Give me just one good reason guns shouldn't be banned. I have yet to hear even one single good reason...

Give me just one good reason guns shouldn't be banned. I have yet to hear even one single good reason. The "constitution" doesn't count as a reason.

Attached: RSsecrets_040212A.jpg (640x356, 241K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/RCK0UZ5vgzQ
scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6484080926445491577&q=heller&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33
scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5141154246897960488&q=heller&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>tell me what 2+2 equals, and no, don't give me that 4 nonesense

cause I fucked your mom last night spic

I can't give you a good reason. Banning guns and getting then out of the hands of white trash sounds like a good idea to me.

Christ you’re a fuckin loser lmao

ok spic

Because I'll kill you and all your gun grabbing friends if you try.

Come and take it faggot.

Attached: Come and Take It Modern.jpg (800x396, 28K)

cuz I don't tell you how to live your life- how's that u fucking control freak

>The foundational documents of our nation don’t count as a counter argument to my ludicrous position

Because of this comment I’m buying 2 guns

>1 post by this spic

Liberty

>constitution prevents banning guns
>constitution is highest law of the land
>"The "constitution" doesn't count as a reason."
They literally can't be banned without overturning the second amendment, you fucking jew.

Attached: get_out_jew.jpg (224x206, 12K)

That's not how it works. You have to justify why you think should be way not us say how should not be that.

Attached: PinkSterling2.jpg (648x484, 86K)

so you can defend yourself from the government, that's a good enough reason.

From my cold dead hands is my argument against banning guns.

Gun control is the pinnacle of class warfare. People who live in racially homogeneous gated communities with 24-hour security shouldn't dictate whether or not people should be able to defend themselves dipshit.

Because I will shoot you in your commie fucking mouth if you try.

Attached: 1466177928916.gif (500x246, 506K)

Slavery.

We need guns to fight tyrannical governments
And before you come out with the "they could just drone strike you" meme, ask yourself the following questions:
Do sand niggers have advanced AA systems?
Has the US succeeded in afghanistan despite sand niggers' lack of advanced AA systems?
Do you think a government would just genocide its entire population in the event of an uprising?
Even if they were willing and able to do so, why do you think that's a good thing?

Attached: 96E4E804-6403-41B0-8054-0304542B7694-328-0000005961775667.jpg (500x520, 40K)

to avoid littering

Attached: 465464564.gif (384x270, 1.1M)

Guns in the hands of the lawful are the only protection against the unlawful. Cops are not always close and they have no duty to protect.

Attached: Based Nipfag.png (872x886, 220K)

Because dangerous people exist. When seconds count the cops are minutes away.

Gotta have guns to size the means of production

Because taking my guns doesn’t make you safer.

just kys already shill, really

because it

>SHALL

>1 post by this ID

Because come and take it.

>NOT

>BE

>INFRINGED

Pretty much that. People without guns can't really tell people with guns what to do.

>The "constitution" doesn't count as a reason

It's the reason you should be hung from the neck until dead for treason against it.

Its insane the level of support virtual taunting murders get from some people. Just because you were goaded into attacking first doesn't mean unloading on them with multiple high fire weapons is the solution. Ever heard of pistol whipping or shooting the ground?

Also in a scenario like government tyranny the cops may very well be who you have to defend yourself from

it's not the 'banning guns' that's the problem
... it's the 'who gets to keep them'
now fuck off

gun free zones have higher crime rates

Literally, the 2nd Amend DOES count as a reason. Go read Supreme Court cases Heller and McDonald v. Chicago to educate yourself before posting uninformed autistic shit like this. Then kys.

so if politicians decide to go all 1984 we can go all 1942

Have to repeal 2nd Amendment, nigger raper.

>Shooting the ground is a better option
Yes having a potentially lethal ricochet hit a bystander is much better
Your digits belie your stupidity

Attached: 395370C2-106C-4CAB-837B-604A396277A5.gif (294x233, 2.47M)

youtu.be/RCK0UZ5vgzQ

Attached: 1537810592125.jpg (768x576, 33K)

unfortunately, statistics show the dangerous people are the ones with the guns.

I have been to some rough parts in USA where walking around late is sketchy as fuck and probably would feel safer with a gun.

The problem is too many uneducated, out of touch humans that have nothing and resort to violence to lash out.

Who knows...

Might be these crazy gun nuts will save America from the NWO or maybe will they just kill each other over trash.

A car is only dangerous for people who are not trained. Not like you can conceal a car and shoot people in the face with it.

God save the queen

Attached: 4343543534.jpg (2711x3995, 1.67M)

Please, for the love of God, faggots who want to ban guns or who don't understand the 2nd Amendment, at least fucking educate yourself on the 2nd Amendment before opening your nigger cum filled mouths.

There's this thing called "Google Scholar" where you can actually READ Supreme Court opinions. Oh wow!

Stop being FUCKING AUTISTIC RETARDS you stupid ass lickers. Fucking idiots. Kill yourselves to stop spreading your stupidity in the gene pool.

Here is D.C. v. Heller:

scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6484080926445491577&q=heller&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33

Here is McDonald v. Chicago:

scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5141154246897960488&q=heller&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33

My anti-gun cousin got raped and beheaded by a nigger because she couldn't defend herself with a gun, not exactly in that order though.

>pistol whipping or shooting the ground
The level of stupid..... I don't even have the energy to explain how dangerous that is to you and the others around. Please die.

As long as white people are forced by their government to live with niggers, spics, pit bulls and any other super predators they should be allowed to protect themselves with muh guns.

I doubt that

because defense of self and community is an inalienable human right, guns are the tool which enables that right.

YOU ARE RETARDED! KYS!

I'll ejaculate on your face

/thread
OP is a nigger

Why are you against women being able to defend themselves? Guns are the great equalizer. It allows a 4' 6" woman to defend herself from a 6' 9" man.
According to Obama's administration, women use pistols to prevent over 1 million violent crimes a month against women. Violent crimes, including preventing/stopping rape and murder.
So why are you trying to take women's ability to defend themselves away? Do you hate women that much? You must, because women are the ones who are critically dependent on the legal ownership of pistols.

I’ll give you as many bullets as you can carry, but I’m keeping my guns.

Good luck.

Wait until Canadians are getting murdered at the same rate as Americans. The whining will be hilarious.

God bless euronons.

Because OP is a nigger rapist.

ok

Attached: 1535254730063.jpg (421x391, 56K)

I think it's more a problem with population density than guns. Limiting guns is just a quick fix. In cities, people can become invisible which leads to civil unrest.

This. Addition:

Would the government kill the population one at a time with $40,000 missiles?

facebook boomer tier post

No. It's a nigger problem.

Attached: blackonwhiteviolence.jpg (616x2030, 927K)

99.997 percent of guns in the US will never be used in commission of a crime.
3 out of every ten motor vehicles in the US will be involved in an accident with physical injuries or death.
By your logic, automobiles should be outlawed.
More than three out of every ten Americans are clinically obese.
By your logic, food should be outlawed.

Attached: US Murder Rate Comparison to Other Countries.jpg (1531x841, 382K)

Democrats and Freemasons.....There's two for ya.

Gun control is like the chickens that get their beaks burned off so they won't peck each other to death in crowded spaces

Idaho, one of the highest gun ownerships per capita, has the 4th lowest murder rate in the US. Guns are not the problem.

Attached: 09031E17-1287-4679-BB95-061745A9C282.jpg (472x621, 72K)

they shouldn't

Attached: 1459619382067.gif (350x197, 1.14M)

you

>the constitution doesnt count
dont ever quote the 14th amendment again.

The absolute state of the UK. Do I need to say more? Oh and sage this lazy faggotry.

This gif for some reason made me lol

If the government has it, I should be able to have it as well.

United States stands as it is because of gun rights.

Fuck off leftist democratic piece of shit.

Let's say you're going to shoot up a shopping mall. Do you pick:
a) the mall in texas where every second man has a revolver strapped to his hip
or
b) the mall in england where the police have to call back to the station and fill out paperwork to get a pistol

The only basis you guys are wanting to ban it on are those of gun crime, but the majority of gun crime is gang-to-gang murder with illegal weapons. No amount of gun control will ever fix that.

every day I have at least one gun on me. it completes me. I don't feel like a real American without one on my person.

Guns should not be banned but there should be city ordinances against owning firearms in order to prevent nonwhites from having guns.

Based Zealander.

Just refer to Chiraq, Detroit, Sweden, UK and Australia, see what's up.

>derp

Attached: 1448319794018.gif (402x230, 1.97M)

Warren v. Washington D.C.
>high court rule that police have NO OBLIGATION TO PROTECT INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS. Their duty is owed to the public at large.

According to the government, the only person responsible for your safety, is you.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

The law of the land doesn't count as a reason? Super low effort Schlomo

Nobody is stopping you from taking the guns away but you might need to buy 500 million guns and raise an army to do so.

Lets see...

1. As a human being, it's your natural right to have the means to defend yourself against those who would threathen you.
2. The USA is a big country, in most places, it takes a while for the cops to show up. They are always too late when every second counts.
3. The current political climate is not static, it's prone to change in either direction.
4. Psychopaths are attracted to power, given enough time, governments can become corrupt institutions full of such people, with the very real risk of becomming authoritarian.
5. As a hedge against foreign invation.

Plenty of argument...

Attached: 1537639993236.png (2000x1333, 137K)

Attached: 1533653858544.jpg (800x1415, 146K)

Nonwhites. What do I win?

High gun crime rates are correlated with democrat states and ethnicities. To think blacks are dying more in states of their own political leaning and at their own hands far more than in the deep south at the hands of whites, yet they still claim racism and inequality. Fix your damn culture before you complain about external influences.

One of the main reasons I see against gun control in the states compared to NZ or Australia is because we've never had a huge amount of guns. But by banning them in the USA you'd just inflate the illegal firearms market and it would take many generations for a sparsity of guns to increase enough to impact gang violence, and that's if you managed to stop them coming in across the border along with drugs.

I should be able to defend my own life as effectively as I can. Next

>SHALL

>NOT

Fpbp

>BE

>INFRINGED

fpbp

Nigga you gay.

thiis

I say FUCK THE MALL!!!

mice shit in my food and overpriced electronics and clothes.

Because regardless of the constitution I have a God given RIGHT to defend me and mine, and rn, firearms provide the best way in which to do that.
Next question?

BECAUSE I WILL MURDER YOUR FAMILY IF YOU TRY

What gives you the right to take my shit?