Pentagon Insider Here

I'm no QAnon (a sophisticated LARP, that a few insiders and sometimes foreign intel likes to play in). I do have some bread crumbs. No big disclosure incoming, just venting. Soros has the executive branch and Congress locked down so hard, no other factions can make any traction. So, fuck it, here's a gimme.

Did a missile hit the Pentagon? No, it was definitely a jet airplane. I know because I was part of the investigation. The secret?
Remember the confiscation of security footage? There was a reason for that.
Video of the AA flight hitting the building would have revealed a very precise glidepath. Any asshole with a dry erase marker could measure it on their computer screen. Anyone with any aviation knowledge would know that this is a basic ILS glidepath.

Let that sink in. ILS is a radar beacon that an airplane's instruments fix on to provide glidepath data to the pilots. Anything built after the 80s has basic autopilot to follow the glidepath without human input. Did it sink it yet? Yeah, the big question - why the fuck would there be an airport radar beacon inside the wall of a secure government office building?

Hijackers were Saudi intelligence contribution to the operation. They did, in fact, train to fly large aircraft. Most of the training, however, consisted of learning how to configure and operate the autopilot - setting course, altitude, and fixing onto an ILS glidepath. No way to fly as precisely as they did with their level of training. However, punching a few buttons is easy. Who knows if they even did much with the control yokes or not?

FBI was onto the hijackers, almost immediately. Hi-level call to back off.
Mossad handled installation of WTC equipment, fireworks, etc. Controlled demolition to guarantee effect.
Planes had enough oomph to take down towers, but fireworks were an insurance policy. First tower started to fall with only a little push, fireworks kept it clean. Second tower fell with fireworks.

Attached: fast.jpg (510x826, 75K)

Other urls found in this thread:

sunavionics.com/AV10_Specifications.html
news18.com/news/india/system-failure-low-fuel-and-bad-weather-with-370-on-board-how-an-air-india-pilot-saved-the-day-on-this-911-1880473.html
youtu.be/W4Q80sJFW8Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Fuck off. The schizophrenics you're looking to fool with your shit larp are over on infinitychan.

Post your shit there, and keep it there.

Pentagon installation was insider work.

The big takeaway on the "inside job" front needs to look at the response to 9/11. We could have gone after Saudi "rogue intel", AT LEAST. The Iraq/GWOT push, and secret extradition of Saudis shows the government had no intent to follow up on the truth.

Media had foreknowledge, in the sense that the "response" was partially coordinate from the beginning. Silverstein worked with Mossad directly. Mossad not involved with P-Gon.

CIA handled US media.

As for "white hats", once we realized the extent of conspiracy and corruption, most didn't think the American people could handle it. Plus, most wanted to flex their muscles in foreign wars anyway, so the call was made to just go with it.

Official 9/11 narrative is thus superficially accurate. No massive inside conspiracy. Just a few high-level insiders, and a lot of collaboration with foreign entities and criminal $$ (think Opium trade).

CIA "glow in dark" heavy "inside" player here. Always tied to the biznass side, since the beginning.

That's all folks. Don't expect this issue to ever be resolved. "Key data" is suppressed hardcore, and the big picture is too complicated. Again, because the official narrative is "close" to reality. Public would never parse this, and without the smoking gun of glidepath video or leftover detonators (there are none), there's nothing to support the case. 28 pages are the most you'll get, and look at how that went.
Good luck!

Prove it then. Otherwise you're just as anti-America as the rest of your cock socking colleagues.

Attached: 1535529933925.gif (252x263, 2.99M)

It's just another boomer who has compiled information that everyone on Jow Forums already knows, and pushes it under the guise of being an insider, because muh attention.

OP, keep your shitty fucking larp on infinitychan. That's where you'll find schizophrenic boomers dumb enough to actually believe you.

Who's behind the Targeted Individual Program?

HAHAHAHAH IM SO SICK OF JEWS LIKE OP

ISRAELI SUBMARINE FIRED A CRUISE MISSILE INTO THE PENTAGON

Attached: 1513869935595.gif (852x568, 1023K)

THERE WERE NUCLEAR BOMBS UNDER THE TWIN TOWERS AND LARRY SILVERSTEIN PULLED BUILDING 7

Attached: 1511107950624.jpg (1156x1409, 258K)

GROUND ZERO WAS BURNING FOR 100 DAYS

Attached: 1529110580340.jpg (971x986, 139K)

Cant wait to see dumb americnas die like Qjoo is demanding so we can go to war against Iran to protect israhell.

Attached: 1528296319420.jpg (928x482, 42K)

TRUMP IS GOING TO REVEAL THE TEXT MESSAGES ABOUT AN ISRAELI ASSASSINATION PLOT AGAINST HIM AND THEN HE WILL CUT TIES WITH ISRAEL AND LET THE RUSSIAN AND ARABS MASSACRE THEM.

Attached: 1509193967933.jpg (1122x1771, 84K)

Attached: 1530346996272.jpg (2060x1615, 1.26M)

Attached: 1509183634066.jpg (2158x1907, 1.5M)

Attached: 1516171323911.jpg (2152x1820, 2.19M)

Attached: 1514302537974.jpg (2236x2381, 3.61M)

Fake and gay.

So fucking wrong. The only way a plane like that can fly that low is in a controlled descent. And once it gets that low it must either land or put its flaps down and flu back up.

It can not fly any sustained length that low. So in order to hit that low on the pentagon the plane MUST have been in a descent.... Downward angle. But a downward angle is not supported by any evidence or the bs claims of the Bush admin.

So fuck off because you are completely fulk of shit.

hi insiderguy. I'm the guy who bashed open the terrorist's skull who had the detonator switches and coordinated with FDNY and Mayor Giuliani to detonate WTC7. Any explanation as to why they were trying to frame me specifically?

Glidepath doesnt change the principles of lift and the passenger jets wing shape.

Guys 9/11 just flew over my house

>No, it was definitely a jet airplane
No shit, everyone knows that it was an converted fighter jet drone and not a passenger plane that hit the pentagon. Drone tech has been actively used since the 90's and maybe even all the way back to the late 70's.

ITT: glow in the dark cia niggers desperately try to convince people that the official 9/11 is true

protip: no one's buying what you're selling

Attached: 1507255086117.png (370x547, 354K)

OP does not seem far-fetched at all.

How exactly is the executive under Soros' control?

Do you think that Trump declassifying things might allow him to break free and start fucking up traitors?

This makes a lot of sense. It explains how those tight flight tolerances were achieved by rookies. But wouldn't radar beacons be visible to military radar sites? Could a radar beacon be visible only to a single plane?

All trust in the MSM and the Fed Gov is gone, no logical and rational thinker believes them anymore.
All " we the people" know at this point, is that the Fed Gov and bureaucrats are 100% corrupt.
No insiders have stepped up and spoken out, they are all guilty.
We are in another 4th Turning cycle, read some history.

No it doesnt dumb fuck. Learn the basics of lift and wing shape.

Because you eat turds. It couldnt have been a commercial jet. They cant fly tjat close to the ground..... Landing is a controlled descent, not flying.

Most of the plane did hit the ground in front of the building, that's the official story. That's why the damage was done at ground level.

There was charring/burnt grass, not a giant fucking skid from from fusealge dragging.

And to do as the dumb OP says the rate at which the plane would have descended would have caused more downward damage than forward. It wasnt a passenger jet.

Did they paint thermite on the on the structural points inside the building a few weeks before? An Isreali construction firm was there at the time and it makes sense that’s what they did.

Attached: A8510B55-FC05-41F3-8FF3-CCF7A477188C.jpg (720x720, 91K)

Your wife needs you to lick her boyfriends cum out of her pussy.

Was flight 97 actually meant for wtc 7?

They always say it was meant for the white house, but that seems fishy considering which building collapsed.

>ILS is a radar beacon that an airplane's instruments fix on to provide glidepath data to the pilots.
Are you suggesting they've build ILS beacon in front on Pentagon? how do you explain no one noticed a fucking giant antenna array on the pentagon lawn?

Attached: 30180730746_610ac45f07_b.jpg (1024x640, 347K)

>No, it was definitely a jet airplane
It was a drone.

The flight control computers and flight management systems in modern aircraft can generate an artificial glide path using GPS and Inertial Reference System. There is no requirement for ground based navigational aids to be used for a VNAV equipped aircraft to fly a precise 3 degree glide path to the surface.

>No way to fly as precisely as they did with their level of training.

Sky king could’ve done it.

-_-

This. I remember the eye witness accounts that were memoryholed. Technically still qualifies as a plane, too. I don’t buy into the Q thing entirely for obvious reasons, but that’s likely what you’re going to hear as a counter argument.

>Video of the AA flight hitting the building would have revealed a very precise glidepath

About 3 degrees, which would be likely have been somewhere around -350 to -700 FPM.

It's not hard to maintain a constant descent rate in an airplane; I had students doing after the first or second lesson. You don't even have to move the throttle. Fake and gay.

Cool

Attached: F1468957-360A-4A5D-AA69-22804BA814DD.jpg (350x347, 53K)

((Neo-cons)))

Attached: 1478520415784.jpg (672x462, 236K)

Who really benefits?

Attached: 1486443942516.jpg (480x360, 17K)

Posting in a shill thread. ILS is two separate radio signals, the localizer beacon for horizontal positioning and the glideslope beacon for vertical guidance, it's actually a relatively bulky array. Also there is no way that a plane could cause so little damage.

Fuck off shill.

You can place these behind walls near a window they will still function.

Beacon was hidden inside the building. Same at wtc if I understand op correctly.

This is the first time I have heard this before and it makes more sense than any other theories including the official story.

>"Key data" is suppressed hardcore,
Your linguistic fingerprint suggests larp.

Newer arrays combine both functions into a single piece of hardware not that bulky. Also you don't even need full ILS to do what was described here just a decent radar and radio beacon to lock onto would be sufficient

ah ignore me. Second post guy was obvious bullshit. OP is credible.

Second post guy was OP too

Attached: 1514911863656.jpg (403x438, 25K)

>trust me it was saudi arabia not israel or your own gov
>trust me it was definitely a jet airliner
jfc Qfags please take a note and learn to think for yourselves.

OP is a reverse shill. There are better arguments, which OP doesn't make.

Fuck off Jewnigger.

fuck off it was a raytheon owned a-3 skywarrior that hit the pentagon

Are we talking literal fireworks or is that just a euphemism for explosives/accelerates?

Attached: 1537369756616cio.png (1024x1665, 495K)

Bobs and vagenes

Also, whats coming down the pipes -should I start digging that bunker?

Actually all you need is a modified ILS tester which anyone with minimal electronics knowledge could make, and a decent amplifier. If your sandniggerbro follows it, he'll get his virgins.

This assertion is testable, just like ILS. You test ILS by inputting stronger signals from your tester which typically sits in your lap while you monitor systems in the cockpit. That tester could be anywhere in range if its signal is strong enough, and ILS has existed for many decades.

sunavionics.com/AV10_Specifications.html

911 in general is pretty obvious there is no discussion to be had anymore

>behind walls
These are not cellphones. They operate on different frequency, that can't penetrate thick walls. It would fry the whole fucking thing right after powering it up.
But feel free to prove me wrong. The idea sounds as interesting as it is ridiculous.

I've never seen this theory before. LARP or not, it's an interesting take.

Attached: Alf.png (688x562, 417K)

Trash LARP, OP. You aren’t wrong, but you are full of ish

So were there ILS beacons in the twin towers too?

>Newer arrays
Here's the problem with your thinking, though, 9-11 happened in the year 2001. That's 17 (S E V E N T E E N) F U C K I N G Y E A R S A G O !

Care to explain the vehicles nearby the towers that appear to be erratically burnt out, with no real consistency even with cars being parked next to one another and the lack of anything else being burnt out, like say paper inside of the vehicle or around it?

Sounds like fires in California. Same tech probably.

Why is it that these threads always read like they were drafted by barely literate high school dropouts?

Did you even attempt to proof read this before you posted it?

I think it's a LARP but I agree with you. It's a cool theory. either way its conjecture. I'm going to kill myself now.

Actual pilot here, you’re full of shit. You can fly a stabilized approach without a glide slope and an a localizer.

This.
Pretty sure ILS glide paths are not designed for planes travelling at a faster speed than normal landing speed, with flaps etc.

I have my suspicions that it's related to technology Tesla had. He was working on a super weapon that used free energy in order to convince the tptb of it's utility, as a backdoor to trying to give the world free energy, since the tptb would not consider it otherwise.

"inside job"
"rogue intel"
"response"
"white hats"
"glow in dark"
"inside"
"Key data"
"close"

Roger

WHY THE FUCK SHOULD I CARE ABOUT 3,000 PEOPLE WHO DIED ON 9/11 WHEN 6,000,000 JEWS DIED IN THE HOLOCAUST

Attached: 1534993222034.gif (480x270, 2.25M)

Hmmm.. Interesting re: ILS glidepath. Check out this article about how Air India pilots saved 370 on board after the 777s ILS system went kaput.

news18.com/news/india/system-failure-low-fuel-and-bad-weather-with-370-on-board-how-an-air-india-pilot-saved-the-day-on-this-911-1880473.html

Attached: poo-in-loo-plane.png (1828x1114, 1.65M)

I think this board is worse in that regard.

Forgot to add that this happened in NYC on 9/11/2018

fuck that's NO plane.

Attached: vn99pwM.png (610x405, 339K)

I can't remember where I heard it...but fat mules can't smell feels, beans.

>Soros has the executive branch and Congress locked down so hard, no other factions can make any traction. So, fuck it, here's a gimme.
Only a redditor shutin would use such horribly gay language. Stupid faggot larper.

there were no planes at wtc or pentagon

Attached: no planes.webm (712x480, 2.22M)

Attached: 911 no planes.webm (720x480, 2.47M)

Attached: BIvbK0kCcAA4j0F.jpg (224x225, 8K)

Attached: wtcbb18.jpg (241x262, 12K)

>fuck that's NO plane
That's a reversed video of a demonstration of a SAM being fired from the pentagon.

Not online for std comm. aircraft in 2001.

i always wondered why the image was flipped

Attached: flipped.gif (852x568, 1.02M)

bombs, but only to guarantee outcome. First tower had "primer" to initiate collapse, but it wasn't looking good so they detonated the rest. Second tower was controlled demo all the way.

There's something called MLS

holy christ this is retarded

Fuck off; why all the fucking lies about plane hitting the pentagon now? this cause Trump gonna release the truth?

the building hadn't realized it had been hit and couldn't have responded so soon

Glide path can be adjusted at the emitter. Plane will follow the trons.
P-Gon was used to collect, the obliterate budget docs - high plausible deniability destruction of evidence.
They would never use a cruise missile, too many people driving by on highway. Despite what you think, these operations are usually as clean as possible. The glidepath issue wouldn't be obvious to bystanders, you'd need video and post hoc knowledge of outcomes to look for it.
4th airplane was downed because - I shit you not - Russia upping their strategic alert. Planners (Cheney) worried about risks. Goal was COG as well, and the Capitol building was the grand finale for COG purposes. Russia called the bluff, so they downed the 4th plane and settled for the hysteria surrounding the "opening rounds".
Conspiracies, because they are literally real, are almost never executed perfectly according to plan. It's about exploiting chaos. Goes back to British Empire spy network, freemasons, etc. Common practice.

It only gets better and better youtu.be/W4Q80sJFW8Q

Why did the 4 planes involved that day have so few passengers and why do the number of passenger and crew add up to specific significant numbers. Start crunching the numbers autists. I don't want to offer any spoilers

Attached: Screen+Shot+2017-11-05+at+5.36.53+PM.png (530x499, 246K)

user low level here, so it was basically a Pearl Harbor 2.0 right? I mean didn't Bush said it between lines in the Project for the New American Century?

Also what I found more interesting around 9/11 wasn't the event itself but the greatness of NLP around it. Decades inserting the event "9/11" into the minds of everyone, to trigger a panic mode once it happened as it did. Can you without confirming or denying, further this concept around?

Fireworks were just to guarantee outcome. Despite "being designed to take the impact of a 707", WTC was designed to be taken down by jet airplanes. A lie close to the truth, in that the airplane issue was closely linked to the design.
WTC was "11" and also the 2 (plus third) pillars of freemasonry (look up third pillar WTC). It was designed for false flag terror from the get go.
WTC was built in conjunction with cold war COG planning, and was in line with the long term plan. Funny thing is that, by 2001, the cold war hadn't gone as what was precisely expected in the 1970s. For one, the reverse Plaza accords inadvertently fucked Russia's economy enough to drop Yeltsin from power.
So, 9/11/2001 was sort of like a back-up plan, a cheap version of what was initially planned. Blow up WTC and capitol, get COG. They did it anyway, but all didn't pan out as hoped for.
Back to the Future 9/11 reference was 100% solid, and if that seems crazy to you (we love those videos, and get a kick out of them), consider that there's a big freemasonic and also Jewish presence in most American institutions. World government is a 3000 year old ideology. Not a 3000 year old plan, because these are just human beings, but an ideology. Often the world changes faster than their planning.
The purpose of the rituals, and numbers games is a mindfuck to keep the ranks in line. It's about keeping secrets most successfully, as a basis for power.

Does that turn anyone else on?

So what you're saying is now that conspiracy theory videos are being ban and memory holed and dissenting voices are being conveniently shut down you glow in the dark fags feel like it's a good time to create the yah there was a cover up but it's not what you think watered down milk toast narrative. You're shit story won't stick I hope you shills get burned at the stake when we rise up.

Attached: b4638d69cb1ceb7498a910e06eded0aa.jpg (300x440, 34K)

this. OP kys.

It came out of 1970s when they were planning COG in event of nuclear war. In actuality, it was a prototype for world government in a post-Vietnam era. WTC was built to be the false flag for COG.
By the late 90s, a lot had changed, but the PNAC people "pulled the trigger" on COG, which always included a WTC takedown.
Yeah, 9/11 are dumb freemason numbers, it was all planned.
Though, don't mystify it. This came out of deep (and expensive) planning in the 70s that went under the guise of plans to keep government running after a nuclear war.

It was less Pearl Harbor 2.0 for Iraq, and more a pre-planned trigger for COG.
Courts, FBI, etc. haven't worked right since 2001, which is why Hillary's not in jail. Her server was actually an intelligence operation. Again, that's why she's not in jail. Someone told her to do that.
Politics are mostly fake.
Deep state policies and procedures don't acknowledge civilian authority, and the mid-tier people who might have stopped it were suckered by the 9/11 mythology. That was the point, to build the framework for the takeover in plain sight, because people thought it was something else (nuclear emergency planning, as opposed to takeover planning).

Not glow in the dark here.
Just in an office that has enough altitude to see what's going on. Some of my knowledge comes from the same conspiracy vids as you. But, I gave you the video piece. We weren't allowed to evaluate the video footage, and we know exactly why. Other things too, that are widely known, that the public is less clued into.
Insider, not leaker. Insider, not cabal member.