Why does Jow Forums disagree with this

why does Jow Forums disagree with this

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 22K)

i dont, i just disagree with this faggot.
he is like a living caricature of a lying populist politician. he dont care bout no poors

The poorest person in america on welfare making minimum wage lives like a blue collar worker over there.

>40 hours a week
Work harder

A retard doing something for 40 hours a week does not automaticly equate to a standard of living worth more than the value of said retards work

Nobody who works 40 hours a week should be living in poverty... if they're a single man living by themselves.
Don't start families when you don't have the financial means to properly sustain it; not that fucking hard, is it?

Attached: 5Cd75167a1282177a4cebd77fa6bb9852a.jpg (1065x1600, 351K)

Why is someone entitled to a part of my wages for being a worse worker?

Not all work is productive.

Why is anybody entitled to any part of your wages for any reason?

Because some people will always be at the bottom of the income scale, and there will always be someone at the bottom of the income scale, which low IQ leftists will call "poverty". They actually believe that everyone should be making well above average income. We need to purge Sanders and his followers.

ofcourse, he's jewish afterall.

move out of your bay area apartment and maybe you won't live in poverty. live within your means. working 40 hours isn't enough depending on what job you have. we're not all equal.

People should just stop being retards and get a better job

>"poverty"
Define that first.

Should’ve picked a better job. No one’s forcing you to work there.

Poverty in the US is when you can only afford a mid-range smartphone.

funny here in israel we call him amerimutt

underage faggots

Work 40 hours a week digging holes and see how much money you get.

This place is infested with ancraps now

40 hours at week 50 weeks a year at 7.5 bucks an hour is 15k a year, which is above the poverty line

Because competitiveness and instinct of climbing the hierarchy ladder is buried in a mind of every healthy man.

Attached: 46A66F7B-5ED3-4065-A46B-D7AF3472425B.jpg (81x125, 13K)

not all work is productive, profitable, or worth a living wag. Work smarter not harder.

You say "amerimutt" in real life?

Attached: 1532556517126.jpg (250x250, 7K)

Because some work is more valuable than others?

Attached: brainlet nothing found.png (903x1176, 805K)

Because some people can't afford to pay their bills AND eat. Those same people might have multiple children they have to support. Them receiving some of your wages would help greatly in ways you don't even know. Imagine being a single mother with 6 or 7 children AND having to work 40+ hours a week only to be constantly struggling with bills and rent each month. You are never able to pursue your dreams and aspirations, never able to have a monent to enjoy life. This in turn creates frustration which often get taken out on the children which causes them to repeat the cycle due to the parent neglecting and abusing them. You can stop all of this. A portion of your wages being garnished is worth imporvished people getting a second chance at life. Have some understanding and common decency.

You can hold off on your fucking new flatscreen TV for little bit longer, you greedy fuck.

>Work smarter not harder.
This. Efficiency is more important than effort. If some idiot is out there pounding sand 40 hours a week then why should he be rewarded as much as a guy who is being productive?

Dont you want white families to be able to afford to be a family?

It's his ideals about immigration and what not that cause them to live in poverty though.

Attached: nigelbond.jpg (1536x2307, 727K)

They don't see poverty as a problem. They see misery, poverty, and dehumanization as just desserts for those predestined for such by the divine hand of the free market.

THIS. Why is Jow Forums so goddamn stupid they don't realize this?

Nobody working 40 hours a week would live in poverty if we didn't subsidize employer wages with food stamps and other socialist assisted living programs.

Imagine if we wiped out most if not all welfare programs. Employers now have to pay their employees rather than tax payers paying their employees.

What I might "want" or think "should be" and what things "are" are different matters.
My point is, if you can't take a moment to evaluate your current financial situation (and future prospects) and make an informed decision as to whether or not it's actually feasible or even responsible for you to start family and know you can care well for them, then you're a short-sighted retard.

Attached: 033-20160805-NO1-003.jpg (400x567, 149K)

how does agreeing with that imply it should be enforced by taking money from people who have done nothing wrong

Sure. I'd maybe care if my country cared about me. But fuck 'em

>Imagine being a single mother with 6 or 7 children AND having to work 40+ hours a week only to be constantly struggling with bills and rent each month. You are never able to pursue your dreams and aspirations, never able to have a moment to enjoy life.
Imagine thinking this kind of bullshit emotional hypothetical scenario would work on anyone except for pussywhipped retards and manginas.
>muh single mothers
lel.

Attached: okha4rglnc1tor18mo2.jpg (1280x961, 198K)

You subhuman baboon, I can't believe leftoids still believe in labour theory of value. So what if I spend 40 hours creating a 20 foot dildo to shove up your homo ass? Do I deserve to live in poverty or not?

Attached: 1494530384343.jpg (240x232, 7K)

I don't disagree with the premise; I disagree with the proposed solution. Basic economics dictates that raising the minimum wage fuels inflation and real wages remain the same.

Yeah. Because people who have careers that are white collar level or salary automatically have a ton of disposable income lying around and can just drop a few hundred on the latest flat screen or whatever gadget. They have expenses in the form of bills and loans too and can have their own struggles so fuck off with this idea that it's okay to just skim off the middle class to help a hot mess of a family who probably fucked themselves with bad decisions as if all it amounts to is delaying someone average Joe from getting a new TV.

Having 6 or 7 kids as a single mother? Fuckin Christ at that point its hopeless to get message across to stop having them and don't give me "b-but muh birth control" Nothing but being irresponsible.

>should
the preferred word of the low-thinking tyrant

Imagine being so fucking stupid to birth children you can't afford

Nigg I work 60 hours a week, commies are so lazy it’s unreal

Or when you can't lift your truck

I disagree with it because it's over-generalized and fails to consider all important metrics.

What if I said "Nobody over 6 feet tall should lose at Basketball"?

If you work 40 hours a week for $15 an hour ($2400 a month) then spend $1800 on drugs, you're now "in poverty" despite all the income

The fundamental fact of the matter is they shouldnt.

But:
Millions of immigrants and faggots are lowering wage expectation

iPhones/ vidya are hobbies. Expensive ones. Not a right.

Clothes dont have to be branded.

If a state taxes you 14% of your income maybe you should fucking move.