ gap.
In their conclusions they state, "We conclude that predictions about the Black–White IQ gap narrowing as a result of the secular rise are unsupported. The (mostly heritable) cause of the one is not the (mostly environmental) cause of the other. The Flynn Effect (the secular rise in IQ) is not a Jensen Effect (because it does not occur on g)."
(2001) Rushton & Rushton show evidence for racial-group differences in the form of brain size and structure, IQ, and musculoskeletal trait variation.
Their analysis shows significant variation in both the structure and sizes of the brains of Negroids, Caucasoids, and East-Asians. In addition to this, they have found differences in the skull shapes and structures of the races, alongside differences in average height and weight and all parts of the bone and muscle structures from the neck to the feet.
(2007) Shatz analyzes the relationship between IQ and fertility.
Joseph Walker
They find that IQ is negatively associated with total fertility rate, birth rate, and population growth rate. This means that higher IQ populations are less fertile than lower IQ populations.
(2013) Michael Woodley, Jan Nijenhuis, and Raegan Murphy conclude that Western IQs have declined by an average of 1,6 points per decade since the Victorian Era.
Higher IQ people are more productive, healthier, and are more creative. The reduction in IQs across the West has been met with a marked decrease in average productivity and general health despite vast increases in average wealth, nutrition and access to healthcare.
The cumulative reduction in IQ is between 12,45 and 13,35 points or roughly one standard deviation on a normal IQ bell curve. This represents an eight-fold reduction in the number of geniuses and a counter to the Flynn Effect.
The resultant decrease in IQ is attributed to dysgenics in the form of outbreeding and negative mate selection within populations. The importation of migrants of different races and ethnicities preempts the outbreeding and subsequent loss in IQ. This effect has sped up as migration has increased.
>Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals?
> In 40 species of wild vertebrates, darker pigmented individuals are more aggressive and sexually active. > Cross fostering studies and pharmacological dose manipulations establish the role of the melatonin system. > We review the human literature within and between populations and find similar relationships with pigmentation. > Darker individuals average higher levels of crime, sexual activity including HIV/AIDS, and lower IQ.
Multiculturalism leads to low-trust and observably low-functioning societies.: >The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings. >In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogeneous settings. archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/
From a biological standpoint, multiculturalism is unsustainable. Eventually the disparities between groups will cause shifts in demographics. Lower birthrate groups, which are lower because they are K-selective compared to others, will eventually be demographically replaced in an egalitarian society, or even worse, a society that puts the economic and social interests of the r-selected above the K groups, which is what we have now. This is only amplified with infinite immigration-based economic expansion policies that the west has.
Genetic distance is based on indexes, like Fst. Those are not directly comparable since they are indexes, and not metrics. To make this comparison directly, you would need to pool all of those samples together and index how much distance is between each group within vs between. Stop pretending to understand genetics because you can google a research paper, not understand how to read it, and only pluck out a single number from it.
Nathaniel Wilson
What, you actually expect people on here to genuinely care about research and not confirming what they actually believe? For shame, user. I’ll bet that nobody even clicks on the spam that’s posted here, just perpetuates it.
I love the morons here who think you can do complex population genetic analysis in microsoft excel.
Lucas Hill
see: additionally, the genetic distances are valid when compared on a within-species basis. of course dogs and humans are different species. the point is that human subspecies are not considered separate subspecies even though their within-group distances are greater than other scientifically-defined groups with recognized subspecies