Should there be harsher laws that require fake news organizations (like Fox, Breitbart, Infowars, etc...

Should there be harsher laws that require fake news organizations (like Fox, Breitbart, Infowars, etc.) to explicitly advertise themselves as entertainment companies, or otherwise face fines for consistent mis-reporting?

Attached: download.png (231x218, 7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith–Mundt_Act
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSS

Retarded faggots

Sage

Attached: w5C5Ps6_d.jpg (640x481, 26K)

I don't know how they escape defamation and slander suits.

Fake news = CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, Media Matters, WaPo, NYT, and whatever Zuckerjew and Jewgle or pushing. All their outlets should be forced to wear fake news armbands

Fox is apart of the Fake News too. They sensationalize bullshit as much as Clinton News Network does. Don’t forget the blonde bimbo’s who get daytime shows to give their horrible opinions.

No. America is not europe. Besides this law would be expoloited. Democrats would only punish fox news, breitbart a d infowars while republicans would only punish cnn, msnbc, new york times etc.

I thought those were just upscale escorts.

Yes. But you also forgot CNN,MSNBC, CBS, Media Matters, and NYT.

U decide, most banned meme=truth.

Attached: image.jpg (750x1334, 329K)

Agreed, every media channel that says anything negative about my political party is fake news, everything other than that is based and is real. It doesn't matter that sites like Breitbart and Infowars actually push out verifiable false statements, those false statements are just alternative facts.

what about MSNBC admitting they are objectively leftist while CNN basically echos them while saying they are not partisan
What about google admitting they are consciously undermining american politics to there own ends despite being supposedly non partisan ?

I'll totally concede that Fox News was fake as fuck back in the Bush days, but they've gotten better after they dumped Glenn Beck.

>What about google admitting they are consciously undermining american politics to there own ends despite being supposedly non partisan ?
How are they undermining American politics?

No, as this would be 1984 as fuck

No it wouldn't, it would be 2018 as fuck, 1984 was 34 years ago dude. :^)

yes, definately, these fake news outlets made me lose trust in every journalist and made me see them as nothing more than propaganda mouthpieces.

I dont even watch the news anymore

>only people and entities I disagree with promote fake news.
it's simultaneously hilarious and sad as fuck desu. just kys you dumb faggot, there's no hope for you.

Attached: 1536151704131.png (225x225, 8K)

Those kind of laws used to be a thing. Thank the republicans for doing away with them.

Everything on cable is considered 'entertainment' kid.

>Those kind of laws used to be a thing. Thank the republicans for doing away with them.
Got repealed under Obama.

all right wingers should be placed into camps by force. unironically.

>All jews should be placed into camps by force
Fixed that for you

>objectively
>leftist
You mean "liberal", and they are liberal, NOT leftist. They're not dovish, they're not against the current order of society, and they're not pro-collectivism. They're the management class and they're bait-and-switching.

How about bringing back the fairness doctrine as national policy?

>How about bringing back the fairness doctrine as national policy?
You don't even understand what that means.
Let me explain:
Under the Fairness Doctrine, national broadcast news (not cable 'news') was required to present both sides of a political opinion, only when that network was ASKED to do so by the opposing political party. If they were never asked, they could just present one party's position.
Also of note: there was no Equal Time provision in the Fairness Doctrine, that is another piece of legislation.

This user was referring to the Smith-Mundt Act. It basically prevented your government from presenting Government propaganda within your nation. It got repealed under Obama.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith–Mundt_Act

You dumb mutts don't even know your own laws. You deserve it. Half the talking heads on your 'news' networks are CIA. They even TELL YOU THIS and yet you lap up everything they say when you agree with it, and go full retard REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE when you don't. You're getting played like a fiddle.

If you want decent news analysis, listen to the No Agenda Show. All they do is deconstruct your media, and call out Jewish tricks. No ads, it's listener supported.

www.noagendashow.com
Subscribe to this, it's the best 'news' show out there.

Even that newsguard app says Fox is a reliable source.

>Even that newsguard app says Fox is a reliable source.
Yeah, they get paid to do that.

Better idea: Any corporation that claims to be a news organization should be sued into bankruptcy for any lie they tell that can be proven to be purposefully done so. Imagine that? The news has to actually report the truth.

The Fairness Doctrine required broadcasters:
- to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest
- and to air contrasting views regarding those matters
The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it.
I'm familiar with Smith-Mundt, and it most assuredly did not deal with domestic broadcasters labeling fake news as entertainment. It dealt with foreign-targeted US propaganda material (RFE/RL, VOA, etc.) not being presented to US populations. See also Pic related from (iirc) the 2016 NDAA, where all the real shit is hidden.
>Half the talking heads on your 'news' networks are CIA
And have been since the CIA was born. Frankly, I don't drink any of that koolaid.
>If you want decent news analysis
There are blogs. One-stop shopping is dangerous.
>noagendanews
A show? Surely not.

Reliable = supports the "master narrative", even if just the other side of it.

Corporations should only be allowed to live at the people's behest. If a corporation is failing to support the public interest, revoke their corporate charters. That may be the closest we can get to putting liars in jail.

Attached: 1531369309800.jpg (927x2527, 625K)

It won’t save any website or media outlet they want to ban. They could have put a banner across the Q subreddit saying it was for entertainment purposes only and then just left everyone alone but they shut it down anyway

>The Fairness Doctrine required broadcasters:
- to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest
- and to air contrasting views regarding those matters
Only when requested.

>I'm familiar with Smith-Mundt, and it most assuredly did not deal with domestic broadcasters labeling fake news as entertainment. It dealt with foreign-targeted US propaganda material (RFE/RL, VOA, etc.) not being presented to US populations.
What do you think 'FAKE NEWS' is, retard? Trump has been literally telling you this, and you associate it with everything he says, but he's trying to tell you that ALL of the FAKE NEWS media is propaganda.

>See also Pic related from (iirc) the 2016 NDAA, where all the real shit is hidden.
Of course! That's Obama, and they were planning on Hilary being elected when it passed. You dodged a bullet, which you obviously deserve, because you're a brainlet.

>A show? Surely not.
It's a podcast, no video. Try listening to it before judging it, you SJW cancer.

Reddit has CIA on the board of directors.

>I'm familiar with Smith-Mundt
No, it prevented them from broadcasting Government propaganda to the people.
It's repealed.
You are being fed propaganda you dumb fuck.

wouldn't be possible in europe, but a lot is covered under free speech in america I guess

cnn msnbc nytimes et all

Attached: 1533059586384.webm (1920x1040, 1.31M)

>either / or mutt mentality
that's your problem right there

You cucked faggots can't even talk bad about Turkey.

>Only when requested.
No, to address controversial topics was a standing expectation as a condition of using the public airwaves.
Equal time was the only doctrine that involved party requests.
I pasted those descriptions from Wikipedia. Usually they're pretty good on basic legal doctrines like this. If you've got a better source, please present it.
>Trump
Come on now. You think I'm some kind of spring chicken? I've been around the sun more than 40 times. EVERYTHING rich people say is a self-interested lie, or they wouldn't be richer than the rest of us. Yes, it really is that simple.
>2016 NDAA
Obama didn't really have much to do with that. Congress passed it with a veto-proof majority, as they always do in relation to the military-industrial complex.
>listen
TEXT, nigger. I'm partially deaf.
>The Smith-Mundt Act
Fine, close enough. You seem to be especially autistic today. Bad fish?

our officals opted for not doing so, yes, I don't like it either, still infowars is obv. fake news and reseller for merchandise

>You seem to be especially autistic today. Bad fish?
Nah, but I do glow in the dark a little. Be a good old person and explain this to others on Facebook. You don't have any idea how bad the food is here.

>our officals opted for not doing so, yes, I don't like it either, still infowars is obv. fake news and reseller for merchandise
Stop apologizing already, fuck, we know you dumb fucks lost. Stop cucking yourself about it constantly, and grow a fucking backbone.

i mean we do, we silently reinforced eastern borders and silently like what Orban is doing, we don't sperg out because muh truck peace, we got the 2015/16 immigration peak done, just saying..I skip our inefficient stuck boomer politicians for a second and thank the ECB for at least keeping it running.

You guys need to shit or get off the pot. You bitch about American gas, but launder money through Cyprus for Russian gas, so you can sell it to the EU for a premium. You lie to your people about immigrants from Turkey, and keep getting fucked by them, while the Turks side with the Russians, which the USA tried to over throw in a coup. Germans are the new Jews in Asia, once again. It's a 100 year cycle.

All I know is the ham's pretty alright.

>1 post by this ID

Attached: 1370134522155.png (254x255, 29K)

Wouldn't know, I havent been there in years. Brennen is going to be executed. That's enough for me.