Should brutal public execution methods be introduced for islamic terrorists, acid throwers etc.? Why? Why not?

No. Jesus says we must forgive

Yes. Definitely. Harsh punishments are needed to deter degenerates from destroying the society. And they need to be public and visible to make sure people know. Honestly, just public shaming would probably work very well in many cases, like adultery.

You can forgive after you've punished. Jesus didn't advocate for people to become cucks and spineless cowards. He wasn't a retard.

Vlad Tepes III knew how to deal with them.
They only understand violence.

>Do what you must, I have already won

also for racemixing and interest slavery

No, because A) we are not like them and if we stoop to their level, they have successfully changed us; B) it would serve as a recruiting tool for them; and C) they can also turn around, like the communists have in the past, and denounce the progress made in the last 300 years as bullshit, since we are doing the same shit people did 1000 years ago.

Get a fucking grip, Hanz. Also, terrorism in the West is at an all time low.

Attached: article-2005515-0C9A403200000578-728_468x699.jpg (468x699, 66K)

>literally if you kill your enemies, they win
Kys Canuck Cuck

No, because we're not savages like them. I'm not opposed to an immediate bullet to the head execution for them once they're found to be a terrorist though.

Strip them naked and display them naked in public. Humiliation without violence can do it.

Remember when you retards tried to go backward in time, like 80 years ago? Remember how that ended?

Yeah, this is why you are getting overrun by niggers and sandniggers. You tried being edgy and got neutered.

lol No one is stupid enough to bring back torture and inhumane punishments.

Attached: cdbatchelor-big.jpg (800x1217, 148K)

>tfw you can never browse Jow Forums again
>tfw you are at peace

Attached: 6C87DD50-872C-4D77-AA4E-AF30B6377809-3232-000006DED1482475.jpg (138x119, 8K)

Don't strip them naked, just show everyone their wife's face. That would humiliate them even more.

What a fuckwit are you to not understand the difference between torturing your enemies to death in a way that negates all advanced Western values and defeating them. You really should pack your shit and go move to some sharia-hellhole. You sound like you'd be pretty comfortable there.

force them to eat pork, bury them in bacon fat and grease, or cremate them and dump the ashes in a bacon grease dumpster. let the rest know this will happen to them and they wont go to that fake magical place they believe in. it should be enough; killing them violently will just re-enforce their magical jihad insta get to heaven meme.

This. Jow Forums should cool it with effective measures. Let's win with love and peace instead. And let us not forget the western values of solidarity, tolerance and raising your wife's sons.

Attached: carl the cuck 2.jpg (183x250, 6K)

We can kill them yes, if they pose a threat in the current situation. If we begin to puplicly execute sandniggers then we are no different than them, we need to show them that we are not savages and can actually live in a society with law and punishment instead of violence and chaos

Attached: 1536344617176.png (184x184, 62K)

Flag fits to you, you tremendous faggot.

Attached: Deal with it.jpg (349x349, 82K)

>negates western values

Fuck off cuck faggot. In a fight for survival anything goes. Europe is in a fight for it's life, and they deserve worse than we can give them.

Attached: chingchong.png (965x415, 51K)

Did I say anything about randomly killing arabs without a reason? No.

>we need to show them
Why the fuck do we need to show anything to subhumans? We need to deal with them the most effective way possible.

You want us to spend resources like bullets and gas on subhuman waste? Rehabilitaion and justice is already in function in non 3rd world countries so why not enforce it

>Why? Why not?
waste of money and not effective, because even if you watch such execution, after some time the memory fades away and it's not a big deterrent anymore, also because you think you can get away with crime, or just the temptation of crime overcomes the memory of that brutal punishment anyway

Trips of truth. Jesus was a defender of the weak and lowly, beating the moneylenders from the temple. However, pertinent to OP’s thread, I believe he would want us to forgive and I don’t believe he would condone punishment that put those condemned to death.

>You want us to spend resources like bullets and gas on subhuman waste?
Yes. I spend resources on cleaning supplies all the time.

Nobody's talking about love and tolerance, you utter moron. It's not an effective measure to adopt the barbarism of the people invading you.

if anything then just kill them and that's that

>in a fight for survival, we'll adopt the worst parts of the cultures that are invading us, so we can defeat them by becoming them

>It's not an effective measure to adopt the barbarism of the people invading you.
And why is that? If the barbarism of invaders is effective, we should adapt and adopt it. Besides, I only want to adopt a tiny aspect of their barbarism, the violence they use towards their enemies.

In a strawman, we strwman a strawman.

drown them in pigs blood or behea them with a sword dipped in pigs blood

(((Kekistani)))

Attached: F7FD0C90-482B-4AEC-8009-1330490A3E89-3232-000006E29BDDAED9.jpg (1900x2048, 462K)

Yeah, great idea. The public won't even get behind reduced immigration, I'm sure they'll love the idea of hanging, drawing and quartering criminals in the street. You go ahead though, we'll catch up.

Spending that amount of money on purging supplies in countries that are not on America level of retarded would see a big fucking swift in the economy and that money would be greatly needed on the fags that will riot against these executions. It would be better to focus more on law enforcement and harder punishments. Spending 15-20 years in prison when people know you're a rapist will be a better torture than sawing your body in half.

The barbarism of the invaders is not effective when you're talking about torturing people to death. How is ISIS, for example burning people alive helping their invasion? The only thing you accomplish is to make yourself look as bad as your enemy. You become a useful idiot. Can you imagine a greater gift to the Muslim victim narrative?

Are you retarded or just memeing? You are making an argument out of resources, when you advocate for jailing people for twenty fucking years?

I would agree for Jewish subversive treason

Attached: 879571.jpg (936x622, 74K)

>I'm sure they'll love the idea of hanging, drawing and quartering criminals in the street.
oh boyo, just wait for the economic crisis. Not to mention that Germanics are violent people historically speaking

>No, because A) we are not like them and if we stoop to their level, they have successfully changed us
but Europe did worse shit than ISIS as punishment. They tied people to wheels and broke all their bones or they let them get ripped apart by horses.

The problem is western laws are for western socialized people. And only work on them. I aways wondered if the west is too arrogant in its judgement of physical punishment. In Germany for example you will only be able to control shoplifting and robbing by Gulag or choping off hands at this point. Sad but true.

We need to take a lesson from the Chinese here.
If they find you guilty they take you behind courthouse and put a bullet in your brain.
EOS

No. Then we are no better than those we despise for doing the same thing.

Right, cause torturing people to death isn't going to help the Muslim victim narrative or anything. Jow Forums really is infested with useful idiots.

I don't give a shit about Muslim narratives. They are a vermin in need of a purging. The best way to do that is to lock them away in their own countries and use extreme violence against any trying to leave.

The only ones worried about narratives are shills. The rest of us only care about what is true.

Brutal executions are a meme. Executions alone are enough, the only real long term advantages are the eugenic effects.

By the time the economic crisis hits, western men will be so cowed they won't even react when their kids are taken away.

They are a deterrent. Flay one Muslim, and one hundred of them will be quite a bit less motivated to come to your country.

This Can you tell me why executing terrorists would be such an immensively expensive endeavour?

The reason the Muslims are a problem in the West is because of the far left's false narratives, one of which is that there's all this "discrimination" against Muslims. This idea of torturing them to death is a wet dream for your enemies.

The time you spent should be determined with the grade of crime you did but we need to seriously increase the shit punishments that are today. Yes, 20 years is an exaggeration but its better to focus resources on the systems we already have to further improove them instead of adopting a new mass execution sharia style type of system that will turn the country into utter chaos (more than it already is)

It's a wet dream for them only for as long as it's not actually happening. Muslims are not a threat to us, if they are not living among us. And they certainly won't live among us for long, if we start treating them the way we should.

Punishment on the inside does nothing. You should punish at borders. More of them you allow inside, more shit you will have. Source: USA who had all from hangings, electrocution, needle, torture and so on and on and still niggers are raping, stealing and killing. Don't import niggers, problem solved.

>By the time the economic crisis hits, western men will be so cowed they won't even react when their kids are taken away
A lot of them yes, but you can always create principalities, you don't have to rule over entire Britain

And how are you going to get to that point if you don't care about narratives? It's narratives that convince people to take action.

Reminder that appeal to morality is what differentiates us from the Left

Then close the fucking doors. And it's a very temporary deterrent that people will just acclimate to.

I teach people about genetics. The moment everyone realizes that altruism is a direct result of shared genetics and that we are barely the same species with sand people, everyone will finally understand that we owe them nothing, need them for nothing and should tolerate nothing.

Pretty sad state of affairs, when you don't even rule your entire country. Sadly, I think things are just going to get worse and worse, nothing is going to save the West.

If you consider the danger of getting flayed a "temporary deterrant", you're psychotic.

The executioning itself would not be expensive, but the consequenses that follow will. In what world would any country want to make any buisness deals with someone that still uses systems from the 1500 century. Like nigga, it's all about what you look like to the general public. You get a bad rep, you're fucked. Anyone that does business with you will get hunted down by the sjw cucks and if they want any more shekels they will be forced to stop talking with you

>if you kill him you’re just as bad as him
>meme flag

Can’t make this shit up

>In what world
In a sane and functional one. Human rights violations have done precisely jack shit to deter trade with Africans dindus and sand people.

Because it’s emotional primitive bullshit

Just take them out back and bullet to the head. Harvest organs, throw them in the dump

Yeah, they are psychotic. Is that a surprise to you or something you complete moron?

Yes. Especially for libshits/race traitors.Nothing redpills the population than seeing a traitor get what's coming to xir.

>Sadly, I think things are just going to get worse and worse
possibly, but the world has to end at one point, as it's predicted in the Apocalypse

They are not psychotic. They are opportunistic normies for the most part. They are coming here due to greed, not due to insanity.

Checked

>can't understand the difference between "kill" and "execution by gruesome torture"
Why does this board contain so many utter brainlets?

Which one is more humane, killing ten invaders or brutally destroying one invader and letting the nine others to flee back to their shitholes?

>Africans dindus and sand people
my dude. this is some next level autism. You're talking about 3rd world countries, people have gotten used to those subhuman waste doing this type of shit. If a country with a population of non tanned people would start doing this, there would be chaos in the world order. Invasions and war would come to them just like it has come to shitskin HQ and nigger centre

It's been 'predicted' for millennia, I wouldn't hold your breath.

Why no just deport them? Id reckon that would be a tad bit less unpopular then flaying them.

>western values
Das rite my fellow cuckold! Western values are what matter here!

Sounds like a narrative to me. Anyways, I find it hard to imagine that anyone can seriously deny that promoting barbarism is going to get the average normie on your side (and yes, that's actually important to do if you want to anything but a derided fringe extremist in the eyes of society).

>Invasions and war would come to them
No it wouldn't. Nobody would invade Sweden if you started executing your Muslims. It'd be far too expensive and far too destructive to invade a civilized country in the current year. Only USA would have the power to do it even relatively fast, and they definitely would not do it lightly against a European country.

Yes, people should be able to make a family day of it. Bring some rocks, pincers, a poker and some barbeque briqs to heat it with and take turns. The one who gets the loudest screams without killing it wins.

That ought to be an effective deterrent for the next cunt. He who terrorizes the public gets his karma, in spades, from same.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-09-22 at 00.48.21.png (124x131, 30K)

Yeah, no shit. Western values are unironically important. That's what leftist post-modernism is attacking you utter moron.

You need to deport them for all eternity. They will hide and be sheltered by traitors, and the ones you manage to deport will try to come back. If you started killing them, they would flee voluntarily, and nobody would want to come here.

>dude...just inject them to death!

Are you also the type who thinks rape can be fought with ‘personal defense’ and no guns

Nope, I'm pro gun.

Our genes are infinitely more important than our values. Our values will be long forgotten in a few hundred years. Our genes should be alive ten thousand years from now.

Alright, but what you just said there is an expression of your values. How are you going to get other whites to help protect the genes of your race if they don't place value on those genes?

>if they don't place value on those genes?
It's inbuilt to all life. You need indoctrination to not place value on them.

You're talking like the european union or NATO doesnt exist. There would be discussion upon discussion to make the goverment stop with this shit and when they'll realize there's no more options left, they will bring force

When they've finished discussing, you would already be free of the invaders, and you could happily comply with whatever demanded of you.

I agree. And this indoctrination takes the form of false narratives, a major one being the narrative of Muslim oppression. That false narrative will be fed by accepting Muslim level barbarism and you'll just end up with more indoctrinated people. It's completely counter productive. If you ever get to the point where the West is violently removing the cancer, that's another matter entirely. You've basically already won at that point.

This.