Isn't B the cutest kid though?

Give to child B.
Gas the other two.

>Patent the concept of a flute
>produce enough to supply 20 billion humans but pretend that flute resources are rare
>Sell people overpriced weekly flute subscriptions
>Have a database with all households which don't have a flute license

>not playing the flute yourself and lead them into the van for flesh flute lessons....

Why? Because she’s the implyed ‘asian qt’? Child A should partner with child B because A can make money performing musical acts and share profic with B for providing the flute in the first place.

Attached: 983FEF5D-7E0F-4102-B091-C77C15B17B61.gif (500x267, 999K)

give it to B. let A use it if B wants to. fuck C in his boypussy for already having victim mentality at a young age.

Non of get the fucking flute, kids are annoying, especially kids with fucking flutes.

The one that can play the flute should teach the girl that made it how to play it and she should teach the girl who can play to make one. As for the kid who has nothing he should learn to observe others and imitate them to better himself, but do not help him otherwise it could become a tom Sawyer situation.

Jow Forumsing comic of this.

Capitalist SCUM you fucking disgust me

Only correct answer is:
The flute is not mine to give or take away.

You arrest child A and C for attempting to steal Child B's flute.

I do not acknowledge that this scenario warrants any debate
the one who made it gets it.

>letting any child near a flute

Is going on top of the tall shelf you little shits

>communist memeflag
kek

Child B because she can sell it to child A if she wants to play it. Child C should just get 20% of the sale so she stays quiet and doesn't destroy all the flutes out of spite.

A clearly has a flute already, and since the flute in question is Bs, it up to her if she wants to sell or lend it to someone.
C can ask, but not demand.

By this standpoint it would make sense for people to give me their money if i have the skillset to make more money with it, because i can make proper use of it, following logic A.

Child A is retarded, if you learned how to play the flute, go learn how to make one now or trade for flute lessons with child B.

Child B is based. Knows how to make the flute, learning it wont be hard and even if the flute might break it can just make a new one.

Child C is retarded and should die for the sake of our species. Weak, no skills, thats why hes in that situation anyway. Should go learn how to make himself useful instead of begging.

tl;dr Child A and B band together and kill Child C. Child A offers child B flute lessons but is allowed to use the flute in return, however B remains its owner.

No, because the other two are gingers.

>again
hypothetical would never arise because b would have never produced the flute in the first place knowing it would be stolen from her by the state.

also, thou shalt not covet.

*Audible heh.*

Child B sells the flute to Child A.
Child B then buys more material and makes more flutes to sell or keep as they please.
Child A puts on concerts and recoups their costs.

Child C has jack all to do with the scenario. They might hear Child A's newest charity concert and be inspired to do something with their life. Otherwise they can fuck off.

Ahh, a fellow man of wisdom.

When killing everyone is always the solution. Show us your burger flag.

give them each a section of the flute.

Force A and B to go ass to ass with the flute.

If you give it to anyone but B no one will ever make a flute again.

Also, why did I take the kids flute in the first place?

The question clearly implies I alone am in charge of the flute's destiny. It's my flute.

B

Best answer so far.

Attached: 5B7u43T.jpg (3571x2000, 322K)

Child C gathers all their friends and mass murders Child A and all concert goers because they refuse to help.

Obvious choice is B unless they are willing to sell it and Child A is willing to pay for it a good enough price to compensate for time and money.

>obviously correct choice has blue hair and it slightly higher, wrong choices are red and lower

Really makes you think. No subtle brainwashing here.

But more importantly if the flute was made by a child then it's probably complete shit. I shove it up my ass and fart out a song.

Commieturd spotted.

Child A, because every flute player puts it in their pussy.

Attached: hqdefault[3].jpg (480x360, 52K)

A gets the flute.
A is then enrolled into a program where she will spend all of her waking hours playing patriotic songs for the factory workers.

B is also taken to the factory to make additional flutes.

C is taken to a training facility where he will learn to play the national anthem on a global stage to advance the glory of our nation.

If B made it, it's B's. Simple. If I want to hear some sick tunes, then I'll give it to A.

I have no fucking clue what C wants with it. He can't play the fucking thing.

>chooses B
>doesn't realize this is socialism

>Giving anything to a chick with blue hair
Blue hair chicks are crazy.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism

Attached: hqdefault[1].jpg (480x360, 25K)

I change my mind. I'll give the flute to whichever child votes for me. I'll promise all three the flute though.

He'll shove it up his nose like most retards.

Attached: Olevan8[1].jpg (708x480, 41K)

Not really, it's their private property, they can do whatever the fuck they want to do with it after they've made it, nobody said they couldn't sell it to make profit, aka capitalism.

First one is obvious socialism.

Government was taking away something from the child B to give to Child A.

Are you retarded user?

Child B makes the flute and wants to sell it. Child A is the only one who plays the flute, but doesn’t have enough money to buy the flute from Child B. So Child B decides to hold a flute concert, where Child A will play the flute, and will receive the flute after the concert as payment for her services. Child B will keep the money made from the concert. But Child B will need someone strong to help set up the stage for the concert, so Child B promises to give Child C a percentage of the earnings from the concert.

Capitalism is the only fucking system that fucking works, and if you don’t reply to this, your mother will die in her sleep tonight.

Attached: E1BC3019-613A-4DB9-BE99-933ACD989BF2.jpg (960x1200, 142K)

That's option D, Option E, questioning if it's even your right to dictate whoever has the flute in the first place is the correct answer in western society, at least it was since the commies are getting their way.

This

>Government was taking away something from the child B

The government taking something away from you and then giving it back to you when they see fit is a completely flawed model.

Attached: fixed.jpg (960x720, 156K)

the gayest blackest child of xourse you bigot

child A gets the flute because she can utilise it
child B gets to listen to the tunes and request songs

child C is cut up in pieces for meat and provisions

The gayest answer.

The our entire modern culture chooses C. And it's the worst possible choice.

If you're being charitable, you could just call giving C the flute (the means of production, i.e. what Mugabe did in Zimbabwe) naive. That's if you're being nice. I mean, C can't use it, has no claim to it, traded nothing for it, and so likely won't maintain it.

Also, you have to ask... How did C get poor? Sometimes yes, external factors, being unlucky play a part, but sometimes it's something that no amount of charity will reverse. Sometimes, just sometimes, poverty is down to a character fault (sociopathy) or biological deficit (IQ, impusle control). If you let yourself follow that dark (but true) thought to its conclusion, you'll realize that C is very unlikely to do anything good with the flute, and will likely trade it for a fraction of its true value in rock candy (crack). Now I'm not saying we should abandon those people-- they deserve SOME consideration. But even thinking of them in those terms is mean, and *we're* nice, so *we don't think them. Even if that means forgetting how to think.

What people on the left need to realize is that human suffering and wealth do not coincide. Some of the richest motherfuckers in the world are the most miserable, while some of the poorest are the most satisfied. What makes humans happy is a very complex subject which I don't claim to really understand despite the fact I could write a book about it. Point is, giving C the flute will probably not make him happy. I mean, sure, give him a 3 hots and a cot sure, security is a prerequisite for it, but actual happiness, the kind of happiness that comes from pursuing something worthwhile, originates from inside. You're not going to buy it with your EBT.

Attached: based danger doggo.jpg (1414x1270, 629K)

Child D gets it, obviously.

Attached: Child D.jpg (659x391, 48K)

Attached: Ichoco.jpg (480x536, 20K)

>child b sells flute to child a
>child a plays flutemusic to the world makes money and inspires more people to play flutemusic
>flutesales skyrocket due to child a’s Inspirational flutemusic
>child b re invests into more materials and trains/hires child c to make flutes
>child c realises there’s a neesh market for sparklyflutes and starts his own little flutebusiness

Is child C retarted? Or is this this the default mentality of the eternal poorfag?
>I cannot use this in any way to improve my life
>Having this will improve my life tho

IS A MAN NOT ENTITLED TO THE SWEAT OF HIS BROW? NO SAYS THE PARASITE

I'd protect B and let her keep making and producing flutes to sell so she is on a firm financial standing when she grows up and find a white husband o full her with love and big white penis

You might think that that naive thought process I outlined is how the leftist elites think. But you'd be wrong. That's the shit they feed the useful idiots they're going to line up against the wall. The people who really run things are *not* naive; they're manipulative. Even of themselves.

Giving C the flute is done to spite A and B. While I used to think it was down to envy and resentment, I've come to realize now that that's only a tool they use to rally the support of the poor. Their real fetish is control-- the ability to take from some to give to others, to dictate what will be, even down to what others will be allowed to think.

Everything they do, even if they themselves aren't aware of it, is in pursuit of power, and in the thrill, the absolute orgasmic rush, of excercising it. The sublime sadistic delight of forcing others to do something they don't want to do, just because you decreed it. All the rhetoric of compassion is just window dressing.

Anyway, with that wall of text out of the way, I choose child D. He will take the flute and make a weapon out of it, or use it to draw attention and build an army, an empire to return for revenge against those who wronged him. He will destroy their armies, burn their cities to the ground, and revel in the lamentations of their women.

Attached: conanthebarbarianasakid.jpg (1280x720, 97K)

I have cat immunity with protection against destruction, I don't need danger dogo

>Blue hair
>White penis

user you have a problem there..

She's anime blue haired not IRL blue haired

B IS LITERALLY THE OWNER, ANY ONE WHO QUESTIONS MUST DIE.

right in real life she is a black haired Oralental

A spends all her money on lessons and rents a flute.

How does sociopathy lead to someone being poor??

Altruism is the great destroyer of man. The cause of altruism, empathy was meant to empower us, to work together for the benefit of both, win-win, trade. But with great manipulators you can convince people that lose-win is a more moral action instead(many times this even leads to interactions that are lose-lose) Man has replaced selfish devotion to devotion of something other or something higher, if it doesn't destroy them it will surely hurt them.

I dont like redheads so the flute goes to B

This picture angers me to no end.
How the hell you have right to give any kid flute if Child B clearly owns it.

sell the flute to child A, charge child A sales tax
give the money to child B, charge child B income tax
loan the money to child C, they pay interest tax
pay myself with the interest tax for solving their problem

Tell B to sell it to A so that she can play for
kids like C who can give small amounts for a show

I'm a semi-capitalist. The market needs regulation, and the primary goal of a government should be to support its people, not business or any other thing.

I want A to end up with the flute. Culture is extremely important-- it's part of what makes life worth living. But it's also important that B is compensated so she keeps making stuff. If A can't afford the flute, I'd consider giving her a grant to pay B for the flute.

In my ideal society, the government can hand out grants by creating money from thin air-- same way banks do now when they give out fractional reserve loans (though that'll be illegal in my ideal world). They never need to be paid back except maybe if girl A fucks up royally... Like immediately taking the flute and selling it for crack money. The grant is given with an expectation of performance, and if you don't perform you have to pay it back or face severe consequences. Like jail time. The kind of brazen shit the people behind the 2008 crisis did would probably get them executed.

These grants don't make taxation unnecessary, and it's a power that has to be used extremely carefully. Grants should only be given out when it's something that would be extremely expensive, but extremely beneficial once created-- things like bridges, roads and hospitals. For the sake of the microcosm here, I'll assume her flute will warrant a grant because of all the extra economic activity it'll generate if she goes around busking in city centers or something. In a macro-world you don't get these magic grants for shit like college tuition for example. Individuals would rarely if ever get them, though your home town would probably get one or two in your lifetime.

Also, I know this doesn't really follow from anything, but I'll also revoke corporate personhood.

Thanks for letting me put my post which nobody will ever read in this thread.

this shit again
sage