>New York Times publishes story based on McCabe's memos claiming Rosenstein wanted to wear a wire and to remove Trump from office >Twice, Rosenstein denies this happened >Menawhile New York Times getting raked over the coals by the left for giving Trump justification to fire him
This was really a ploy to force Trump's hand into firing Rosenstein so that the left can say that Trump is obstructing justice (midterm fuel). Why would McCabe throw Rosenstein under the bus this way? Does he know something about the Russia investigation? After all, Rosenstein was the one who recommended the firing of James Comey.
This happened right after Trump threatened to declassify the FISA application and DOJ text messages. This is no coincidence; they know they're both fucked and they're probably either preparing their legal defense or fleeing the country.
Carter Price
This Trips of Truth
Nicholas Anderson
Rosenstein offered his resignation, doesn't mean it was or should be accepted. Rosenstein is a real wild card in all this. Its pretty clear which side McCabe, Brennan, Comey, etc are on. Not as clear with Rosenstein. The fact the NYT put out a hit piece on him has me leaning towards Rosenstein being pro swamp draining.
You also have to acknowledge the possibility that the story was preemptive damage control for the NYT. It looks, to me, like they're trying to distance themselves from the (((resistance))) before it's too late.
Daniel Ward
I trust stephen miller
I'm still not sure about rosenstein though...
Josiah Carter
>Mccabe GOYED (((rosenstein))) >Loretta Lynch SASSIED (((rosenstein))) with recordings >Ohr WHITE KNIGHTS /"ASIAN MASCULINITY" them all for his waifu nellie chan.
Ryan Jones
I can’t see rosenstein as a good guy. But the motives behind the nty publishing an anonymous sources article seemingly validating trump are suspect. I think the rats are 1. using rosenstein as the fall guy in light of the fisa declassification news and 2. hoping that goading trump into firing rosenstein himself will supercharge the Left with a month until midterms.
Wyatt Johnson
Possible. But I don't think most people realize, Rosenstein wasn't working in the DOJ until late April of 2017. That was well after almost all of this corrupt shit happened.
Noah Torres
i always figured comey for the fall guy and (((nosenstein))) for a master manipulator tribal
Matthew Morales
This has been coming for a long time. "we could milk this cow for 15 years", a quote from just after the towers came down. 2001+15=2016. How right they were, but NO MORE.
Rosenstein oversees the Russia probe, aka Democrats' only hope.
Samuel Reyes
Imagine believing this
William Clark
Who takes over the Mueller probe then? Is sessions back in action? And I thought he quit?
Alexander Barnes
Fleeing the country was a meme but do you have any other explanation as to why Rosenstein chose to resign right now, of all times?
Jeremiah Stewart
He does, but I would argue the longer the Russia probe goes the more it actually helps Trump in the court of public opinion.
Oliver Russell
Regardless of how long it takes, the news media can always fall back on "investigations take time." The probe would go forever, if that were an option for them.
John Ramirez
Is it just a coincidence that Q has been posting "Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein" for the past two weeks? At some point it can't be a larp...
Kevin Allen
There's a good chance the Mueller probe, otherwise known as the Insurance Policy, won't survive the declassification.
Adrian Evans
I don't believe in Q. Didn't he only start saying that after the NYT article?
Asher Sanchez
Rosenstein is a snake kike, a total liar and actively obstructing whenever he can.
Ryder Bennett
the age of the Hibernians is over... the age of the Sicilians is at hand
Benjamin Brooks
Proofs?
Caleb Stewart
>let the kike stay how about no
Carter Harris
This, it's all about FISA. I expect we'll see the left throwing more people under the bus soon, e.g. Comey, who I think will/ has already flipped. That's when it'll get real interesting. We will find out soon enough.
Wyatt Howard
No.
Aiden Morgan
Rosenstein is probably in that gray area of people who have been involved in some corruption, but when given a chance to do the right thing, they made a deal. So he's not necessarily a good guy, and not really /ourguy/ by choice, but he's playing his part because he has to.
Lincoln Morris
Watching his testimonies. That's all you need to see.
Jack Carter
Or it could be that McCabe got spooked by the FISA declassifications and sent a message to Rosenstein that he either stops them or gets dragged down with him. Not everything the Democrats do is perfectly planned out.
Christopher Davis
and just like that the anti-Trumpers suddenly realize the New York Times is fake news.
Ian Watson
This. I think it's either what you said, damage control, an attempt to get ahead of the FISA declass. OR They are throwing ol' nosenstein under the bus and try to pin all of the declass shite on him
Owen Bell
Or it could be the NYT trying to salvage whatever credibility they have before EVERYONE is red pulled.
Anthony Powell
I don't "believe" in anything, but Q is getting very hard to ignore...
Kayden Flores
>is it just a coincidence that Q has been saying some shit everyone is talking about happening might happen No, it isn't a coincidence, it is just shitty horoscope type nonsense. Be vague and never commit to anything and you can claim to always be proven right.
Dylan Sullivan
It really is. Trump's obsession with 17 is fucking weird.
Mason Allen
"Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein" is not vague. Also Q is not claiming to be right. Q has been signing posts with "Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein" for over 2 weeks, then the times article comes out, then the Axios article. I think skepticism is healthy but it is getting harder and harder to deny that whoever is posting to the Q tripcode on /patirotsfight/ doesn't have some sort of inside information
Charles Roberts
You're close OP. NYT burned RR because he's finished by DECLAS anyway. It's damage control. They knew Trump wouldn't take the bait and fire him. Now they're flirting with the idea of him resigning and floating the narrative of "Trump didn't fire him but he was absolutely going to so we should react as if he did and it's all Drumpf's fault IMBEACH IMBEACH". It's pure kikery.
>"Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein" is not vague. It is incredibly vague. Everyone has been talking about when Trump will get rid of Rosenstein for a fucking year. What 'inside information' do you need for that? There have been articles about his fuckups the entire time, if he had said that shit 6 months ago you would say the same thing. Q is astrology for political brainlets.
Austin Hughes
You are either a paid shill or are in denial. Q wasn't signing posts with "Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein" 6 months ago. It started two weeks ago.
Noah Nguyen
We know there is a grand jury for at least McCabe. Logic would tell you there is one for others as well like Strzok and Comey. We already have 1 indictment related to leaking classified documents from the Senate. Maybe the requested documents aren't being turned over to Congress because the documents are part of ongoing investigations into members of congress?
Carson Foster
President Rosenstein after Drumpf gets impeached? Methinks yess
Brandon Gonzalez
I agree it's a ploy to try to get Trump to fire Rosenkike, but it is far from forcing his hand, he doesn't have to fire rosenstein now, it's obvious that it was a ploy, NYT is the one who "broke" the news lmao.
Lucas Thomas
it's not a wild guess to say "goodbye rosenstein" after the wire tap story. honestly how fucking retarded are you Q posters?
Are you illiterate? I said IF he did it 6 months ago, you would be able to find the same 'signs' then as now. It is deliberately vague as fuck so you can always find something to connect it to, just your nana's horoscope. It wasn't a wild guess before the story, either. These people are just gullible retards trying to make sense of politics. They need secret messages to make themselves feel in control of things.
Justin Torres
>it's not as clear with Rosenstein Maybe if you're a retarded faggot.
Here is the Rosenstein rundown:
>Worked under Obama in the leftist DOJ >was approved for Deputy AG with "bipartisan" support, ie. deepstate >writes letter supporting firing Comey >starts a special counsel investigation into Trump >signs a FISA warrant to spy on Trump's team >allows all the Mueller bullshit, including ONLY looking at potential Republican crimes and completely ignoring democrat crimes >stone walls Congress on docs >allows unnecessary redactions
If you are unsure what side Rosenstein is on, then you are more retarded than a NPC.
The mainstream media has been defending the shit out of him from day 1, and they would NOT keep it up for 1.5 years based on a hunch. They know Rosenstein is part of the resistance .
Christopher Taylor
In addition to the "Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein" sig, Q has been explicitly stating that A) declas of FISA is imminent, and B) Declas of FISA will force Rosenstein to resign and all signers will be under grand jury investigation. These are not vague statements.
>these are not vague statements Correct, and every time Q actually gets specific...it doesn't happen.
Isn't it funny how the only things Q says that come "true" are the vague statements that can be interpreted after the fact to be anything?
Crazy how that works
Juan Harris
>In addition to the "Goodbye Mr. Rosenstein" sig, Q has been explicitly stating that A) declas of FISA is imminent, and B) Declas of FISA will force Rosenstein to resign and all signers will be under grand jury investigation. These are not vague statements. None of that recquires 'inside information' either, that is basic bitch awareness of the FISA mess being damaging to people involved in it, with the addition of saying THIS WILL HAPPEN instead of the IF that you would use if you weren't a LARPer. And if it doesn't happen that way you will rationalize it as being an adjustment to 'the plan'. It isn't falsifiable, it's just a comfort blanket for brainlets who can't handle uncertainty.
Christian Sullivan
it's more disinfo leaks to add more names to the sealed indictments.
Austin Thomas
It's Fake News. Just more support to the theory that Rosenstein is on Trump's side in all this. If he's part of the Resist, then the MSM wouldn't be going after him and trying to get Trump to fire him.
But Trump DID order FISA declas, and it appears as though Rosenstein IS resigning. So these statements which you just admitted are not vague did come true. I hope you are getting paid well for your time.
Jeremiah Hughes
THIS.
ALL THE LAWYERS IN THE DOJ ARE ON TRUMP'S SIDE NOW
I personally do not care if Q is real or a larp. I have been skeptical since Q first appeared on Jow Forums It is getting more and more difficult to deny that Q is closely connected to the administration. Being a blind Q follower is silly. Ignoring Q is even sillier. If you aren't already, I would recommend following Q's posts, then following the news, and deciding for yourself.
Adrian Lopez
Proof of how this rationalization process works. It doesn't matter whether or not Rosenstein resigns, gets fired, or stays put. All three cases 'prove' that Q is part of the secret plan. If he stays they will say the "goodbye" meant "goodbye" from the Left because Rosenstein has joined Trump's secret plan.
Lincoln Allen
This, hope Trump is very careful dealing with this. The left is already acting as if Trump fired him >well of course he resigned, Trump was going to fire him anyway! Obstruction! IMPEACH! Sounds like resigning was the only way to sort of start that narrative going. Perhaps Trump shouldn’t accept the resignation?
This is false because Q has explicitly stated that FISA declas will force Rosenstein to resign or be impeached and that Trump will not take the bait and fire him prematurely.
Leo Clark
>it's the Jews >but Rosenstein is a good guy Keep jumping through those hoops.
Leo Williams
Nobody thinks in black and white kike. To outjew the jew you need jews on your side.
Jeremiah Cook
What is false? That the believers will keep believing no matter what the outcome? I didn't say any of the 3 outcomes will happen, or that Q predictions are all proven false, but that it doesn't matter what happens it will all be folded into the fantasy.
Isaac Anderson
Exactly what a Jew would say, to ensure he always has somewhere to run. >you need me, goyim
When Israel gets destroyed your life will be in ruins
Hunter Ramirez
I agree that blindly believing Q is silly. But to blindly believe it is a larp regardless of the outcome is just as silly. Pot meet kettle.
Jaxon Ward
Nigger, what the fuck are you saying? To kill the jew you need to separate all kikes from whites. Jews are known subversives throughout history. Open up a book, ffs.
James Gonzalez
I unironically hope you watch israel get invaded and then you watch your family die.
It fits all the patterns of astrology type hoaxes, it makes no predictions that are not either a)pedestrian (it would be bad for Rosenstein if FISA docs come out) or b) incredibly vague. Its believers are also usually completely credulous morons like the other guy in this thread defending it. It's good you are skeptical at least.
Robert Butler
>goys, accept a few based jews >we won't win without them >you're a kike if you don't like based kikes
unironically, off yourself.
Aiden Hill
>Panuccio >Trump is putting his mob friends I'm control of DOJ Let's go!
Notice how whenever any rational discussion of Q breaks out on Jow Forums, the muhjoos shills relentlessly bombard the thread to get it off topic. Nothing to see here.
Xavier Rivera
There is no rational discussion of Q. When you get drafted into the IDF and die people will be celebrating.
Julian Lopez
Here have a (you). You just got aid 2 cents by David Brock. Congrats!
The plane into the pentagon is not such a stretch. It could have been a small plane, like a global hawk, etc. Also I subscribe to an 9/11 truth guy who has done research into the 9/11 hoax and the tower collapse physics. He recently did a multi-part vid into the plane hitting the pentagon and came to the same conclusion. It's not crazy.
But what I don't believe is that there are aliens and that the moon landings were real. Q recently said as much. Total horsesh*t IMHO.
That said, I believe that Q is real and that he puts out disinfo occasionally. Q followers are good people, loyal, but many are retards.
Nicholas Sanchez
The (((resistance))) runs almost entirely on foreign money and foreign agitprop. For the rest we have FEMA camps.
Christopher Myers
>using rosenstein as the fall guy If he did it is he a fall guy? He’s just a sneaky plant.
>Rosenstein might be a good guy >is balls deep in the fisa abuse Lmao why dont you fucking reddit niggers lurk more?
Joseph Davis
I thought rosenstein was smart.
How did he get cornered so easily?
Ayden Flores
get this whop to the 1st or 2nd spot
Nicholas Myers
Source negro
Austin Brown
Rosenstein isn't fired though?
Anthony Martin
Says who? Nobody said he wasn’t.
Jonathan Perez
Can someone give me a quick rundown, I know nothing about what happened.
Logan Walker
This is the only logical explanation. The left's goal was to antagonize trump into firing rosenstein so they could claim obstruction of justice. The NYT piece alone gives enough justification for immediate dismissal which means the dem plan is fucked. Add in the fisa application fuckery and rosenstein might be facing criminal charges. Resigning now denies trump the ability to fire him, and keeps the debacle outside of public scrutiny a little bit longer. Everything the democrats do these days is about stalling for time. They are betting the farm on winning the house With the hopes that they can be obstructionist for the next 2 years, then run on a platform of trump being incompetent. Their rhetoric these days supports this strategy. Unfortunately for them the economy is booming, and trump's base is satisfied. Furthermore, the underhanded tactics they have been using has disenfranchised a lot of moderates. To top it all off, even if the den plan works and they take the house, they still have no viable presidential candidates. The absolute STATE of the democrat party. RIP in piss