The civil war was not about slavery

youtu.be/pfv9FDnMcaI

we should all vote to succeed from the union again

Attached: 1537502668147.jpg (768x768, 129K)

and it wasn't very civil either

Attached: 1537490147185.webm (352x640, 953K)

No shit newfag

But we did succeed from the union.
What's so civil about war, anyway?

>filmed in Canada

MILKY MILKY WARM AND TASTY!

MOMMY! MILKY! PLEASE BE HASTY!

REFRESHING DRINK FROM MOMMY'S UDDERS!

I WANT MOMMY'S AND NO OTHER'S!

GIVE IT! GIVE IT! GIVE IT NOW!

GIVE ME MILKY, LAZY SOW!

UNTIL YOU DO I'LL SCREAM I'LL SHOUT!

I'LL CRY I'LL WHINE AND STOMP ABOUT!

UNTIL MY BELLY IS FULL AND HAPPY!

I REFUSE TO TAKE A NAPPY!

Attached: milkers.gif (773x512, 40K)

It was an no one is buying your attempts to pretend otherwise.

Attached: BTFO.png (728x720, 816K)

No no secession is illegal; we should vote to kick non-producers out and cut federal funding.

why can't no one accept this?right to Slavery was a major reason because the darn southerners were basically the North's niggErs. The north leaded in all important exports and manufacture, while the south was agriculture and relied on slaves. Dumbos that couldn't do what the great NORF could

Some states are trying to separate

Attached: mommy.jpg (778x512, 64K)

I unironically want to experience this.

thanks russia

>IT WASN'T ABOUT SLAVERY IT WAS ABOUT STATE RIGHTS
What state right was it fought over then? Oh I forgot, the right of slave ownership and sale.

>This kills the BBC myth

kek

Milkies from thots are worthless

Attached: ahsheeeiiiiiit.png (222x343, 170K)

But they already had their slavery, the Missouri Compromise to make sure they wouldn't be outvoted in the Senate, and the Dred Scott decision to force the free states to comply.

Attached: card_slave.png (480x640, 175K)

Self-determination. Agriculture was and still is dependent on credit meaning the only value planters had was in their assets meaning slaves. Abolishment of slavery would have destroyed the southern economy and society which it did anyway.